From patchwork Wed Nov 25 16:25:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11931483 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD573C6379D for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2B52067C for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="EwcEQpQn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4A2B52067C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1D09E6B0075; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 17BFD6B0078; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 044216B007B; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0092.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.92]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48736B0075 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7301EE6 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77523466566.03.rail78_3b09ee027378 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E8728A4E8 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:43 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: rail78_3b09ee027378 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 9047 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (mail-wr1-f65.google.com [209.85.221.65]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r3so2516721wrt.2 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jq9JvDrUL/TA9GTf55fSJ4uVoaSHU81yQFdcXJqW7Ws=; b=EwcEQpQn9sIUpy3VrHTfZCx3MPEmQJn+LBDPHPCzLmPl19zl8PL/wo6hXJzLXKzkVd eTK6d9iOsjq+GfHfZcwVX8jhaHn1fyLOkz1YP3/MrF/8+dgjPE0H/vk2rNTF6cIgsW8N OrTbGqPT6yprBftpY5K2pCQQxmIfCizGEPS5I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jq9JvDrUL/TA9GTf55fSJ4uVoaSHU81yQFdcXJqW7Ws=; b=s5DSRDhs3N2Fjhl+oXiSxdHpV1RiySYVI8+q+Jw6Arm8knVNympQd7TRUh+Eyys542 slc1P3bIytzP8J/qh3Rm1ZZ/eGB0DvlqXw7o6nxRFcAFgKgfMK53E3xnsIehUOpD5C6C adEH8PnCj22eBkuxrkcItID7DqUcmGv+5NjyWNwgfdKelxWUohHHIZiCVDjnv68jFXa7 wcvKz5CoveXVwbff7tExSeZsG6XnV7p1lqg60cEjxrd7LWKdoLR4fWpgygmfw+X5yzAi XL1Oemp63BkMwglIz+qTGQVdUl336aB9nbP6UZ2fVs3gHdGJ9LgaFPm1X1UIoSWEYE0O bypQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tv7xUbvQOlQgAeEUvh6oKSgESb4mfN4Fyp4BXStat/uDrJyJT mpdiAbJDnnwFIOGVicOSv1W3Bg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/RDigUSrDHbk/aNrMeP5KeOA6e2iW4/mH8GTRlb9VB29XGiIfdu01Y9YBBtZepTIzy4xVVA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5505:: with SMTP id b5mr5055205wrv.410.1606321539765; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm4855187wmb.38.2020.11.25.08.25.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:38 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Cc: Intel Graphics Development , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave Chinner , Qian Cai , =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Andrew Morton , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst , =?utf-8?q?Christian_?= =?utf-8?q?K=C3=B6nig?= , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Daniel Vetter Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm: Track mmu notifiers in fs_reclaim_acquire/release Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:25:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20201125162532.1299794-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: fs_reclaim_acquire/release nicely catch recursion issues when allocating GFP_KERNEL memory against shrinkers (which gpu drivers tend to use to keep the excessive caches in check). For mmu notifier recursions we do have lockdep annotations since 23b68395c7c7 ("mm/mmu_notifiers: add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end"). But these only fire if a path actually results in some pte invalidation - for most small allocations that's very rarely the case. The other trouble is that pte invalidation can happen any time when __GFP_RECLAIM is set. Which means only really GFP_ATOMIC is a safe choice, GFP_NOIO isn't good enough to avoid potential mmu notifier recursion. I was pondering whether we should just do the general annotation, but there's always the risk for false positives. Plus I'm assuming that the core fs and io code is a lot better reviewed and tested than random mmu notifier code in drivers. Hence why I decide to only annotate for that specific case. Furthermore even if we'd create a lockdep map for direct reclaim, we'd still need to explicit pull in the mmu notifier map - there's a lot more places that do pte invalidation than just direct reclaim, these two contexts arent the same. Note that the mmu notifiers needing their own independent lockdep map is also the reason we can't hold them from fs_reclaim_acquire to fs_reclaim_release - it would nest with the acquistion in the pte invalidation code, causing a lockdep splat. And we can't remove the annotations from pte invalidation and all the other places since they're called from many other places than page reclaim. Hence we can only do the equivalent of might_lock, but on the raw lockdep map. With this we can also remove the lockdep priming added in 66204f1d2d1b ("mm/mmu_notifiers: prime lockdep") since the new annotations are strictly more powerful. v2: Review from Thomas Hellstrom: - unbotch the fs_reclaim context check, I accidentally inverted it, but it didn't blow up because I inverted it immediately - fix compiling for !CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER v3: Unbreak the PF_MEMALLOC_ context flags. Thanks to Qian for the report and Dave for explaining what I failed to see. Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Qian Cai Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Hellström (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Christian König Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- mm/mmu_notifier.c | 7 ------- mm/page_alloc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c index 5654dd19addc..61ee40ed804e 100644 --- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c +++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c @@ -612,13 +612,6 @@ int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription, mmap_assert_write_locked(mm); BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0); - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) { - fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); - lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); - lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); - fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); - } - if (!mm->notifier_subscriptions) { /* * kmalloc cannot be called under mm_take_all_locks(), but we diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 23f5066bd4a5..ff0f9a84b8de 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -4264,10 +4265,8 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, unsigned int order, int alloc_fla static struct lockdep_map __fs_reclaim_map = STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("fs_reclaim", &__fs_reclaim_map); -static bool __need_fs_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask) +static bool __need_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask) { - gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask); - /* no reclaim without waiting on it */ if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)) return false; @@ -4276,10 +4275,6 @@ static bool __need_fs_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask) if (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) return false; - /* We're only interested __GFP_FS allocations for now */ - if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) - return false; - if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOLOCKDEP) return false; @@ -4298,15 +4293,29 @@ void __fs_reclaim_release(void) void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask) { - if (__need_fs_reclaim(gfp_mask)) - __fs_reclaim_acquire(); + gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask); + + if (__need_reclaim(gfp_mask)) { + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) + __fs_reclaim_acquire(); + +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER + lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); + lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); +#endif + + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_reclaim_acquire); void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask) { - if (__need_fs_reclaim(gfp_mask)) - __fs_reclaim_release(); + gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask); + + if (__need_reclaim(gfp_mask)) { + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) + __fs_reclaim_release(); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_reclaim_release); #endif From patchwork Wed Nov 25 16:25:30 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11931487 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF5DC64E7D for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7232067C for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="QMYNGEeA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7F7232067C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A0AA56B0078; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 91E786B007B; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7EA996B007E; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0192.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.192]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529D06B0078 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6A71EE6 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77523466608.30.watch00_4b113d727378 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3ED180B3C8E for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:43 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: watch00_4b113d727378 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 8285 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id p22so2509080wmg.3 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UNSb6Wp1AZE4VV1tRwOeD55taeEGpBqVtqBoZlJ/7FM=; b=QMYNGEeA4YfhfQORAYeqBZnZcsSUcenw0mAE059wCrKDDwvxV6pkAgR4/U23dLWec0 RevBzZUbIN+mA+zBM07VEiG7Y25QELLdsH60N6ottEwiWDuwJQpLTRsg7/QipBmILxir xUhl44+qhKqBTkmVewpxVXpAPVi4yZQtwpPgw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UNSb6Wp1AZE4VV1tRwOeD55taeEGpBqVtqBoZlJ/7FM=; b=XFdewc8c686xCg/mfUIJ7Ri8i914GMOpa4i973gxyEKFe33xNisoWSF63RCfrQGysq HbVwDtBeInWxT3Wi2DmTREwfCBqHwTniQZBN6CdgtGJSxvbJgmz4dM9iNtKpahaF2s8o T9TgAFOFeFnSRlJipzu8irmjIrbXcTNh2LNP/3wdzRDIMNyRJmHdWIH6c8vf0UB5/h0h 2ySPyzZLOyOVs5ePBVrxG/OuLQ2LDier3x/2JxyNNpAyznKOJgaUZBXmhIcGNnJN6a74 YxTRHUybHp02kDeayuYhZ50awntCY8XKq/zeDN2sOnYfkX72WPkk5+/s0ywLTAJlbsrJ 9ZZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Kth5OF8jJlZvb+GbfgLCgoG1ZQZPlVqB38SkNoTt33r6dZhhz hqrCXNdD6eXmCw6n847ot3YNEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7GHHP/Ip7I6Y1Tn4QI7dFjHyZUmuEZ7U3OT2GK1eKINNZ3obuKDnLln9NKOQlPoUBDiVX7A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6209:: with SMTP id w9mr4886901wmb.120.1606321541410; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm4855187wmb.38.2020.11.25.08.25.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:40 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Cc: Intel Graphics Development , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Daniel Vetter , Vlastimil Babka , "Paul E . McKenney" , Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michel Lespinasse , Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , Randy Dunlap , Dave Chinner , Qian Cai , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Daniel Vetter Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: Extract might_alloc() debug check Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:25:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20201125162532.1299794-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Extracted from slab.h, which seems to have the most complete version including the correct might_sleep() check. Roll it out to slob.c. Motivated by a discussion with Paul about possibly changing call_rcu behaviour to allocate memory, but only roughly every 500th call. There are a lot fewer places in the kernel that care about whether allocating memory is allowed or not (due to deadlocks with reclaim code) than places that care whether sleeping is allowed. But debugging these also tends to be a lot harder, so nice descriptive checks could come in handy. I might have some use eventually for annotations in drivers/gpu. Note that unlike fs_reclaim_acquire/release gfpflags_allow_blocking does not consult the PF_MEMALLOC flags. But there is no flag equivalent for GFP_NOWAIT, hence this check can't go wrong due to memalloc_no*_save/restore contexts. Willy is working on a patch series which might change this: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200625113122.7540-7-willy@infradead.org/ I think best would be if that updates gfpflags_allow_blocking(), since there's a ton of callers all over the place for that already. v2: Fix typos in kerneldoc (Randy) Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Cc. Randy Dunlap Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Michel Lespinasse Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Qian Cai Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- include/linux/sched/mm.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ mm/slab.h | 5 +---- mm/slob.c | 6 ++---- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h index d5ece7a9a403..a11a61b5226f 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h @@ -180,6 +180,22 @@ static inline void fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_t gfp_mask) { } static inline void fs_reclaim_release(gfp_t gfp_mask) { } #endif +/** + * might_alloc - Mark possible allocation sites + * @gfp_mask: gfp_t flags that would be used to allocate + * + * Similar to might_sleep() and other annotations, this can be used in functions + * that might allocate, but often don't. Compiles to nothing without + * CONFIG_LOCKDEP. Includes a conditional might_sleep() if @gfp allows blocking. + */ +static inline void might_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask) +{ + fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_mask); + fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask); + + might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask)); +} + /** * memalloc_noio_save - Marks implicit GFP_NOIO allocation scope. * diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h index 6d7c6a5056ba..37b981247e5d 100644 --- a/mm/slab.h +++ b/mm/slab.h @@ -500,10 +500,7 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *slab_pre_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, { flags &= gfp_allowed_mask; - fs_reclaim_acquire(flags); - fs_reclaim_release(flags); - - might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(flags)); + might_alloc(flags); if (should_failslab(s, flags)) return NULL; diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c index 7cc9805c8091..8d4bfa46247f 100644 --- a/mm/slob.c +++ b/mm/slob.c @@ -474,8 +474,7 @@ __do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t gfp, int node, unsigned long caller) gfp &= gfp_allowed_mask; - fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp); - fs_reclaim_release(gfp); + might_alloc(gfp); if (size < PAGE_SIZE - minalign) { int align = minalign; @@ -597,8 +596,7 @@ static void *slob_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *c, gfp_t flags, int node) flags &= gfp_allowed_mask; - fs_reclaim_acquire(flags); - fs_reclaim_release(flags); + might_alloc(flags); if (c->size < PAGE_SIZE) { b = slob_alloc(c->size, flags, c->align, node, 0); From patchwork Wed Nov 25 16:25:31 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 11931485 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C96FC56202 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D42206F7 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="jVHAscAY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B1D42206F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E79B46B007B; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DB5926B007E; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:45 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C7BE46B0080; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:45 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0132.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.132]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ED86B007B for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:25:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EA4363D for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77523466650.16.end02_620254827378 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F563100E6912 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: end02_620254827378 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 6430 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 1so2694926wme.3 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S5C08Hy1XMQFC0buOh9jSFHuZ0iwVVw80p1E5iRWSvg=; b=jVHAscAYlfUZpaUDcWeAN+ImydgMtSo0J4j+H0r2qtoN4JmJx9Vve4jifNb53zuGqi Ho1AFwAoWORedY91OsjnrVbKw6hwQJ2Kv5B8EMyK5Y7KSllnc5Cw2fu9iTZNFFbiKE7V xTc7fqCfuiYJbUWlEUEfD8UXGnYqpwS8fW1sk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S5C08Hy1XMQFC0buOh9jSFHuZ0iwVVw80p1E5iRWSvg=; b=dKp9OUQcfHfwlAmjUzr0xlxPNoAMlsqsK4Jmu5iALyU0tsQ+7uRw9o4j/Ft4UeRBD5 xv0Ss9TbLxuGcw231DP5NBg+IqJNsq4VywyIRjFBTJvwJgvGzNduplK1umng9mJxLWB6 JYVJkHEKXtYyW4W6M8j41TCvkQeKwwjjXHDiR4ZBm8XDc7OJ4KrToyh0FIjgl3iK1yxT szog+AwAE8SJMiWUXzCciTjMMFKJiZdrYvGJo8uCdVtwcFADo3jijSlicQQ9zUW86jW3 Q1X1sum8fAbzi7eF3yUwpe8rKvYknZ4WHyehpkkHwbBUZnyaw/6dEAWd0YGdPOKnWBIU LvpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LX7JYd0oA8y0oTIyZEXZ9skWZ8S3tGikcUs7IfYXRdkBkXVmZ 3PPfP0XiBQe1MwPfpJr/IfE3YTzljvraPQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvYwNleTXWY/S3WavDz5/k2r0sp2h9zjamdvz+WUc8Vx3B5vSrofONxe4Fcqlg5PcbCQYGaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3ce:: with SMTP id t14mr4768131wmj.170.1606321543202; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm4855187wmb.38.2020.11.25.08.25.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:25:42 -0800 (PST) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Cc: Intel Graphics Development , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Daniel Vetter , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Chinner , Qian Cai , =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Andrew Morton , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maarten Lankhorst , =?utf-8?q?Christian_?= =?utf-8?q?K=C3=B6nig?= , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Daniel Vetter , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/selftests: Add testcases for fs_reclaim Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:25:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20201125162532.1299794-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201125162532.1299794-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Since I butchered this I figured better to make sure we have testcases for this now. Since we only have a locking context for __GFP_FS that's the only thing we're testing right now. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Qian Cai Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Thomas Hellström (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Christian König Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- lib/locking-selftest.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/locking-selftest.c b/lib/locking-selftest.c index a899b3f0e2e5..ad47c3358e30 100644 --- a/lib/locking-selftest.c +++ b/lib/locking-selftest.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -2357,6 +2358,50 @@ static void queued_read_lock_tests(void) pr_cont("\n"); } +static void fs_reclaim_correct_nesting(void) +{ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_alloc(GFP_NOFS); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); +} + +static void fs_reclaim_wrong_nesting(void) +{ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_alloc(GFP_KERNEL); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); +} + +static void fs_reclaim_protected_nesting(void) +{ + unsigned int flags; + + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + flags = memalloc_nofs_save(); + might_alloc(GFP_KERNEL); + memalloc_nofs_restore(flags); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); +} + +static void fs_reclaim_tests(void) +{ + printk(" --------------------\n"); + printk(" | fs_reclaim tests |\n"); + printk(" --------------------\n"); + + print_testname("correct nesting"); + dotest(fs_reclaim_correct_nesting, SUCCESS, 0); + pr_cont("\n"); + + print_testname("wrong nesting"); + dotest(fs_reclaim_wrong_nesting, FAILURE, 0); + pr_cont("\n"); + + print_testname("protected nesting"); + dotest(fs_reclaim_protected_nesting, SUCCESS, 0); + pr_cont("\n"); +} + void locking_selftest(void) { /* @@ -2478,6 +2523,8 @@ void locking_selftest(void) if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS)) queued_read_lock_tests(); + fs_reclaim_tests(); + if (unexpected_testcase_failures) { printk("-----------------------------------------------------------------\n"); debug_locks = 0;