From patchwork Thu May 13 09:23:49 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vaibhav Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 12255403 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A85BC433B4 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C8761435 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:24:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 39C8761435 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA06A100EAB5E; Thu, 13 May 2021 02:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com; receiver= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC95100EAB58 for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 02:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14D93JUX009494; Thu, 13 May 2021 05:23:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ryN0cK0VEnUDDLi9cNe0YnZJElAltNa6aSauAkXvWJ8=; b=c34lUQfdeQwuqIy3sVDzfGdmdvg7DqjcSMPMKhLAKPEN0wKzPLVNv0tLf1vpTVXReApe JLXUS6n/bPye40kNBGxThHwNC/vTtenlNtkoPRDieSub2uAOZ/y2mt4u8RlmFv1Vmz9c aDljxo5IX85bU0XunXTzyXS6Sz2nqKJQ7aZUDOs7xn2r7RN5UYtEpQKh+VyTxgI5mCmt c5oRx+Rj/GepjFZeDUBSPeIe0cAClY2z5IvlcdgFMHXy37Wi0nTThKwqzJZI7tAK2NU6 pteua86AZg3zzAnT+wC+2cX8nmvujMAPmwUMmPOxG9XMP2uRQUgMh6d10AnSwvvy7eOD fA== Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38gyp0jrcc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 May 2021 05:23:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14D9D2XJ017841; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:57 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38dj98amvx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:57 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14D9Nsne33554836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:54 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD7511C050; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB9511C04C; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vajain21.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.77.192.67]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vajain21.in.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 13 May 2021 14:53:50 +0530 From: Vaibhav Jain To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Subject: [PATCH v3] powerpc/papr_scm: Make 'perf_stats' invisible if perf-stats unavailable Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 14:53:49 +0530 Message-Id: <20210513092349.285021-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZictZ_Zq2c1YETdp6V0OM1XYZThyw_Vs X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ZictZ_Zq2c1YETdp6V0OM1XYZThyw_Vs X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-13_04:2021-05-12,2021-05-13 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105130070 Message-ID-Hash: H5SVYFGFATC7FA3W2OB633Q2ZK63DGHJ X-Message-ID-Hash: H5SVYFGFATC7FA3W2OB633Q2ZK63DGHJ X-MailFrom: vaibhav@linux.ibm.com X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Vaibhav Jain , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Michael Ellerman X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: In case performance stats for an nvdimm are not available, reading the 'perf_stats' sysfs file returns an -ENOENT error. A better approach is to make the 'perf_stats' file entirely invisible to indicate that performance stats for an nvdimm are unavailable. So this patch updates 'papr_nd_attribute_group' to add a 'is_visible' callback implemented as newly introduced 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()' that returns an appropriate mode in case performance stats aren't supported in a given nvdimm. Also the initialization of 'papr_scm_priv.stat_buffer_len' is moved from papr_scm_nvdimm_init() to papr_scm_probe() so that it value is available when 'papr_nd_attribute_visible()' is called during nvdimm initialization. Even though 'perf_stats' attribute is available since v5.9, there are no known user-space tools/scripts that are dependent on presence of its sysfs file. Hence I dont expect any user-space breakage with this patch. Fixes: 2d02bf835e57('powerpc/papr_scm: Fetch nvdimm performance stats from PHYP') Reviewed-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: v3: * Minor spell corrections [ Dan Williams ] * Switched to kobj_to_dev() helper in papr_nd_attribute_visible() [ Dan Williams ] * Updated ABI/../sysfs-bus-papr-pmem to indicate that the attribute is only available for devices that support performance stats. * Updated patch description. v2: * Removed a redundant dev_info() from pap_scm_nvdimm_init() [ Aneesh ] * Marked papr_nd_attribute_visible() as static which also fixed the build warning reported by kernel build robot --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-papr-pmem | 8 +++-- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 35 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-papr-pmem b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-papr-pmem index 8316c33862a0..0aa02bf2bde5 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-papr-pmem +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-papr-pmem @@ -39,9 +39,11 @@ KernelVersion: v5.9 Contact: linuxppc-dev , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Description: (RO) Report various performance stats related to papr-scm NVDIMM - device. Each stat is reported on a new line with each line - composed of a stat-identifier followed by it value. Below are - currently known dimm performance stats which are reported: + device. This attribute is only available for NVDIMM devices + that support reporting NVDIMM performance stats. Each stat is + reported on a new line with each line composed of a + stat-identifier followed by it value. Below are currently known + dimm performance stats which are reported: * "CtlResCt" : Controller Reset Count * "CtlResTm" : Controller Reset Elapsed Time diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c index e2b69cc3beaf..e8577e7e49ab 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c @@ -907,6 +907,20 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev, } DEVICE_ATTR_RO(flags); +static umode_t papr_nd_attribute_visible(struct kobject *kobj, + struct attribute *attr, int n) +{ + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj); + struct nvdimm *nvdimm = to_nvdimm(dev); + struct papr_scm_priv *p = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm); + + /* For if perf-stats not available remove perf_stats sysfs */ + if (attr == &dev_attr_perf_stats.attr && p->stat_buffer_len == 0) + return 0; + + return attr->mode; +} + /* papr_scm specific dimm attributes */ static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = { &dev_attr_flags.attr, @@ -916,6 +930,7 @@ static struct attribute *papr_nd_attributes[] = { static struct attribute_group papr_nd_attribute_group = { .name = "papr", + .is_visible = papr_nd_attribute_visible, .attrs = papr_nd_attributes, }; @@ -931,7 +946,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p) struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc; unsigned long dimm_flags; int target_nid, online_nid; - ssize_t stat_size; p->bus_desc.ndctl = papr_scm_ndctl; p->bus_desc.module = THIS_MODULE; @@ -1016,16 +1030,6 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p) list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions); mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock); - /* Try retriving the stat buffer and see if its supported */ - stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0); - if (stat_size > 0) { - p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size; - dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n", - p->stat_buffer_len); - } else { - dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "Dimm performance stats unavailable\n"); - } - return 0; err: nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); @@ -1102,6 +1106,7 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) u64 blocks, block_size; struct papr_scm_priv *p; const char *uuid_str; + ssize_t stat_size; u64 uuid[2]; int rc; @@ -1179,6 +1184,14 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) p->res.name = pdev->name; p->res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; + /* Try retrieving the stat buffer and see if its supported */ + stat_size = drc_pmem_query_stats(p, NULL, 0); + if (stat_size > 0) { + p->stat_buffer_len = stat_size; + dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Max perf-stat size %lu-bytes\n", + p->stat_buffer_len); + } + rc = papr_scm_nvdimm_init(p); if (rc) goto err2;