From patchwork Fri May 21 00:43:58 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 12271627 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TRACKER_ID, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0F0C43460 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE27613AC for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234935AbhEUAq1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:46:27 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([96.44.175.130]:46824 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234062AbhEUAq0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:46:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591D312806BA; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1621557904; bh=DuZHT76KUDV00KmHwsqf6h0JaIIqASJ6gsvsa3ZXk/E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F+t51Mjwcl4KUgutAqvcgzXT7Xh25IMjfrPlKuJAUj414YjrcYNtwx5D8HfPD3+Vr kkaiKLOVYr1DYDfrPxz7v0aYHwb8c6QlikeFpTQKZhuZDTA26xygXfOjyP5VpclSaP CapRRPe7JhsNKwniM+PGEyyRyqVFh+6JbB0amagM= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lPW1ppB2oOah; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70D812806B1; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:03 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: [PATCH 1/4] security: keys: trusted: add PCR policy to TPM2 keys Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:43:58 -0700 Message-Id: <20210521004401.4167-2-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org This commit adds the ability to specify a PCR lock policy to TPM2 keys. There is a complexity in that the creator of the key must chose either to use a PCR lock policy or to use authentication. At the current time they can't use both due to a complexity with the way authentication works when policy registers are in use. The way to construct a pcrinfo statement for a key is simply to use the TPMS_PCR_SELECT structure to specify the PCRs and follow this by a hash of all their values in order of ascending PCR number. For simplicity, we require the hash of the PCRs to use the same hash algorithm as the one passed in. Thus to construct a policy around the value of the resettable PCR 16 using the sha1 bank, first reset the PCR to zero giving a hash of all zeros as: 6768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f Then the TPMS_PCR_SELECT value for PCR 16 is 03000001 So create a new 32 byte key with a policy locking the key to this value of PCR 16 with a parent key of 81000001 would be: keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 keyhandle=0x81000001 hash=sha1 pcrinfo=030000016768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f" @u Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- .../security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 36 +- include/keys/trusted-type.h | 5 +- include/linux/tpm.h | 3 + security/keys/Kconfig | 2 + security/keys/trusted-keys/Makefile | 1 + security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c | 359 ++++++++++++++++++ security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h | 30 ++ security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2key.asn1 | 13 + security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 8 +- security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 86 ++++- 10 files changed, 530 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) create mode 100644 security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c create mode 100644 security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst index 80d5a5af62a1..5c66f29b7a1c 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst @@ -156,7 +156,10 @@ Usage:: (40 ascii zeros) blobauth= ascii hex auth for sealed data default 0x00... (40 ascii zeros) - pcrinfo= ascii hex of PCR_INFO or PCR_INFO_LONG (no default) + pcrinfo= ascii hex of PCR_INFO or PCR_INFO_LONG (no + default) on TPM 1.2 and a TPMS_PCR_SELECTION + coupled with a hash of all the selected PCRs on + TPM 2.0 using the selected hash. pcrlock= pcr number to be extended to "lock" blob migratable= 0|1 indicating permission to reseal to new PCR values, default 1 (resealing allowed) @@ -254,6 +257,20 @@ Load a trusted key from the saved blob:: f1f8fff03ad0acb083725535636addb08d73dedb9832da198081e5deae84bfaf0409c22b e4a8aea2b607ec96931e6f4d4fe563ba +Create a trusted key on TPM 2.0 using an all zero value of PCR16 and +using the NV storage root 81000001 as the parent:: + + $ keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 keyhandle=0x81000001 hash=sha1 pcrinfo=030000016768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f" @u + +Note the TPMS_PCR_SELECT value for PCR 16 is 03000001 because all +current TPMs have 24 PCRs, so the initial 03 says there are three +following bytes of selection and then because the bytes are big +endian, 16 is bit zero of byte 2. the hash is the sha1 sum of all +zeros (the value of PCR 16):: + + $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=20 2>/dev/null|sha1sum + 6768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f + Reseal (TPM specific) a trusted key under new PCR values:: $ keyctl update 268728824 "update pcrinfo=`cat pcr.blob`" @@ -325,11 +342,17 @@ policy:: TPMKey ::= SEQUENCE { type OBJECT IDENTIFIER emptyAuth [0] EXPLICIT BOOLEAN OPTIONAL + policy [1] EXPLICIT SEQUENCE OF TPMPolicy OPTIONAL parent INTEGER pubkey OCTET STRING privkey OCTET STRING } + TPMPolicy ::= SEQUENCE { + CommandCode [0] EXPLICIT INTEGER + CommandPolicy [1] EXPLICIT OCTET STRING + } + type is what distinguishes the key even in binary form since the OID is provided by the TCG to be unique and thus forms a recognizable binary pattern at offset 3 in the key. The OIDs currently made @@ -355,6 +378,17 @@ is false or not present, the key requires an explicit authorization phrase. This is used by most user space consumers to decide whether to prompt for a password. +policy represents a sequence of one or more policy statements that +must be executed successfully into a session policy register. If +policy isn't present then no policy is required to unlock the key, but +if it is, commandCode is the TPM 2.0 command code of the policy +instruction that must be executed and CommandPolicy represents the +binary parameter area of the policy command. + +Note that the current sequential execution requirement means that only +AND based policy can be constructed at the moment, so TPM2_PolicyOR is +not currently supported. + parent represents the parent key handle, either in the 0x81 MSO space, like 0x81000001 for the RSA primary storage key. Userspace programmes also support specifying the primary handle in the 0x40 MSO space. If diff --git a/include/keys/trusted-type.h b/include/keys/trusted-type.h index d89fa2579ac0..749dadbd72e7 100644 --- a/include/keys/trusted-type.h +++ b/include/keys/trusted-type.h @@ -20,9 +20,11 @@ #define MIN_KEY_SIZE 32 #define MAX_KEY_SIZE 128 #define MAX_BLOB_SIZE 512 -#define MAX_PCRINFO_SIZE 64 +#define MAX_PCRINFO_SIZE 128 #define MAX_DIGEST_SIZE 64 +#define TPM2_MAX_POLICIES 16 + struct trusted_key_payload { struct rcu_head rcu; unsigned int key_len; @@ -31,6 +33,7 @@ struct trusted_key_payload { unsigned char old_format; unsigned char key[MAX_KEY_SIZE + 1]; unsigned char blob[MAX_BLOB_SIZE]; + struct tpm2_policies *policies; }; struct trusted_key_options { diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index aa11fe323c56..298321fe07ee 100644 --- a/include/linux/tpm.h +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h @@ -230,10 +230,12 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_LOAD = 0x0161, TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_SAVE = 0x0162, TPM2_CC_FLUSH_CONTEXT = 0x0165, + TPM2_CC_START_AUTH_SESS = 0x0176, TPM2_CC_VERIFY_SIGNATURE = 0x0177, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A, TPM2_CC_GET_RANDOM = 0x017B, TPM2_CC_PCR_READ = 0x017E, + TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR = 0x017F, TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182, TPM2_CC_EVENT_SEQUENCE_COMPLETE = 0x0185, TPM2_CC_HASH_SEQUENCE_START = 0x0186, @@ -242,6 +244,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { }; enum tpm2_permanent_handles { + TPM2_RH_NULL = 0x40000007, TPM2_RS_PW = 0x40000009, }; diff --git a/security/keys/Kconfig b/security/keys/Kconfig index 64b81abd087e..8a79f4faba97 100644 --- a/security/keys/Kconfig +++ b/security/keys/Kconfig @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ config TRUSTED_KEYS select CRYPTO select CRYPTO_HMAC select CRYPTO_SHA1 + select CRYPTO_SHA256 + select CRYPTO_SHA512 select CRYPTO_HASH_INFO select ASN1_ENCODER select OID_REGISTRY diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/Makefile b/security/keys/trusted-keys/Makefile index feb8b6c3cc79..39c598c4d2ef 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/Makefile +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/Makefile @@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ trusted-y += trusted_tpm1.o $(obj)/trusted_tpm2.o: $(obj)/tpm2key.asn1.h trusted-y += trusted_tpm2.o trusted-y += tpm2key.asn1.o +trusted-y += tpm2-policy.o trusted-$(CONFIG_TEE) += trusted_tee.o diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b05b2953d5ea --- /dev/null +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c @@ -0,0 +1,359 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (C) 2019 James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include + +#include + +#include +#include + +#include "tpm2key.asn1.h" +#include "tpm2-policy.h" + +/* used by ASN.1 parser only to extract policy code */ +int tpm2_key_code(void *context, size_t hdrlen, + unsigned char tag, + const void *value, size_t vlen) +{ + struct tpm2_key_context *ctx = context; + u32 code = 0; + const u8 *v = value; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < vlen; i++) { + code <<= 8; + code |= v[i]; + } + + ctx->policy_code[ctx->policy_count] = code; + + return 0; +} + +/* used by ASN.1 parser only to extract policy sequence */ +int tpm2_key_policy(void *context, size_t hdrlen, + unsigned char tag, + const void *value, size_t vlen) +{ + struct tpm2_key_context *ctx = context; + + ctx->policies[ctx->policy_count] = value; + ctx->policy_len[ctx->policy_count++] = vlen; + + return 0; +} + +/* we only support a limited number of policy statement so + * make sure we don't have anything we can't support + */ +static int tpm2_validate_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols) +{ + int i; + + if (pols->count == 0) + return 0; + + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + switch (pols->code[i]) { + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR: + break; + default: + pr_warn("tpm2 policy 0x%x is unsupported", + pols->code[i]); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + return 0; +} + +/** + * tpm2_key_process_policy - collect the policty from the context + * @ctx: the context to collect from + * @payload: the payload structure to place it in + * + * THis function sizes the policy statements and allocates space + * within the payload to receive them before copying them over. It + * should be used after the ber decoder has completed successfully + */ +int tpm2_key_policy_process(struct tpm2_key_context *ctx, + struct trusted_key_payload *payload) +{ + int tot_len = 0; + u8 *buf; + int i, ret, len = 0; + struct tpm2_policies *pols; + + if (ctx->policy_count == 0) + return 0; + + for (i = 0; i < ctx->policy_count; i++) + tot_len += ctx->policy_len[i]; + tot_len += sizeof(*pols); + + pols = kmalloc(tot_len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pols) + return -ENOMEM; + + payload->policies = pols; + buf = (u8 *)(pols + 1); + + for (i = 0; i < ctx->policy_count; i++) { + pols->policies[i] = &buf[len]; + pols->len[i] = ctx->policy_len[i]; + pols->code[i] = ctx->policy_code[i]; + if (pols->len[i]) + memcpy(pols->policies[i], ctx->policies[i], + ctx->policy_len[i]); + len += ctx->policy_len[i]; + } + pols->count = ctx->policy_count; + + ret = tpm2_validate_policy(pols); + if (ret) { + kfree(pols); + payload->policies = NULL; + } + + /* capture the hash and size */ + + /* the hash is the second algorithm */ + pols->hash = get_unaligned_be16(&ctx->pub[4]); + /* and the digest appears after the attributes */ + pols->hash_size = get_unaligned_be16(&ctx->pub[10]); + + return ret; +} + +int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, + u32 hash, u8 *policydigest, u32 *plen) +{ + int i; + struct crypto_shash *tfm; + int rc; + + if (pols->count == 0) + return 0; + + tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hash_algo_name[hash], 0, 0); + if (IS_ERR(tfm)) + return PTR_ERR(tfm); + + rc = crypto_shash_digestsize(tfm); + if (WARN(rc > MAX_DIGEST_SIZE, + "BUG: trusted key code has alg %s with digest too large (%d)", + hash_algo_name[hash], rc)) { + rc = -EINVAL; + goto err; + } + + pols->hash = hash; + pols->hash_size = rc; + *plen = rc; + + /* policy digests always start out all zeros */ + memset(policydigest, 0, rc); + + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + u8 *policy = pols->policies[i]; + int len = pols->len[i]; + u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; + u8 code[4]; + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(sdesc, tfm); + + sdesc->tfm = tfm; + rc = crypto_shash_init(sdesc); + if (rc) + goto err; + + /* first hash the previous digest */ + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policydigest, *plen); + + /* then hash the command code */ + put_unaligned_be32(cmd, code); + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, code, 4); + + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); + + /* now output the intermediate to the policydigest */ + crypto_shash_final(sdesc, policydigest); + + } + rc = 0; + + err: + crypto_free_shash(tfm); + return rc; +} + +int tpm2_encode_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u8 **data, u32 *len) +{ + const int SCRATCH_SIZE = PAGE_SIZE; + u8 *buf = kmalloc(2 * SCRATCH_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); + u8 *work = buf + SCRATCH_SIZE; + u8 *ptr; + u8 *end_work = work + SCRATCH_SIZE; + int i, ret; + + if (!buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + u8 *seq, *tag; + u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; + + if (WARN(work - buf + 14 + pols->len[i] > 2 * SCRATCH_SIZE, + "BUG: scratch buffer is too small")) + return -EINVAL; + + work = asn1_encode_sequence(work, end_work, NULL, -1); + seq = work; + + work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 0, NULL, -1); + tag = work; + + work = asn1_encode_integer(work, end_work, cmd); + asn1_encode_tag(tag, end_work, 0, NULL, work - tag); + + work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 1, NULL, -1); + tag = work; + + work = asn1_encode_octet_string(work, end_work, + pols->policies[i], + pols->len[i]); + + asn1_encode_tag(tag, end_work, 1, NULL, work - tag); + + seq = asn1_encode_sequence(seq, end_work, NULL, work - seq); + if (IS_ERR(seq)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(seq); + goto err; + } + } + ptr = asn1_encode_sequence(buf, buf + SCRATCH_SIZE, buf + PAGE_SIZE, + work - buf - PAGE_SIZE); + if (IS_ERR(ptr)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(ptr); + goto err; + } + + *data = buf; + *len = ptr - buf; + + return 0; + + err: + kfree(buf); + return ret; +} + +static int tpm2_start_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, + u16 hash, u32 *handle) +{ + struct tpm_buf buf; + int rc; + int i; + + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_START_AUTH_SESS); + if (rc) + return rc; + + /* NULL salt key handle */ + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_RH_NULL); + + /* NULL bind key handle */ + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_RH_NULL); + + /* empty nonce caller */ + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, 20); + for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) + tpm_buf_append_u8(&buf, 0); + + /* empty auth */ + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, 0); + + /* session type policy */ + tpm_buf_append_u8(&buf, 0x01); + + /* symmetric encryption parameters */ + + /* symmetric algorithm */ + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, TPM_ALG_NULL); + + /* hash algorithm for session */ + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, hash); + + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 0, "start policy session"); + if (rc) + goto out; + + *handle = get_unaligned_be32(buf.data + TPM_HEADER_SIZE); + + out: + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); + + return rc <= 0 ? rc : -EPERM; +} + +int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, + u32 *handle) +{ + int i, rc; + const char *failure; + + rc = tpm2_start_policy_session(chip, pols->hash, handle); + if (rc) + return rc; + + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; + struct tpm_buf buf; + + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, cmd); + if (rc) + return rc; + + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, *handle); + + switch (cmd) { + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR: + failure = "PCR"; + /* + * for reasons best known to the TCG we have + * to reverse the two arguments to send to the + * policy command + */ + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, pols->hash_size); + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i] + pols->len[i] - + pols->hash_size, pols->hash_size); + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], + pols->len[i] - pols->hash_size); + break; + default: + failure = "unknown policy"; + break; + } + + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 0, "send policy"); + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); + if (rc) { + dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM policy %s failed, rc=%d\n", + failure, rc); + tpm2_flush_context(chip, *handle); + *handle = 0; + return -EPERM; + } + } + + return 0; +} diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..46bf1f0a9325 --- /dev/null +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ + +struct tpm2_key_context { + u32 parent; + const u8 *pub; + u32 pub_len; + const u8 *priv; + u32 priv_len; + const u8 *policies[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u32 policy_code[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u16 policy_len[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u8 policy_count; +}; + +struct tpm2_policies { + u32 code[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u8 *policies[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u16 len[TPM2_MAX_POLICIES]; + u8 count; + u16 hash; + u16 hash_size; +}; + +int tpm2_key_policy_process(struct tpm2_key_context *ctx, + struct trusted_key_payload *payload); +int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u32 hash, + u8 *policydigest, u32 *plen); +int tpm2_encode_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u8 **data, u32 *len); +int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, + u32 *handle); diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2key.asn1 b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2key.asn1 index f57f869ad600..1684bd8f725e 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2key.asn1 +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2key.asn1 @@ -1,11 +1,24 @@ --- --- ASN.1 for TPM 2.0 keys --- +--- Note: This isn't quite the definition in the standard +--- However, the Linux asn.1 parser doesn't understand +--- [2] EXPLICIT SEQUENCE OF OPTIONAL +--- So there's an extra intermediate TPMPolicySequence +--- definition to work around this TPMKey ::= SEQUENCE { type OBJECT IDENTIFIER ({tpm2_key_type}), emptyAuth [0] EXPLICIT BOOLEAN OPTIONAL, + policy [1] EXPLICIT TPMPolicySequence OPTIONAL, parent INTEGER ({tpm2_key_parent}), pubkey OCTET STRING ({tpm2_key_pub}), privkey OCTET STRING ({tpm2_key_priv}) } + +TPMPolicySequence ::= SEQUENCE OF TPMPolicy + +TPMPolicy ::= SEQUENCE { + commandCode [0] EXPLICIT INTEGER ({tpm2_key_code}), + commandPolicy [1] EXPLICIT OCTET STRING ({tpm2_key_policy}) + } diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c index d5c891d8d353..7a41c64e67b0 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ static void trusted_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *rcu) struct trusted_key_payload *p; p = container_of(rcu, struct trusted_key_payload, rcu); + kfree_sensitive(p->policies); kfree_sensitive(p); } @@ -299,7 +300,12 @@ static long trusted_read(const struct key *key, char *buffer, */ static void trusted_destroy(struct key *key) { - kfree_sensitive(key->payload.data[0]); + + struct trusted_key_payload *p; + + p = key->payload.data[0]; + kfree_sensitive(p->policies); + kfree_sensitive(p); } struct key_type key_type_trusted = { diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index 0165da386289..a218f982fef5 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include "tpm2key.asn1.h" +#include "tpm2-policy.h" static struct tpm2_hash tpm2_hash_map[] = { {HASH_ALGO_SHA1, TPM_ALG_SHA1}, @@ -62,6 +63,21 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload, work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 0, bool, w - bool); } + if (payload->policies) { + u8 *encoded_pols; + u32 encoded_pol_len; + int ret; + + ret = tpm2_encode_policy(payload->policies, &encoded_pols, + &encoded_pol_len); + if (ret) + return ret; + + work = asn1_encode_tag(work, end_work, 1, encoded_pols, + encoded_pol_len); + kfree(encoded_pols); + } + /* * Assume both octet strings will encode to a 2 byte definite length * @@ -85,14 +101,6 @@ static int tpm2_key_encode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload, return work1 - payload->blob; } -struct tpm2_key_context { - u32 parent; - const u8 *pub; - u32 pub_len; - const u8 *priv; - u32 priv_len; -}; - static int tpm2_key_decode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload, struct trusted_key_options *options, u8 **buf) @@ -115,6 +123,12 @@ static int tpm2_key_decode(struct trusted_key_payload *payload, if (!blob) return -ENOMEM; + ret = tpm2_key_policy_process(&ctx, payload); + if (ret) { + kfree(blob); + return ret; + } + *buf = blob; options->keyhandle = ctx.parent; @@ -248,6 +262,42 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, if (!options->keyhandle) return -EINVAL; + if (options->pcrinfo_len != 0) { + struct tpm2_policies *pols; + static u8 *scratch; + /* 4 array len, 2 hash alg */ + const int len = 4 + 2 + options->pcrinfo_len; + + pols = kmalloc(sizeof(*pols) + len, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pols) + return -ENOMEM; + + pols->count = 1; + pols->len[0] = len; + scratch = (u8 *)(pols + 1); + pols->policies[0] = scratch; + pols->code[0] = TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR; + + put_unaligned_be32(1, &scratch[0]); + put_unaligned_be16(hash, &scratch[4]); + memcpy(&scratch[6], options->pcrinfo, options->pcrinfo_len); + payload->policies = pols; + } + + if (options->policydigest_len != 0 && payload->policies) { + /* can't specify both a digest and a policy */ + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (payload->policies) { + rc = tpm2_generate_policy_digest(payload->policies, + options->hash, + options->policydigest, + &options->policydigest_len); + if (rc) + return rc; + } + rc = tpm_try_get_ops(chip); if (rc) return rc; @@ -464,21 +514,37 @@ static int tpm2_unseal_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, u16 data_len; u8 *data; int rc; + u32 policyhandle; + + if (payload->policies && options->policyhandle) + /* can't have both a passed in policy and a key resident one */ + return -EINVAL; rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_UNSEAL); if (rc) return rc; + if (payload->policies) { + rc = tpm2_get_policy_session(chip, payload->policies, + &policyhandle); + if (rc) + return rc; + } else { + policyhandle = options->policyhandle; + } + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, blob_handle); tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, - options->policyhandle ? - options->policyhandle : TPM2_RS_PW, + policyhandle ? + policyhandle : TPM2_RS_PW, NULL /* nonce */, 0, TPM2_SA_CONTINUE_SESSION, options->blobauth /* hmac */, options->blobauth_len); rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &buf, 6, "unsealing"); + if (payload->policies) + tpm2_flush_context(chip, policyhandle); if (rc > 0) rc = -EPERM; From patchwork Fri May 21 00:43:59 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 12271629 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F71EC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6686135B for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235071AbhEUAqn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:46:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234062AbhEUAqm (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:46:42 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [IPv6:2607:fcd0:100:8a00::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B20C061574; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E6512806BA; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1621557920; bh=g7Pav1Z/93yPRlFkuBLtk0OlOKI5UY3aQypTQCuxC38=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AdrmgmaNz8AuCEWX4Exzeel0b7QUZF6coIoJ3sTPirtiHSVGx2WYCFZSIHVT+F54s qbUeoumWgxfgRu6A/xssRGSVWUF09TZO+HHomKW/5ro6cxmfTizRlX4lpQHgzwn6Qd tkuzXrukMCIO/IhZeFHzSFVK4r+S1a649hRQs2+g= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OyU3DdHZOvE; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D7D12806B1; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:20 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: [PATCH 2/4] security: keys: trusted: add ability to specify arbitrary policy Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:43:59 -0700 Message-Id: <20210521004401.4167-3-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org This patch adds a policy= argument to key creation. The policy is the standard tss policymaker format and each separate policy line must have a newline after it. Thus to construct a policy requiring authorized value and pcr 16 locking using a sha256 hash, the policy (policy.txt) file would be two lines: 0000017F00000001000B03000001303095B49BE85E381E5B20E557E46363EF55B0F43B132C2D8E3DE9AC436656F2 0000016b This can be inserted into the key with keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 policy=`cat policy.txt` keyhandle=0x81000001 hash=sha256" @u Note that although a few policies work like this, most require special handling which must be added to the kernel policy construction routine. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- .../security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 16 ++++++ security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++ security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h | 1 + security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c | 15 ++++++ security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 4 ++ 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst index 5c66f29b7a1c..883844c95e91 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ Usage:: policyhandle= handle to an authorization policy session that defines the same policy and with the same hash algorithm as was used to seal the key. + policy= specify an arbitrary set of policies. These must + be in policymaker format with each separate + policy line newline terminated. "keyctl print" returns an ascii hex copy of the sealed key, which is in standard TPM_STORED_DATA format. The key length for new keys are always in bytes. @@ -271,6 +274,19 @@ zeros (the value of PCR 16):: $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=20 2>/dev/null|sha1sum 6768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f +You can also specify arbitrary policy in policymaker format, so a two +value policy (the pcr example above and authvalue) would look like +this in policymaker format:: + + 0000017F000000010004030000016768033e216468247bd031a0a2d9876d79818f8f + 0000016b + +This can be placed in a file (say policy.txt) and then added to the key as:: + + $ keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 keyhandle=0x81000001 hash=sha1 policy=`cat policy.txt`" @u + +The newlines in the file policy.txt will be automatically processed. + Reseal (TPM specific) a trusted key under new PCR values:: $ keyctl update 268728824 "update pcrinfo=`cat pcr.blob`" diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c index b05b2953d5ea..bb28c864fa9b 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c @@ -357,3 +357,56 @@ int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, return 0; } + +int tpm2_parse_policies(struct tpm2_policies **ppols, char *str) +{ + struct tpm2_policies *pols; + char *p; + u8 *ptr; + int i = 0, left = PAGE_SIZE, res; + + pols = kmalloc(left, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pols) + return -ENOMEM; + + ptr = (u8 *)(pols + 1); + left -= ptr - (u8 *)pols; + + while ((p = strsep(&str, "\n"))) { + if (*p == '\0' || *p == '\n') + continue; + + pols->len[i] = strlen(p)/2; + if (pols->len[i] > left) { + res = -E2BIG; + goto err; + } + + res = hex2bin(ptr, p, pols->len[i]); + if (res) + goto err; + + /* get command code and skip past */ + pols->code[i] = get_unaligned_be32(ptr); + pols->policies[i] = ptr + 4; + ptr += pols->len[i]; + left -= pols->len[i]; + pols->len[i] -= 4; + + /* + * FIXME: this does leave the code embedded in dead + * regions of the memory, but it's easier than + * hexdumping to a temporary or copying over + */ + i++; + } + + pols->count = i; + *ppols = pols; + + return 0; + + err: + kfree(pols); + return res; +} diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h index 46bf1f0a9325..0da013116c1c 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.h @@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u32 hash, int tpm2_encode_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u8 **data, u32 *len); int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, u32 *handle); +int tpm2_parse_policies(struct tpm2_policies **ppols, char *str); diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c index aa108bea6739..6ed7303e36b5 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #include +#include "tpm2-policy.h" + static const char hmac_alg[] = "hmac(sha1)"; static const char hash_alg[] = "sha1"; static struct tpm_chip *chip; @@ -713,6 +715,7 @@ enum { Opt_hash, Opt_policydigest, Opt_policyhandle, + Opt_policy, }; static const match_table_t key_tokens = { @@ -725,6 +728,7 @@ static const match_table_t key_tokens = { {Opt_hash, "hash=%s"}, {Opt_policydigest, "policydigest=%s"}, {Opt_policyhandle, "policyhandle=%s"}, + {Opt_policy, "policy=%s"}, {Opt_err, NULL} }; @@ -858,6 +862,17 @@ static int getoptions(char *c, struct trusted_key_payload *pay, return -EINVAL; opt->policyhandle = handle; break; + + case Opt_policy: + if (pay->policies) + return -EINVAL; + if (!tpm2) + return -EINVAL; + res = tpm2_parse_policies(&pay->policies, args[0].from); + if (res) + return res; + break; + default: return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index a218f982fef5..afe9cc41885e 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, /* 4 array len, 2 hash alg */ const int len = 4 + 2 + options->pcrinfo_len; + if (payload->policies) + /* can't specify pcr and general policy */ + return -EINVAL; + pols = kmalloc(sizeof(*pols) + len, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pols) return -ENOMEM; From patchwork Fri May 21 00:44:00 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 12271631 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TRACKER_ID, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859CBC433ED for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666B1613AE for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235351AbhEUArB (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:47:01 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([96.44.175.130]:46950 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234062AbhEUArA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:47:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865A712806BA; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1621557938; bh=VvyxQjcDUACEkbKQIFQodsbnA7yfgHSn4PF/wgzsl7M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wXMUYvSi6LBvnR5iDghG4Dq5/XpougAmTajfW5xSxiGqgHTPlOj2ICECrp9g9oEJW qUrB9SH1tUWiKkvRGWaWFfJym2VFo1ho05gmw67S2l8kx7LFCJX7VNIQ14n+bZVAAZ 6Ckn3ZKrH/Q6uG8Zw/DKuWYmE8xiFt5O8AyOCxAQ= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fE2aTIOZXT1; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1000212806B1; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:45:38 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: [PATCH 3/4] security: keys: trusted: implement counter/timer policy Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:44:00 -0700 Message-Id: <20210521004401.4167-4-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org This is actually a generic policy allowing a range of comparisons against any value set in the TPM Clock, which includes things like the reset count, a monotonic millisecond count and the restart count. The most useful comparison is against the millisecond count for expiring keys. However, you have to remember that currently Linux doesn't try to sync the epoch timer with the TPM, so the expiration is actually measured in how long the TPM itself has been powered on ... the TPM timer doesn't count while the system is powered down. The millisecond counter is a u64 quantity found at offset 8 in the timer structure, and the <= comparision operand is 9, so a policy set to expire after the TPM has been up for 100 seconds would look like 0000016d00000000000f424000080009 Where 0x16d is the counter timer policy code and 0xf4240 is 100 000 in hex. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- .../security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 31 +++++++++++++- include/linux/tpm.h | 1 + security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 3 +- 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst index 883844c95e91..c40e38200c1e 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst @@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ Another new format 'enc32' has been defined in order to support encrypted keys with payload size of 32 bytes. This will initially be used for nvdimm security but may expand to other usages that require 32 bytes payload. - TPM 2.0 ASN.1 Key Format ------------------------ @@ -420,3 +419,33 @@ string length. privkey is the binary representation of TPM2B_PUBLIC excluding the initial TPM2B header which can be reconstructed from the ASN.1 octed string length. + + +Appendix +-------- + +TPM 2.0 Policies +---------------- + +The current TPM supports PCR lock policies as documented above and +CounterTimer policies which can be used to create expiring keys. One +caveat with expiring keys is that the TPM millisecond counter does not +update while a system is powered off and Linux does not sync the TPM +millisecond count with its internal clock, so the best you can expire +in is in terms of how long any given TPM has been powered on. (FIXME: +Linux should simply update the millisecond clock to the current number +of seconds past the epoch on boot). + +A CounterTimer policy is expressed in terms of length and offset +against the TPM clock structure (TPMS_TIME_INFO), which looks like the +packed structure:: + + struct tpms_time_info { + u64 uptime; /* time in ms since last start or reset */ + u64 clock; /* cumulative uptime in ms */ + u32 resetcount; /* numer of times the TPM has been reset */ + u32 restartcount; /* number of times the TPM has been restarted */ + u8 safe /* time was safely loaded from NVRam */ + }; + +The usual comparison for expiring keys is against clock, at offset 8. diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index 298321fe07ee..85e167ae2c65 100644 --- a/include/linux/tpm.h +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_LOAD = 0x0161, TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_SAVE = 0x0162, TPM2_CC_FLUSH_CONTEXT = 0x0165, + TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER = 0x016D, TPM2_CC_START_AUTH_SESS = 0x0176, TPM2_CC_VERIFY_SIGNATURE = 0x0177, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY = 0x017A, diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c index bb28c864fa9b..21bfeb686287 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static int tpm2_validate_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols) for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { switch (pols->code[i]) { + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER: case TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR: break; default: @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, u8 *policy = pols->policies[i]; int len = pols->len[i]; u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; + u8 digest[MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; u8 code[4]; SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(sdesc, tfm); @@ -183,6 +185,19 @@ int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, put_unaligned_be32(cmd, code); crypto_shash_update(sdesc, code, 4); + /* commands that need special handling */ + if (cmd == TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER) { + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(sdesc1, tfm); + + sdesc1->tfm = tfm; + + /* counter timer policies are double hashed */ + crypto_shash_digest(sdesc1, policy, len, + digest); + policy = digest; + len = *plen; + } + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); /* now output the intermediate to the policydigest */ @@ -339,8 +354,35 @@ int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], pols->len[i] - pols->hash_size); break; + + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER: { + /* + * the format of this is the last two u16 + * quantities are the offset and operation + * respectively. The rest is operandB which + * must be zero padded in a hash digest + */ + u16 opb_len = pols->len[i] - 4; + + if (opb_len > pols->hash_size) + return -EINVAL; + + tpm_buf_append_u16(&buf, opb_len); + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], opb_len); + + /* offset and operand*/ + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i] + opb_len, 4); + failure = "Counter Timer"; + + break; + } + default: failure = "unknown policy"; + if (pols->len[i]) + tpm_buf_append(&buf, pols->policies[i], + pols->len[i]); + break; } diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index afe9cc41885e..b7eb919de8ef 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 flags; int i; int rc; + static const int POLICY_SIZE = 2 * PAGE_SIZE; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tpm2_hash_map); i++) { if (options->hash == tpm2_hash_map[i].crypto_id) { @@ -272,7 +273,7 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, /* can't specify pcr and general policy */ return -EINVAL; - pols = kmalloc(sizeof(*pols) + len, GFP_KERNEL); + pols = kmalloc(POLICY_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pols) return -ENOMEM; From patchwork Fri May 21 00:44:01 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: James Bottomley X-Patchwork-Id: 12271633 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226CAC433B4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0551D613AE for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 00:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235372AbhEUArp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:47:45 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([96.44.175.130]:47062 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235348AbhEUAro (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 20:47:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF7E12806C8; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1621557982; bh=nSMAvFQ2qf9u9Cj4tHSExvhtmIcTBRz0nwDD/jHDViE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=At7D9XLAKMgLsUo3Y5WU/PXR0kQEUjlyJEMRuFQyc07gwDFuO/+YJbo1Evrek0jpQ HSjQIj9iFEcmyTV9uWqb0jJ7/Z2VNRTiUPZec9/pV7STMBvDUKrD5mFWOGkRSM2nXA Lx1r6NBnBa3jLqlrAS+1DS5Qy5KTV4nU6P8lqEiM= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biPT8wdljmij; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (jarvis.ext.hansenpartnership.com [153.66.160.226]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203412806B1; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:46:22 -0700 (PDT) From: James Bottomley To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar , Jarkko Sakkinen , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: [PATCH 4/4] security: keys: trusted: implement authorization policy Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:44:01 -0700 Message-Id: <20210521004401.4167-5-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20210521004401.4167-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org When using authorizations (passwords) with a policy, the trigger for the authorizations must be present in the policy statements that are required to build to the policy hash. Add this required policy statement if blobauth is present. Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- include/linux/tpm.h | 2 ++ security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c | 14 +++++++++- security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index 85e167ae2c65..081ed7d6d4ac 100644 --- a/include/linux/tpm.h +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_LOAD = 0x0161, TPM2_CC_CONTEXT_SAVE = 0x0162, TPM2_CC_FLUSH_CONTEXT = 0x0165, + TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE = 0x016B, TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER = 0x016D, TPM2_CC_START_AUTH_SESS = 0x0176, TPM2_CC_VERIFY_SIGNATURE = 0x0177, @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@ enum tpm2_command_codes { TPM2_CC_PCR_EXTEND = 0x0182, TPM2_CC_EVENT_SEQUENCE_COMPLETE = 0x0185, TPM2_CC_HASH_SEQUENCE_START = 0x0186, + TPM2_CC_POLICY_PASSWORD = 0x018c, TPM2_CC_CREATE_LOADED = 0x0191, TPM2_CC_LAST = 0x0193, /* Spec 1.36 */ }; diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c index 21bfeb686287..0f5daa5653bf 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/tpm2-policy.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static int tpm2_validate_policy(struct tpm2_policies *pols) switch (pols->code[i]) { case TPM2_CC_POLICY_COUNTER_TIMER: case TPM2_CC_POLICY_PCR: + case TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE: break; default: pr_warn("tpm2 policy 0x%x is unsupported", @@ -198,7 +199,8 @@ int tpm2_generate_policy_digest(struct tpm2_policies *pols, len = *plen; } - crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); + if (len) + crypto_shash_update(sdesc, policy, len); /* now output the intermediate to the policydigest */ crypto_shash_final(sdesc, policydigest); @@ -334,6 +336,16 @@ int tpm2_get_policy_session(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm2_policies *pols, u32 cmd = pols->code[i]; struct tpm_buf buf; + if (cmd == TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE) + /* + * both PolicyAuthValue and PolicyPassword + * hash to the same thing, but one triggers + * HMAC authentication and the other simple + * authentication. Since we have no HMAC + * code, we're choosing the simple + */ + cmd = TPM2_CC_POLICY_PASSWORD; + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, cmd); if (rc) return rc; diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c index b7eb919de8ef..282c633bd2ec 100644 --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c @@ -294,6 +294,39 @@ int tpm2_seal_trusted(struct tpm_chip *chip, return -EINVAL; } + /* + * if we already have a policy, we have to add authorization + * to it. If we don't, we can simply follow the usual + * non-policy route. + */ + if (options->blobauth_len != 0 && payload->policies) { + struct tpm2_policies *pols; + static u8 *scratch; + int i; + bool found = false; + + pols = payload->policies; + + /* make sure it's not already in policy */ + for (i = 0; i < pols->count; i++) { + if (pols->code[i] == TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE) { + found = true; + + break; + } + } + + if (!found) { + i = pols->count++; + scratch = pols->policies[i - 1] + pols->len[i - 1]; + + /* the TPM2_PolicyPassword command has no payload */ + pols->policies[i] = scratch; + pols->len[i] = 0; + pols->code[i] = TPM2_CC_POLICY_AUTHVALUE; + } + } + if (payload->policies) { rc = tpm2_generate_policy_digest(payload->policies, options->hash,