From patchwork Wed Jun 30 19:40:48 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Fastabend X-Patchwork-Id: 12352777 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830B0C11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D5F61477 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233749AbhF3Tnm (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:43:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40050 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229700AbhF3Tnm (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:43:42 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAC7C061756; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id h3so4027858ilc.9; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MCM7KRnV/PI1c93unODv/6BzjghcEhL/TUDBiodTGIk=; b=u26JCKM+Omy7FgbrcKBvrs66G6zoQ+l4H/mZyGUhrQ+6tRQ8tsVoskZg8hVe1086a4 zrNN9hXew7PNkaecdtJtZmbP7L+w3bWmz+IPwTPq7Onyq1NnHQq/Fw2KXRk8XSS35Epm fcrtA/f3iQUdxM2ix/UPcVVeJWvkpVsCzlp6YTg1AzuTavDXnUe09byCE5RMYSalD6CR moIAk94FC1cmFvzAN7xK0u9taczJSv3Fl80tGKsES9xckkocGY9CnAYJLSy8Sd44h/tP LQApg14v4pZlOhM5E7fYd5MS1p9tLYx8/d9PEAT7N2d3VKxoYGebGpllgvFUtvzG0tfH Bxbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MCM7KRnV/PI1c93unODv/6BzjghcEhL/TUDBiodTGIk=; b=R9EJc09Wh4Oj8RjsuWZmceO2BJovJHQ2mtcB231d2SwTPZ3omnBsNL9+q3pepauR9R rQL3zg1PT11U2nlaRHaOlLfwFW4jhu/D7lBQBphfYFw8Oj58/RpIyDnmRsQuj+0R+no9 BNmzHHrG1o+T/I9jeebpR2w8lxzlV2rbGZ+/6Ow9exIyuuRvLMCKkBItx5L1O4G+ayS8 0GlkVSAxxJejLNjvS/Ax5lyTWYRVCiKfIwpOdRYFFb/5pfOzGEwW3gc0RNKIU+rhnEG3 BPFaI9021bQ01BKgrN7CVwQ8R57ad3CWuawNhamHQhO+cw1Jfc2tYeI/aQLsyvqa/ZEv kppw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vCweYZzW4O+nEdC9CQ8R+gHBQbjbaYC1xAqjf6JryIP76+oWV Z7cIeC72jJvsHUX4hBLQ+SY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp+/52AwCtC2lm8Y5H7TDfBX0RsCd0feLYWQLxmPZXjHu1aqtSN+xobjYrZFZU2Cn8HuVQhw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b85:: with SMTP id h5mr19223030ili.99.1625082072587; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from john-XPS-13-9370.lan ([172.243.157.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm10977680iod.48.2021.06.30.12.41.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:12 -0700 (PDT) From: John Fastabend To: maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andriin@fb.com Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: track subprog poke correctly, fix use-after-free Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:40:48 -0700 Message-Id: <20210630194049.46453-2-john.fastabend@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210630194049.46453-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com> References: <20210630194049.46453-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Subprograms are calling map_poke_track but on program release there is no hook to call map_poke_untrack. But on prog release the aux memory is freed even though we still have a reference to it in the element list of the map aux data. So when we run map_poke_run() we end up accessing free'd memory. This triggers with KASAN in prog_array_map_poke_run() shown here. [ 402.824686] ================================================================== [ 402.824689] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824698] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881905a7940 by task hubble-fgs/4337 [ 402.824705] CPU: 1 PID: 4337 Comm: hubble-fgs Tainted: G I 5.12.0+ #399 [ 402.824715] Call Trace: [ 402.824719] dump_stack+0x93/0xc2 [ 402.824727] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x140 [ 402.824736] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824740] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824744] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [ 402.824752] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824757] prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824765] bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem+0x124/0x1a0 The elements concerned are walked like this, for (i = 0; i < elem->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { poke = &elem->aux->poke_tab[i]; So the access to size_poke_tab is the 4B read, verified by checking offsets in the KASAN dump, [ 402.825004] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881905a7800 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [ 402.825008] The buggy address is located 320 bytes inside of 1024-byte region [ffff8881905a7800, ffff8881905a7c00) With pahol output, struct bpf_prog_aux { ... /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) --- */ u32 size_poke_tab; /* 320 4 */ ... In general subprograms do not manage their own data structures. For example btf func_info, linfo, etc are just pointers to the prog structure. This allows reference counting and cleanup to be done on the main prog. The aux->poke_tab struct however did not follow this logic. The initial fix for above use after free further embedded subprogram tracking of poke data tracking into the subprogram with proper reference counting. However, Daniel and Alexei questioned why we were treating these objects specially. I agree its unnecessary. The fix here removes the per subprogram poke data structure alloc and map tracking and instead simply points the aux->poke_tab pointer at the main programs poke_tab. This way map tracking is done on the origin program and we do not need to manage them per subprogram. A couple small complication arise here. First on bpf_prog_free_deferred(), where we unwind the prog reference counting and kfree objects, we need to ensure that we don't try to double free the poke_tab when free'ing the subprog structures. This is easily solved by NULL'ing the poke_tab pointer. The second detail is to ensure that per subprog jit logic only does fixups on poke_tab[] entries it owns. To do this we add a pointer in the poke structure to point at the subprog value so JITs can easily check while walking the poke_tab structure if the current entry belongs to the current program. This change is necessary per JIT. See x86/net/bpf_jit_compo.c func bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup() for the details. Only x86 is currently using the poke_tab struct so we only need to fixup the x86 JIT. Fixes: a748c6975dea3 ("bpf: propagate poke descriptors to subprograms") Signed-off-by: John Fastabend --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++++ include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/core.c | 7 ++++++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 39 +++++++------------------------------ 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 2a2e290fa5d8..ce8dbc9310a9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -576,6 +576,10 @@ static void bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup(struct bpf_prog *prog) for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { poke = &prog->aux->poke_tab[i]; + + if (poke->aux && poke->aux != prog->aux) + continue; + WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(poke->tailcall_target_stable)); if (poke->reason != BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 02b02cb29ce2..a7532cb3493a 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -777,6 +777,7 @@ struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor { void *tailcall_target; void *tailcall_bypass; void *bypass_addr; + void *aux; union { struct { struct bpf_map *map; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 5e31ee9f7512..72810314c43b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -2211,8 +2211,13 @@ static void bpf_prog_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) #endif if (aux->dst_trampoline) bpf_trampoline_put(aux->dst_trampoline); - for (i = 0; i < aux->func_cnt; i++) + for (i = 0; i < aux->func_cnt; i++) { + /* poke_tab in subprogs are links to main prog and are + * freed above so delete link without kfree. + */ + aux->func[i]->aux->poke_tab = NULL; bpf_jit_free(aux->func[i]); + } if (aux->func_cnt) { kfree(aux->func); bpf_prog_unlock_free(aux->prog); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 6e2ebcb0d66f..daa5a3f5e7b8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -12109,30 +12109,17 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) /* the btf and func_info will be freed only at prog->aux */ func[i]->aux->btf = prog->aux->btf; func[i]->aux->func_info = prog->aux->func_info; + func[i]->aux->poke_tab = prog->aux->poke_tab; + func[i]->aux->size_poke_tab = prog->aux->size_poke_tab; for (j = 0; j < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) { - u32 insn_idx = prog->aux->poke_tab[j].insn_idx; - int ret; + struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke; - if (!(insn_idx >= subprog_start && - insn_idx <= subprog_end)) - continue; - - ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(func[i], - &prog->aux->poke_tab[j]); - if (ret < 0) { - verbose(env, "adding tail call poke descriptor failed\n"); - goto out_free; - } + poke = &prog->aux->poke_tab[j]; - func[i]->insnsi[insn_idx - subprog_start].imm = ret + 1; - - map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[ret].tail_call.map; - ret = map_ptr->ops->map_poke_track(map_ptr, func[i]->aux); - if (ret < 0) { - verbose(env, "tracking tail call prog failed\n"); - goto out_free; - } + if (poke->insn_idx < subprog_end && + poke->insn_idx >= subprog_start) + poke->aux = func[i]->aux; } /* Use bpf_prog_F_tag to indicate functions in stack traces. @@ -12163,18 +12150,6 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) cond_resched(); } - /* Untrack main program's aux structs so that during map_poke_run() - * we will not stumble upon the unfilled poke descriptors; each - * of the main program's poke descs got distributed across subprogs - * and got tracked onto map, so we are sure that none of them will - * be missed after the operation below - */ - for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { - map_ptr = prog->aux->poke_tab[i].tail_call.map; - - map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, prog->aux); - } - /* at this point all bpf functions were successfully JITed * now populate all bpf_calls with correct addresses and * run last pass of JIT From patchwork Wed Jun 30 19:40:49 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Fastabend X-Patchwork-Id: 12352779 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6442C11F65 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF5861477 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 19:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233817AbhF3Tnv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:43:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229700AbhF3Tnu (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:43:50 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465E3C061756; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id a11so4065437ilf.2; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAsH87Dl+Xk0ALZXtlUT1irdqz1tbP3ucQOTTRoeFs4=; b=MvKovCzQIpJPwDwCTgWf3mzCizTGYye7z6NMI/mRHbKSS4JwCSNDx+XnKOF9DvAa8p FUUY0cI2oCUnwSTqWrwIf/w+eufhLABoxK2pC8+8gEpawHpF7CEUqFedUh1i7S9+Mhz+ e2ntE5+hcHHDfxYKTY5MlIf8umfgOFEjJor7FsNkGTD+uHDmLevxlmgRVkSbtbmUbIsl GR58GydoULzlWwjszlzMYdz5Z33GcC2XkzR1ydLbzM0a3EZfC/JpPu8kb+PCnkTtKmrE LLSMBuSfp/kPw7X3BKQ5pElvNQh9X8HUF7qnF2ZO+o/Rut/hCkBWIF4EMpOqAGpiMPzj Oj9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAsH87Dl+Xk0ALZXtlUT1irdqz1tbP3ucQOTTRoeFs4=; b=kz5+52On3IVxZFPbszDGYkH2vlgmjkivUrAVWKWp/SSWIbG8jQOLythAtD7ZlaaFVy 8sBHaiLHwvmjLRw6A5yth6ATNCyjoq4/0wePrDNAPZ5R8eyI194wPstXLIuNe8O4/YUZ X9fEUrR0hMUTRM627koQuxgRnoI2V+7aULG5rAvuB8ZLNOjcws8LCypY+i52TAVNguzy pgqPh8/W4iFFGW8X/brVFNNW1lVy/QuWsR5ln5yOB5Mz8HkbBzHKUOjITcLOik3ckOJA r17irK5W1o7FeTbjlllHB8xIwoj7aZFMH2wrY7hQNLG9yiSzWM3by3IxWSmGxgLwEFhv n7EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z0Zoi1oSqE6VFzkWE/HicDqdwLZmy7lvnTX+WCv0zQ80zg2Vg iPKPC40xtbPI3tAl/t5gJmQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNji68GXhD+fKEaUZxdk9EU4NrU9JhRRADZUCb6SeV4EH3aZUFwjDm3ouOl04nuTmAju7h7A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:10c2:: with SMTP id s2mr26975794ilj.24.1625082079731; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from john-XPS-13-9370.lan ([172.243.157.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm10977680iod.48.2021.06.30.12.41.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:41:19 -0700 (PDT) From: John Fastabend To: maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andriin@fb.com Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls and tailcalls with insn patch Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:40:49 -0700 Message-Id: <20210630194049.46453-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210630194049.46453-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com> References: <20210630194049.46453-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net This adds some extra noise to the tailcall_bpf2bpf4 tests that will cause verify to patch insns. This then moves around subprog start/end insn index and poke descriptor insn index to ensure that verify and JIT will continue to track these correctly. If done correctly verifier should pass this program same as before and JIT should emit tail call logic. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 36 +++++++++++++------ .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 21 ++++++++++- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c index ee27d68d2a1c..b5940e6ca67c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(void) bpf_object__close(obj); } +#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf4.skel.h" + /* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 checks that tailcall counter is correctly preserved * across tailcalls combined with bpf2bpf calls. for making sure that tailcall * counter behaves correctly, bpf program will go through following flow: @@ -727,10 +729,15 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(void) * the loop begins. At the end of the test make sure that the global counter is * equal to 31, because tailcall counter includes the first two tailcalls * whereas global counter is incremented only on loop presented on flow above. + * + * The noise parameter is used to insert bpf_map_update calls into the logic + * to force verifier to patch instructions. This allows us to ensure jump + * logic remains correct with instruction movement. */ -static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) +static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise) { - int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val; + int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i; + struct tailcall_bpf2bpf4__bss val; struct bpf_map *prog_array, *data_map; struct bpf_program *prog; struct bpf_object *obj; @@ -774,11 +781,6 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) goto out; } - err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0, - &duration, &retval, NULL); - CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", - err, errno, retval); - data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) return; @@ -787,10 +789,22 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) return; + i = 0; + val.noise = noise; + val.count = 0; + err = bpf_map_update_elem(data_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY); + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) + goto out; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0, + &duration, &retval, NULL); + CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", + err, errno, retval); + i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); - CHECK(err || val != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n", - err, errno, val); + CHECK(err || val.count != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n", + err, errno, val.count); out: bpf_object__close(obj); @@ -815,5 +829,7 @@ void test_tailcalls(void) if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_3")) test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(); if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_4")) - test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(); + test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false); + if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5")) + test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c index 9a1b166b7fbe..6242803dabde 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c @@ -2,6 +2,13 @@ #include #include +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); +} nop_table SEC(".maps"); + struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 3); @@ -9,11 +16,23 @@ struct { __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); } jmp_table SEC(".maps"); -static volatile int count; +int count = 0; +int noise = 0; + +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void) +{ + __u32 key = 0; + + bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key); + bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key); + return 0; +} __noinline int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { + if (noise) + subprog_noise(); bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2); return skb->len * 3; }