From patchwork Thu Aug 5 23:07:34 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrii Nakryiko X-Patchwork-Id: 12422317 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292ECC4338F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 23:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F2A610A2 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 23:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233425AbhHEXH7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:07:59 -0400 Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:5434 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232896AbhHEXH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:07:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0044010.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 175N1V6d019235 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:44 -0700 Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([163.114.132.120]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3a8jhftpq5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:07:44 -0700 Received: from intmgw001.06.ash9.facebook.com (2620:10d:c085:208::11) by mail.thefacebook.com (2620:10d:c085:11d::4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:43 -0700 Received: by devbig012.ftw2.facebook.com (Postfix, from userid 137359) id 46F573D405B3; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrii Nakryiko To: , , CC: , Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: rename reference_tracking BPF programs Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20210805230734.437914-1-andrii@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FB-Internal: Safe X-FB-Source: Intern X-Proofpoint-GUID: U8JgzTq6QDkJKVnyl4R86l1WaPczdj9k X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: U8JgzTq6QDkJKVnyl4R86l1WaPczdj9k X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.790 definitions=2021-08-05_11:2021-08-05,2021-08-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=fb_default_notspam policy=fb_default score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=912 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1034 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2108050135 X-FB-Internal: deliver Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_". Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c | 4 ++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c index de2688166696..4e91f4d6466c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ void test_reference_tracking(void) if (!test__start_subtest(title)) continue; - /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'fail' */ - if (strstr(title, "fail") != NULL) { + /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'err' */ + if (strstr(title, "err_") != NULL) { libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn; old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(NULL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c index e83d0b48d80c..8249075f088f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_use_after_free") +SEC("classifier/err_use_after_free") int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) return family; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release") int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_twice") +SEC("classifier/err_release_twice") int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_unchecked") +SEC("classifier/err_release_unchecked") int bpf_sk_lookup_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void lookup_no_release(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, &tuple, sizeof(tuple), BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release_subcall") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release_subcall") int bpf_sk_lookup_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb) { lookup_no_release(skb);