From patchwork Tue Nov 16 15:26:52 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lin Ma X-Patchwork-Id: 12622677 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B72C433F5 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89FF61BFB for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238124AbhKPPaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:04 -0500 Received: from spam.zju.edu.cn ([61.164.42.155]:18668 "EHLO zju.edu.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238078AbhKPPaD (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [222.205.2.245]) by mail-app3 (Coremail) with SMTP id cC_KCgC3vxvBzZNhONFDCA--.11582S4; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:26:58 +0800 (CST) From: Lin Ma To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, Lin Ma Subject: [PATCH net v5 1/2] NFC: reorder the logic in nfc_{un,}register_device Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:26:52 +0800 Message-Id: <20211116152652.19217-1-linma@zju.edu.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cC_KCgC3vxvBzZNhONFDCA--.11582S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxZw1UAFy7WFWftw4kJFW7CFg_yoW5Kr47p3 WrGas3KryDKr4UWr4fZr47JFy5ur48tw4rZryFkryjkrZxZrWftr93Jry8Jas5Ja95AayY qrWUZw48ur45XF7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvY1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AE w4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E 87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c 8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_ Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwI xGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lc2xSY4AK67AK6ryrMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48J MxAIw28IcVCjz48v1sIEY20_GFWkJr1UJwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c 02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_ Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0J U3Ma8UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: qtrwiiyqvtljo62m3hxhgxhubq/ Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org There is a potential UAF between the unregistration routine and the NFC netlink operations. The race that cause that UAF can be shown as below: (FREE) | (USE) nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev | nfc_genl_dev_up nci_close_device | nci_unregister_device | nfc_get_device nfc_unregister_device | nfc_dev_up rfkill_destory | device_del | rfkill_blocked ... | ... The root cause for this race is concluded below: 1. The rfkill_blocked (USE) in nfc_dev_up is supposed to be placed after the device_is_registered check. 2. Since the netlink operations are possible just after the device_add in nfc_register_device, the nfc_dev_up() can happen anywhere during the rfkill creation process, which leads to data race. This patch reorder these actions to permit 1. Once device_del is finished, the nfc_dev_up cannot dereference the rfkill object. 2. The rfkill_register need to be placed after the device_add of nfc_dev because the parent device need to be created first. So this patch keeps the order but inject device_lock to prevent the data race. Signed-off-by: Lin Ma Fixes: be055b2f89b5 ("NFC: RFKILL support") Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- net/nfc/core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c index 3c645c1d99c9..dc7a2404efdf 100644 --- a/net/nfc/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/core.c @@ -94,13 +94,13 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (dev->rfkill && rfkill_blocked(dev->rfkill)) { - rc = -ERFKILL; + if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { - rc = -ENODEV; + if (dev->rfkill && rfkill_blocked(dev->rfkill)) { + rc = -ERFKILL; goto error; } @@ -1125,11 +1125,7 @@ int nfc_register_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) if (rc) pr_err("Could not register llcp device\n"); - rc = nfc_genl_device_added(dev); - if (rc) - pr_debug("The userspace won't be notified that the device %s was added\n", - dev_name(&dev->dev)); - + device_lock(&dev->dev); dev->rfkill = rfkill_alloc(dev_name(&dev->dev), &dev->dev, RFKILL_TYPE_NFC, &nfc_rfkill_ops, dev); if (dev->rfkill) { @@ -1138,6 +1134,12 @@ int nfc_register_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) dev->rfkill = NULL; } } + device_unlock(&dev->dev); + + rc = nfc_genl_device_added(dev); + if (rc) + pr_debug("The userspace won't be notified that the device %s was added\n", + dev_name(&dev->dev)); return 0; } @@ -1154,10 +1156,17 @@ void nfc_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) pr_debug("dev_name=%s\n", dev_name(&dev->dev)); + rc = nfc_genl_device_removed(dev); + if (rc) + pr_debug("The userspace won't be notified that the device %s " + "was removed\n", dev_name(&dev->dev)); + + device_lock(&dev->dev); if (dev->rfkill) { rfkill_unregister(dev->rfkill); rfkill_destroy(dev->rfkill); } + device_unlock(&dev->dev); if (dev->ops->check_presence) { device_lock(&dev->dev); @@ -1167,11 +1176,6 @@ void nfc_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) cancel_work_sync(&dev->check_pres_work); } - rc = nfc_genl_device_removed(dev); - if (rc) - pr_debug("The userspace won't be notified that the device %s " - "was removed\n", dev_name(&dev->dev)); - nfc_llcp_unregister_device(dev); mutex_lock(&nfc_devlist_mutex); From patchwork Tue Nov 16 15:27:32 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lin Ma X-Patchwork-Id: 12622679 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750FFC433FE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8AE63248 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238233AbhKPPak (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:40 -0500 Received: from spam.zju.edu.cn ([61.164.42.155]:18738 "EHLO zju.edu.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238210AbhKPPah (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:30:37 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [222.205.2.245]) by mail-app3 (Coremail) with SMTP id cC_KCgDXnvDkzZNhFtRDCA--.7427S4; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:27:32 +0800 (CST) From: Lin Ma To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, Lin Ma Subject: [PATCH net v5 2/2] NFC: add NCI_UNREG flag to eliminate the race Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:27:32 +0800 Message-Id: <20211116152732.19238-1-linma@zju.edu.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1 In-Reply-To: <20211116152652.19217-1-linma@zju.edu.cn> References: <20211116152652.19217-1-linma@zju.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cC_KCgDXnvDkzZNhFtRDCA--.7427S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxZryxCFy8Kw4xtr15XF1xGrg_yoW5Zr4Dpa nYgFy3Kry8Cry7GrW0vw18JF1Y9w40kayfG3yruw4xGa9xXFyaqFyktFWjqa48uFZ5AFWa qFy3Ca4rCr1UJr7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvY1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AE w4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2 IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E 87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c 8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JrI_ JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwI xGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lc2xSY4AK67AK6ryrMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48J MxAIw28IcVCjz48v1sIEY20_GFWkJr1UJwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c 02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_ Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0J UgmRUUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: qtrwiiyqvtljo62m3hxhgxhubq/ Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org There are two sites that calls queue_work() after the destroy_workqueue() and lead to possible UAF. The first site is nci_send_cmd(), which can happen after the nci_close_device as below nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev | nfc_genl_dev_up nci_close_device | flush_workqueue | del_timer_sync | nci_unregister_device | nfc_get_device destroy_workqueue | nfc_dev_up nfc_unregister_device | nci_dev_up device_del | nci_open_device | __nci_request | nci_send_cmd | queue_work !!! Another site is nci_cmd_timer, awaked by the nci_cmd_work from the nci_send_cmd. ... | ... nci_unregister_device | queue_work destroy_workqueue | nfc_unregister_device | ... device_del | nci_cmd_work | mod_timer | ... | nci_cmd_timer | queue_work !!! For the above two UAF, the root cause is that the nfc_dev_up can race between the nci_unregister_device routine. Therefore, this patch introduce NCI_UNREG flag to easily eliminate the possible race. In addition, the mutex_lock in nci_close_device can act as a barrier. Signed-off-by: Lin Ma Fixes: 6a2968aaf50c ("NFC: basic NCI protocol implementation") Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 1 + net/nfc/nci/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h index a964daedc17b..ea8595651c38 100644 --- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h +++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ enum nci_flag { NCI_UP, NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE, NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE_TO, + NCI_UNREG, }; /* NCI device states */ diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c index 6fd873aa86be..1be9ad539f25 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c @@ -473,6 +473,11 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock); + if (test_bit(NCI_UNREG, &ndev->flags)) { + rc = -ENODEV; + goto done; + } + if (test_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) { rc = -EALREADY; goto done; @@ -545,6 +550,10 @@ static int nci_open_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) { nci_req_cancel(ndev, ENODEV); + + /* This mutex needs to be held as a barrier for + * caller nci_unregister_device + */ mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock); if (!test_and_clear_bit(NCI_UP, &ndev->flags)) { @@ -582,8 +591,8 @@ static int nci_close_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) del_timer_sync(&ndev->cmd_timer); - /* Clear flags */ - ndev->flags = 0; + /* Clear flags except NCI_UNREG */ + ndev->flags &= BIT(NCI_UNREG); mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock); @@ -1266,6 +1275,12 @@ void nci_unregister_device(struct nci_dev *ndev) { struct nci_conn_info *conn_info, *n; + /* This set_bit is not protected with specialized barrier, + * However, it is fine because the mutex_lock(&ndev->req_lock); + * in nci_close_device() will help to emit one. + */ + set_bit(NCI_UNREG, &ndev->flags); + nci_close_device(ndev); destroy_workqueue(ndev->cmd_wq);