From patchwork Fri Feb 18 22:43:02 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Oscar Salvador X-Patchwork-Id: 12751991 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30174C433FE for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id ABC8B6B0075; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:43:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A6BCF6B0078; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:43:25 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 90C6A6B007B; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:43:25 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0142.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8275A6B0075 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:43:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7489D283 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:25 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79157378370.21.E5A9F4C Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C02620007 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0E41F37F; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1645224203; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZI7eb1YtnV7jiyH1+LFtBKo1YQC7gG8qhsVdB0DfRqg=; b=na0AmMrBG3/DqP2YtYj6dlBCBUmzAiEDPEZi0BVj+4TwwMKxqrPIDMHiwL+t2E9s63FBks Eyckr+wNZYo/L3EN/i8i38fF2Q5XIknlk45hvYgf7qRfAy4Og2WVehb0X/jT4XGWfHdkVP x9VEgkTBWqf+MmwGWf/mFUCrnYc1i08= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1645224203; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZI7eb1YtnV7jiyH1+LFtBKo1YQC7gG8qhsVdB0DfRqg=; b=tibGjMo6uoy/D73l37bvC/dIWVQIDNM+eNCMR7LqsHMRndigXcvdTAnkEHZQPBic7jwsVy geGnD3ZnyWxeYLBA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07FF13CCE; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id IDOIMwohEGKMQwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 22:43:22 +0000 From: Oscar Salvador To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand , Rafael Aquini , Dave Hansen , Michal Hocko , Wei Yang , Dennis Zhou , Alexey Makhalov , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador Subject: [PATCH 1/1] arch/x86/mm/numa: Do not initialize nodes twice Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 23:43:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20220218224302.5282-2-osalvador@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220218224302.5282-1-osalvador@suse.de> References: <20220218224302.5282-1-osalvador@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=na0AmMrB; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=tibGjMo6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=suse.de; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of osalvador@suse.de designates 195.135.220.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=osalvador@suse.de X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9C02620007 X-Stat-Signature: y3c6qs1abrkejah6wt58jxudgpztykhi X-HE-Tag: 1645224204-848244 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On x86, prior to ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracecully"), NUMA nodes could be allocated at three different places. - numa_register_memblks - init_cpu_to_node - init_gi_nodes All these calls happen at setup_arch, and have the following order: setup_arch ... x86_numa_init numa_init numa_register_memblks ... init_cpu_to_node init_memory_less_node alloc_node_data free_area_init_memoryless_node init_gi_nodes init_memory_less_node alloc_node_data free_area_init_memoryless_node numa_register_memblks() is only interested in those nodes which have memory, so it skips over any memoryless node it founds. Later on, when we have read ACPI's SRAT table, we call init_cpu_to_node() and init_gi_nodes(), which initialize any memoryless node we might have that have either CPU or Initiator affinity, meaning we allocate pg_data_t struct for them and we mark them as ONLINE. So far so good, but the thing is that after ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully"), we allocate all possible NUMA nodes in free_area_init(), meaning we have a picture like the following: setup_arch x86_numa_init numa_init numa_register_memblks <-- allocate non-memoryless node x86_init.paging.pagetable_init ... free_area_init free_area_init_memoryless <-- allocate memoryless node init_cpu_to_node alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with CPU free_area_init_memoryless_node init_gi_nodes alloc_node_data <-- allocate memoryless node with Initiator free_area_init_memoryless_node free_area_init() already allocates all possible NUMA nodes, but init_cpu_to_node() and init_gi_nodes() are clueless about that, so they go ahead and allocate a new pg_data_t struct without checking anything, meaning we end up allocating twice. It should be mad clear that this only happens in the case where memoryless NUMA node happens to have a CPU/Initiator affinity. So get rid of init_memory_less_node() and just set the node online. Note that setting the node online is needed, otherwise we choke down the chain when bringup_nonboot_cpus() ends up calling __try_online_node()->register_one_node()->... and we blow up in bus_add_device(). Like can be seen here: ========= [ 0.585060] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000060 [ 0.586091] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 0.586831] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 0.586930] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 0.586930] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 0.586930] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4-1-default+ #45 [ 0.586930] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/4 [ 0.586930] RIP: 0010:bus_add_device+0x5a/0x140 [ 0.586930] Code: 8b 74 24 20 48 89 df e8 84 96 ff ff 85 c0 89 c5 75 38 48 8b 53 50 48 85 d2 0f 84 bb 00 004 [ 0.586930] RSP: 0000:ffffc9000022bd10 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 0.586930] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100987400 RCX: ffff8881003e4e19 [ 0.586930] RDX: ffff8881009a5e00 RSI: ffff888100987400 RDI: ffff888100987400 [ 0.586930] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff8881003e4e18 R09: ffff8881003e4c98 [ 0.586930] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff888100402bc0 R12: ffffffff822ceba0 [ 0.586930] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888100987400 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 0.586930] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88853fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.586930] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 000000000200a001 CR4: 00000000001706b0 [ 0.586930] Call Trace: [ 0.586930] [ 0.586930] device_add+0x4c0/0x910 [ 0.586930] __register_one_node+0x97/0x2d0 [ 0.586930] __try_online_node+0x85/0xc0 [ 0.586930] try_online_node+0x25/0x40 [ 0.586930] cpu_up+0x4f/0x100 [ 0.586930] bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 [ 0.586930] smp_init+0x26/0x79 [ 0.586930] kernel_init_freeable+0x130/0x2f1 [ 0.586930] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100 [ 0.586930] kernel_init+0x17/0x150 [ 0.586930] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100 [ 0.586930] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 0.586930] [ 0.586930] Modules linked in: [ 0.586930] CR2: 0000000000000060 [ 0.586930] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ========= The reason is simple, by the time bringup_nonboot_cpus() gets called, we did not register the node_subsys bus yet, so we crash when bus_add_device() tries to dereference bus()->p. The following shows the order of the calls: kernel_init_freeable smp_init bringup_nonboot_cpus ... bus_add_device() <- we did not register node_subsys yet do_basic_setup do_initcalls postcore_initcall(register_node_type); register_node_type subsys_system_register subsys_register bus_register <- register node_subsys bus Why setting the node online saves us then? Well, simply because __try_online_node() backs off when the node is online, meaning we do not end up calling register_one_node() in the first place. This is subtle, broken and deserves a deep analysis and thought about how to put this into shape, but for now let us have this easy fix for the leaking memory issue. Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador Fixes: da4490c958ad ("mm: handle uninitialized numa nodes gracefully") Acked-by: Michal Hocko --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 15 ++------------- include/linux/mm.h | 1 - mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index c6b1213086d6..37039a6af8ae 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -738,17 +738,6 @@ void __init x86_numa_init(void) numa_init(dummy_numa_init); } -static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid) -{ - /* Allocate and initialize node data. Memory-less node is now online.*/ - alloc_node_data(nid); - free_area_init_memoryless_node(nid); - - /* - * All zonelists will be built later in start_kernel() after per cpu - * areas are initialized. - */ -} /* * A node may exist which has one or more Generic Initiators but no CPUs and no @@ -768,7 +757,7 @@ void __init init_gi_nodes(void) for_each_node_state(nid, N_GENERIC_INITIATOR) if (!node_online(nid)) - init_memory_less_node(nid); + node_set_online(nid); } /* @@ -799,7 +788,7 @@ void __init init_cpu_to_node(void) continue; if (!node_online(node)) - init_memory_less_node(node); + node_set_online(node); numa_set_node(cpu, node); } diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 213cc569b192..9ff1c4c8449e 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2453,7 +2453,6 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pud_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud) } extern void __init pagecache_init(void); -extern void __init free_area_init_memoryless_node(int nid); extern void free_initmem(void); /* diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 83da2279be72..967085c1c78a 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7698,7 +7698,7 @@ static void __init free_area_init_node(int nid) free_area_init_core(pgdat); } -void __init free_area_init_memoryless_node(int nid) +static void __init free_area_init_memoryless_node(int nid) { free_area_init_node(nid); }