From patchwork Fri Feb 25 07:47:28 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Steffen Klassert X-Patchwork-Id: 12759762 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E97C433FE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238250AbiBYHsR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 02:48:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238240AbiBYHsO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 02:48:14 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E97C1B01A6 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 23:47:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795A720538; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udJm0XkQITjD; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B3FA2057A; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058FF80004A; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.18; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:37 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.18; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:36 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A18AA31801E9; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:36 +0100 (CET) From: Steffen Klassert To: David Miller , Jakub Kicinski CC: Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , Subject: [PATCH 1/6] xfrm: fix MTU regression Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20220225074733.118664-2-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220225074733.118664-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> References: <20220225074733.118664-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Jiri Bohac Commit 749439bfac6e1a2932c582e2699f91d329658196 ("ipv6: fix udpv6 sendmsg crash caused by too small MTU") breaks PMTU for xfrm. A Packet Too Big ICMPv6 message received in response to an ESP packet will prevent all further communication through the tunnel if the reported MTU minus the ESP overhead is smaller than 1280. E.g. in a case of a tunnel-mode ESP with sha256/aes the overhead is 92 bytes. Receiving a PTB with MTU of 1371 or less will result in all further packets in the tunnel dropped. A ping through the tunnel fails with "ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument". Apparently the MTU on the xfrm route is smaller than 1280 and fails the check inside ip6_setup_cork() added by 749439bf. We found this by debugging USGv6/ipv6ready failures. Failing tests are: "Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario IPsec" / 5.3.11 and 5.4.11 (Tunnel Mode: Fragmentation). Commit b515d2637276a3810d6595e10ab02c13bfd0b63a ("xfrm: xfrm_state_mtu should return at least 1280 for ipv6") attempted to fix this but caused another regression in TCP MSS calculations and had to be reverted. The patch below fixes the situation by dropping the MTU check and instead checking for the underflows described in the 749439bf commit message. Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac Fixes: 749439bfac6e ("ipv6: fix udpv6 sendmsg crash caused by too small MTU") Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c index 2995f8d89e7e..4ff110214dea 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c @@ -1408,8 +1408,6 @@ static int ip6_setup_cork(struct sock *sk, struct inet_cork_full *cork, if (np->frag_size) mtu = np->frag_size; } - if (mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU) - return -EINVAL; cork->base.fragsize = mtu; cork->base.gso_size = ipc6->gso_size; cork->base.tx_flags = 0; @@ -1471,8 +1469,6 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk, fragheaderlen = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + rt->rt6i_nfheader_len + (opt ? opt->opt_nflen : 0); - maxfraglen = ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen - - sizeof(struct frag_hdr); headersize = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + (opt ? opt->opt_flen + opt->opt_nflen : 0) + @@ -1480,6 +1476,13 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk, sizeof(struct frag_hdr) : 0) + rt->rt6i_nfheader_len; + if (mtu < fragheaderlen || + ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen < sizeof(struct frag_hdr)) + goto emsgsize; + + maxfraglen = ((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen - + sizeof(struct frag_hdr); + /* as per RFC 7112 section 5, the entire IPv6 Header Chain must fit * the first fragment */