From patchwork Wed Apr 27 12:47:20 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 12828771 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EA7C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234169AbiD0MgY (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234069AbiD0MgX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:23 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73371FD31; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100003.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KpJ6S1Wf3zfZrg; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:32:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:10 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:09 +0800 From: Yu Kuai To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH -next v3 1/3] block, bfq: record how many queues are busy in bfq_group Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:47:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20220427124722.48465-2-yukuai3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> References: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Prepare to refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'. Add a counter 'busy_queues' in bfq_group, and update it in bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy(). Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 1 + block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 ++ block/bfq-wf2q.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index 09574af83566..4d516879d9fa 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ static void bfq_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) */ bfqg->bfqd = bfqd; bfqg->active_entities = 0; + bfqg->busy_queues = 0; bfqg->online = true; bfqg->rq_pos_tree = RB_ROOT; } diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 978ef5d6fe6a..3847f4ab77ac 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -906,6 +906,7 @@ struct bfq_group_data { * are groups with more than one active @bfq_entity * (see the comments to the function * bfq_bfqq_may_idle()). + * @busy_queues: number of busy bfqqs. * @rq_pos_tree: rbtree sorted by next_request position, used when * determining if two or more queues have interleaving * requests (see bfq_find_close_cooperator()). @@ -942,6 +943,7 @@ struct bfq_group { struct bfq_entity *my_entity; int active_entities; + int busy_queues; struct rb_root rq_pos_tree; diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c index f8eb340381cf..53826797430f 100644 --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c @@ -218,6 +218,14 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity) return false; } +static void bfq_update_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_add) +{ + if (is_add) + bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues++; + else + bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues--; +} + #else /* CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */ static bool bfq_update_parent_budget(struct bfq_entity *next_in_service) @@ -230,6 +238,10 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity) return true; } +static void bfq_update_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_add) +{ +} + #endif /* CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */ /* @@ -1660,6 +1672,7 @@ void bfq_del_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bfq_clear_bfqq_busy(bfqq); bfqd->busy_queues[bfqq->ioprio_class - 1]--; + bfq_update_busy_queues(bfqq, false); if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1) bfqd->wr_busy_queues--; @@ -1683,6 +1696,7 @@ void bfq_add_bfqq_busy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_mark_bfqq_busy(bfqq); bfqd->busy_queues[bfqq->ioprio_class - 1]++; + bfq_update_busy_queues(bfqq, true); if (!bfqq->dispatched) if (bfqq->wr_coeff == 1) From patchwork Wed Apr 27 12:47:21 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 12828773 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC27DC433FE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234222AbiD0Mg1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234179AbiD0MgZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:25 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B144C7BF; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KpJ7F5NVxzhYqG; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:32:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:11 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:10 +0800 From: Yu Kuai To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH -next v3 2/3] block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:47:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20220427124722.48465-3-yukuai3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> References: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they are not issued from root group. This is because 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs': Before this patch: 1) root group will never be counted. 2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests. 3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests. After this patch: 1) root group is counted. 2) Count if bfqg have at least one bfqq that is marked busy. 3) Don't count if bfqg doesn't have any busy bfqqs. With this change, the occasion that only one group is activated can be detected, and next patch will support concurrent sync io in the occasion. This patch also rename 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' to 'num_groups_with_busy_queues'. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 46 ++------------------------------------- block/bfq-iosched.h | 52 ++++++--------------------------------------- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 23 ++++++-------------- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index e47c75f1fa0f..609b4e894684 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd, return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED - || bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0 + || bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues > 0 #endif ; } @@ -962,48 +962,6 @@ void __bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { - struct bfq_entity *entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - - for_each_entity(entity) { - struct bfq_sched_data *sd = entity->my_sched_data; - - if (sd->next_in_service || sd->in_service_entity) { - /* - * entity is still active, because either - * next_in_service or in_service_entity is not - * NULL (see the comments on the definition of - * next_in_service for details on why - * in_service_entity must be checked too). - * - * As a consequence, its parent entities are - * active as well, and thus this loop must - * stop here. - */ - break; - } - - /* - * The decrement of num_groups_with_pending_reqs is - * not performed immediately upon the deactivation of - * entity, but it is delayed to when it also happens - * that the first leaf descendant bfqq of entity gets - * all its pending requests completed. The following - * instructions perform this delayed decrement, if - * needed. See the comments on - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs for details. - */ - if (entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) { - entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = false; - bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs--; - } - } - - /* - * Next function is invoked last, because it causes bfqq to be - * freed if the following holds: bfqq is not in service and - * has no dispatched request. DO NOT use bfqq after the next - * function invocation. - */ __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, &bfqd->queue_weights_tree); } @@ -7107,7 +7065,7 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) bfqd->idle_slice_timer.function = bfq_idle_slice_timer; bfqd->queue_weights_tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED; - bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs = 0; + bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues = 0; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->active_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->idle_list); diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 3847f4ab77ac..5889883ef68a 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -495,52 +495,14 @@ struct bfq_data { struct rb_root_cached queue_weights_tree; /* - * Number of groups with at least one descendant process that - * has at least one request waiting for completion. Note that - * this accounts for also requests already dispatched, but not - * yet completed. Therefore this number of groups may differ - * (be larger) than the number of active groups, as a group is - * considered active only if its corresponding entity has - * descendant queues with at least one request queued. This - * number is used to decide whether a scenario is symmetric. - * For a detailed explanation see comments on the computation - * of the variable asymmetric_scenario in the function - * bfq_better_to_idle(). - * - * However, it is hard to compute this number exactly, for - * groups with multiple descendant processes. Consider a group - * that is inactive, i.e., that has no descendant process with - * pending I/O inside BFQ queues. Then suppose that - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs is still accounting for this - * group, because the group has descendant processes with some - * I/O request still in flight. num_groups_with_pending_reqs - * should be decremented when the in-flight request of the - * last descendant process is finally completed (assuming that - * nothing else has changed for the group in the meantime, in - * terms of composition of the group and active/inactive state of child - * groups and processes). To accomplish this, an additional - * pending-request counter must be added to entities, and must - * be updated correctly. To avoid this additional field and operations, - * we resort to the following tradeoff between simplicity and - * accuracy: for an inactive group that is still counted in - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs, we decrement - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs when the first descendant - * process of the group remains with no request waiting for - * completion. - * - * Even this simpler decrement strategy requires a little - * carefulness: to avoid multiple decrements, we flag a group, - * more precisely an entity representing a group, as still - * counted in num_groups_with_pending_reqs when it becomes - * inactive. Then, when the first descendant queue of the - * entity remains with no request waiting for completion, - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs is decremented, and this flag - * is reset. After this flag is reset for the entity, - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs won't be decremented any - * longer in case a new descendant queue of the entity remains - * with no request waiting for completion. + * Number of groups with at leaset one bfqq that is marked busy, + * and this number is used to decide whether a scenario is symmetric. + * Note that bfqq is busy doesn't mean that the bfqq contains requests. + * If idling is needed for service guarantees, bfqq will stay busy + * after dispatching the last request, see details in + * __bfq_bfqq_expire(). */ - unsigned int num_groups_with_pending_reqs; + unsigned int num_groups_with_busy_queues; /* * Per-class (RT, BE, IDLE) number of bfq_queues containing diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c index 53826797430f..24c90378f1d4 100644 --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c @@ -220,10 +220,12 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity) static void bfq_update_busy_queues(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_add) { - if (is_add) - bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues++; - else - bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues--; + if (is_add) { + if (!(bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues++)) + bfqq->bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues++; + } else if (!(--bfqq_group(bfqq)->busy_queues)) { + bfqq->bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues--; + } } #else /* CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED */ @@ -996,19 +998,6 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity, entity->on_st_or_in_serv = true; } -#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED - if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity)) { /* bfq_group */ - struct bfq_group *bfqg = - container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity); - struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd; - - if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) { - entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = true; - bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs++; - } - } -#endif - bfq_update_fin_time_enqueue(entity, st, backshifted); } From patchwork Wed Apr 27 12:47:22 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 12828774 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A63C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234249AbiD0Mg3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58406 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234201AbiD0MgZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:36:25 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3CB4CD40; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi100002.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KpJ2H1m2xzCs1M; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:28:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) by kwepemi100002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.188) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:11 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:33:11 +0800 From: Yu Kuai To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH -next v3 3/3] block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:47:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20220427124722.48465-4-yukuai3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> References: <20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemm600009.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.164) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Now that root group is counted into 'num_groups_with_busy_queues', 'num_groups_with_busy_queues > 0' is always true in bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). Thus change the condition to '> 1'. On the other hand, this change can enable concurrent sync io if only one group is activated. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 609b4e894684..aeba9001da0b 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd, return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED - || bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues > 0 + || bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues > 1 #endif ; }