From patchwork Mon Aug 15 02:33:42 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Liu Jian X-Patchwork-Id: 12943041 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F778C25B06 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 02:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231705AbiHOCai (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:30:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57908 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230096AbiHOCag (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:30:36 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC655599 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M5dVw5fgSzmVX4; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:28:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.101.6) by canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:30:31 +0800 From: Liu Jian To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] sk_msg: Keep reference on socket file while wait_memory Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:33:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20220815023343.295094-2-liujian56@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20220815023343.295094-1-liujian56@huawei.com> References: <20220815023343.295094-1-liujian56@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.101.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Fix the below NULL pointer dereference: [ 14.471200] Call Trace: [ 14.471562] [ 14.471882] lock_acquire+0x245/0x2e0 [ 14.472416] ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50 [ 14.473014] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x17/0x50 [ 14.473681] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x50 [ 14.474318] ? remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50 [ 14.474907] remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x50 [ 14.475480] sk_stream_wait_memory+0x20d/0x340 [ 14.476127] ? do_wait_intr_irq+0x80/0x80 [ 14.476704] do_tcp_sendpages+0x287/0x600 [ 14.477283] tcp_bpf_push+0xab/0x260 [ 14.477817] tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir+0x297/0x500 [ 14.478461] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x77/0xe0 [ 14.479096] tcp_bpf_send_verdict+0x105/0x470 [ 14.479729] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x318/0x4f0 [ 14.480311] sock_sendmsg+0x2d/0x40 [ 14.480822] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 14.481390] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80 [ 14.482048] ___sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 [ 14.482580] ? vmf_insert_pfn_prot+0x91/0x150 [ 14.483215] ? __do_fault+0x2a/0x1a0 [ 14.483738] ? do_fault+0x15e/0x5d0 [ 14.484246] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x56b/0x1040 [ 14.484874] ? lock_is_held_type+0xdf/0x130 [ 14.485474] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 14.486046] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70 [ 14.486587] __sys_sendmsg+0x41/0x70 [ 14.487105] ? intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core+0x350/0x350 [ 14.487822] do_syscall_64+0x34/0x80 [ 14.488345] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd The test scene as following flow: thread1 thread2 ----------- --------------- tcp_bpf_sendmsg tcp_bpf_send_verdict tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir sock_close tcp_bpf_push_locked __sock_release tcp_bpf_push //inet_release do_tcp_sendpages sock->ops->release sk_stream_wait_memory // tcp_close sk_wait_event sk->sk_prot->close release_sock(__sk); *** lock_sock(sk); __tcp_close sock_orphan(sk) sk->sk_wq = NULL release_sock **** lock_sock(__sk); remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); sk_sleep(sk) //NULL pointer dereference &rcu_dereference_raw(sk->sk_wq)->wait While waiting for memory in thread1, the socket is released with its wait queue because thread2 has closed it. This caused by tcp_bpf_send_verdict didn't increase the f_count of psock->sk_redir->sk_socket->file in thread1. Avoid it by keeping a reference to the socket file while redirect sock wait send memory. Refer to [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190211090949.18560-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/ Signed-off-by: Liu Jian Tested-by: Liu Jian --- net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c index a1626afe87a1..201375829367 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c @@ -125,9 +125,17 @@ static int tcp_bpf_push_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, { int ret; + /* Hold on to socket wait queue. */ + if (sk->sk_socket && sk->sk_socket->file) + get_file(sk->sk_socket->file); + lock_sock(sk); ret = tcp_bpf_push(sk, msg, apply_bytes, flags, uncharge); release_sock(sk); + + if (sk->sk_socket && sk->sk_socket->file) + fput(sk->sk_socket->file); + return ret; } From patchwork Mon Aug 15 02:33:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Liu Jian X-Patchwork-Id: 12943039 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D71C3F6B0 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 02:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230009AbiHOCah (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:30:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57916 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231705AbiHOCah (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:30:37 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264AC6155 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 19:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4M5dVw6cFyzmVkp; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:28:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.101.6) by canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:30:32 +0800 From: Liu Jian To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add wait send memory test for sockmap redirect Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:33:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20220815023343.295094-3-liujian56@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20220815023343.295094-1-liujian56@huawei.com> References: <20220815023343.295094-1-liujian56@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.101.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To canpemm500010.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.118) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Add one test for wait redirect sock's send memory test for sockmap. Signed-off-by: Liu Jian --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c index 0fbaccdc8861..95b9b45ad028 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct sockmap_options { bool data_test; bool drop_expected; bool check_recved_len; + bool tx_wait_mem; int iov_count; int iov_length; int rate; @@ -578,6 +579,10 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt, sent = sendmsg(fd, &msg, flags); if (!drop && sent < 0) { + if (opt->tx_wait_mem && errno == EACCES) { + errno = 0; + goto out_errno; + } perror("sendmsg loop error"); goto out_errno; } else if (drop && sent >= 0) { @@ -644,6 +649,15 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt, goto out_errno; } + if (opt->tx_wait_mem) { + FD_ZERO(&w); + FD_SET(fd, &w); + slct = select(max_fd + 1, NULL, NULL, &w, &timeout); + errno = 0; + close(fd); + goto out_errno; + } + errno = 0; if (peek_flag) { flags |= MSG_PEEK; @@ -752,6 +766,22 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt) return err; } + if (opt->tx_wait_mem) { + struct timeval timeout; + int rxtx_buf_len = 1024; + + timeout.tv_sec = 3; + timeout.tv_usec = 0; + + err = setsockopt(c2, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, &timeout, sizeof(struct timeval)); + err |= setsockopt(c2, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUFFORCE, &rxtx_buf_len, sizeof(int)); + err |= setsockopt(p2, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, &rxtx_buf_len, sizeof(int)); + if (err) { + perror("setsockopt failed()"); + return errno; + } + } + rxpid = fork(); if (rxpid == 0) { if (txmsg_pop || txmsg_start_pop) @@ -788,6 +818,9 @@ static int sendmsg_test(struct sockmap_options *opt) return errno; } + if (opt->tx_wait_mem) + close(c2); + txpid = fork(); if (txpid == 0) { if (opt->sendpage) @@ -1452,6 +1485,14 @@ static void test_txmsg_redir(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) test_send(opt, cgrp); } +static void test_txmsg_redir_wait_sndmem(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) +{ + txmsg_redir = 1; + opt->tx_wait_mem = true; + test_send_large(opt, cgrp); + opt->tx_wait_mem = false; +} + static void test_txmsg_drop(int cgrp, struct sockmap_options *opt) { txmsg_drop = 1; @@ -1800,6 +1841,7 @@ static int populate_progs(char *bpf_file) struct _test test[] = { {"txmsg test passthrough", test_txmsg_pass}, {"txmsg test redirect", test_txmsg_redir}, + {"txmsg test redirect wait send mem", test_txmsg_redir_wait_sndmem}, {"txmsg test drop", test_txmsg_drop}, {"txmsg test ingress redirect", test_txmsg_ingress_redir}, {"txmsg test skb", test_txmsg_skb},