From patchwork Wed Sep 21 08:43:01 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yicong Yang X-Patchwork-Id: 12983383 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6690C6FA97 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B15AD6B0074; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AC35D6B0075; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 91530940007; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830F66B0074 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576F5160FB6 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79935459198.19.355258D Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C7F100023 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MXX3m3J9RzpT1K; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:42:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.164.66) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:45:32 +0800 From: Yicong Yang To: , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, , , , , Anshuman Khandual Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer() Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:43:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20220921084302.43631-2-yangyicong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.0 In-Reply-To: <20220921084302.43631-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> References: <20220921084302.43631-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.164.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1663749938; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=70rGSZEssMg2bc9Zf1Ms3XIYm3n1v2oYiXqquJpgT/4TXErYUfrdgsh4jZd2AbWDvbLcB2 tL+QgL+9Uiiy0qOhf4y/tivGqwSbu8ZCAIUWZhWB3C+1bFkSqqz2f+pI1vg1/HE/gj9eeG 4jXq3a+D1mJ+p6TZY7lmElSArs3hwrg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1663749938; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fwdX5wy3+cKvG6aOEYolkkFG2V2miohPLCWFPLGyccE=; b=lRCqvMA39xp9iuNBX+D+U5U1PLiqitpTPs2uN15TnJMInZe1gMXMNXhjsWgX1nUhBJJhux FFalcczD99wiEcAo3kOmsSE+GqU+pFgkw1dw/X7U9ILwS9elcT2ICacSKC7/QxImQaqnUk MbD2cBvAIb1tyD8rlWy6bw54zzrJWFc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of yangyicong@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.187 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yangyicong@huawei.com X-Stat-Signature: orag6u1y5gppc15buygyeuuzq3pit9yi X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 74C7F100023 Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of yangyicong@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.187 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yangyicong@huawei.com X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1663749937-979847 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Anshuman Khandual The entire scheme of deferred TLB flush in reclaim path rests on the fact that the cost to refill TLB entries is less than flushing out individual entries by sending IPI to remote CPUs. But architecture can have different ways to evaluate that. Hence apart from checking TTU_BATCH_FLUSH in the TTU flags, rest of the decision should be architecture specific. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual [https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20171101101735.2318-2-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com/] Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang [Rebase and fix incorrect return value type] Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual Reviewed-by: Barry Song --- arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 ++++++++++++ mm/rmap.c | 9 +-------- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h index cda3118f3b27..8a497d902c16 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -240,6 +240,18 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long a) flush_tlb_mm_range(vma->vm_mm, a, a + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIFT, false); } +static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + bool should_defer = false; + + /* If remote CPUs need to be flushed then defer batch the flush */ + if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), get_cpu()) < nr_cpu_ids) + should_defer = true; + put_cpu(); + + return should_defer; +} + static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm) { /* diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 93d5a6f793d2..cd8cf5cb0b01 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -690,17 +690,10 @@ static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, bool writable) */ static bool should_defer_flush(struct mm_struct *mm, enum ttu_flags flags) { - bool should_defer = false; - if (!(flags & TTU_BATCH_FLUSH)) return false; - /* If remote CPUs need to be flushed then defer batch the flush */ - if (cpumask_any_but(mm_cpumask(mm), get_cpu()) < nr_cpu_ids) - should_defer = true; - put_cpu(); - - return should_defer; + return arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(mm); } /* From patchwork Wed Sep 21 08:43:02 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yicong Yang X-Patchwork-Id: 12983382 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A393C6FA93 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 60C2A6B0073; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5938E6B0074; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4355D6B0075; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E856B0073 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 04:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DEA140FEA for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79935459156.26.872D87A Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24AE20031 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MXX2W1R9QzmWKW; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:41:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.164.66) by canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:45:34 +0800 From: Yicong Yang To: , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, , , , , Barry Song , Nadav Amit , Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:43:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20220921084302.43631-3-yangyicong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.0 In-Reply-To: <20220921084302.43631-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> References: <20220921084302.43631-1-yangyicong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.164.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To canpemm500009.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.203) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1663749938; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/NT5pK+wDUfgiQ2VKn7F3jsBI6wxWUgw9jOJFSCTVrY=; b=U9c5vScBb2Y59CdyJbxwgJsIUBONyIlSfe6SaxR+uf52Oxul2YVxl15RX0COaD9RFhmRkB elWyrgeuF9SDyGe0ntqQUwafG15exuceoDHxi2em6qsPOGkQXLu0xKCyoGkQDTb7wkHiy9 IFa7ydZNoAtG9B8IkggnznIZzParm2k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of yangyicong@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yangyicong@huawei.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1663749938; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Md8y/ew285xdBoFqeM6Tu16ag0UZbI5Ep8JXAYmfHQO20qMWsUgsGNEbAhOvdwMceD6guh 5a3VCQOUVeR2/MN6UWyXTmYzrkPDMzWWs7l2hwABNQdX/+GV59Ex8eRZDn1G6y165NuwQI R8FZC7w9vecEG+g6iL6ymff0elKDuGE= X-Stat-Signature: am3qhpy86w56t8k34noy8m177t6sytg8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D24AE20031 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of yangyicong@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yangyicong@huawei.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-HE-Tag: 1663749937-516473 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Barry Song on x86, batched and deferred tlb shootdown has lead to 90% performance increase on tlb shootdown. on arm64, HW can do tlb shootdown without software IPI. But sync tlbi is still quite expensive. Even running a simplest program which requires swapout can prove this is true, #include #include #include #include int main() { #define SIZE (1 * 1024 * 1024) volatile unsigned char *p = mmap(NULL, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); memset(p, 0x88, SIZE); for (int k = 0; k < 10000; k++) { /* swap in */ for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i += 4096) { (void)p[i]; } /* swap out */ madvise(p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT); } } Perf result on snapdragon 888 with 8 cores by using zRAM as the swap block device. ~ # perf record taskset -c 4 ./a.out [ perf record: Woken up 10 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 2.297 MB perf.data (60084 samples) ] ~ # perf report # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 60K of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 35706225414 # # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol # ........ ....... ................. ............................................................................. # 21.07% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq 8.23% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore 6.67% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] filemap_map_pages 6.16% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __zram_bvec_write 5.36% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ptep_clear_flush 3.71% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock 3.49% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] memset64 1.63% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] clear_page 1.42% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock 1.26% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mod_zone_state.llvm.8525150236079521930 1.23% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] xas_load 1.15% a.out [kernel.kallsyms] [k] zram_slot_lock ptep_clear_flush() takes 5.36% CPU in the micro-benchmark swapping in/out a page mapped by only one process. If the page is mapped by multiple processes, typically, like more than 100 on a phone, the overhead would be much higher as we have to run tlb flush 100 times for one single page. Plus, tlb flush overhead will increase with the number of CPU cores due to the bad scalability of tlb shootdown in HW, so those ARM64 servers should expect much higher overhead. Further perf annonate shows 95% cpu time of ptep_clear_flush is actually used by the final dsb() to wait for the completion of tlb flush. This provides us a very good chance to leverage the existing batched tlb in kernel. The minimum modification is that we only send async tlbi in the first stage and we send dsb while we have to sync in the second stage. With the above simplest micro benchmark, collapsed time to finish the program decreases around 5%. Typical collapsed time w/o patch: ~ # time taskset -c 4 ./a.out 0.21user 14.34system 0:14.69elapsed w/ patch: ~ # time taskset -c 4 ./a.out 0.22user 13.45system 0:13.80elapsed Also, Yicong Yang added the following observation. Tested with benchmark in the commit on Kunpeng920 arm64 server, observed an improvement around 12.5% with command `time ./swap_bench`. w/o w/ real 0m13.460s 0m11.771s user 0m0.248s 0m0.279s sys 0m12.039s 0m11.458s Originally it's noticed a 16.99% overhead of ptep_clear_flush() which has been eliminated by this patch: [root@localhost yang]# perf record -- ./swap_bench && perf report [...] 16.99% swap_bench [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ptep_clear_flush Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Nadav Amit Cc: Mel Gorman Tested-by: Yicong Yang Tested-by: Xin Hao Signed-off-by: Barry Song Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang --- .../features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt | 2 +- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h | 12 ++++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 3 +- mm/rmap.c | 10 +++-- 6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h diff --git a/Documentation/features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt b/Documentation/features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt index 039e4e91ada3..2caf815d7c6c 100644 --- a/Documentation/features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt +++ b/Documentation/features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ | alpha: | TODO | | arc: | TODO | | arm: | TODO | - | arm64: | N/A | + | arm64: | ok | | csky: | TODO | | hexagon: | TODO | | ia64: | TODO | diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 1ce7685ad5de..40da6984f303 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ config ARM64 select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if CC_HAS_INT128 select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK + select ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION if COMPAT select ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_BPF_JIT select ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..fedb0b87b8db --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _ARCH_ARM64_TLBBATCH_H +#define _ARCH_ARM64_TLBBATCH_H + +struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch { + /* + * For arm64, HW can do tlb shootdown, so we don't + * need to record cpumask for sending IPI + */ +}; + +#endif /* _ARCH_ARM64_TLBBATCH_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h index 412a3b9a3c25..1b4df0352960 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -254,17 +254,24 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) dsb(ish); } -static inline void flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + +static inline void __flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long uaddr) { unsigned long addr; dsb(ishst); - addr = __TLBI_VADDR(uaddr, ASID(vma->vm_mm)); + addr = __TLBI_VADDR(uaddr, ASID(mm)); __tlbi(vale1is, addr); __tlbi_user(vale1is, addr); } +static inline void flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long uaddr) +{ + return __flush_tlb_page_nosync(vma->vm_mm, uaddr); +} + static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long uaddr) { @@ -272,6 +279,32 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, dsb(ish); } +static inline bool arch_tlbbatch_should_defer(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + /* for small systems with small number of CPUs, TLB shootdown is cheap */ + if (num_online_cpus() <= 4) + return false; + +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI + if (unlikely(this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI))) + return false; +#endif + + return true; +} + +static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_mm(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long uaddr) +{ + __flush_tlb_page_nosync(mm, uaddr); +} + +static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch) +{ + dsb(ish); +} + /* * This is meant to avoid soft lock-ups on large TLB flushing ranges and not * necessarily a performance improvement. diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h index 8a497d902c16..5bd78ae55cd4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm) } static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_mm(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch, - struct mm_struct *mm) + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long uaddr) { inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm); cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm)); diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index cd8cf5cb0b01..e060cc0187cd 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -645,12 +645,13 @@ void try_to_unmap_flush_dirty(void) #define TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_LARGE \ (TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_PENDING_MASK / 2) -static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, bool writable) +static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, bool writable, + unsigned long uaddr) { struct tlbflush_unmap_batch *tlb_ubc = ¤t->tlb_ubc; int batch, nbatch; - arch_tlbbatch_add_mm(&tlb_ubc->arch, mm); + arch_tlbbatch_add_mm(&tlb_ubc->arch, mm, uaddr); tlb_ubc->flush_required = true; /* @@ -728,7 +729,8 @@ void flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm) } } #else -static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, bool writable) +static void set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(struct mm_struct *mm, bool writable, + unsigned long uaddr) { } @@ -1590,7 +1592,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma, */ pteval = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pvmw.pte); - set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pte_dirty(pteval)); + set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending(mm, pte_dirty(pteval), address); } else { pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte); }