From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:04 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012710 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53155C433FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230128AbiJTHM6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:12:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230099AbiJTHMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:12:55 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D29D159A1D for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666249973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vvc9nSeTOx+R9O1KRdNsOErR2cLTeHQp0FKXCgftjxs=; b=YSTBEAKdcWImZSrGfojiqyqjBrO14lwizd352jwNpYNwG8pi7uNxvpJr9Lohy9doahirJ/ XW5tzWOH/BOS6Xf8xaviOqdqv1BY4oeTSmjXtMee9IYkRkwLCldCbMNrbwDgmmz3+PEhN3 JHauLdDoAMNtmuZD/COHM0bnJ19hcB4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-296-nI8UtPRCNiuaY4FWD93Yig-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:12:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nI8UtPRCNiuaY4FWD93Yig-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B56101A528; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574EA40C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm() Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:04 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-2-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org In prepare_vm(), 'data->nslots' is assigned with 'max_mem_slots - 1' at the beginning, meaning they are interchangeable. Use 'data->nslots' isntead of 'max_mem_slots - 1'. With this, it becomes easier to move the logic of probing number of slots into upper layer in subsequent patches. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index 44995446d942..231cc8449c2e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -280,14 +280,14 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n", - max_mem_slots - 1, data->pages_per_slot, rempages); + data->nslots, data->pages_per_slot, rempages); clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tstart); - for (slot = 1, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < max_mem_slots; slot++) { + for (slot = 1, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot <= data->nslots; slot++) { uint64_t npages; npages = data->pages_per_slot; - if (slot == max_mem_slots - 1) + if (slot == data->nslots) npages += rempages; vm_userspace_mem_region_add(data->vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, @@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, } *slot_runtime = timespec_elapsed(tstart); - for (slot = 0, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < max_mem_slots - 1; slot++) { + for (slot = 0, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < data->nslots; slot++) { uint64_t npages; uint64_t gpa; npages = data->pages_per_slot; - if (slot == max_mem_slots - 2) + if (slot == data->nslots - 1) npages += rempages; gpa = vm_phy_pages_alloc(data->vm, npages, guest_addr, From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:05 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012711 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D837C433FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230182AbiJTHNI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54626 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230130AbiJTHNC (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B6D15ECCC for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666249979; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9FjkKJ4RB0wBhJUFjtqAZ3VQdnrJF4akYRPmacZ3lG8=; b=iSXtiOmC9cAbBMxcfNza3b9SOSV1MzCt3/LKSneqeR8oMagT0JKBAE/cHH/NYypKfpPZfY nxSKlM4DR+L7Tx5KcdB6JmIITpQFHBs8AZmuNDhvWqrX6gJO02Z9lj7KKkphOgBxniXW0l IAGrZNgtqiyVxNfgOISjLfz2IrVcjQw= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-86-n3h-O6ciMHaqmna_rDKDRg-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:12:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: n3h-O6ciMHaqmna_rDKDRg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E665E800186; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17E540C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate loop conditions in prepare_vm() Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-3-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org There are two loops in prepare_vm(), which have different conditions. 'slot' is treated as meory slot index in the first loop, but index of the host virtual address array in the second loop. It makes it a bit hard to understand the code. Change the usage of 'slot' in the second loop, to treat it as the memory slot index either. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index 231cc8449c2e..dcb492b3f27b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -297,21 +297,20 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, } *slot_runtime = timespec_elapsed(tstart); - for (slot = 0, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < data->nslots; slot++) { + for (slot = 1, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot <= data->nslots; slot++) { uint64_t npages; uint64_t gpa; npages = data->pages_per_slot; - if (slot == data->nslots - 1) + if (slot == data->nslots) npages += rempages; - gpa = vm_phy_pages_alloc(data->vm, npages, guest_addr, - slot + 1); + gpa = vm_phy_pages_alloc(data->vm, npages, guest_addr, slot); TEST_ASSERT(gpa == guest_addr, "vm_phy_pages_alloc() failed\n"); - data->hva_slots[slot] = addr_gpa2hva(data->vm, guest_addr); - memset(data->hva_slots[slot], 0, npages * 4096); + data->hva_slots[slot - 1] = addr_gpa2hva(data->vm, guest_addr); + memset(data->hva_slots[slot - 1], 0, npages * 4096); guest_addr += npages * 4096; } From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:06 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012714 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E93DC4332F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230229AbiJTHOJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:14:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230056AbiJTHNv (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:51 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B571633A7 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666249990; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PqVmt5YoyTpdybpQLaBWLMwp2J8t1L+xxmd4ToLLOLQ=; b=aLY5hB1hxUFIZ6WMYswATV03BxnRPWeK4y/laIHKccW4F+Dp+SZ7leZ/yKat8NquFWAN4K 3viVIKbpNYXA2NMePt/k9FmXXm0NtFaWMeXvGOtD4IZLsXiY/E9OvGMdC+BNW4vKNFIhsM ogWAGaGe8AUtYzeNL9WbHeQ9EQV6pe8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-330-gKNIcA3RMcqrmkokm2R28A-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gKNIcA3RMcqrmkokm2R28A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C39AB86F123; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7057E40C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:12:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:06 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-4-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not free and unnecessary. Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args() for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 32 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index dcb492b3f27b..f0ea3f75b6e1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages, struct timespec *slot_runtime) { - uint32_t max_mem_slots; uint64_t rempages; uint64_t guest_addr; uint32_t slot; struct timespec tstart; struct sync_area *sync; - max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); - TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1, - "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1"); - TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1, - "Slot count cap should be greater than 1"); - if (nslots != -1) - max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots); - pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots); - TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); data->npages = mempages; - data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1; + data->nslots = nslots; data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots; if (!data->pages_per_slot) { *maxslots = mempages + 1; @@ -869,6 +859,7 @@ static void help(char *name, struct test_args *targs) static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], struct test_args *targs) { + uint32_t max_mem_slots; int opt; while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hvds:f:e:l:r:")) != -1) { @@ -885,8 +876,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], break; case 's': targs->nslots = atoi(optarg); - if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) { - pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n"); + if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) { + pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n"); return false; } break; @@ -932,6 +923,21 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], return false; } + max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); + if (max_mem_slots <= 1) { + pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n"); + return false; + } + + /* Memory slot 0 is reserved */ + if (targs->nslots == -1) + targs->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1; + else + targs->nslots = min_t(int, targs->nslots, max_mem_slots) - 1; + + pr_info_v("Allowed Number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", + targs->nslots + 1); + return true; } From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:07 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012713 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DAEC4332F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230142AbiJTHOH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:14:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54820 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230313AbiJTHNu (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D4D115F902 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666249995; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sBn2f5RrCg6eDGj+T7jO75/kZlHZBldyQBhseLT/saM=; b=RUEFBLfqLzdQKHbcyBU6o/yZKCpQeS8pesiEaElph6NA7HjGfDQniOzskQdDaZl9w9p9X4 w3OKf03M1jaygg5r2KXZyHJFrGMHRbtjbyf8WG7q9JwcyTtMOIvi5VrdzF8eVeZ9TVsbYm FoFQSKaBsrCMsrEQPZpIILWTfU0xgjA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-489-mS_OPMmNPKykPgqmisHLug-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mS_OPMmNPKykPgqmisHLug-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201B486F12C; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6157540C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Support variable guest page size Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-5-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org The test case is obviously broken on aarch64 because non-4KB guest page size is supported. The guest page size on aarch64 could be 4KB, 16KB or 64KB. This supports variable guest page size, mostly for aarch64. - The host determines the guest page size when virtual machine is created. The value is also passed to guest through the synchronization area. - The number of guest pages are unknown until the virtual machine is to be created. So all the related macros are dropped. Instead, their values are dynamically calculated based on the guest page size. - The static checks on memory sizes and pages becomes dependent on guest page size, which is unknown until the virtual machine is about to be created. So all the static checks are converted to dynamic checks, done in check_memory_sizes(). - As the address passed to madvise() should be aligned to host page, the size of page chunk is automatically selected, other than one page. - MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE has fixed and non-working 64KB. It will be consolidated in next patch. However, the comments about how it's calculated has been correct. - All other changes included in this patch are almost mechanical replacing '4096' with 'guest_page_size'. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 210 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index f0ea3f75b6e1..9af61ca8ad0a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -26,14 +26,11 @@ #include #define MEM_SIZE ((512U << 20) + 4096) -#define MEM_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_SIZE / 4096) #define MEM_GPA 0x10000000UL #define MEM_AUX_GPA MEM_GPA #define MEM_SYNC_GPA MEM_AUX_GPA #define MEM_TEST_GPA (MEM_AUX_GPA + 4096) #define MEM_TEST_SIZE (MEM_SIZE - 4096) -static_assert(MEM_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem test size"); /* * 32 MiB is max size that gets well over 100 iterations on 509 slots. @@ -42,43 +39,37 @@ static_assert(MEM_TEST_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid mem test size"); * limited resolution). */ #define MEM_SIZE_MAP ((32U << 20) + 4096) -#define MEM_SIZE_MAP_PAGES (MEM_SIZE_MAP / 4096) #define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE (MEM_SIZE_MAP - 4096) -#define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / 4096) -static_assert(MEM_SIZE_MAP % 4096 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE % 4096 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES % 2 == 0, "invalid map test region size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES > 2, "invalid map test region size"); /* * 128 MiB is min size that fills 32k slots with at least one page in each * while at the same time gets 100+ iterations in such test + * + * 2 MiB chunk size like a typical huge page */ #define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE (128U << 20) -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / 4096) -/* 2 MiB chunk size like a typical huge page */ -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_PAGES (2U << (20 - 12)) -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE, - "invalid unmap test region size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE % 4096 == 0, - "invalid unmap test region size"); -static_assert(MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES % - (2 * MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_PAGES) == 0, - "invalid unmap test region size"); +#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE (2U << 20) /* * For the move active test the middle of the test area is placed on * a memslot boundary: half lies in the memslot being moved, half in * other memslot(s). * - * When running this test with 32k memslots (32764, really) each memslot - * contains 4 pages. - * The last one additionally contains the remaining 21 pages of memory, - * for the total size of 25 pages. - * Hence, the maximum size here is 50 pages. + * We have different number of memory slots, excluding the reserved + * memory slot 0, on various architectures and configurations. The + * memory size in this test is calculated by picking the maximal + * last memory slot's memory size, with alignment to the largest + * supported page size (64KB). In this way, the selected memory + * size for this test is compatible with test_memslot_move_prepare(). + * + * architecture slots memory-per-slot memory-on-last-slot + * -------------------------------------------------------------- + * x86-4KB 32763 16KB 100KB + * arm64-4KB 32766 16KB 52KB + * arm64-16KB 32766 16KB 48KB + * arm64-64KB 8192 64KB 64KB */ -#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE_PAGES (50) -#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE (MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE_PAGES * 4096) +#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE 0x10000 #define MEM_TEST_MOVE_GPA_DEST (MEM_GPA + MEM_SIZE) static_assert(MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE, "invalid move test region size"); @@ -100,6 +91,7 @@ struct vm_data { }; struct sync_area { + uint32_t guest_page_size; atomic_bool start_flag; atomic_bool exit_flag; atomic_bool sync_flag; @@ -192,14 +184,15 @@ static void *vm_gpa2hva(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t gpa, uint64_t *rempages) uint64_t gpage, pgoffs; uint32_t slot, slotoffs; void *base; + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; TEST_ASSERT(gpa >= MEM_GPA, "Too low gpa to translate"); - TEST_ASSERT(gpa < MEM_GPA + data->npages * 4096, + TEST_ASSERT(gpa < MEM_GPA + data->npages * guest_page_size, "Too high gpa to translate"); gpa -= MEM_GPA; - gpage = gpa / 4096; - pgoffs = gpa % 4096; + gpage = gpa / guest_page_size; + pgoffs = gpa % guest_page_size; slot = min(gpage / data->pages_per_slot, (uint64_t)data->nslots - 1); slotoffs = gpage - (slot * data->pages_per_slot); @@ -217,14 +210,16 @@ static void *vm_gpa2hva(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t gpa, uint64_t *rempages) } base = data->hva_slots[slot]; - return (uint8_t *)base + slotoffs * 4096 + pgoffs; + return (uint8_t *)base + slotoffs * guest_page_size + pgoffs; } static uint64_t vm_slot2gpa(struct vm_data *data, uint32_t slot) { + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + TEST_ASSERT(slot < data->nslots, "Too high slot number"); - return MEM_GPA + slot * data->pages_per_slot * 4096; + return MEM_GPA + slot * data->pages_per_slot * guest_page_size; } static struct vm_data *alloc_vm(void) @@ -242,33 +237,35 @@ static struct vm_data *alloc_vm(void) } static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, - void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages, + void *guest_code, uint64_t mem_size, struct timespec *slot_runtime) { - uint64_t rempages; + uint64_t mempages, rempages; uint64_t guest_addr; - uint32_t slot; + uint32_t slot, guest_page_size; struct timespec tstart; struct sync_area *sync; - TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1, - "Can't test without any memory"); + guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; + mempages = mem_size / guest_page_size; + + data->vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&data->vcpu, mempages, guest_code); + ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); + TEST_ASSERT(data->vm->page_size == guest_page_size, "Invalid VM page size"); data->npages = mempages; + TEST_ASSERT(data->npages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); data->nslots = nslots; - data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots; + data->pages_per_slot = data->npages / data->nslots; if (!data->pages_per_slot) { - *maxslots = mempages + 1; + *maxslots = data->npages + 1; return false; } - rempages = mempages % data->nslots; + rempages = data->npages % data->nslots; data->hva_slots = malloc(sizeof(*data->hva_slots) * data->nslots); TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail"); - data->vm = __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&data->vcpu, mempages, guest_code); - ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); - pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n", data->nslots, data->pages_per_slot, rempages); @@ -283,7 +280,7 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, vm_userspace_mem_region_add(data->vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, guest_addr, slot, npages, 0); - guest_addr += npages * 4096; + guest_addr += npages * guest_page_size; } *slot_runtime = timespec_elapsed(tstart); @@ -300,12 +297,12 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, "vm_phy_pages_alloc() failed\n"); data->hva_slots[slot - 1] = addr_gpa2hva(data->vm, guest_addr); - memset(data->hva_slots[slot - 1], 0, npages * 4096); + memset(data->hva_slots[slot - 1], 0, npages * guest_page_size); - guest_addr += npages * 4096; + guest_addr += npages * guest_page_size; } - virt_map(data->vm, MEM_GPA, MEM_GPA, mempages); + virt_map(data->vm, MEM_GPA, MEM_GPA, data->npages); sync = (typeof(sync))vm_gpa2hva(data, MEM_SYNC_GPA, NULL); atomic_init(&sync->start_flag, false); @@ -404,6 +401,7 @@ static bool guest_perform_sync(void) static void guest_code_test_memslot_move(void) { struct sync_area *sync = (typeof(sync))MEM_SYNC_GPA; + uint32_t page_size = (typeof(page_size))READ_ONCE(sync->guest_page_size); uintptr_t base = (typeof(base))READ_ONCE(sync->move_area_ptr); GUEST_SYNC(0); @@ -414,7 +412,7 @@ static void guest_code_test_memslot_move(void) uintptr_t ptr; for (ptr = base; ptr < base + MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE; - ptr += 4096) + ptr += page_size) *(uint64_t *)ptr = MEM_TEST_VAL_1; /* @@ -432,6 +430,7 @@ static void guest_code_test_memslot_move(void) static void guest_code_test_memslot_map(void) { struct sync_area *sync = (typeof(sync))MEM_SYNC_GPA; + uint32_t page_size = (typeof(page_size))READ_ONCE(sync->guest_page_size); GUEST_SYNC(0); @@ -441,14 +440,16 @@ static void guest_code_test_memslot_map(void) uintptr_t ptr; for (ptr = MEM_TEST_GPA; - ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / 2; ptr += 4096) + ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / 2; + ptr += page_size) *(uint64_t *)ptr = MEM_TEST_VAL_1; if (!guest_perform_sync()) break; for (ptr = MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / 2; - ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE; ptr += 4096) + ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE; + ptr += page_size) *(uint64_t *)ptr = MEM_TEST_VAL_2; if (!guest_perform_sync()) @@ -495,6 +496,9 @@ static void guest_code_test_memslot_unmap(void) static void guest_code_test_memslot_rw(void) { + struct sync_area *sync = (typeof(sync))MEM_SYNC_GPA; + uint32_t page_size = (typeof(page_size))READ_ONCE(sync->guest_page_size); + GUEST_SYNC(0); guest_spin_until_start(); @@ -503,14 +507,14 @@ static void guest_code_test_memslot_rw(void) uintptr_t ptr; for (ptr = MEM_TEST_GPA; - ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; ptr += 4096) + ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; ptr += page_size) *(uint64_t *)ptr = MEM_TEST_VAL_1; if (!guest_perform_sync()) break; - for (ptr = MEM_TEST_GPA + 4096 / 2; - ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; ptr += 4096) { + for (ptr = MEM_TEST_GPA + page_size / 2; + ptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; ptr += page_size) { uint64_t val = *(uint64_t *)ptr; GUEST_ASSERT_1(val == MEM_TEST_VAL_2, val); @@ -528,6 +532,8 @@ static bool test_memslot_move_prepare(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync, uint64_t *maxslots, bool isactive) { + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t move_pages = MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE / guest_page_size; uint64_t movesrcgpa, movetestgpa; movesrcgpa = vm_slot2gpa(data, data->nslots - 1); @@ -536,7 +542,7 @@ static bool test_memslot_move_prepare(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t lastpages; vm_gpa2hva(data, movesrcgpa, &lastpages); - if (lastpages < MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE_PAGES / 2) { + if (lastpages < move_pages / 2) { *maxslots = 0; return false; } @@ -582,8 +588,9 @@ static void test_memslot_do_unmap(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t offsp, uint64_t count) { uint64_t gpa, ctr; + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; - for (gpa = MEM_TEST_GPA + offsp * 4096, ctr = 0; ctr < count; ) { + for (gpa = MEM_TEST_GPA + offsp * guest_page_size, ctr = 0; ctr < count; ) { uint64_t npages; void *hva; int ret; @@ -591,12 +598,12 @@ static void test_memslot_do_unmap(struct vm_data *data, hva = vm_gpa2hva(data, gpa, &npages); TEST_ASSERT(npages, "Empty memory slot at gptr 0x%"PRIx64, gpa); npages = min(npages, count - ctr); - ret = madvise(hva, npages * 4096, MADV_DONTNEED); + ret = madvise(hva, npages * guest_page_size, MADV_DONTNEED); TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "madvise(%p, MADV_DONTNEED) on VM memory should not fail for gptr 0x%"PRIx64, hva, gpa); ctr += npages; - gpa += npages * 4096; + gpa += npages * guest_page_size; } TEST_ASSERT(ctr == count, "madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) should exactly cover all of the requested area"); @@ -607,11 +614,12 @@ static void test_memslot_map_unmap_check(struct vm_data *data, { uint64_t gpa; uint64_t *val; + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; if (!map_unmap_verify) return; - gpa = MEM_TEST_GPA + offsp * 4096; + gpa = MEM_TEST_GPA + offsp * guest_page_size; val = (typeof(val))vm_gpa2hva(data, gpa, NULL); TEST_ASSERT(*val == valexp, "Guest written values should read back correctly before unmap (%"PRIu64" vs %"PRIu64" @ %"PRIx64")", @@ -621,12 +629,14 @@ static void test_memslot_map_unmap_check(struct vm_data *data, static void test_memslot_map_loop(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) { + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t guest_pages = MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / guest_page_size; + /* * Unmap the second half of the test area while guest writes to (maps) * the first half. */ - test_memslot_do_unmap(data, MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2, - MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2); + test_memslot_do_unmap(data, guest_pages / 2, guest_pages / 2); /* * Wait for the guest to finish writing the first half of the test @@ -637,10 +647,8 @@ static void test_memslot_map_loop(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) */ host_perform_sync(sync); test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, 0, MEM_TEST_VAL_1); - test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, - MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2 - 1, - MEM_TEST_VAL_1); - test_memslot_do_unmap(data, 0, MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2); + test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, guest_pages / 2 - 1, MEM_TEST_VAL_1); + test_memslot_do_unmap(data, 0, guest_pages / 2); /* @@ -653,16 +661,16 @@ static void test_memslot_map_loop(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) * the test area. */ host_perform_sync(sync); - test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2, - MEM_TEST_VAL_2); - test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE_PAGES - 1, - MEM_TEST_VAL_2); + test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, guest_pages / 2, MEM_TEST_VAL_2); + test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, guest_pages - 1, MEM_TEST_VAL_2); } static void test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync, uint64_t chunk) { + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t guest_pages = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / guest_page_size; uint64_t ctr; /* @@ -674,42 +682,49 @@ static void test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(struct vm_data *data, */ host_perform_sync(sync); test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, 0, MEM_TEST_VAL_1); - for (ctr = 0; ctr < MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2; ctr += chunk) + for (ctr = 0; ctr < guest_pages / 2; ctr += chunk) test_memslot_do_unmap(data, ctr, chunk); /* Likewise, but for the opposite host / guest areas */ host_perform_sync(sync); - test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2, - MEM_TEST_VAL_2); - for (ctr = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES / 2; - ctr < MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES; ctr += chunk) + test_memslot_map_unmap_check(data, guest_pages / 2, MEM_TEST_VAL_2); + for (ctr = guest_pages / 2; ctr < guest_pages; ctr += chunk) test_memslot_do_unmap(data, ctr, chunk); } static void test_memslot_unmap_loop(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) { - test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(data, sync, 1); + uint32_t host_page_size = getpagesize(); + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t guest_chunk_pages = guest_page_size >= host_page_size ? + 1 : host_page_size / guest_page_size; + + test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(data, sync, guest_chunk_pages); } static void test_memslot_unmap_loop_chunked(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) { - test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(data, sync, MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_PAGES); + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t guest_chunk_pages = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE / guest_page_size; + + test_memslot_unmap_loop_common(data, sync, guest_chunk_pages); } static void test_memslot_rw_loop(struct vm_data *data, struct sync_area *sync) { uint64_t gptr; + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; - for (gptr = MEM_TEST_GPA + 4096 / 2; - gptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; gptr += 4096) + for (gptr = MEM_TEST_GPA + guest_page_size / 2; + gptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; gptr += guest_page_size) *(uint64_t *)vm_gpa2hva(data, gptr, NULL) = MEM_TEST_VAL_2; host_perform_sync(sync); for (gptr = MEM_TEST_GPA; - gptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; gptr += 4096) { + gptr < MEM_TEST_GPA + MEM_TEST_SIZE; gptr += guest_page_size) { uint64_t *vptr = (typeof(vptr))vm_gpa2hva(data, gptr, NULL); uint64_t val = *vptr; @@ -738,7 +753,7 @@ static bool test_execute(int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, struct timespec *slot_runtime, struct timespec *guest_runtime) { - uint64_t mem_size = tdata->mem_size ? : MEM_SIZE_PAGES; + uint64_t mem_size = tdata->mem_size ? : MEM_SIZE; struct vm_data *data; struct sync_area *sync; struct timespec tstart; @@ -753,6 +768,7 @@ static bool test_execute(int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, sync = (typeof(sync))vm_gpa2hva(data, MEM_SYNC_GPA, NULL); + sync->guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; if (tdata->prepare && !tdata->prepare(data, sync, maxslots)) { ret = false; @@ -786,19 +802,19 @@ static bool test_execute(int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, static const struct test_data tests[] = { { .name = "map", - .mem_size = MEM_SIZE_MAP_PAGES, + .mem_size = MEM_SIZE_MAP, .guest_code = guest_code_test_memslot_map, .loop = test_memslot_map_loop, }, { .name = "unmap", - .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES + 1, + .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + 4096, .guest_code = guest_code_test_memslot_unmap, .loop = test_memslot_unmap_loop, }, { .name = "unmap chunked", - .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE_PAGES + 1, + .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + 4096, .guest_code = guest_code_test_memslot_unmap, .loop = test_memslot_unmap_loop_chunked, }, @@ -856,6 +872,35 @@ static void help(char *name, struct test_args *targs) pr_info("%d: %s\n", ctr, tests[ctr].name); } +static bool check_memory_sizes(void) +{ + uint32_t guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; + + if (MEM_SIZE % guest_page_size || + MEM_TEST_SIZE % guest_page_size) { + pr_info("invalid MEM_SIZE or MEM_TEST_SIZE\n"); + return false; + } + + if (MEM_SIZE_MAP % guest_page_size || + MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE % guest_page_size || + (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) <= 2 || + (MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) % 2) { + pr_info("invalid MEM_SIZE_MAP or MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE\n"); + return false; + } + + if (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE > MEM_TEST_SIZE || + MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE % guest_page_size || + (MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE / guest_page_size) % + (2 * MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE / guest_page_size)) { + pr_info("invalid MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE or MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE\n"); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], struct test_args *targs) { @@ -1015,6 +1060,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) /* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */ setbuf(stdout, NULL); + if (!check_memory_sizes()) + return -1; + if (!parse_args(argc, argv, &targs)) return -1; From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012712 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B4AC4332F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230239AbiJTHOA (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:14:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55662 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230281AbiJTHNf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:35 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8806C1645E1 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666249998; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J1UM8Q4XCnJXEEhn+ghVOV9BUOCnBbI8Wc42C/4GuEI=; b=E0thmQqnVZcY3k0UFIOjyk2kRb+G7bGi0yoI+TLUQxSgq/Vsc3VmgPy9EnHSA8ziDV2/PG R+vmqHCzsPV+ymM71LiobrjODKMM47C78SoR8xGuJipnkuLiHy/y3s5wqUBHV/FPHkhqva 5l/ICpqPT+/59WG+m2RXmB+BvkKP4NM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-519-RAFMVK5ONQWj7_8GG4AbPA-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RAFMVK5ONQWj7_8GG4AbPA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B48585A5B6; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A428E40C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:08 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-6-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org The addresses and sizes passed to vm_userspace_mem_region_add() and madvise() should be aligned to host page size, which can be 64KB on aarch64. So it's wrong by passing additional fixed 4KB memory area to various tests. Fix it by passing additional fixed 64KB memory area to various tests. We also add checks to ensure that none of host/guest page size exceeds 64KB. MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE is fixed up to 192KB either. With this, the following command works fine on 64KB-page-size-host and 4KB-page-size-guest. # ./memslot_perf_test -v -s 512 Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 43 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index 9af61ca8ad0a..daebc264de5a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -20,17 +20,20 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include -#define MEM_SIZE ((512U << 20) + 4096) -#define MEM_GPA 0x10000000UL +#define MEM_EXTRA_SIZE SZ_64K + +#define MEM_SIZE (SZ_512M + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE) +#define MEM_GPA SZ_256M #define MEM_AUX_GPA MEM_GPA #define MEM_SYNC_GPA MEM_AUX_GPA -#define MEM_TEST_GPA (MEM_AUX_GPA + 4096) -#define MEM_TEST_SIZE (MEM_SIZE - 4096) +#define MEM_TEST_GPA (MEM_AUX_GPA + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE) +#define MEM_TEST_SIZE (MEM_SIZE - MEM_EXTRA_SIZE) /* * 32 MiB is max size that gets well over 100 iterations on 509 slots. @@ -38,8 +41,8 @@ * 8194 slots in use can then be tested (although with slightly * limited resolution). */ -#define MEM_SIZE_MAP ((32U << 20) + 4096) -#define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE (MEM_SIZE_MAP - 4096) +#define MEM_SIZE_MAP (SZ_32M + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE) +#define MEM_TEST_MAP_SIZE (MEM_SIZE_MAP - MEM_EXTRA_SIZE) /* * 128 MiB is min size that fills 32k slots with at least one page in each @@ -47,8 +50,8 @@ * * 2 MiB chunk size like a typical huge page */ -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE (128U << 20) -#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE (2U << 20) +#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE SZ_128M +#define MEM_TEST_UNMAP_CHUNK_SIZE SZ_2M /* * For the move active test the middle of the test area is placed on @@ -64,12 +67,12 @@ * * architecture slots memory-per-slot memory-on-last-slot * -------------------------------------------------------------- - * x86-4KB 32763 16KB 100KB - * arm64-4KB 32766 16KB 52KB - * arm64-16KB 32766 16KB 48KB - * arm64-64KB 8192 64KB 64KB + * x86-4KB 32763 16KB 160KB + * arm64-4KB 32766 16KB 112KB + * arm64-16KB 32766 16KB 112KB + * arm64-64KB 8192 64KB 128KB */ -#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE 0x10000 +#define MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE (3 * SZ_64K) #define MEM_TEST_MOVE_GPA_DEST (MEM_GPA + MEM_SIZE) static_assert(MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE <= MEM_TEST_SIZE, "invalid move test region size"); @@ -533,7 +536,6 @@ static bool test_memslot_move_prepare(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t *maxslots, bool isactive) { uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; - uint64_t move_pages = MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE / guest_page_size; uint64_t movesrcgpa, movetestgpa; movesrcgpa = vm_slot2gpa(data, data->nslots - 1); @@ -542,7 +544,7 @@ static bool test_memslot_move_prepare(struct vm_data *data, uint64_t lastpages; vm_gpa2hva(data, movesrcgpa, &lastpages); - if (lastpages < move_pages / 2) { + if (lastpages * guest_page_size < MEM_TEST_MOVE_SIZE / 2) { *maxslots = 0; return false; } @@ -808,13 +810,13 @@ static const struct test_data tests[] = { }, { .name = "unmap", - .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + 4096, + .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE, .guest_code = guest_code_test_memslot_unmap, .loop = test_memslot_unmap_loop, }, { .name = "unmap chunked", - .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + 4096, + .mem_size = MEM_TEST_UNMAP_SIZE + MEM_EXTRA_SIZE, .guest_code = guest_code_test_memslot_unmap, .loop = test_memslot_unmap_loop_chunked, }, @@ -874,8 +876,15 @@ static void help(char *name, struct test_args *targs) static bool check_memory_sizes(void) { + uint32_t host_page_size = getpagesize(); uint32_t guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; + if (host_page_size > SZ_64K || guest_page_size > SZ_64K) { + pr_info("Unsupported page size on host (0x%x) or guest (0x%x)\n", + host_page_size, guest_page_size); + return false; + } + if (MEM_SIZE % guest_page_size || MEM_TEST_SIZE % guest_page_size) { pr_info("invalid MEM_SIZE or MEM_TEST_SIZE\n"); From patchwork Thu Oct 20 07:12:09 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Gavin Shan X-Patchwork-Id: 13012715 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967AC4332F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230227AbiJTHOf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:14:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230258AbiJTHOD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:14:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90CD616699F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666250003; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FzMWVAugfUTLDKVc6MZDfcXiQ1pIkYlmEhf7GtdgsCg=; b=cPmG/l9vAa8XbXBAUVzLrP9I00nZoQw1ZWdbykUbAae6jmccBQjFNaQYqBDPQgKDCMFetQ XRZT5SD1bKxTBC0sDwBGW0hu0e3uu6JCcFJV+0R9BtFA1lDeSICGmh6Ib2PovOm8fQdFQW VxbG8pnf45X1VNafvBoB7CrmdLYM55E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-651-5ez8t1IUM6GylxvlF3TLAA-1; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:13:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5ez8t1IUM6GylxvlF3TLAA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5EAC800B30; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56C340C6EC2; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Report optimal memory slots Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:12:09 +0800 Message-Id: <20221020071209.559062-7-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221020071209.559062-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org The memory area in each slot should be aligned to host page size. Otherwise, the test will fail. For example, the following command fails with the following messages with 64KB-page-size-host and 4KB-pae-size-guest. It's not user friendly to abort the test. Lets do something to report the optimal memory slots, instead of failing the test. # ./memslot_perf_test -v -s 1000 Number of memory slots: 999 Testing map performance with 1 runs, 5 seconds each Adding slots 1..999, each slot with 8 pages + 216 extra pages last ==== Test Assertion Failure ==== lib/kvm_util.c:824: vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(vm->mode, npages) == npages pid=19872 tid=19872 errno=0 - Success 1 0x00000000004065b3: vm_userspace_mem_region_add at kvm_util.c:822 2 0x0000000000401d6b: prepare_vm at memslot_perf_test.c:273 3 (inlined by) test_execute at memslot_perf_test.c:756 4 (inlined by) test_loop at memslot_perf_test.c:994 5 (inlined by) main at memslot_perf_test.c:1073 6 0x0000ffff7ebb4383: ?? ??:0 7 0x00000000004021ff: _start at :? Number of guest pages is not compatible with the host. Try npages=16 Report the optimal memory slots instead of failing the test when the memory area in each slot isn't aligned to host page size. With this applied, the optimal memory slots is reported. # ./memslot_perf_test -v -s 1000 Number of memory slots: 999 Testing map performance with 1 runs, 5 seconds each Memslot count too high for this test, decrease the cap (max is 514) Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index daebc264de5a..2ad40f7c9c08 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -239,16 +239,52 @@ static struct vm_data *alloc_vm(void) return data; } +static bool check_slot_pages(uint32_t host_page_size, uint32_t guest_page_size, + uint64_t pages_per_slot, uint64_t rempages) +{ + if (!pages_per_slot) + return false; + + if ((pages_per_slot * guest_page_size) % host_page_size) + return false; + + if ((rempages * guest_page_size) % host_page_size) + return false; + + return true; +} + + +static uint64_t get_max_slots(struct vm_data *data, uint32_t host_page_size) +{ + uint32_t guest_page_size = data->vm->page_size; + uint64_t mempages, pages_per_slot, rempages; + uint64_t slots; + + mempages = data->npages; + slots = data->nslots; + while (--slots > 1) { + pages_per_slot = mempages / slots; + rempages = mempages % pages_per_slot; + if (check_slot_pages(host_page_size, guest_page_size, + pages_per_slot, rempages)) + return slots + 1; /* slot 0 is reserved */ + } + + return 0; +} + static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, void *guest_code, uint64_t mem_size, struct timespec *slot_runtime) { uint64_t mempages, rempages; uint64_t guest_addr; - uint32_t slot, guest_page_size; + uint32_t slot, host_page_size, guest_page_size; struct timespec tstart; struct sync_area *sync; + host_page_size = getpagesize(); guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size; mempages = mem_size / guest_page_size; @@ -260,12 +296,13 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, TEST_ASSERT(data->npages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); data->nslots = nslots; data->pages_per_slot = data->npages / data->nslots; - if (!data->pages_per_slot) { - *maxslots = data->npages + 1; + rempages = data->npages % data->nslots; + if (!check_slot_pages(host_page_size, guest_page_size, + data->pages_per_slot, rempages)) { + *maxslots = get_max_slots(data, host_page_size); return false; } - rempages = data->npages % data->nslots; data->hva_slots = malloc(sizeof(*data->hva_slots) * data->nslots); TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail");