From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:34 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067290 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B181FC63703 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229769AbiLGPtt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229756AbiLGPtq (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:46 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BD73AC14 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id o12so17979013pjo.4 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=71ca0yPxFF6EaiLKMWlrSqitNHDHlqW3RCkGeX1vy+A=; b=PhU557wYsKo/iDLZ/eBYG10j3SUNufkud5V4AzaP2ICyOtQc995aeL12t/n/DCDOjS NMogyAHS/VfnZLMBDSu6Di4KmFIVVQ0uOhTFzgcacngKlg82FwY5QBCqc7jvGtP83Lsg 0oNoHBlwcyoa3/tfXpapegc2TgwcvzzxnMc4Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=71ca0yPxFF6EaiLKMWlrSqitNHDHlqW3RCkGeX1vy+A=; b=OrmrVL7+sxchoESpywDTYK4DnpUR4SGsPhV8h70xBq7OcI3by/j+WtpnKzCoga/0Te aVrotMlIbmj5q12pxcKmG6/0iDocvtKwcWwddTNbrBvxL5mp/nSiqiD6URsnTijsJrDu UaUjn1LdR6atu4fI0EMx3yaulqAtQFpIr3u9bUmTtgPW8peamo05vUIdmBNWZoabq3Dt u66Rk+H6fRdn9f5z3cvjJfixlUOrpwaxbQoXVjSoCba+Fgs9DKyuNovBu1qONKq/btr7 MZHi0/PSGyOk8sVlJWClH76Ndax3H2CthclF117TkZRnb/ke8teEK4lENkhXcpdvbf9I UIDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plFTQMGIGpcqu/wUZaltQ95lJ05rPdQh7HbAYc1LGpsMi/6p0bn 9pRaKraG+Sbhj/Ag2ob1h7KxiA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6LlztV8oc9Di/UeVnMjrwTxAuHnQqhNmrhBv6DODQ39jcxdztg/nAsot9XSmGNU3B9Sjff5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8343:b0:187:1f0:4579 with SMTP id z3-20020a170902834300b0018701f04579mr748942pln.61.1670428185700; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:44 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/memfd: add F_SEAL_EXEC Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:34 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-2-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Verkamp The new F_SEAL_EXEC flag will prevent modification of the exec bits: written as traditional octal mask, 0111, or as named flags, S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP | S_IXOTH. Any chmod(2) or similar call that attempts to modify any of these bits after the seal is applied will fail with errno EPERM. This will preserve the execute bits as they are at the time of sealing, so the memfd will become either permanently executable or permanently un-executable. Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp Co-developed-by: Jeff Xu Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 1 + mm/memfd.c | 2 ++ mm/shmem.c | 6 ++++++ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h index 2f86b2ad6d7e..e8c07da58c9f 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #define F_SEAL_GROW 0x0004 /* prevent file from growing */ #define F_SEAL_WRITE 0x0008 /* prevent writes */ #define F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE 0x0010 /* prevent future writes while mapped */ +#define F_SEAL_EXEC 0x0020 /* prevent chmod modifying exec bits */ /* (1U << 31) is reserved for signed error codes */ /* diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 08f5f8304746..4ebeab94aa74 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) } #define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \ + F_SEAL_EXEC | \ F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ F_SEAL_GROW | \ F_SEAL_WRITE | \ @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing * SEAL_WRITE: Prevent write access to the file + * SEAL_EXEC: Prevent modification of the exec bits in the file mode * * As we don't require any trust relationship between two parties, we * must prevent seals from being removed. Therefore, sealing a file diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index c1d8b8a1aa3b..e18a9cf9d937 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -1085,6 +1085,12 @@ static int shmem_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, if (error) return error; + if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_EXEC) && (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_MODE)) { + if ((inode->i_mode ^ attr->ia_mode) & 0111) { + return -EPERM; + } + } + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE)) { loff_t oldsize = inode->i_size; loff_t newsize = attr->ia_size; From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:35 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067291 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A226C63708 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229603AbiLGPtw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50474 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229713AbiLGPts (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEC7391D9 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id d3so17390287plr.10 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NbsvwgwPR3B757gRns7/stgcrkFvNaKcuShOuGKUmaw=; b=dWibBvBTiVA/84gDobjRgvxVixl764pEHsZqeOQjsQTYcSLe2AY2xlkKC1Imw+7IV2 PoFF7j9IoX6GzTzxhWS5x5nv3blYhAWDvnhY/ykRnnBQF3Y3rS372HPWrCicpAQYKQ4/ NY3okmtSv8f4TkrJddqps6OldgMeuk8K3hlFY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NbsvwgwPR3B757gRns7/stgcrkFvNaKcuShOuGKUmaw=; b=gm6XOIAJW0+08e4wIm144YIkM9UKFalk7kcbhHZygB54jLn4XVb4mXYGyZytkS6YUz TkmA2laDufU7B6qcxg5t4FjuryT8RMUJ7/SSuwkOu6EzOKCvFJ7FJaLei6v+ntYeVn2J qBPJ5Y4B8BWmmMMf6LV3GQXplxfjqHmEum7NY3i+eADZtqbz1hrImtaIcIdB2IUEwWR9 XnMtS8nAOlHsqlDKUaNiYP/0Qcc5Jj8jBuwBIvBuaYTsO1qmiXTW0YeU53okRotLBmqp zp6SAiilaNR+/+EpHFO/zVIa2c5K6SaNTyCMgNppGoAMOZzc8cpUZgqNZMm72Y0mc0Bx ZEhg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmzN+m3frJ4yqLf+zAOrPZ5BgLHi+IaxgBMwUCsplBOTqzOaB3L MJb+xSJv9ErMtcgYaPFsyubk+A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf65I6vPuxVOpHwNsHHWkaw68sLPWZIiaC5lE8zMMVwu8IMu2bTggeZG3xjdH6nSzo8NcdHflA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:40cb:b0:189:b4d0:aee with SMTP id t11-20020a17090340cb00b00189b4d00aeemr756372pld.67.1670428186688; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] selftests/memfd: add tests for F_SEAL_EXEC Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:35 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-3-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Verkamp Basic tests to ensure that user/group/other execute bits cannot be changed after applying F_SEAL_EXEC to a memfd. Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp Co-developed-by: Jeff Xu Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 94df2692e6e4..1d7e7b36bbdd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -28,12 +28,44 @@ #define MFD_DEF_SIZE 8192 #define STACK_SIZE 65536 +#ifndef F_SEAL_EXEC +#define F_SEAL_EXEC 0x0020 +#endif + +#ifndef MAX_PATH +#define MAX_PATH 256 +#endif + /* * Default is not to test hugetlbfs */ static size_t mfd_def_size = MFD_DEF_SIZE; static const char *memfd_str = MEMFD_STR; +static ssize_t fd2name(int fd, char *buf, size_t bufsize) +{ + char buf1[MAX_PATH]; + int size; + ssize_t nbytes; + + size = snprintf(buf1, MAX_PATH, "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd); + if (size < 0) { + printf("snprintf(%d) failed on %m\n", fd); + abort(); + } + + /* + * reserver one byte for string termination. + */ + nbytes = readlink(buf1, buf, bufsize-1); + if (nbytes == -1) { + printf("readlink(%s) failed %m\n", buf1); + abort(); + } + buf[nbytes] = '\0'; + return nbytes; +} + static int mfd_assert_new(const char *name, loff_t sz, unsigned int flags) { int r, fd; @@ -98,11 +130,14 @@ static unsigned int mfd_assert_get_seals(int fd) static void mfd_assert_has_seals(int fd, unsigned int seals) { + char buf[MAX_PATH]; + int nbytes; unsigned int s; + fd2name(fd, buf, MAX_PATH); s = mfd_assert_get_seals(fd); if (s != seals) { - printf("%u != %u = GET_SEALS(%d)\n", seals, s, fd); + printf("%u != %u = GET_SEALS(%s)\n", seals, s, buf); abort(); } } @@ -594,6 +629,64 @@ static void mfd_fail_grow_write(int fd) } } +static void mfd_assert_mode(int fd, int mode) +{ + struct stat st; + char buf[MAX_PATH]; + int nbytes; + + fd2name(fd, buf, MAX_PATH); + + if (fstat(fd, &st) < 0) { + printf("fstat(%s) failed: %m\n", buf); + abort(); + } + + if ((st.st_mode & 07777) != mode) { + printf("fstat(%s) wrong file mode 0%04o, but expected 0%04o\n", + buf, (int)st.st_mode & 07777, mode); + abort(); + } +} + +static void mfd_assert_chmod(int fd, int mode) +{ + char buf[MAX_PATH]; + int nbytes; + + fd2name(fd, buf, MAX_PATH); + + if (fchmod(fd, mode) < 0) { + printf("fchmod(%s, 0%04o) failed: %m\n", buf, mode); + abort(); + } + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, mode); +} + +static void mfd_fail_chmod(int fd, int mode) +{ + struct stat st; + char buf[MAX_PATH]; + int nbytes; + + fd2name(fd, buf, MAX_PATH); + + if (fstat(fd, &st) < 0) { + printf("fstat(%s) failed: %m\n", buf); + abort(); + } + + if (fchmod(fd, mode) == 0) { + printf("fchmod(%s, 0%04o) didn't fail as expected\n", + buf, mode); + abort(); + } + + /* verify that file mode bits did not change */ + mfd_assert_mode(fd, st.st_mode & 07777); +} + static int idle_thread_fn(void *arg) { sigset_t set; @@ -880,6 +973,39 @@ static void test_seal_resize(void) close(fd); } +/* + * Test SEAL_EXEC + * Test that chmod() cannot change x bits after sealing + */ +static void test_seal_exec(void) +{ + int fd; + + printf("%s SEAL-EXEC\n", memfd_str); + + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_seal_exec", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0777); + + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0644); + + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, 0); + mfd_assert_add_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0600); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0670); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0605); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0700); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0100); + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0666); + + close(fd); +} + /* * Test sharing via dup() * Test that seals are shared between dupped FDs and they're all equal. @@ -1059,6 +1185,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) test_seal_shrink(); test_seal_grow(); test_seal_resize(); + test_seal_exec(); test_share_dup("SHARE-DUP", ""); test_share_mmap("SHARE-MMAP", ""); From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:36 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067292 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11458C4708E for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229845AbiLGPtw (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50618 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229772AbiLGPtt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F229F24951 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id o12so17979095pjo.4 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=j02hcUmpYLv5fRuUpSeXXOL/JCHtO2qkj12Q1X4RZAg=; b=R5BHpK7ZG9aovJ+1jeInMWGBsCCU+DnF25bMLAW45g60cIzG8FFjGMOXE+YWkWnupK kQHfR+uCW3ib+lGzbzFcJTQMcw+b6mTj+yo7v+J3Y5PsUrokernH9eTgmzS5L2ZyHQPx He6qg6g0nzNS1MVsYGfSwJbIUQhYQcP1HAQvE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j02hcUmpYLv5fRuUpSeXXOL/JCHtO2qkj12Q1X4RZAg=; b=Kb5qEdVSDdhmq29JE9qJmVZDVXSAZww/NGgviTr8yDnFovrGOqIs+tqq8jdwvthFfV A95zzUKtM4f/0qEpcvsho9MlIJx6HfOg2hMspHz/0DB12l7kzKuM+z2tSxvD+INDp8Q1 irU/08Okk6neKkqZGwyqNmicrKvNbf5iNALYyzPWWPF2zRhlOHWLsttumFv+AlvhKMSB PosE2aVf4JpaR3T+41617SUK0PfInjp1JWBzhVguJI3RM781kW+EBA5r2UFYXJpQBaxA 1OB5+0vpe8YKSaWn7m7fXMqUrc2CvR1aH3gdaL6LVqOR+0ZVLLdSzQRY1lU7gX5gHWHS W1Nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmTKrKsJdeZE5w6zumc07BRkLBc5xrdydBLb8/YKgll+iFf93rU vbfyG1JIkP+divnFWdjapC7LGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf49DtKKipwaoufTRe2LK61YHmgP1blkWyCRZQSQe30lAZaQ8E20zAeYdQETl/N3udGE0IQ+MA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9891:b0:189:2688:c97f with SMTP id s17-20020a170902989100b001892688c97fmr690338plp.50.1670428187656; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH v6 3/6] mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:36 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-4-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Xu The new MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC flags allows application to set executable bit at creation time (memfd_create). When MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is set, memfd is created without executable bit (mode:0666), and sealed with F_SEAL_EXEC, so it can't be chmod to be executable (mode: 0777) after creation. when MFD_EXEC flag is set, memfd is created with executable bit (mode:0777), this is the same as the old behavior of memfd_create. The new pid namespaced sysctl vm.memfd_noexec has 3 values: 0: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL acts like MFD_EXEC was set. 1: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL acts like MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL was set. 2: memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected. The sysctl allows finer control of memfd_create for old-software that doesn't set the executable bit, for example, a container with vm.memfd_noexec=1 means the old-software will create non-executable memfd by default. Also, the value of memfd_noexec is passed to child namespace at creation time. For example, if the init namespace has vm.memfd_noexec=2, all its children namespaces will be created with 2. Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Co-developed-by: Daniel Verkamp Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp Reported-by: kernel test robot --- include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 19 +++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/memfd.h | 4 +++ kernel/pid_namespace.c | 5 +++ kernel/pid_sysctl.h | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/memfd.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 5 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/pid_sysctl.h diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h index 07481bb87d4e..a4789a7b34a9 100644 --- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h @@ -16,6 +16,21 @@ struct fs_pin; +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) +/* + * sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec + * 0: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL + * acts like MFD_EXEC was set. + * 1: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL + * acts like MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL was set. + * 2: memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be + * rejected. + */ +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC 0 +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL 1 +#define MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED 2 +#endif + struct pid_namespace { struct idr idr; struct rcu_head rcu; @@ -31,6 +46,10 @@ struct pid_namespace { struct ucounts *ucounts; int reboot; /* group exit code if this pidns was rebooted */ struct ns_common ns; +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) + /* sysctl for vm.memfd_noexec */ + int memfd_noexec_scope; +#endif } __randomize_layout; extern struct pid_namespace init_pid_ns; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h b/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h index 7a8a26751c23..273a4e15dfcf 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/memfd.h @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ #define MFD_CLOEXEC 0x0001U #define MFD_ALLOW_SEALING 0x0002U #define MFD_HUGETLB 0x0004U +/* not executable and sealed to prevent changing to executable. */ +#define MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL 0x0008U +/* executable */ +#define MFD_EXEC 0x0010U /* * Huge page size encoding when MFD_HUGETLB is specified, and a huge page diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c index f4f8cb0435b4..8a98b1af9376 100644 --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include "pid_sysctl.h" static DEFINE_MUTEX(pid_caches_mutex); static struct kmem_cache *pid_ns_cachep; @@ -110,6 +111,8 @@ static struct pid_namespace *create_pid_namespace(struct user_namespace *user_ns ns->ucounts = ucounts; ns->pid_allocated = PIDNS_ADDING; + initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(ns); + return ns; out_free_idr: @@ -455,6 +458,8 @@ static __init int pid_namespaces_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE register_sysctl_paths(kern_path, pid_ns_ctl_table); #endif + + register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(); return 0; } diff --git a/kernel/pid_sysctl.h b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5986d6493b5b --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/pid_sysctl.h @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef LINUX_PID_SYSCTL_H +#define LINUX_PID_SYSCTL_H + +#include + +#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) && defined(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) +static inline void initialize_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) +{ + ns->memfd_noexec_scope = + task_active_pid_ns(current)->memfd_noexec_scope; +} + +static int pid_mfd_noexec_dointvec_minmax(struct ctl_table *table, + int write, void *buf, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) +{ + struct pid_namespace *ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); + struct ctl_table table_copy; + + if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EPERM; + + table_copy = *table; + if (ns != &init_pid_ns) + table_copy.data = &ns->memfd_noexec_scope; + + /* + * set minimum to current value, the effect is only bigger + * value is accepted. + */ + if (*(int *)table_copy.data > *(int *)table_copy.extra1) + table_copy.extra1 = table_copy.data; + + return proc_dointvec_minmax(&table_copy, write, buf, lenp, ppos); +} + +static struct ctl_table pid_ns_ctl_table_vm[] = { + { + .procname = "memfd_noexec", + .data = &init_pid_ns.memfd_noexec_scope, + .maxlen = sizeof(init_pid_ns.memfd_noexec_scope), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = pid_mfd_noexec_dointvec_minmax, + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO, + .extra2 = SYSCTL_TWO, + }, + { } +}; +static struct ctl_path vm_path[] = { { .procname = "vm", }, { } }; +static inline void register_pid_ns_sysctl_table_vm(void) +{ + register_sysctl_paths(vm_path, pid_ns_ctl_table_vm); +} +#else +static inline void set_memfd_noexec_scope(struct pid_namespace *ns) {} +static inline void register_pid_ns_ctl_table_vm(void) {} +#endif + +#endif /* LINUX_PID_SYSCTL_H */ diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 4ebeab94aa74..ec70675a7069 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include /* @@ -263,12 +264,14 @@ long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) #define MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(MFD_NAME_PREFIX) - 1) #define MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN (NAME_MAX - MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) -#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB) +#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL | MFD_EXEC) SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, const char __user *, uname, unsigned int, flags) { + char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN]; + struct pid_namespace *ns; unsigned int *file_seals; struct file *file; int fd, error; @@ -285,6 +288,39 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, return -EINVAL; } + /* Invalid if both EXEC and NOEXEC_SEAL are set.*/ + if ((flags & MFD_EXEC) && (flags & MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL)) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) { +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL + int sysctl = MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC; + + ns = task_active_pid_ns(current); + if (ns) + sysctl = ns->memfd_noexec_scope; + + switch (sysctl) { + case MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_EXEC: + flags |= MFD_EXEC; + break; + case MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL: + flags |= MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL; + break; + default: + pr_warn_ratelimited( + "memfd_create(): MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is enforced, pid=%d '%s'\n", + task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); + return -EINVAL; + } +#else + flags |= MFD_EXEC; +#endif + pr_warn_ratelimited( + "memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=%d '%s'\n", + task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); + } + /* length includes terminating zero */ len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); if (len <= 0) @@ -328,7 +364,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, file->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; file->f_flags |= O_LARGEFILE; - if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { + if (flags & MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL) { + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); + + inode->i_mode &= ~0111; + file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; + *file_seals |= F_SEAL_EXEC; + } else if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { + /* MFD_EXEC and MFD_ALLOW_SEALING are set */ file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; } From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:37 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067293 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65985C63706 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229772AbiLGPtx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229820AbiLGPtt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D829127CE5 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id d3so17390361plr.10 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=68tZIB+0aYpPIylSIqK6cc/meXXHAi0u5AcBKUyeGcY=; b=Pgcz8EqFIllSIrbiyT8+zFROC9GpuYiPrYWAWuws/ZAml4A7Ugasa59H8dzt4twoB4 O0cAxxO9Mke403E/Mj+rjoT+GeN92NHh57bpsegW33gdWlb7tQAmt+ewJoJYOEJvEyeH jGBefsgqUB3ZHzuky+3uRwszEnFjlO/ZS+68A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=68tZIB+0aYpPIylSIqK6cc/meXXHAi0u5AcBKUyeGcY=; b=tdeBH1eSHsIPoCRnflU0DuJc9OL55gxNg5ScpJu7Zs4s0KXPFhzFm05XVm/u1xWnXV FmIqouM0tdsPu9+WjdaWDs0LurXcY6u0SsW9iv8tuGuJL4YfHaTtVLRkXPqfr+vATkuk lqHUz9LKYaRut7g86KxesPBaASxcKuEVII7eL7ipJF+LEcK5GGrV3E7d6+rmlRF5K9h2 BsdBwZQ6lgz+gXv0bEfNGG0H8Fg+m4akWE9qGoLU1Zl74OWleyuXBM4GbUxHrCphcxw6 B1hXvI34Dzp3P1a9Ar5VKhMPIbh3flt36wyLsIB5XQ+hwsbGC/87O5wxUBl+D1QJRZA8 4EAw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkcRQns43oD9ArnaSes5MULvWB3P5hmaciDafxFt4csxNBLZtdP gf2QcfzXIY0HURoLbcj8KrmBTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6RkUVGcJjeQXvXQRSUZJARW3Rj32QYHY9STgcjYfWrJ0sPoKsrx/6HB7CijCJ1h5EjJkg5dg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:9991:b0:a4:5f8d:805a with SMTP id ve17-20020a056a21999100b000a45f8d805amr1331414pzb.53.1670428188610; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 4/6] mm/memfd: Add write seals when apply SEAL_EXEC to executable memfd Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:37 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-5-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Xu In order to avoid WX mappings, add F_SEAL_WRITE when apply F_SEAL_EXEC to an executable memfd, so W^X from start. This implys application need to fill the content of the memfd first, after F_SEAL_EXEC is applied, application can no longer modify the content of the memfd. Typically, application seals the memfd right after writing to it. For example: 1. memfd_create(MFD_EXEC). 2. write() code to the memfd. 3. fcntl(F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_EXEC) to convert the memfd to W^X. 4. call exec() on the memfd. Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- mm/memfd.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index ec70675a7069..92f0a5765f7c 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -222,6 +222,12 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) } } + /* + * SEAL_EXEC implys SEAL_WRITE, making W^X from the start. + */ + if (seals & F_SEAL_EXEC && inode->i_mode & 0111) + seals |= F_SEAL_SHRINK|F_SEAL_GROW|F_SEAL_WRITE|F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE; + *file_seals |= seals; error = 0; From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:38 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067294 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C36C352A1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229865AbiLGPtz (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50796 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229562AbiLGPtv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA7E63BB5 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id y17so17406564plp.3 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KFN1ukpXKxLmNAYkBULVsoTlaw64wakqQaa318EnS7w=; b=mzrL0wC7HJZg6H4fg+hl9vB15griUB7WwlNY9n7bcHzWC9Ln1UlmOfqokZnpGBCCzk 9g2xDYSY9rsPj1uzjolhlIwWhChYv22zqyPN5DysMI6Cix18qsA7ESpgAGiOxo1KA90p JBXL2IWPcZJqXOT434+F0e46/gbeZiuZ3sUlk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KFN1ukpXKxLmNAYkBULVsoTlaw64wakqQaa318EnS7w=; b=fLsHM8PmlVvwFgqH5kmcaFHIQWkKSoTzJGExbSWBjFClI/AR6K8APt2SaCs0ygQpOD NBJO5d69ssHYIf9E09r9bhEgSm81nOWyu6wNbzB+e3S0r1x/njK/AJcKzEMGGh1DISTo Qofu11n4uoR/1JboJ26PEtQrIkFfukJbw8h+g9dpBkTG9oNm/kxAL7VkMmmW7ztxr4WR MeZ3c93N0fteSN18RzuVJEa2bn1ZvrGWUwrifHm0+W88rKoPlbYH9mmtXRugHThko5lc mFK4SgqfjKNp0qxlF5mUnM8LeCXp0ntPh/2uLQQTIbX73sWjJ67OZT40Hvr7XyX4ctkT V2Ag== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnZ9ikMNzjFKghGpJqrcWPDtQDMhMnL4zgdt1rZ8MxMNRirmBqh WrOBQRA4B24lwKEY3CsKoNCB3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5K4kmSUPTkS50J0yjzZq+96PrBd/chPBv9Id337EfDtGpUZbG4aCet3uRKBpJrZ7DFluZdmw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8218:b0:189:9ef4:4b59 with SMTP id x24-20020a170902821800b001899ef44b59mr685624pln.52.1670428189559; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 5/6] selftests/memfd: add tests for MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL MFD_EXEC Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:38 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-6-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Xu Tests to verify MFD_NOEXEC, MFD_EXEC and vm.memfd_noexec sysctl. Co-developed-by: Daniel Verkamp Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c index be675002f918..93798c8c5d54 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 1d7e7b36bbdd..cbf1768fb1b9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -32,10 +32,19 @@ #define F_SEAL_EXEC 0x0020 #endif +#define F_WX_SEALS (F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ + F_SEAL_GROW | \ + F_SEAL_WRITE | \ + F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE | \ + F_SEAL_EXEC) #ifndef MAX_PATH #define MAX_PATH 256 #endif +#ifndef MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL +#define MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL 0x0008U +#endif + /* * Default is not to test hugetlbfs */ @@ -86,6 +95,37 @@ static int mfd_assert_new(const char *name, loff_t sz, unsigned int flags) return fd; } +static void sysctl_assert_write(const char *val) +{ + int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/memfd_noexec", O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC); + + if (fd < 0) { + printf("open sysctl failed\n"); + abort(); + } + + if (write(fd, val, strlen(val)) < 0) { + printf("write sysctl failed\n"); + abort(); + } +} + +static void sysctl_fail_write(const char *val) +{ + int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/memfd_noexec", O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC); + + if (fd < 0) { + printf("open sysctl failed\n"); + abort(); + } + + if (write(fd, val, strlen(val)) >= 0) { + printf("write sysctl %s succeeded, but failure expected\n", + val); + abort(); + } +} + static int mfd_assert_reopen_fd(int fd_in) { int fd; @@ -764,6 +804,9 @@ static void test_create(void) mfd_fail_new("", ~0); mfd_fail_new("", 0x80000000U); + /* verify EXEC and NOEXEC_SEAL can't both be set */ + mfd_fail_new("", MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); + /* verify MFD_CLOEXEC is allowed */ fd = mfd_assert_new("", 0, MFD_CLOEXEC); close(fd); @@ -975,20 +1018,21 @@ static void test_seal_resize(void) /* * Test SEAL_EXEC - * Test that chmod() cannot change x bits after sealing + * Test fd is created with exec and allow sealing. + * chmod() cannot change x bits after sealing. */ -static void test_seal_exec(void) +static void test_exec_seal(void) { int fd; printf("%s SEAL-EXEC\n", memfd_str); + printf("%s Apply SEAL_EXEC\n", memfd_str); fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_seal_exec", mfd_def_size, - MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_EXEC); mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0777); - mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0644); mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, 0); @@ -1002,10 +1046,181 @@ static void test_seal_exec(void) mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0700); mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0100); mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_write(fd); + close(fd); + + printf("%s Apply ALL_SEALS\n", memfd_str); + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_seal_exec", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_EXEC); + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0777); + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0700); + + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, 0); + mfd_assert_add_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_WX_SEALS); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0711); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0600); + mfd_fail_write(fd); + close(fd); +} + +/* + * Test EXEC_NO_SEAL + * Test fd is created with exec and not allow sealing. + */ +static void test_exec_no_seal(void) +{ + int fd; + + printf("%s EXEC_NO_SEAL\n", memfd_str); + + /* Create with EXEC but without ALLOW_SEALING */ + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_exec_no_sealing", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_EXEC); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0777); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_SEAL); + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0666); close(fd); } +/* + * Test memfd_create with MFD_NOEXEC flag + */ +static void test_noexec_seal(void) +{ + int fd; + + printf("%s NOEXEC_SEAL\n", memfd_str); + + /* Create with NOEXEC and ALLOW_SEALING */ + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_noexec", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + close(fd); + + /* Create with NOEXEC but without ALLOW_SEALING */ + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_noexec", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL); + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + close(fd); +} + +static void test_sysctl_child(void) +{ + int fd; + + printf("%s sysctl 0\n", memfd_str); + sysctl_assert_write("0"); + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_0", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0777); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, 0); + mfd_assert_chmod(fd, 0644); + close(fd); + + printf("%s sysctl 1\n", memfd_str); + sysctl_assert_write("1"); + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_1", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + sysctl_fail_write("0"); + close(fd); + + printf("%s sysctl 2\n", memfd_str); + sysctl_assert_write("2"); + mfd_fail_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_2", + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + sysctl_fail_write("0"); + sysctl_fail_write("1"); +} + +static int newpid_thread_fn(void *arg) +{ + test_sysctl_child(); + return 0; +} + +static void test_sysctl_child2(void) +{ + int fd; + + sysctl_fail_write("0"); + fd = mfd_assert_new("kern_memfd_sysctl_1", + mfd_def_size, + MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING); + + mfd_assert_mode(fd, 0666); + mfd_assert_has_seals(fd, F_SEAL_EXEC); + mfd_fail_chmod(fd, 0777); + close(fd); +} + +static int newpid_thread_fn2(void *arg) +{ + test_sysctl_child2(); + return 0; +} +static pid_t spawn_newpid_thread(unsigned int flags, int (*fn)(void *)) +{ + uint8_t *stack; + pid_t pid; + + stack = malloc(STACK_SIZE); + if (!stack) { + printf("malloc(STACK_SIZE) failed: %m\n"); + abort(); + } + + pid = clone(fn, + stack + STACK_SIZE, + SIGCHLD | flags, + NULL); + if (pid < 0) { + printf("clone() failed: %m\n"); + abort(); + } + + return pid; +} + +static void join_newpid_thread(pid_t pid) +{ + waitpid(pid, NULL, 0); +} + +/* + * Test sysctl + * A very basic sealing test to see whether setting/retrieving seals works. + */ +static void test_sysctl(void) +{ + int pid = spawn_newpid_thread(CLONE_NEWPID, newpid_thread_fn); + + join_newpid_thread(pid); + + printf("%s child ns\n", memfd_str); + sysctl_assert_write("1"); + + pid = spawn_newpid_thread(CLONE_NEWPID, newpid_thread_fn2); + join_newpid_thread(pid); +} + /* * Test sharing via dup() * Test that seals are shared between dupped FDs and they're all equal. @@ -1179,13 +1394,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) test_create(); test_basic(); + test_exec_seal(); + test_exec_no_seal(); + test_noexec_seal(); test_seal_write(); test_seal_future_write(); test_seal_shrink(); test_seal_grow(); test_seal_resize(); - test_seal_exec(); test_share_dup("SHARE-DUP", ""); test_share_mmap("SHARE-MMAP", ""); @@ -1201,6 +1418,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) test_share_fork("SHARE-FORK", SHARED_FT_STR); join_idle_thread(pid); + test_sysctl(); + printf("memfd: DONE\n"); return 0; From patchwork Wed Dec 7 15:49:39 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13067295 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190FCC4708E for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229869AbiLGPt6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50800 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229836AbiLGPtv (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 10:49:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B6D63BBA for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id o1-20020a17090a678100b00219cf69e5f0so1832724pjj.2 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=br+NzT6Ekl7un/bONAJTTP+zVNWLoPX0fUe5M313tYk=; b=KveNxSwrAsaP96yq/2ARVH0FCPenY0jXv1lv5clhnkzL7NYz4dsA1XuERs7Zl08c5t 8vCBKRTn59G+ilGEelru03ZLrBZQfDmbySTIZfw8NCC1D/7Z0wESKY45SOkudNKxEzZ8 +FtkzZYTl3DL+21FEiiiK6YesMBG9HrOrbn8g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=br+NzT6Ekl7un/bONAJTTP+zVNWLoPX0fUe5M313tYk=; b=1VFyGe1HMGmbqayGuIK8gp7iGa0ecmj/HD4t7g8kXHyxFF3e4xO1/inGfajzpZ5apa 5M3HJ/EJAxNH59IGllOwzmAlxKIfA8tSNWpb/jN6tpBqRTUsP4Eq/ckpWrYKdlVXb0pR 1MohYulNO5fDMbfrLEQOhPdJPJ28HXDdoFyBHy7JOPxBwgZoNweGTUau/U/36+Et/d9u 4A91lu7QNqNn6QBsYk/1mjllWRNXv1fI35ZHDNGMXCf/Gtd/SiKHjsRT0vBc7/PMTE1r WIob2hrX66bVJ7+aiDMDBZBynFpzZ/g3wybt3ve/pcKmggnjLOqYAF6jbzKvXLr0mIcG k7MA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plMdcWlONTy1WvVP5Z1zdQKW19wi488WWP6lr8M/rISW60J8cIX j387bM7vVmyu+J+Lg1IcVODrKA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf57dGN3HP5pxzO/6ZrtWfZYkkrlIG8JgxnnEiR9bTT2jaGtlpyPcPbFFAjo3seHVll29EA/mQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b611:b0:188:f570:7bdf with SMTP id b17-20020a170902b61100b00188f5707bdfmr682078pls.40.1670428190523; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9-20020a170902ecc900b0017f7628cbddsm14920934plh.30.2022.12.07.07.49.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:49:49 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH v6 6/6] mm/memfd: security hook for memfd_create Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:49:39 +0000 Message-Id: <20221207154939.2532830-7-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog In-Reply-To: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Xu The new security_memfd_create allows lsm to check flags of memfd_create. The security by default system (such as chromeos) can use this to implement system wide lsm to allow only non-executable memfd being created. Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu Reported-by: kernel test robot --- include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 1 + include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 4 ++++ include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++ mm/memfd.c | 5 +++++ security/security.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h index ec119da1d89b..fd40840927c8 100644 --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_alloc_security, struct file *file) LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, file_free_security, struct file *file) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, file_ioctl, struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +LSM_HOOK(int, 0, memfd_create, char *name, unsigned int flags) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, mmap_addr, unsigned long addr) LSM_HOOK(int, 0, mmap_file, struct file *file, unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags) diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h index 4ec80b96c22e..5a18a6552278 100644 --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h @@ -543,6 +543,10 @@ * simple integer value. When @arg represents a user space pointer, it * should never be used by the security module. * Return 0 if permission is granted. + * @memfd_create: + * @name is the name of memfd file. + * @flags is the flags used in memfd_create. + * Return 0 if permission is granted. * @mmap_addr : * Check permissions for a mmap operation at @addr. * @addr contains virtual address that will be used for the operation. diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index ca1b7109c0db..5b87a780822a 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask); int security_file_alloc(struct file *file); void security_file_free(struct file *file); int security_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); +int security_memfd_create(char *name, unsigned int flags); int security_mmap_file(struct file *file, unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags); int security_mmap_addr(unsigned long addr); @@ -963,6 +964,11 @@ static inline int security_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, return 0; } +static inline int security_memfd_create(char *name, unsigned int flags) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline int security_mmap_file(struct file *file, unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags) { diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 92f0a5765f7c..f04ed5f0474f 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -356,6 +356,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, goto err_name; } + /* security hook for memfd_create */ + error = security_memfd_create(name, flags); + if (error) + return error; + if (flags & MFD_HUGETLB) { file = hugetlb_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE, HUGETLB_ANONHUGE_INODE, diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index 79d82cb6e469..5c018e080923 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -1010,6 +1010,19 @@ int security_sb_clone_mnt_opts(const struct super_block *oldsb, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sb_clone_mnt_opts); +int security_add_mnt_opt(const char *option, const char *val, int len, + void **mnt_opts) +{ + return call_int_hook(sb_add_mnt_opt, -EINVAL, + option, val, len, mnt_opts); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_add_mnt_opt); + +int security_memfd_create(char *name, unsigned int flags) +{ + return call_int_hook(memfd_create, 0, name, flags); +} + int security_move_mount(const struct path *from_path, const struct path *to_path) { return call_int_hook(move_mount, 0, from_path, to_path);