From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:35 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069405 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9693C4708D for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229563AbiLIJoy (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54352 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229696AbiLIJow (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:52 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46D15F6E5 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id vp12so10196647ejc.8 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MHNOxudxM6McPM4QNqz211aWfFtZ/qdgv2gbbQO9ibA=; b=eIu3jvkhMV0SgHXbMxoO9ggOsQbotsSXnIGQLQlErSqbE4QM2apY+S2L2Qmoe9lNtw WpPf5UxAXQ01doOD9PV4DZllqMq074/En55/y6ctROUJddGVyDy6dRkyUsT5A8JYxLa2 KoT8KRH+fH9eYZu50Xj469phSDWIcJGzkPlVFyxiwl2N0oQEOuUijndkgvM6M1ZdBFSy Tu1MSo85/8rAu8Kj5nZsYrrv6+jfwnH2j2Cald50SnmCCb7bVy0GBokeZhzMdfIBoabZ vR8TAZy8+J4CXyTefWgHgEAYhen6/NuUm89AaHEAIFNxKtu9kJvqjK3hJLI9Cuma+TMI aGrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MHNOxudxM6McPM4QNqz211aWfFtZ/qdgv2gbbQO9ibA=; b=VzXEmxtQ63jlbwJJXe+8tyHUI2PQJfCbPCyeOrL1O1tFXhkOJU3R/9Z5c/t85fzEuB 6W9Qf4oVpMhEHHbwZtfw1SzBj/g+RcEDLcOBAWh2N/7zRQd25hDcczzaqawqraZQaEig QjM2qn2o/rjlbAk0Mb23Id4peNKQcu5auQ3N1NH5edZEJEE25T4W111vrpuHRTwVgmAq P9A6V3EVFkp5EOSbDRmpPyTwNYn4xBqc1rK772u9q2AystTRH/JF84x4SClIMS8uFhCJ SKoAIdjkvkEHT/JrvvBNXYqYLv1Tyq3mN0d/oMrh9yTQWljsUGgXDGx1tws//KD42OIm DVDg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk94rh6O0djxUNe1lUck7YIfvA3N0XylASpwKWYt/XA0Eobg1LP uEMJwPk8wLqxeMMnf9gDhKJUog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5WIPMDpTQYb6xjpns1HCA2M0e9WR8fOv9cIfZt//BUwCi/Si8RuCSNpOT/ew3uNbbfbH+LVg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1146:b0:7ae:cda1:76d0 with SMTP id i6-20020a170906114600b007aecda176d0mr3983118eja.15.1670579089016; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:48 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Paolo Valente , Gabriele Felici , Carmine Zaccagnino Subject: [PATCH V10 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Single-LUN multi-actuator SCSI drives, as well as all multi-actuator SATA drives appear as a single device to the I/O subsystem [1]. Yet they address commands to different actuators internally, as a function of Logical Block Addressing (LBAs). A given sector is reachable by only one of the actuators. For example, Seagate’s Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA) version contains two actuators and maps the lower half of the SATA LBA space to the lower actuator and the upper half to the upper actuator. Evidently, to fully utilize actuators, no actuator must be left idle or underutilized while there is pending I/O for it. The block layer must somehow control the load of each actuator individually. This commit lays the ground for allowing BFQ to provide such a per-actuator control. BFQ associates an I/O-request sync bfq_queue with each process doing synchronous I/O, or with a group of processes, in case of queue merging. Then BFQ serves one bfq_queue at a time. While in service, a bfq_queue is emptied in request-position order. Yet the same process, or group of processes, may generate I/O for different actuators. In this case, different streams of I/O (each for a different actuator) get all inserted into the same sync bfq_queue. So there is basically no individual control on when each stream is served, i.e., on when the I/O requests of the stream are picked from the bfq_queue and dispatched to the drive. This commit enables BFQ to control the service of each actuator individually for synchronous I/O, by simply splitting each sync bfq_queue into N queues, one for each actuator. In other words, a sync bfq_queue is now associated to a pair (process, actuator). As a consequence of this split, the per-queue proportional-share policy implemented by BFQ will guarantee that the sync I/O generated for each actuator, by each process, receives its fair share of service. This is just a preparatory patch. If the I/O of the same process happens to be sent to different queues, then each of these queues may undergo queue merging. To handle this event, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be properly extended. In addition, stable merging must be disabled to avoid loss of control on individual actuators. Finally, also async queues must be split. These issues are described in detail and addressed in next commits. As for this commit, although multiple per-process bfq_queues are provided, the I/O of each process or group of processes is still sent to only one queue, regardless of the actuator the I/O is for. The forwarding to distinct bfq_queues will be enabled after addressing the above issues. [1] https://www.linaro.org/blog/budget-fair-queueing-bfq-linux-io-scheduler-optimizations-for-multi-actuator-sata-hard-drives/ Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici Signed-off-by: Carmine Zaccagnino Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 92 ++++++++++++++------------ block/bfq-iosched.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- block/bfq-iosched.h | 51 +++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index 7d624a3a3f0f..7ea77f994424 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -704,6 +704,47 @@ void bfq_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bfq_put_queue(bfqq); } +static void bfq_sync_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, + struct bfq_queue *sync_bfqq, + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_group *bfqg, + unsigned int act_idx) +{ + struct bfq_queue *bfqq; + + if (!sync_bfqq->new_bfqq && !bfq_bfqq_coop(sync_bfqq)) { + /* We are the only user of this bfqq, just move it */ + if (sync_bfqq->entity.sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) + bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd, sync_bfqq, bfqg); + return; + } + + /* + * The queue was merged to a different queue. Check + * that the merge chain still belongs to the same + * cgroup. + */ + for (bfqq = sync_bfqq; bfqq; bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq) + if (bfqq->entity.sched_data != + &bfqg->sched_data) + break; + if (bfqq) { + /* + * Some queue changed cgroup so the merge is not valid + * anymore. We cannot easily just cancel the merge (by + * clearing new_bfqq) as there may be other processes + * using this queue and holding refs to all queues + * below sync_bfqq->new_bfqq. Similarly if the merge + * already happened, we need to detach from bfqq now + * so that we cannot merge bio to a request from the + * old cgroup. + */ + bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq); + bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, true, act_idx); + } +} + /** * __bfq_bic_change_cgroup - move @bic to @bfqg. * @bfqd: the queue descriptor. @@ -718,53 +759,20 @@ static void *__bfq_bic_change_cgroup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_group *bfqg) { - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, 0); - struct bfq_queue *sync_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, 1); - struct bfq_entity *entity; + unsigned int act_idx; - if (async_bfqq) { - entity = &async_bfqq->entity; + for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < bfqd->num_actuators; act_idx++) { + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false, act_idx); + struct bfq_queue *sync_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx); - if (entity->sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) { - bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, 0); + if (async_bfqq && + async_bfqq->entity.sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) { + bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, false, act_idx); bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, async_bfqq); } - } - if (sync_bfqq) { - if (!sync_bfqq->new_bfqq && !bfq_bfqq_coop(sync_bfqq)) { - /* We are the only user of this bfqq, just move it */ - if (sync_bfqq->entity.sched_data != &bfqg->sched_data) - bfq_bfqq_move(bfqd, sync_bfqq, bfqg); - } else { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq; - - /* - * The queue was merged to a different queue. Check - * that the merge chain still belongs to the same - * cgroup. - */ - for (bfqq = sync_bfqq; bfqq; bfqq = bfqq->new_bfqq) - if (bfqq->entity.sched_data != - &bfqg->sched_data) - break; - if (bfqq) { - /* - * Some queue changed cgroup so the merge is - * not valid anymore. We cannot easily just - * cancel the merge (by clearing new_bfqq) as - * there may be other processes using this - * queue and holding refs to all queues below - * sync_bfqq->new_bfqq. Similarly if the merge - * already happened, we need to detach from - * bfqq now so that we cannot merge bio to a - * request from the old cgroup. - */ - bfq_put_cooperator(sync_bfqq); - bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, sync_bfqq); - bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, 1); - } - } + if (sync_bfqq) + bfq_sync_bfqq_move(bfqd, sync_bfqq, bic, bfqg, act_idx); } return bfqg; diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 7ea427817f7f..16dbf52ce74b 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -377,14 +377,21 @@ static const unsigned long bfq_late_stable_merging = 600; #define RQ_BIC(rq) ((struct bfq_io_cq *)((rq)->elv.priv[0])) #define RQ_BFQQ(rq) ((rq)->elv.priv[1]) -struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) +struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync, + unsigned int actuator_idx) { - return bic->bfqq[is_sync]; + if (is_sync) + return bic->bfqq[1][actuator_idx]; + + return bic->bfqq[0][actuator_idx]; } static void bfq_put_stable_ref(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); -void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync) +void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, + struct bfq_queue *bfqq, + bool is_sync, + unsigned int actuator_idx) { /* * If bfqq != NULL, then a non-stable queue merge between @@ -399,7 +406,10 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync) * we cancel the stable merge if * bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq. */ - bic->bfqq[is_sync] = bfqq; + if (is_sync) + bic->bfqq[1][actuator_idx] = bfqq; + else + bic->bfqq[0][actuator_idx] = bfqq; if (bfqq && bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq) { /* @@ -672,9 +682,9 @@ static void bfq_limit_depth(blk_opf_t opf, struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) { struct bfq_data *bfqd = data->q->elevator->elevator_data; struct bfq_io_cq *bic = bfq_bic_lookup(data->q); - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic ? bic_to_bfqq(bic, op_is_sync(opf)) : NULL; int depth; unsigned limit = data->q->nr_requests; + unsigned int act_idx; /* Sync reads have full depth available */ if (op_is_sync(opf) && !op_is_write(opf)) { @@ -684,14 +694,21 @@ static void bfq_limit_depth(blk_opf_t opf, struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data) limit = (limit * depth) >> bfqd->full_depth_shift; } - /* - * Does queue (or any parent entity) exceed number of requests that - * should be available to it? Heavily limit depth so that it cannot - * consume more available requests and thus starve other entities. - */ - if (bfqq && bfqq_request_over_limit(bfqq, limit)) - depth = 1; + for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < bfqd->num_actuators; act_idx++) { + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = + bic ? bic_to_bfqq(bic, op_is_sync(opf), act_idx) : NULL; + /* + * Does queue (or any parent entity) exceed number of + * requests that should be available to it? Heavily + * limit depth so that it cannot consume more + * available requests and thus starve other entities. + */ + if (bfqq && bfqq_request_over_limit(bfqq, limit)) { + depth = 1; + break; + } + } bfq_log(bfqd, "[%s] wr_busy %d sync %d depth %u", __func__, bfqd->wr_busy_queues, op_is_sync(opf), depth); if (depth) @@ -1812,6 +1829,18 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_higher_class_or_weight(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, return bfqq_weight > in_serv_weight; } +/* + * Get the index of the actuator that will serve bio. + */ +static unsigned int bfq_actuator_index(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio) +{ + /* + * Multi-actuator support not complete yet, so always return 0 + * for the moment (to keep incomplete mechanisms off). + */ + return 0; +} + static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq); static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd, @@ -2142,7 +2171,7 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * We reset waker detection logic also if too much time has passed * since the first detection. If wakeups are rare, pointless idling * doesn't hurt throughput that much. The condition below makes sure - * we do not uselessly idle blocking waker in more than 1/64 cases. + * we do not uselessly idle blocking waker in more than 1/64 cases. */ if (bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq != bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq || @@ -2478,7 +2507,8 @@ static bool bfq_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio, */ bfq_bic_update_cgroup(bic, bio); - bfqd->bio_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, op_is_sync(bio->bi_opf)); + bfqd->bio_bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, op_is_sync(bio->bi_opf), + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); } else { bfqd->bio_bfqq = NULL; } @@ -3174,7 +3204,7 @@ bfq_merge_bfqqs(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, /* * Merge queues (that is, let bic redirect its requests to new_bfqq) */ - bic_set_bfqq(bic, new_bfqq, 1); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, new_bfqq, true, bfqq->actuator_idx); bfq_mark_bfqq_coop(new_bfqq); /* * new_bfqq now belongs to at least two bics (it is a shared queue): @@ -4808,11 +4838,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd) */ if (bfq_bfqq_wait_request(bfqq) || (bfqq->dispatched != 0 && bfq_better_to_idle(bfqq))) { - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq = - bfqq->bic && bfqq->bic->bfqq[0] && - bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->bic->bfqq[0]) && - bfqq->bic->bfqq[0]->next_rq ? - bfqq->bic->bfqq[0] : NULL; + unsigned int act_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx; + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq = NULL; struct bfq_queue *blocked_bfqq = !hlist_empty(&bfqq->woken_list) ? container_of(bfqq->woken_list.first, @@ -4820,6 +4847,10 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd) woken_list_node) : NULL; + if (bfqq->bic && bfqq->bic->bfqq[0][act_idx] && + bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->bic->bfqq[0][act_idx]) && + bfqq->bic->bfqq[0][act_idx]->next_rq) + async_bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0][act_idx]; /* * The next four mutually-exclusive ifs decide * whether to try injection, and choose the queue to @@ -4904,7 +4935,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd) icq_to_bic(async_bfqq->next_rq->elv.icq) == bfqq->bic && bfq_serv_to_charge(async_bfqq->next_rq, async_bfqq) <= bfq_bfqq_budget_left(async_bfqq)) - bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0]; + bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0][act_idx]; else if (bfqq->waker_bfqq && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->waker_bfqq) && bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq && @@ -5365,49 +5396,55 @@ static void bfq_exit_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); } -static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) +static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync, + unsigned int actuator_idx) { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync); + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync, actuator_idx); struct bfq_data *bfqd; if (bfqq) bfqd = bfqq->bfqd; /* NULL if scheduler already exited */ if (bfqq && bfqd) { - unsigned long flags; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags); bfqq->bic = NULL; bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq); - bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync, actuator_idx); } } static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq) { struct bfq_io_cq *bic = icq_to_bic(icq); + struct bfq_data *bfqd = bic_to_bfqd(bic); + unsigned long flags; + unsigned int act_idx; + /* + * If bfqd and thus bfqd->num_actuators is not available any + * longer, then cycle over all possible per-actuator bfqqs in + * next loop. We rely on bic being zeroed on creation, and + * therefore on its unused per-actuator fields being NULL. + */ + unsigned int num_actuators = BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS; - if (bic->stable_merge_bfqq) { - struct bfq_data *bfqd = bic->stable_merge_bfqq->bfqd; + /* + * bfqd is NULL if scheduler already exited, and in that case + * this is the last time these queues are accessed. + */ + if (bfqd) { + spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags); + num_actuators = bfqd->num_actuators; + } - /* - * bfqd is NULL if scheduler already exited, and in - * that case this is the last time bfqq is accessed. - */ - if (bfqd) { - unsigned long flags; + if (bic->stable_merge_bfqq) + bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq); - spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags); - bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); - } else { - bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq); - } + for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < num_actuators; act_idx++) { + bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx); + bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, false, act_idx); } - bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true); - bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, false); + if (bfqd) + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); } /* @@ -5484,23 +5521,25 @@ static void bfq_check_ioprio_change(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bio *bio) bic->ioprio = ioprio; - bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false); + bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, false, bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); if (bfqq) { bfq_release_process_ref(bfqd, bfqq); bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, false, bic, true); - bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, false, bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); } - bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, true); + bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, true, bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); if (bfqq) bfq_set_next_ioprio_data(bfqq, bic); } static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, - struct bfq_io_cq *bic, pid_t pid, int is_sync) + struct bfq_io_cq *bic, pid_t pid, int is_sync, + unsigned int act_idx) { u64 now_ns = ktime_get_ns(); + bfqq->actuator_idx = act_idx; RB_CLEAR_NODE(&bfqq->entity.rb_node); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqq->fifo); INIT_HLIST_NODE(&bfqq->burst_list_node); @@ -5753,7 +5792,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd, if (bfqq) { bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, bic, current->pid, - is_sync); + is_sync, bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); bfq_init_entity(&bfqq->entity, bfqg); bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "allocated"); } else { @@ -6068,7 +6107,8 @@ static bool __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * then complete the merge and redirect it to * new_bfqq. */ - if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), 1) == bfqq) + if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), true, + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)) == bfqq) bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq, new_bfqq); @@ -6622,7 +6662,7 @@ bfq_split_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) return bfqq; } - bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, 1); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, true, bfqq->actuator_idx); bfq_put_cooperator(bfqq); @@ -6636,7 +6676,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bool split, bool is_sync, bool *new_queue) { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync); + unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio); + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync, act_idx); if (likely(bfqq && bfqq != &bfqd->oom_bfqq)) return bfqq; @@ -6648,7 +6689,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfq_put_queue(bfqq); bfqq = bfq_get_queue(bfqd, bio, is_sync, bic, split); - bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, is_sync); + bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, is_sync, act_idx); if (split && is_sync) { if ((bic->was_in_burst_list && bfqd->large_burst) || bic->saved_in_large_burst) @@ -7090,8 +7131,10 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) * Our fallback bfqq if bfq_find_alloc_queue() runs into OOM issues. * Grab a permanent reference to it, so that the normal code flow * will not attempt to free it. + * Set zero as actuator index: we will pretend that + * all I/O requests are for the same actuator. */ - bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqd->oom_bfqq, NULL, 1, 0); + bfq_init_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqd->oom_bfqq, NULL, 1, 0, 0); bfqd->oom_bfqq.ref++; bfqd->oom_bfqq.new_ioprio = BFQ_DEFAULT_QUEUE_IOPRIO; bfqd->oom_bfqq.new_ioprio_class = IOPRIO_CLASS_BE; @@ -7110,6 +7153,13 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) bfqd->queue = q; + /* + * Multi-actuator support not complete yet, unconditionally + * set to only one actuator for the moment (to keep incomplete + * mechanisms off). + */ + bfqd->num_actuators = 1; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->dispatch); hrtimer_init(&bfqd->idle_slice_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 71f721670ab6..2b413ddffbb9 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ */ #define BFQ_SOFTRT_WEIGHT_FACTOR 100 +/* + * Maximum number of actuators supported. This constant is used simply + * to define the size of the static array that will contain + * per-actuator data. The current value is hopefully a good upper + * bound to the possible number of actuators of any actual drive. + */ +#define BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS 8 + struct bfq_entity; /** @@ -225,12 +233,14 @@ struct bfq_ttime { * struct bfq_queue - leaf schedulable entity. * * A bfq_queue is a leaf request queue; it can be associated with an - * io_context or more, if it is async or shared between cooperating - * processes. @cgroup holds a reference to the cgroup, to be sure that it - * does not disappear while a bfqq still references it (mostly to avoid - * races between request issuing and task migration followed by cgroup - * destruction). - * All the fields are protected by the queue lock of the containing bfqd. + * io_context or more, if it is async or shared between cooperating + * processes. Besides, it contains I/O requests for only one actuator + * (an io_context is associated with a different bfq_queue for each + * actuator it generates I/O for). @cgroup holds a reference to the + * cgroup, to be sure that it does not disappear while a bfqq still + * references it (mostly to avoid races between request issuing and + * task migration followed by cgroup destruction). All the fields are + * protected by the queue lock of the containing bfqd. */ struct bfq_queue { /* reference counter */ @@ -395,6 +405,9 @@ struct bfq_queue { * the woken queues when this queue exits. */ struct hlist_head woken_list; + + /* index of the actuator this queue is associated with */ + unsigned int actuator_idx; }; /** @@ -403,8 +416,17 @@ struct bfq_queue { struct bfq_io_cq { /* associated io_cq structure */ struct io_cq icq; /* must be the first member */ - /* array of two process queues, the sync and the async */ - struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2]; + /* + * Matrix of associated process queues: first row for async + * queues, second row sync queues. Each row contains one + * column for each actuator. An I/O request generated by the + * process is inserted into the queue pointed by bfqq[i][j] if + * the request is to be served by the j-th actuator of the + * drive, where i==0 or i==1, depending on whether the request + * is async or sync. So there is a distinct queue for each + * actuator. + */ + struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; /* per (request_queue, blkcg) ioprio */ int ioprio; #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED @@ -768,6 +790,13 @@ struct bfq_data { */ unsigned int word_depths[2][2]; unsigned int full_depth_shift; + + /* + * Number of independent actuators. This is equal to 1 in + * case of single-actuator drives. + */ + unsigned int num_actuators; + }; enum bfqq_state_flags { @@ -964,8 +993,10 @@ struct bfq_group { extern const int bfq_timeout; -struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync); -void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync); +struct bfq_queue *bic_to_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync, + unsigned int actuator_idx); +void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync, + unsigned int actuator_idx); struct bfq_data *bic_to_bfqd(struct bfq_io_cq *bic); void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq); void bfq_weights_tree_add(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:36 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069406 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA665C4167B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229892AbiLIJoy (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54368 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229756AbiLIJox (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C145F6F4 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id vp12so10196760ejc.8 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=H138aqobhHjmcHH6RFqFD59W1hrmC7/KCJez2I0jafo=; b=btsU6l53eY4vFTX9AKDdy2g9od1LLpdLdDuu1QCPF/k7IGTTEemCejPLwajzETQFOM rHSM4wnGbVop+UajdwrT/guv2ol9KtEfORylRr+hxwkiQnVNvBx+7LMBBg3KGjQbf11o 9f9nHHpTXziUIugVTOV14V58b7lRvIhMWGQti3p+PROjNvzcqtbqT1Bp7hIH7y9zhnZ1 tyJm3f2OgsfG42zlttZeAGz/0UdT3NcR9ljWDRl/9t5ZQPSNum9HsWM9DR8C/dEHNtVR eunCVoF7iRT8Ke4TBTKkXZCV2B0wcmKLkXbqmZrp1D2EiNVfAble4f6sHizgGQ27PaPD Qaag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H138aqobhHjmcHH6RFqFD59W1hrmC7/KCJez2I0jafo=; b=oB71d4MAPT6ekAsuSTd3L3rkM2FkkkOLE2jf/I/Pifhn9OVfY3p56LWkXgRBj9I1MA wOheS62OeCU2NMCRZAqtlQYLlgs+wd6khNc8JiWY31bid6/IRWJC5jlT1wjA30sAh8Tk rlxucIuKaFgADTtIuNkCHOCwIfVZMc15eadoTSRudPB1b1PLEHvjjPautSIkZ0qKdG2g gsScfVka0eXKgiGYItuC2ABBRu7B0n28seD68deP8E5ai9OcoacHfSv0kQAbL4LNrN2t +VqqD4nNlt0bIVhCUUoPA05VEPs2nt9ioHKyBQ6r6AUPs53iPfuIxoOmEZSMBwW23i05 twzg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plLPghQnwZHvLfZ7gc0mvQ7AyS3jv76NFY9EfzQv7zv78GqTAWr e71vDHWEVfUTAiKIo7JkB+mohQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf56YsryAxyHwHwpOu7+wWTQ89NirJxVuHzRZQds2YmCDTN7qwuW2baOR6DrPcHkXgWAYPsz8g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a0cb:b0:7b9:c08b:e8a2 with SMTP id hw11-20020a170907a0cb00b007b9c08be8a2mr4665419ejc.15.1670579089983; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:49 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Paolo Valente , Damien Le Moal Subject: [PATCH V10 2/8] block, bfq: forbid stable merging of queues associated with different actuators Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-3-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org If queues associated with different actuators are merged, then control is lost on each actuator. Therefore some actuator may be underutilized, and throughput may decrease. This problem cannot occur with basic queue merging, because the latter is triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are not close to each other. Yet it may happen with stable merging. To address this issue, this commit prevents stable merging from occurring among queues associated with different actuators. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 16dbf52ce74b..456b5f5c24fd 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -5708,9 +5708,13 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, * it has been set already, but too long ago, then move it * forward to bfqq. Finally, move also if bfqq belongs to a * different group than last_bfqq_created, or if bfqq has a - * different ioprio or ioprio_class. If none of these - * conditions holds true, then try an early stable merge or - * schedule a delayed stable merge. + * different ioprio, ioprio_class or actuator_idx. If none of + * these conditions holds true, then try an early stable merge + * or schedule a delayed stable merge. As for the condition on + * actuator_idx, the reason is that, if queues associated with + * different actuators are merged, then control is lost on + * each actuator. Therefore some actuator may be + * underutilized, and throughput may decrease. * * A delayed merge is scheduled (instead of performing an * early merge), in case bfqq might soon prove to be more @@ -5728,7 +5732,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfqq->creation_time) || bfqq->entity.parent != last_bfqq_created->entity.parent || bfqq->ioprio != last_bfqq_created->ioprio || - bfqq->ioprio_class != last_bfqq_created->ioprio_class) + bfqq->ioprio_class != last_bfqq_created->ioprio_class || + bfqq->actuator_idx != last_bfqq_created->actuator_idx) *source_bfqq = bfqq; else if (time_after_eq(last_bfqq_created->creation_time + bfqd->bfq_burst_interval, From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:37 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069408 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D18C10F1B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229954AbiLIJo4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229873AbiLIJoy (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:54 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813415F6CE for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id vv4so10243543ejc.2 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XTwJnYwXqmbEqiuqtSDQykovTGEftLU9E09zUz3ipHY=; b=kZCb1P+xQUQGWI9rt3RjwrlxI7+5AYyajBbAONzpZCYql+unWQoGh41KjigN9Csqsu aLEV7t2YbVi4j1Wy94Ds3e1WHRoKf+XEeAU7lg9RGeas8aFxyZJ9XLL4CJB6ykX49uYl rDvl8WK+hD4m9xmFUWtw9MK8y0p5wnDeWdc92HJXjVedGrn1l95v38SzT7okz78/2MDq G+96ZSUegNzzll14u74NIDRuhQMGv/jlkN6E1ku18XTu9deW0ra58k5TTZD89uaFPeqg xSGB1WBd4Af0cdDzdKR3gIo4Bl6EchoUaZFdQmGemqdrNgc9pDsNfbxt1/At9cFS2bG5 eytw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XTwJnYwXqmbEqiuqtSDQykovTGEftLU9E09zUz3ipHY=; b=o/YkMAhjfo8NVDxWtBtFic5dXig4qid3sG2j4U+8UBtlspVpLlx1vC5+8ZrxIbpV+C lq3ZxLDcTHNfwuakdsgp3kbanf8BoQDjWq7jDDDL5UL5fzdOzZfRH9XWW3SRK0dzPG5t WaRs1MhkwsyJGdM4a+sGPU0ZJ+OQ/AS5SYpvIPZ35IbIEZXsAbmBt5cRxzKB4QFFJT+5 8GWLBiU4oQhON5szTM/62MgeLlMmXep1vGwtIZ4GM79Y2HiIF7Bkpj4YYVhghDv69SOB qiPrg4u2jl44w5hORZLy8ZFEcKkx9RmAJ8TGER2ILwaD4TZMRwRwet2gAodya6HPQ+Ul fa0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plcz77921huJTRnJpTPOOgeUk9fEXKLpF1nXCgRl7payxulORS2 VTNpo3OYvycfNermuVhs5uKbNQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5fOelB+EJjG/1AHgJoDIwsKI3/LaxrPd21bH61bqxKcxoNA2hxEVhhSSSHpeo+LMr67ojNJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f856:b0:7c0:b0f9:e360 with SMTP id ks22-20020a170906f85600b007c0b0f9e360mr4249900ejb.16.1670579090976; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:50 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Paolo Valente , Damien Le Moal , Gianmarco Lusvardi , Giulio Barabino , Emiliano Maccaferri Subject: [PATCH V10 3/8] block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-4-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org With a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be able to accommodate its per-queue persistent information for N queues. Currently it stores this information for just one queue, in several scalar fields. This is a preparatory commit for moving to accommodating persistent information for N queues. In particular, this commit packs all the above scalar fields into a single data structure. Then there is now only one field, in bfq_io_cq, that stores all the above information. This scalar field will then be turned into an array by a following commit. Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- block/bfq-iosched.h | 52 +++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 456b5f5c24fd..0d6b35ef3d3f 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -406,12 +406,14 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, * we cancel the stable merge if * bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq. */ + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + if (is_sync) bic->bfqq[1][actuator_idx] = bfqq; else bic->bfqq[0][actuator_idx] = bfqq; - if (bfqq && bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq) { + if (bfqq && bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq) { /* * Actually, these same instructions are executed also * in bfq_setup_cooperator, in case of abort or actual @@ -420,9 +422,9 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, * did so, we would nest even more complexity in this * function. */ - bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq); + bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq); - bic->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL; + bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL; } } @@ -1179,38 +1181,40 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool bfq_already_existing) { + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; unsigned int old_wr_coeff = 1; bool busy = bfq_already_existing && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq); - if (bic->saved_has_short_ttime) + if (bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime) bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); else bfq_clear_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); - if (bic->saved_IO_bound) + if (bfqq_data->saved_IO_bound) bfq_mark_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); else bfq_clear_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); - bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = bic->saved_last_serv_time_ns; - bfqq->inject_limit = bic->saved_inject_limit; - bfqq->decrease_time_jif = bic->saved_decrease_time_jif; + bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns; + bfqq->inject_limit = bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit; + bfqq->decrease_time_jif = bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif; - bfqq->entity.new_weight = bic->saved_weight; - bfqq->ttime = bic->saved_ttime; - bfqq->io_start_time = bic->saved_io_start_time; - bfqq->tot_idle_time = bic->saved_tot_idle_time; + bfqq->entity.new_weight = bfqq_data->saved_weight; + bfqq->ttime = bfqq_data->saved_ttime; + bfqq->io_start_time = bfqq_data->saved_io_start_time; + bfqq->tot_idle_time = bfqq_data->saved_tot_idle_time; /* * Restore weight coefficient only if low_latency is on */ if (bfqd->low_latency) { old_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff; - bfqq->wr_coeff = bic->saved_wr_coeff; + bfqq->wr_coeff = bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff; } - bfqq->service_from_wr = bic->saved_service_from_wr; - bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt; - bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish; - bfqq->wr_cur_max_time = bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time; + bfqq->service_from_wr = bfqq_data->saved_service_from_wr; + bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = + bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt; + bfqq->last_wr_start_finish = bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish; + bfqq->wr_cur_max_time = bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time; if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 && (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq) || time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->last_wr_start_finish + @@ -1895,7 +1899,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd, wr_or_deserves_wr = bfqd->low_latency && (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 || (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && - (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->stably_merged) && + (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data.stably_merged) && (*interactive || soft_rt))); /* @@ -2909,6 +2913,7 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, void *io_struct, bool request, struct bfq_io_cq *bic) { struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; /* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */ if (bfqq->new_bfqq) @@ -2930,21 +2935,21 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, * stable merging) also if bic is associated with a * sync queue, but this bfqq is async */ - if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && bic->stable_merge_bfqq && + if (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq && !bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq) && time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->split_time + msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging)) && time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->creation_time + msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging))) { struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq = - bic->stable_merge_bfqq; + bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq; int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq), bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq)); /* deschedule stable merge, because done or aborted here */ bfq_put_stable_ref(stable_merge_bfqq); - bic->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL; + bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL; if (!idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) && proc_ref > 0) { @@ -2953,10 +2958,10 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq); if (new_bfqq) { - bic->stably_merged = true; + bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; if (new_bfqq->bic) - new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged = - true; + new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged = + true; } return new_bfqq; } else @@ -3055,6 +3060,7 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { struct bfq_io_cq *bic = bfqq->bic; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; /* * If !bfqq->bic, the queue is already shared or its requests @@ -3064,18 +3070,21 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) if (!bic) return; - bic->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns; - bic->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit; - bic->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif; - - bic->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight; - bic->saved_ttime = bfqq->ttime; - bic->saved_has_short_ttime = bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); - bic->saved_IO_bound = bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); - bic->saved_io_start_time = bfqq->io_start_time; - bic->saved_tot_idle_time = bfqq->tot_idle_time; - bic->saved_in_large_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq); - bic->was_in_burst_list = !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq->burst_list_node); + bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns; + bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit; + bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif; + + bfqq_data->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight; + bfqq_data->saved_ttime = bfqq->ttime; + bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime = + bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); + bfqq_data->saved_IO_bound = bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); + bfqq_data->saved_io_start_time = bfqq->io_start_time; + bfqq_data->saved_tot_idle_time = bfqq->tot_idle_time; + bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq); + bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list = + !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq->burst_list_node); + if (unlikely(bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq) && !bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq) && bfqq->bfqd->low_latency)) { @@ -3088,17 +3097,21 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) * to bfqq, so that to avoid that bfqq unjustly fails * to enjoy weight raising if split soon. */ - bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff; - bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bfq_smallest_from_now(); - bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfq_wr_duration(bfqq->bfqd); - bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = jiffies; + bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff; + bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = + bfq_smallest_from_now(); + bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time = + bfq_wr_duration(bfqq->bfqd); + bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish = jiffies; } else { - bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff; - bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = + bfqq_data->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff; + bfqq_data->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt; - bic->saved_service_from_wr = bfqq->service_from_wr; - bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = bfqq->last_wr_start_finish; - bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time; + bfqq_data->saved_service_from_wr = + bfqq->service_from_wr; + bfqq_data->saved_last_wr_start_finish = + bfqq->last_wr_start_finish; + bfqq_data->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time; } } @@ -5425,6 +5438,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq) * therefore on its unused per-actuator fields being NULL. */ unsigned int num_actuators = BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; /* * bfqd is NULL if scheduler already exited, and in that case @@ -5435,8 +5449,8 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq) num_actuators = bfqd->num_actuators; } - if (bic->stable_merge_bfqq) - bfq_put_stable_ref(bic->stable_merge_bfqq); + if (bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq) + bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq); for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < num_actuators; act_idx++) { bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx); @@ -5627,13 +5641,14 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, { struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, last_bfqq_created); + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; if (!new_bfqq) return bfqq; if (new_bfqq->bic) - new_bfqq->bic->stably_merged = true; - bic->stably_merged = true; + new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged = true; + bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; /* * Reusing merge functions. This implies that @@ -5702,6 +5717,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, &bfqd->last_bfqq_created; struct bfq_queue *last_bfqq_created = *source_bfqq; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; /* * If last_bfqq_created has not been set yet, then init it. If @@ -5763,7 +5779,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, /* * Record the bfqq to merge to. */ - bic->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created; + bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created; } } @@ -6683,6 +6699,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd, { unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio); struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync, act_idx); + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; if (likely(bfqq && bfqq != &bfqd->oom_bfqq)) return bfqq; @@ -6696,12 +6713,12 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bic_set_bfqq(bic, bfqq, is_sync, act_idx); if (split && is_sync) { - if ((bic->was_in_burst_list && bfqd->large_burst) || - bic->saved_in_large_burst) + if ((bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list && bfqd->large_burst) || + bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst) bfq_mark_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq); else { bfq_clear_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq); - if (bic->was_in_burst_list) + if (bfqq_data->was_in_burst_list) /* * If bfqq was in the current * burst list before being @@ -6790,6 +6807,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) struct bfq_queue *bfqq; bool new_queue = false; bool bfqq_already_existing = false, split = false; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data; if (unlikely(!rq->elv.icq)) return NULL; @@ -6813,15 +6831,17 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq = bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd, bic, bio, false, is_sync, &new_queue); + bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + if (likely(!new_queue)) { /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && - !bic->stably_merged) { + !bfqq_data->stably_merged) { struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) - bic->saved_in_large_burst = true; + bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = true; bfqq = bfq_split_bfqq(bic, bfqq); split = true; diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 2b413ddffbb9..9d77d964620f 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -411,27 +411,9 @@ struct bfq_queue { }; /** - * struct bfq_io_cq - per (request_queue, io_context) structure. - */ -struct bfq_io_cq { - /* associated io_cq structure */ - struct io_cq icq; /* must be the first member */ - /* - * Matrix of associated process queues: first row for async - * queues, second row sync queues. Each row contains one - * column for each actuator. An I/O request generated by the - * process is inserted into the queue pointed by bfqq[i][j] if - * the request is to be served by the j-th actuator of the - * drive, where i==0 or i==1, depending on whether the request - * is async or sync. So there is a distinct queue for each - * actuator. - */ - struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; - /* per (request_queue, blkcg) ioprio */ - int ioprio; -#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED - uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */ -#endif +* struct bfq_data - bfqq data unique and persistent for associated bfq_io_cq +*/ +struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data { /* * Snapshot of the has_short_time flag before merging; taken * to remember its value while the queue is merged, so as to @@ -486,6 +468,34 @@ struct bfq_io_cq { struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq; bool stably_merged; /* non splittable if true */ +}; + +/** + * struct bfq_io_cq - per (request_queue, io_context) structure. + */ +struct bfq_io_cq { + /* associated io_cq structure */ + struct io_cq icq; /* must be the first member */ + /* + * Matrix of associated process queues: first row for async + * queues, second row sync queues. Each row contains one + * column for each actuator. An I/O request generated by the + * process is inserted into the queue pointed by bfqq[i][j] if + * the request is to be served by the j-th actuator of the + * drive, where i==0 or i==1, depending on whether the request + * is async or sync. So there is a distinct queue for each + * actuator. + */ + struct bfq_queue *bfqq[2][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + /* per (request_queue, blkcg) ioprio */ + int ioprio; +#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED + uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */ +#endif + + /* persistent data for associated synchronous process queue */ + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data bfqq_data; + unsigned int requests; /* Number of requests this process has in flight */ }; From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:38 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069407 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF73C04FDE for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229873AbiLIJo7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54416 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229905AbiLIJoz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78825186D2 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id x22so10193622ejs.11 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cYbo291sOXt7l2BC18S2yHlocn22et2tRa8ByKa8vkY=; b=Sga2LLnuRDsEwvL7t02EfazswzXvVGiUiHMH9lgT5pOqv3efinPo6RDmkOMAx59NuU sgLPG7MQgO1CsWCxQvdHRJJOoj9ZzSG7Tpme1KC2kxwXp1WJzBxmeVkt1SIAIyLh1Ljj 9MCgpZlun4rCRpRx302psTQr6d1jH6xA7wDKvHr91WL+lQR/gr7X2aQ1Ttw0kQirQf6Q H1bFIdog1VQHg+umuyiOBgwhHmvhS3TF87FfvVP7cMW+t/2lKr0QvsPvFyGtZjeAFdlo mkd3WpPV/uJOu6pInLw/T7n1zTQQslLEbY3/63NEIM7ItLrIBFdOmrpcwiPgQebdjI4B I7Dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cYbo291sOXt7l2BC18S2yHlocn22et2tRa8ByKa8vkY=; b=b2IM8xJWgrGgTbK0RqSKtMTMU+p6xeUIbcyh1SOMukq+xNBAw68dhYDUsDdaLM18m1 tg2r6Q0LztFzttaKd1dv/RcBCSIyP0sekryq400bT41uacBMK5y2F7fzwFpDWszyMMok 6U1dLpgstHUftQ0GNNxu0KBUzkNeFp9kq9SX8lO6MAs72NxlBEkJh1jB2CbgVGrh0hwm iklFXGi3Kq/Kr891O9DGXuT4hpwEQxCCkju2sECqCG4aMp6QeJNTdcIQleaWkG9LBry7 FJM+ZFPMXD3YgwBV6z8LWETnrDI3QJhx5vN0ogzmxTsdi7xqdLOvUehoRWVOk/JTHTDc Ga/w== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnbFgPPGbiaireKCvuALO+kJotaq9cwjRGp1vXC5aly9Y17nwGj DI5nIwiBRpRROIF80Il4b95IRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5vFv+IeRPc8/YR/kVnw3Edty+PaRkrWqSxRjll9HxJVnRLHj2BKeIgd7Q4A4vsox2fJdTFeA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1356:b0:7c0:f216:cc14 with SMTP id x22-20020a170906135600b007c0f216cc14mr4423852ejb.11.1670579091896; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:51 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Paolo Valente , Damien Le Moal , Gabriele Felici , Gianmarco Lusvardi , Giulio Barabino , Emiliano Maccaferri Subject: [PATCH V10 4/8] block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org When a bfq_queue Q is merged with another queue, several pieces of information are saved about Q. These pieces are stored in the bfqq_data field in the bfq_io_cq data structure of the process associated with Q. Yet, with a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. Each of these queues may undergo a merge. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure must be able to accommodate the above information for N queues. This commit solves this problem by turning the bfqq_data scalar field into an array of N elements (and by changing code so as to handle this array). This solution is written under the assumption that bfq_queues associated with different actuators cannot be cross-merged. This assumption holds naturally with basic queue merging: the latter is triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are not close to each other (apart from the corner case of the last sectors served by a given actuator and the first sectors served by the next actuator). As for stable cross-merging, the assumption here is that it is disabled. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ block/bfq-iosched.h | 12 ++++-- 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 0d6b35ef3d3f..48a2a57097c9 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, * we cancel the stable merge if * bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq. */ - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[actuator_idx]; if (is_sync) bic->bfqq[1][actuator_idx] = bfqq; @@ -1181,9 +1181,10 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool bfq_already_existing) { - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; unsigned int old_wr_coeff = 1; bool busy = bfq_already_existing && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq); + unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx]; if (bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime) bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq); @@ -1864,7 +1865,9 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd, arrived_in_time = ktime_get_ns() <= bfqq->ttime.last_end_request + bfqd->bfq_slice_idle * 3; - + unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio); + bool bfqq_non_merged_or_stably_merged = + bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data[act_idx].stably_merged; /* * bfqq deserves to be weight-raised if: @@ -1898,9 +1901,8 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd, */ wr_or_deserves_wr = bfqd->low_latency && (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 || - (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && - (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data.stably_merged) && - (*interactive || soft_rt))); + (bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) && bfqq_non_merged_or_stably_merged && + (*interactive || soft_rt))); /* * Using the last flag, update budget and check whether bfqq @@ -2888,6 +2890,35 @@ static bool bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, static bool idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq); +static struct bfq_queue * +bfq_setup_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, + struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq, + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data) +{ + int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq), + bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq)); + struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq; + + if (idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) || + proc_ref == 0) + return NULL; + + /* next function will take at least one ref */ + new_bfqq = bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq); + + if (new_bfqq) { + bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; + if (new_bfqq->bic) { + unsigned int new_a_idx = new_bfqq->actuator_idx; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *new_bfqq_data = + &new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data[new_a_idx]; + + new_bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; + } + } + return new_bfqq; +} + /* * Attempt to schedule a merge of bfqq with the currently in-service * queue or with a close queue among the scheduled queues. Return @@ -2913,7 +2944,8 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, void *io_struct, bool request, struct bfq_io_cq *bic) { struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq; - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx]; /* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */ if (bfqq->new_bfqq) @@ -2943,29 +2975,15 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging))) { struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq = bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq; - int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq), - bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq)); /* deschedule stable merge, because done or aborted here */ bfq_put_stable_ref(stable_merge_bfqq); bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL; - if (!idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) && - proc_ref > 0) { - /* next function will take at least one ref */ - struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = - bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq); - - if (new_bfqq) { - bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; - if (new_bfqq->bic) - new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged = - true; - } - return new_bfqq; - } else - return NULL; + return bfq_setup_stable_merge(bfqd, bfqq, + stable_merge_bfqq, + bfqq_data); } } @@ -3060,7 +3078,8 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { struct bfq_io_cq *bic = bfqq->bic; - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx]; /* * If !bfqq->bic, the queue is already shared or its requests @@ -3071,7 +3090,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) return; bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns; - bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit; + bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit; bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif; bfqq_data->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight; @@ -5438,7 +5457,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq) * therefore on its unused per-actuator fields being NULL. */ unsigned int num_actuators = BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS; - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = bic->bfqq_data; /* * bfqd is NULL if scheduler already exited, and in that case @@ -5449,10 +5468,10 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq) num_actuators = bfqd->num_actuators; } - if (bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq) - bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq); - for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < num_actuators; act_idx++) { + if (bfqq_data[act_idx].stable_merge_bfqq) + bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data[act_idx].stable_merge_bfqq); + bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx); bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, false, act_idx); } @@ -5639,16 +5658,16 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *last_bfqq_created) { + unsigned int a_idx = last_bfqq_created->actuator_idx; struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq = bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, last_bfqq_created); - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; if (!new_bfqq) return bfqq; if (new_bfqq->bic) - new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged = true; - bfqq_data->stably_merged = true; + new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged = true; + bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged = true; /* * Reusing merge functions. This implies that @@ -5717,7 +5736,6 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, &bfqd->last_bfqq_created; struct bfq_queue *last_bfqq_created = *source_bfqq; - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; /* * If last_bfqq_created has not been set yet, then init it. If @@ -5779,7 +5797,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, /* * Record the bfqq to merge to. */ - bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created; + bic->bfqq_data[last_bfqq_created->actuator_idx].stable_merge_bfqq = + last_bfqq_created; } } @@ -6699,7 +6718,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd, { unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio); struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync, act_idx); - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[act_idx]; if (likely(bfqq && bfqq != &bfqd->oom_bfqq)) return bfqq; @@ -6807,7 +6826,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) struct bfq_queue *bfqq; bool new_queue = false; bool bfqq_already_existing = false, split = false; - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data; + unsigned int a_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio); if (unlikely(!rq->elv.icq)) return NULL; @@ -6831,17 +6850,16 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq) bfqq = bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd, bic, bio, false, is_sync, &new_queue); - bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data; - if (likely(!new_queue)) { /* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */ if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) && - !bfqq_data->stably_merged) { + !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) { struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq; /* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */ if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq)) - bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = true; + bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].saved_in_large_burst = + true; bfqq = bfq_split_bfqq(bic, bfqq); split = true; diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 9d77d964620f..a685aa32b037 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ struct bfq_queue { struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data { /* * Snapshot of the has_short_time flag before merging; taken - * to remember its value while the queue is merged, so as to + * to remember its values while the queue is merged, so as to * be able to restore it in case of split. */ bool saved_has_short_ttime; @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data { u64 saved_tot_idle_time; /* - * Same purpose as the previous fields for the value of the + * Same purpose as the previous fields for the values of the * field keeping the queue's belonging to a large burst */ bool saved_in_large_burst; @@ -493,8 +493,12 @@ struct bfq_io_cq { uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */ #endif - /* persistent data for associated synchronous process queue */ - struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data bfqq_data; + /* + * Persistent data for associated synchronous process queues + * (one queue per actuator, see field bfqq above). In + * particular, each of these queues may undergo a merge. + */ + struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data bfqq_data[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; unsigned int requests; /* Number of requests this process has in flight */ }; From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:39 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069410 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E38C4332F for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229756AbiLIJpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54436 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229948AbiLIJoz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592485F6F4 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id t17so10264438eju.1 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IOHHhqR2S54Aod/+Wvm2K6i0oD15P47f+sL8oLcqEKQ=; b=COHjF90WB3erJjLE7d/tTt/ZqNjZG3jWz3bjz+uG5SB8sDWNuCESyH3s5lNy2xcwRs WYGrfXtMUv268Pw30VWJVIuGzP2dq9lemIsLVRKYRjM7bhanSSRJkzzmCSKYpCYOw2od OPx01Xu2a4XX/9Kiy5jeZrYRQtJ5H4P6dTWsdIA6lOKJpkNn0jypFwv3IsapLOjgqGMo wDiw34NRETQnC6xftmF6o7KxCFsao25zmkwdjqYj+NhI4U8Yk2hJ0qrcLrzieB00mmAg VRDMqHKlnI1RsrebBC+fULc+tUm+D+T5onycnQ42131R1ZjA142jimQ/+EpiwFKm3la+ eGew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IOHHhqR2S54Aod/+Wvm2K6i0oD15P47f+sL8oLcqEKQ=; b=DasKPksON/jhphXwzBf78MeU2Qr/1evylLphBazTqIgw9xyqNk8jVGAvTyRiKe9XCK /x/XggLAiz3pi1plSa+U+sBCp1YqIlNZoA651VMSni84AqezuY1B0YoHIYumHXkxZZo5 51U4ewotwqfhvU4gbEljYwNeMAGcdaFtIMWuJ/Yj+n3dBKB3BWxhWS0vjasX1OCienHe dPBZEJ+ZjQdBfRXWTf2KkTS+jRcUX/rEj6ycjDTydC6NoXQ6+NwKojh52prHLYko8/rp NPzdGu+lW9dMjK/G5GSiaXfXjyoLUWsCNcdzXRGRn5XZxuB0jiMlwI9uOJH0bcDPcc2z D+/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plsQTq/MbOCvY+HWz98KSVxrn8NvLh6PqmIkQpiYqfnGi4horgj axabcQvRkwJM201zL3NUZPxU9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6Wd4oM+eXPpsJ8Vm4h9akqsP3e78OJhpp4wLC+oqggT1lkR4QFeuD9Eu/nPyx6m6ndpvSx1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:814d:b0:7c0:9b4a:76a with SMTP id z13-20020a170906814d00b007c09b4a076amr4315291ejw.28.1670579092858; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:52 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Davide Zini , Damien Le Moal , Paolo Valente Subject: [PATCH V10 5/8] block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-6-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org From: Davide Zini Similarly to sync bfq_queues, also async bfq_queues need to be split on a per-actuator basis. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Signed-off-by: Davide Zini --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ block/bfq-iosched.h | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 48a2a57097c9..e6684442d775 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2680,14 +2680,16 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_end_wr(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg) { - int i, j; - - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) - for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++) - if (bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j]) - bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j]); - if (bfqg->async_idle_bfqq) - bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_idle_bfqq); + int i, j, k; + + for (k = 0; k < bfqd->num_actuators; k++) { + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) + for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++) + if (bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]) + bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]); + if (bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]) + bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]); + } } static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data *bfqd) @@ -5636,18 +5638,18 @@ static void bfq_init_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, static struct bfq_queue **bfq_async_queue_prio(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg, - int ioprio_class, int ioprio) + int ioprio_class, int ioprio, int act_idx) { switch (ioprio_class) { case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT: - return &bfqg->async_bfqq[0][ioprio]; + return &bfqg->async_bfqq[0][ioprio][act_idx]; case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE: ioprio = IOPRIO_BE_NORM; fallthrough; case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE: - return &bfqg->async_bfqq[1][ioprio]; + return &bfqg->async_bfqq[1][ioprio][act_idx]; case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE: - return &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq; + return &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[act_idx]; default: return NULL; } @@ -5820,7 +5822,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfqg = bfq_bio_bfqg(bfqd, bio); if (!is_sync) { async_bfqq = bfq_async_queue_prio(bfqd, bfqg, ioprio_class, - ioprio); + ioprio, + bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio)); bfqq = *async_bfqq; if (bfqq) goto out; @@ -7037,13 +7040,15 @@ static void __bfq_put_async_bfqq(struct bfq_data *bfqd, */ void bfq_put_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg) { - int i, j; + int i, j, k; - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) - for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++) - __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j]); + for (k = 0; k < bfqd->num_actuators; k++) { + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) + for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++) + __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]); - __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq); + __bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]); + } } /* diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index a685aa32b037..1450990dba32 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -976,8 +976,8 @@ struct bfq_group { void *bfqd; - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS]; - struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; struct bfq_entity *my_entity; @@ -993,8 +993,8 @@ struct bfq_group { struct bfq_entity entity; struct bfq_sched_data sched_data; - struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS]; - struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *async_bfqq[2][IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS][BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + struct bfq_queue *async_idle_bfqq[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; struct rb_root rq_pos_tree; }; From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:40 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069409 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BDBC4167B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229875AbiLIJpI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54418 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229942AbiLIJoz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:44:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E425F6E9 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id qk9so10240521ejc.3 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=q8Ndh5ww5PJl6V+nNKyxMmWERBXisd1X8r2wdGJifcs=; b=SU0NrwSy9J6RrBWZ4G4Z9peX4zNN8U2k5xHUuUagSYqVUF93Zow+lD9umnp7fENtDX XD7aoLYVZ8p173G2zU8KQsHQl8scqKDs4vN26PGYSACczDKxKlv8CvzaY9p4PMgWQeWW 2PWWo0QOiWLGC4rQqN4+TL9OWViY9fXY610Q60UbUcqazeQAreWYrYTU2XqJ4iIlgUEa Zw3pKQthrOltFY5TjmcJY0cgskXcjvEISS7pADSlwuT+OLjCjtDsIzfLtTXgokHLnxID Szi4789EySjwqpP+QC/sxgjX33ocTOIJqkC+oECiqOfeOLPzJ4jvzLoRVsWNcs8mc4wj +iRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q8Ndh5ww5PJl6V+nNKyxMmWERBXisd1X8r2wdGJifcs=; b=Abg+h+6SGbxS4L3EQk+SZQA43sqPhNv6gacmi5Z5XZPnpVrZoRpdVMxRPaQkJqGDoc T2egmGgkNOi/QkqRJGI+UUGTvYqLiMcflJWerhyuHUd/1yrdozpl2ZAEiNswSgTPZ+w3 QXieWEvXsR35xwGIS3OGYGdGSrlyIWoM1nXAekQLRWE2j4xz6ZNGATf5rvV2pkMe7LuA DGyenXFr1IsQFlFKuT5A6u+q9EZwOPZRiQKvINmThh5aC4e0Fgx14k2EeB+W/+Nbri2M tVAyuAN/fz9bT5erNSR9Z20oymcUp05PtflhfeGSoqMh0zntWf5Hy3EVV/0gXANlUKYJ 1QQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmaYi2R86eIgC8p2zFN9brBvUX+Fh4wlJucxzUXdfofs55rDzMM F//VzbCgV/7kw79fwA2sggH07QqlTPr8b1Xp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5tOqEFQXSiuTEgkvmxIxN19DMe1VdzQiF8xYxIvL+z82HrS/o4UbxTfoSvYtMJZnjZidX11Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:d40c:b0:7c0:8a2c:8883 with SMTP id vi12-20020a170907d40c00b007c08a2c8883mr5098961ejc.56.1670579093792; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:53 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Federico Gavioli , Damien Le Moal , Paolo Valente Subject: [PATCH V10 6/8] block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-7-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org From: Federico Gavioli This patch implements the code to gather the content of the independent_access_ranges structure from the request_queue and copy it into the queue's bfq_data. This copy is done at queue initialization. We copy the access ranges into the bfq_data to avoid taking the queue lock each time we access the ranges. This implementation, however, puts a limit to the maximum independent ranges supported by the scheduler. Such a limit is equal to the constant BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS. This limit was placed to avoid the allocation of dynamic memory. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Co-developed-by: Rory Chen Signed-off-by: Rory Chen Signed-off-by: Federico Gavioli Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ block/bfq-iosched.h | 8 +++++- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index e6684442d775..b5ed666be0e6 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -1839,10 +1839,25 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_higher_class_or_weight(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, */ static unsigned int bfq_actuator_index(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio) { - /* - * Multi-actuator support not complete yet, so always return 0 - * for the moment (to keep incomplete mechanisms off). - */ + unsigned int i; + sector_t end; + + /* no search needed if one or zero ranges present */ + if (bfqd->num_actuators == 1) + return 0; + + /* bio_end_sector(bio) gives the sector after the last one */ + end = bio_end_sector(bio) - 1; + + for (i = 0; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { + if (end >= bfqd->sector[i] && + end < bfqd->sector[i] + bfqd->nr_sectors[i]) + return i; + } + + WARN_ONCE(true, + "bfq_actuator_index: bio sector out of ranges: end=%llu\n", + end); return 0; } @@ -7159,6 +7174,8 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) { struct bfq_data *bfqd; struct elevator_queue *eq; + unsigned int i; + struct blk_independent_access_ranges *ia_ranges = q->disk->ia_ranges; eq = elevator_alloc(q, e); if (!eq) @@ -7201,12 +7218,38 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) bfqd->queue = q; + bfqd->num_actuators = 1; /* - * Multi-actuator support not complete yet, unconditionally - * set to only one actuator for the moment (to keep incomplete - * mechanisms off). + * If the disk supports multiple actuators, copy independent + * access ranges from the request queue structure. */ - bfqd->num_actuators = 1; + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + if (ia_ranges) { + /* + * Check if the disk ia_ranges size exceeds the current bfq + * actuator limit. + */ + if (ia_ranges->nr_ia_ranges > BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS) { + pr_crit("nr_ia_ranges higher than act limit: iars=%d, max=%d.\n", + ia_ranges->nr_ia_ranges, BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS); + pr_crit("Falling back to single actuator mode.\n"); + } else { + bfqd->num_actuators = ia_ranges->nr_ia_ranges; + + for (i = 0; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { + bfqd->sector[i] = ia_ranges->ia_range[i].sector; + bfqd->nr_sectors[i] = + ia_ranges->ia_range[i].nr_sectors; + } + } + } + + /* Otherwise use single-actuator dev info */ + if (bfqd->num_actuators == 1) { + bfqd->sector[0] = 0; + bfqd->nr_sectors[0] = get_capacity(q->disk); + } + spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->dispatch); diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 1450990dba32..953980de6b4b 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -810,7 +810,13 @@ struct bfq_data { * case of single-actuator drives. */ unsigned int num_actuators; - + /* + * Disk independent access ranges for each actuator + * in this device. + */ + sector_t sector[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + sector_t nr_sectors[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + struct blk_independent_access_range ia_ranges[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; }; enum bfqq_state_flags { From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:41 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069412 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE4C10F1B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230075AbiLIJpY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230077AbiLIJpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609C7654FD for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id bj12so10151270ejb.13 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ykh07IwrUXmaSxHaiXoLYY+Z+DaPxKq/jy+loiUINT0=; b=ecVb8+aV1SEzFIJrmJLG0mGhsuy8tj7Z3wcXvU2DzmNl22LzzIxm1TQ8rvKJOb5e0S IHYcC+cE5/90RjjTUlrOpsKzMcYUmxzkurOzfq6QcSty72B3paAJX21zsWobS1pH+wkt mFKnSqEgjjrbVf3WjOCBGZ5JiHpnKAXIL3LYpaav3DLZqM6LOpCtI0Pipp3WbIjM+Xg/ ft3z2Y2QAhCcIS0y9vU6oYrg8vhzDhe1mXsD8zpbQK9s3W3l5G2FnNN61wRlpId4NA7C M+0rroovrtIEZGewiBVKOIGr9KEdg+2rQCOS486WrkPhbHQD6pVJoET178ekciZM+JPf wBcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ykh07IwrUXmaSxHaiXoLYY+Z+DaPxKq/jy+loiUINT0=; b=U3Pdw5F1LkvaOoVDNOn9m19CNIevJFD84W0MI6gDuldK3TWYyyVa9BVHQAt47BcSyL +6WDgUb4Uf4ivtrpe2yvMFdWZoxF1F5hIuUrxYFPEsZZM66tMo7ZXoNd3pgv4E5dQyre +K8/SQICdJAgHU9Dj9YslLW0OWelK0OGCDxi7PIwo1+k57STzUGkEFubvxh65d8c2slB WKQTV+ujWPhCtfjJGpFuQ8dBP07FAXuK/HDC/7iT1QRZc93ZC5Q0lDwXEgr7d8fU9tYB 1ZpXv7tfPjreIQkNsA6L/SOVFL0jOlFzaVFpI7Arc22NWbon3YDY20HSxCmNX/FGvCRB HZlg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkR7l5j91Qyiw1ji57urkT4k1KBsRZChfPE57sQ59u5L9r6bEjn N1a1EQH01m0sRTiwOMtJtdAgKQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6ikj5iEIZ76DXZfwluuLCbzbglC4idDq8SG6m2qjPzoaECG/zQFLvyq2FmB4XGdECTKWx09Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fd53:b0:7c0:a247:2f3c with SMTP id wi19-20020a170906fd5300b007c0a2472f3cmr3495484ejb.1.1670579094733; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:54 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Davide Zini , Damien Le Moal , Paolo Valente Subject: [PATCH V10 7/8] block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-8-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org From: Davide Zini The main service scheme of BFQ for sync I/O is serving one sync bfq_queue at a time, for a while. In particular, BFQ enforces this scheme when it deems the latter necessary to boost throughput or to preserve service guarantees. Unfortunately, when BFQ enforces this policy, only one actuator at a time gets served for a while, because each bfq_queue contains I/O only for one actuator. The other actuators may remain underutilized. Actually, BFQ may serve (inject) extra I/O, taken from other bfq_queues, in parallel with that of the in-service queue. This injection mechanism may provide the ground for dealing also with the above actuator-underutilization problem. Yet BFQ does not take the actuator load into account when choosing which queue to pick extra I/O from. In addition, BFQ may happen to inject extra I/O only when the in-service queue is temporarily empty. In view of these facts, this commit extends the injection mechanism in such a way that the latter: (1) takes into account also the actuator load; (2) checks such a load on each dispatch, and injects I/O for an underutilized actuator, if there is one and there is I/O for it. To perform the check in (2), this commit introduces a load threshold, currently set to 4. A linear scan of each actuator is performed, until an actuator is found for which the following two conditions hold: the load of the actuator is below the threshold, and there is at least one non-in-service queue that contains I/O for that actuator. If such a pair (actuator, queue) is found, then the head request of that queue is returned for dispatch, instead of the head request of the in-service queue. We have set the threshold, empirically, to the minimum possible value for which an actuator is fully utilized, or close to be fully utilized. By doing so, injected I/O 'steals' as few drive-queue slots as possibile to the in-service queue. This reduces as much as possible the probability that the service of I/O from the in-service bfq_queue gets delayed because of slot exhaustion, i.e., because all the slots of the drive queue are filled with I/O injected from other queues (NCQ provides for 32 slots). This new mechanism also counters actuator underutilization in the case of asymmetric configurations of bfq_queues. Namely if there are few bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators and many bfq_queues containing I/O for other actuators. Or if the bfq_queues containing I/O for some actuators have lower weights than the other bfq_queues. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Signed-off-by: Davide Zini --- block/bfq-cgroup.c | 2 +- block/bfq-iosched.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ block/bfq-iosched.h | 39 +++++++++++- block/bfq-wf2q.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c index 7ea77f994424..5783601f3d7a 100644 --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ void bfq_bfqq_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bfq_activate_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq); } - if (!bfqd->in_service_queue && !bfqd->rq_in_driver) + if (!bfqd->in_service_queue && !bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver) bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd); /* release extra ref taken above, bfqq may happen to be freed now */ bfq_put_queue(bfqq); diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index b5ed666be0e6..527def05ce44 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2303,9 +2303,9 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq) * elapsed. */ if (bfqq == bfqd->in_service_queue && - (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0 || + (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 0 || (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns > 0 && - bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0)) && + bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver > 0)) && time_is_before_eq_jiffies(bfqq->decrease_time_jif + msecs_to_jiffies(10))) { bfqd->last_empty_occupied_ns = ktime_get_ns(); @@ -2329,7 +2329,7 @@ static void bfq_add_request(struct request *rq) * will be set in case injection is performed * on bfqq before rq is completed). */ - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0) + if (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 0) bfqd->rqs_injected = false; } } @@ -2427,15 +2427,18 @@ static sector_t get_sdist(sector_t last_pos, struct request *rq) static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) { struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; + unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio); - bfqd->rq_in_driver++; + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver++; + bfqd->rq_in_driver[act_idx]++; } static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) { struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data; - bfqd->rq_in_driver--; + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver--; + bfqd->rq_in_driver[bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)]--; } #endif @@ -2710,11 +2713,14 @@ void bfq_end_wr_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data *bfqd) { struct bfq_queue *bfqq; + int i; spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock); - list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list, bfqq_list) - bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq); + for (i = 0; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { + list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list[i], bfqq_list) + bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq); + } list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->idle_list, bfqq_list) bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq); bfq_end_wr_async(bfqd); @@ -3671,13 +3677,13 @@ static void bfq_update_peak_rate(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) * - start a new observation interval with this dispatch */ if (now_ns - bfqd->last_dispatch > 100*NSEC_PER_MSEC && - bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0) + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 0) goto update_rate_and_reset; /* Update sampling information */ bfqd->peak_rate_samples++; - if ((bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0 || + if ((bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver > 0 || now_ns - bfqd->last_completion < BFQ_MIN_TT) && !BFQ_RQ_SEEKY(bfqd, bfqd->last_position, rq)) bfqd->sequential_samples++; @@ -3942,10 +3948,8 @@ static bool idling_needed_for_service_guarantees(struct bfq_data *bfqd, return false; return (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 && - (bfqd->wr_busy_queues < - tot_busy_queues || - bfqd->rq_in_driver >= - bfqq->dispatched + 4)) || + (bfqd->wr_busy_queues < tot_busy_queues || + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver >= bfqq->dispatched + 4)) || bfq_asymmetric_scenario(bfqd, bfqq) || tot_busy_queues == 1; } @@ -4716,6 +4720,8 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) { struct bfq_queue *bfqq, *in_serv_bfqq = bfqd->in_service_queue; unsigned int limit = in_serv_bfqq->inject_limit; + int i; + /* * If * - bfqq is not weight-raised and therefore does not carry @@ -4747,7 +4753,7 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) ) limit = 1; - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver >= limit) + if (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver >= limit) return NULL; /* @@ -4762,11 +4768,12 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) * (and re-added only if it gets new requests, but then it * is assigned again enough budget for its new backlog). */ - list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list, bfqq_list) - if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) && - (in_serv_always_inject || bfqq->wr_coeff > 1) && - bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->next_rq, bfqq) <= - bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq)) { + for (i = 0; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { + list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list[i], bfqq_list) + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) && + (in_serv_always_inject || bfqq->wr_coeff > 1) && + bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->next_rq, bfqq) <= + bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq)) { /* * Allow for only one large in-flight request * on non-rotational devices, for the @@ -4791,22 +4798,69 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) else limit = in_serv_bfqq->inject_limit; - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver < limit) { + if (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver < limit) { bfqd->rqs_injected = true; return bfqq; } } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static struct bfq_queue * +bfq_find_active_bfqq_for_actuator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, int idx) +{ + struct bfq_queue *bfqq; + + if (bfqd->in_service_queue && + bfqd->in_service_queue->actuator_idx == idx) + return bfqd->in_service_queue; + + list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list[idx], bfqq_list) { + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) && + bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->next_rq, bfqq) <= + bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq)) { + return bfqq; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Perform a linear scan of each actuator, until an actuator is found + * for which the following two conditions hold: the load of the + * actuator is below the threshold (see comments on actuator_load_threshold + * for details), and there is a queue that contains I/O for that + * actuator. On success, return that queue. + */ +static struct bfq_queue * +bfq_find_bfqq_for_underused_actuator(struct bfq_data *bfqd) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0 ; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { + if (bfqd->rq_in_driver[i] < bfqd->actuator_load_threshold) { + struct bfq_queue *bfqq = + bfq_find_active_bfqq_for_actuator(bfqd, i); + + if (bfqq) + return bfqq; + } + } return NULL; } + /* * Select a queue for service. If we have a current queue in service, * check whether to continue servicing it, or retrieve and set a new one. */ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd) { - struct bfq_queue *bfqq; + struct bfq_queue *bfqq, *inject_bfqq; struct request *next_rq; enum bfqq_expiration reason = BFQQE_BUDGET_TIMEOUT; @@ -4828,6 +4882,15 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd) goto expire; check_queue: + /* + * If some actuator is underutilized, but the in-service + * queue does not contain I/O for that actuator, then try to + * inject I/O for that actuator. + */ + inject_bfqq = bfq_find_bfqq_for_underused_actuator(bfqd); + if (inject_bfqq && inject_bfqq != bfqq) + return inject_bfqq; + /* * This loop is rarely executed more than once. Even when it * happens, it is much more convenient to re-execute this loop @@ -5183,11 +5246,11 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) /* * We exploit the bfq_finish_requeue_request hook to - * decrement rq_in_driver, but + * decrement tot_rq_in_driver, but * bfq_finish_requeue_request will not be invoked on * this request. So, to avoid unbalance, just start - * this request, without incrementing rq_in_driver. As - * a negative consequence, rq_in_driver is deceptively + * this request, without incrementing tot_rq_in_driver. As + * a negative consequence, tot_rq_in_driver is deceptively * lower than it should be while this request is in * service. This may cause bfq_schedule_dispatch to be * invoked uselessly. @@ -5196,7 +5259,7 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) * bfq_finish_requeue_request hook, if defined, is * probably invoked also on this request. So, by * exploiting this hook, we could 1) increment - * rq_in_driver here, and 2) decrement it in + * tot_rq_in_driver here, and 2) decrement it in * bfq_finish_requeue_request. Such a solution would * let the value of the counter be always accurate, * but it would entail using an extra interface @@ -5225,7 +5288,7 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) * Of course, serving one request at a time may cause loss of * throughput. */ - if (bfqd->strict_guarantees && bfqd->rq_in_driver > 0) + if (bfqd->strict_guarantees && bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver > 0) goto exit; bfqq = bfq_select_queue(bfqd); @@ -5236,7 +5299,8 @@ static struct request *__bfq_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) if (rq) { inc_in_driver_start_rq: - bfqd->rq_in_driver++; + bfqd->rq_in_driver[bfqq->actuator_idx]++; + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver++; start_rq: rq->rq_flags |= RQF_STARTED; } @@ -6304,7 +6368,7 @@ static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data *bfqd) struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfqd->in_service_queue; bfqd->max_rq_in_driver = max_t(int, bfqd->max_rq_in_driver, - bfqd->rq_in_driver); + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver); if (bfqd->hw_tag == 1) return; @@ -6315,7 +6379,7 @@ static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data *bfqd) * sum is not exact, as it's not taking into account deactivated * requests. */ - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver + bfqd->queued <= BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD) + if (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver + bfqd->queued <= BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD) return; /* @@ -6326,7 +6390,7 @@ static void bfq_update_hw_tag(struct bfq_data *bfqd) if (bfqq && bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) && bfqq->dispatched + bfqq->queued[0] + bfqq->queued[1] < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD && - bfqd->rq_in_driver < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD) + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_THRESHOLD) return; if (bfqd->hw_tag_samples++ < BFQ_HW_QUEUE_SAMPLES) @@ -6347,7 +6411,8 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd) bfq_update_hw_tag(bfqd); - bfqd->rq_in_driver--; + bfqd->rq_in_driver[bfqq->actuator_idx]--; + bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver--; bfqq->dispatched--; if (!bfqq->dispatched && !bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq)) { @@ -6466,7 +6531,7 @@ static void bfq_completed_request(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd) BFQQE_NO_MORE_REQUESTS); } - if (!bfqd->rq_in_driver) + if (!bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver) bfq_schedule_dispatch(bfqd); } @@ -6597,13 +6662,13 @@ static void bfq_update_inject_limit(struct bfq_data *bfqd, * conditions to do it, or we can lower the last base value * computed. * - * NOTE: (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 1) means that there is no I/O + * NOTE: (bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 1) means that there is no I/O * request in flight, because this function is in the code * path that handles the completion of a request of bfqq, and, * in particular, this function is executed before - * bfqd->rq_in_driver is decremented in such a code path. + * bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver is decremented in such a code path. */ - if ((bfqq->last_serv_time_ns == 0 && bfqd->rq_in_driver == 1) || + if ((bfqq->last_serv_time_ns == 0 && bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 1) || tot_time_ns < bfqq->last_serv_time_ns) { if (bfqq->last_serv_time_ns == 0) { /* @@ -6613,7 +6678,7 @@ static void bfq_update_inject_limit(struct bfq_data *bfqd, bfqq->inject_limit = max_t(unsigned int, 1, old_limit); } bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = tot_time_ns; - } else if (!bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->rq_in_driver == 1) + } else if (!bfqd->rqs_injected && bfqd->tot_rq_in_driver == 1) /* * No I/O injected and no request still in service in * the drive: these are the exact conditions for @@ -7260,7 +7325,8 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) bfqd->queue_weights_tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED; bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs = 0; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->active_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->active_list[0]); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->active_list[1]); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bfqd->idle_list); INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&bfqd->burst_list); @@ -7305,6 +7371,9 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e) ref_wr_duration[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue)]; bfqd->peak_rate = ref_rate[blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue)] * 2 / 3; + /* see comments on the definition of next field inside bfq_data */ + bfqd->actuator_load_threshold = 4; + spin_lock_init(&bfqd->lock); /* diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 953980de6b4b..be725d9143fa 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -586,7 +586,12 @@ struct bfq_data { /* number of queued requests */ int queued; /* number of requests dispatched and waiting for completion */ - int rq_in_driver; + int tot_rq_in_driver; + /* + * number of requests dispatched and waiting for completion + * for each actuator + */ + int rq_in_driver[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; /* true if the device is non rotational and performs queueing */ bool nonrot_with_queueing; @@ -680,8 +685,13 @@ struct bfq_data { /* maximum budget allotted to a bfq_queue before rescheduling */ int bfq_max_budget; - /* list of all the bfq_queues active on the device */ - struct list_head active_list; + /* + * List of all the bfq_queues active for a specific actuator + * on the device. Keeping active queues separate on a + * per-actuator basis helps implementing per-actuator + * injection more efficiently. + */ + struct list_head active_list[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; /* list of all the bfq_queues idle on the device */ struct list_head idle_list; @@ -817,6 +827,29 @@ struct bfq_data { sector_t sector[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; sector_t nr_sectors[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; struct blk_independent_access_range ia_ranges[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS]; + + /* + * If the number of I/O requests queued in the device for a + * given actuator is below next threshold, then the actuator + * is deemed as underutilized. If this condition is found to + * hold for some actuator upon a dispatch, but (i) the + * in-service queue does not contain I/O for that actuator, + * while (ii) some other queue does contain I/O for that + * actuator, then the head I/O request of the latter queue is + * returned (injected), instead of the head request of the + * currently in-service queue. + * + * We set the threshold, empirically, to the minimum possible + * value for which an actuator is fully utilized, or close to + * be fully utilized. By doing so, injected I/O 'steals' as + * few drive-queue slots as possibile to the in-service + * queue. This reduces as much as possible the probability + * that the service of I/O from the in-service bfq_queue gets + * delayed because of slot exhaustion, i.e., because all the + * slots of the drive queue are filled with I/O injected from + * other queues (NCQ provides for 32 slots). + */ + unsigned int actuator_load_threshold; }; enum bfqq_state_flags { diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c index 8fc3da4c23bb..ec0273e2cd07 100644 --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c @@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static void bfq_active_insert(struct bfq_service_tree *st, bfqd = (struct bfq_data *)bfqg->bfqd; #endif if (bfqq) - list_add(&bfqq->bfqq_list, &bfqq->bfqd->active_list); + list_add(&bfqq->bfqq_list, &bfqq->bfqd->active_list[bfqq->actuator_idx]); #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (bfqg != bfqd->root_group) bfqg->active_entities++; From patchwork Fri Dec 9 09:44:42 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 13069411 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76F8C4167B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230107AbiLIJpX (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54416 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230072AbiLIJpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 04:45:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D2E68C69 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:44:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id m18so10206832eji.5 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GaqQn9QBmVk5NBvgZzVnJIbHKeIyyamAKMjG6Bafei0=; b=Sj8iI9sGK76NewZS3Nd/PjxEAikAxNkrULKH08r/OmP7RB+LUpVZrAPjE8ZgIBYTFY B13h6iJ2MMa6kp51hftaaKXYIODkle/laWFJwprBbe8R6mRftJ/C9HMI0otSp2IcrtI6 PYxlQ07qYohodAUwdMVEgC+P5vsKGflEMegYna6mJIqE85P8/LbYGj35DZMcc+6Opc9P mtJZv13ncQVFrh0qC98YD6mir2hV/opDgG6lV0pZ2+ELlb1NSU2GzBHzlMrnqotvjvpG t3EFKci1yrpcIRZIQZzB1YIo9xTG9NR9jA/aWt55rceXltKcyzFsIRYAdyZeZppMcrYz XiNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GaqQn9QBmVk5NBvgZzVnJIbHKeIyyamAKMjG6Bafei0=; b=gi8MhnpLS/5z3fZb3GvIziNpSZ+w3vZz9J3EIDZc9+ZVfrGTd7nnz/7LU+OG/kVqQr d+nHoXNkyp+Rx7dkM1/DGt40K//4FuJvlFxjucyzs9TAwhZ6phudjoTa4KvlVRV8RjH9 UXtvluOTBvIokXl5LZr+G9qSiEmUHTDQBN70TbMBA08F/ATJd9BG449jb1qZMGg8hxQR HeZh0mB2q8MdcGmRT8IcC7RmWBKXoUmwwpBNohjMdE3eZZBbJD7rVwyEDk2nSApRfoHm O82Q0HSFEbkPP+uyPb73a2jtFtSrAqZYfZjHmRhLhWAmuMkUpLmVrSWkgWJwFaIJ6CUB yw4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pm1eb+3LhraqnnSTwWF/dUpMEgl9aTldyYams8de+93ahis7Pgd xNaIjAVEuDyRwWt2qcJLmOIDIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4isvrXEIo+NVn/pEPgCc9sU6Vc8mT/qvqgE5DDUZuXrDhXuZx3Bt5TvXzVw/tWy03QcctB/A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b610:b0:7ad:80cd:67b4 with SMTP id vl16-20020a170907b61000b007ad80cd67b4mr4621065ejc.48.1670579095577; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP-di-Paolo.station (net-2-35-55-161.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [2.35.55.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id oz18-20020a170906cd1200b007c11f2a3b3dsm353421ejb.107.2022.12.09.01.44.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 01:44:55 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com, rory.c.chen@seagate.com, glen.valante@linaro.org, Davide Zini , Paolo Valente Subject: [PATCH V10 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among underutilized actuators Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:44:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20221209094442.36896-9-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org From: Davide Zini Upon the invocation of its dispatch function, BFQ returns the next I/O request of the in-service bfq_queue, unless some exception holds. One such exception is that there is some underutilized actuator, different from the actuator for which the in-service queue contains I/O, and that some other bfq_queue happens to contain I/O for such an actuator. In this case, the next I/O request of the latter bfq_queue, and not of the in-service bfq_queue, is returned (I/O is injected from that bfq_queue). To find such an actuator, a linear scan, in increasing index order, is performed among actuators. Performing a linear scan entails a prioritization among actuators: an underutilized actuator may be considered for injection only if all actuators with a lower index are currently fully utilized, or if there is no pending I/O for any lower-index actuator that happens to be underutilized. This commits breaks this prioritization and tends to distribute injection uniformly across actuators. This is obtained by adding the following condition to the linear scan: even if an actuator A is underutilized, A is however skipped if its load is higher than that of the next actuator. Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Signed-off-by: Davide Zini Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 527def05ce44..0ec8310331e1 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -4830,10 +4830,16 @@ bfq_find_active_bfqq_for_actuator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, int idx) /* * Perform a linear scan of each actuator, until an actuator is found - * for which the following two conditions hold: the load of the - * actuator is below the threshold (see comments on actuator_load_threshold - * for details), and there is a queue that contains I/O for that - * actuator. On success, return that queue. + * for which the following three conditions hold: the load of the + * actuator is below the threshold (see comments on + * actuator_load_threshold for details) and lower than that of the + * next actuator (comments on this extra condition below), and there + * is a queue that contains I/O for that actuator. On success, return + * that queue. + * + * Performing a plain linear scan entails a prioritization among + * actuators. The extra condition above breaks this prioritization and + * tends to distribute injection uniformly across actuators. */ static struct bfq_queue * bfq_find_bfqq_for_underused_actuator(struct bfq_data *bfqd) @@ -4841,7 +4847,9 @@ bfq_find_bfqq_for_underused_actuator(struct bfq_data *bfqd) int i; for (i = 0 ; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) { - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver[i] < bfqd->actuator_load_threshold) { + if (bfqd->rq_in_driver[i] < bfqd->actuator_load_threshold && + (i == bfqd->num_actuators - 1 || + bfqd->rq_in_driver[i] < bfqd->rq_in_driver[i+1])) { struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_find_active_bfqq_for_actuator(bfqd, i);