From patchwork Thu May 11 13:50:21 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Conor Dooley X-Patchwork-Id: 13237976 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79E3C77B7C for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:51:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=Zv7r10bBF+2eXLuxUJpYSD7xiJJ+SnGyTATYgdKmSX0=; b=Ynpa8uXtCOzE/o LGDuiVDfH8yegYLikib++DgI3DfLI3jD0n3IayGyUkQScTXvljEGF6NpNT8XYEii4zr0ZA3LTLQiP 5+lR1FDqG68q+qEWk4CEAZSEs51wEPmyGwv+VblNGzKWGrZD9BubYnZHSb70NwqFsMHSJh6l4Y+Zt b02/8PjtDUO3VwNuDhco3Tu0YuhiOiq+4B24kHxeN+KIHrlC5tMnmgA2MG4+Yg/IPeAjHOojKzJBO vgNUgJ/+wknopbQLjfwtwt9osQVaU7DRo4rDId2B2AoJ0IrSX2wQId97sRcKn3mf5EDTtPjpqYd18 ZhP6EIuOYfOK+BF5hPog==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1px6hF-008vw1-11; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:51:05 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1px6h9-008vuq-1a for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 13:51:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1683813059; x=1715349059; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=goBFUJ7UZs0dYyuEV5My6BVRqae6i6p1vfypGMQ2jEg=; b=VTaKkRBFSDuYoQ6yziM4HbSsPIVUxrb1J9rl7vwAsQmSKvXQLfeJFJQo DYjNlXOByWOdILEAbXgC7GHUi+4w0+GkvCjfbYZ5TBk+LJAdE872r83wF 9+sLLb7ck6CiQIAYY9u04vCeeYtWc6NLvmLkb54A3sLH2NcQ1TtRIIjhQ xQqIbPXTLuw/j4UBPOvZpWOaNqYt5UAv9X2wfwGkvXbv2yN05ENEgzDKb 23AkQTsJoK5ef4C6wGyArMTsDsnH9s5potSDbp5yUknAWgN2mrVYZqP7f y6j/ag18V11X+TJXSVMjFkRZFye6deEOSUdjb4GQCwmyzU8HVKdwFwglt A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,266,1677567600"; d="scan'208";a="151547033" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 11 May 2023 06:50:53 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:50:52 -0700 Received: from wendy.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:50:51 -0700 From: Conor Dooley To: CC: , , =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFQ=?= =?utf-8?b?w7ZwZWw=?= , Paul Walmsley , Jonathan Corbet , , Subject: [PATCH v1] Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: mention patchwork's role Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20230511-equation-decline-56b638ff9440@wendy> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=2549; i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=goBFUJ7UZs0dYyuEV5My6BVRqae6i6p1vfypGMQ2jEg=; b=owGbwMvMwCFWscWwfUFT0iXG02pJDCkxn2ZL294VUZ839dbabiem9S92znz4odok1f3B9rgJ0Sp+ m6486ShlYRDjYJAVU2RJvN3XIrX+j8sO5563MHNYmUCGMHBxCsBEjpcx/OHP3WfpIuaastb38V+77Q 3dvBseZSupJUmvEJl18++imnxGhgtv4zYVl7t08M+9u+dPUveCSQsPJHDErKhwes+0zmbdBGYA X-Developer-Key: i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; a=openpgp; fpr=F9ECA03CF54F12CD01F1655722E2C55B37CF380C X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230511_065059_703738_3BBDC884 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.98 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork instance plays in patch acceptance. Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley --- The bit about fixes being applied to riscv/fixes is not actually correct, it's actually linux-next/pending-fixes. We've not had issues with the fixes branch being broken in a while, but I switched it over to pending-fixes due to the KVM breakage. I'll swap back to match the documentation I'm adding. I was also not sure if this was the correct doc for this, or whether a process/maintainer-riscv.rst file was better suited. There's clearly no rush on this though so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ CC: Björn Töpel CC: Palmer Dabbelt CC: Paul Walmsley CC: Jonathan Corbet CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst index 1d1fb885326b..76ec57626043 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst @@ -16,6 +16,24 @@ tested code over experimental code. We wish to extend these same principles to the RISC-V-related code that will be accepted for inclusion in the kernel. +Patchwork +--------- + +RISC-V has a patchwork instance, where the status of patches can be checked: + + https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ + +If your patch does not appear in the default view, the RISC-V maintainers have +likely either requested changes, or expect it to be applied to another tree. + +Automation runs against this patchwork instance, building/testing patches as +they arrive. The automation applies patches against the current HEAD of the +RISC-V `for-next` and `fixes` branches, depending on whether the patch has been +detected as a fix. The exact commit to which a series has been applied will be +noted on patchwork. +Patches for which any of the checks fail are unlikely to be applied and in most +cases will need to be resubmitted. + Submit Checklist Addendum ------------------------- We'll only accept patches for new modules or extensions if the