From patchwork Tue Jun 6 06:59:19 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Conor Dooley X-Patchwork-Id: 13268354 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6786CC77B7A for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 07:00:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC :To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=dRS+2JsraeCxqYOAwKd6Avvwn0kRZhdmuCw5HKxXK7A=; b=FLR4P5jLa4V623 wkHNzh0CCKKKRqlWMY3Y2WVPTbPFqrsjvAEWFNbjOdFl0T9AHtcZss7kgCDwrSpShcz1cf7AMLIKN XjKGs0eEreJTRZIkfIySV/VNqE0fFvLBR8oSVRMDIapffFbWhMibKkVbqA2mSqQw+uWSc2cnxHbYf 9/eI5XUxGhxIF3xx5iEkRbKrzGMTwWHpcPe0q7TOq9LG6fONUot5J6D6R73AW8MIJdwDEVcd+GqFb doRCquNBn45b14668i30RJIQUkMjibvseFTapoRdGS8/5wysK0MF7dPF8MU1W9N9GVUv7PyEzt7rv Wal8GN38IHjU5b9BciTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q6QgS-000Sjt-0o; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 07:00:48 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q6QgO-000SiT-1Z for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 07:00:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1686034844; x=1717570844; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=9aOdZLL0INgSjDe1MDQQYSUITQ9XpofYHKDcavMUzGc=; b=UgCSCbjLBy8Qt9VQjXvil8uH9P368DRGQcPWQl2QvRYYKukMB1tPEtAz 17bR5Y3IwYH5V1869aStvB1Xa6TBLYyOn7jjo7KDaGbaWAD/9j5gUAJQr Cy/el0I+qqYNI1PCaFIoywcwpT5MsPlIuCn9dmUkS5Nklbr34DqV2maXa vNc8yimi9ND2MXIHnVPaEHquL1Lho1RB65hGsoPZYM7s+Emeu6Mt5Yl+X /eldfXgqFS+ikiaHHiMgL1eTSvSj56frgeUwD5wRkgOmYmYm7G1y0GVD/ xp1I7l+3L4GOFDzyLwZLUDPI9jbtuPBJoFmW9ZUqXTwdYGOYxfJNHAnAl Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,219,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="228592302" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 06 Jun 2023 00:00:38 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 00:00:37 -0700 Received: from wendy.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 00:00:36 -0700 From: Conor Dooley To: CC: , , =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFQ=?= =?utf-8?b?w7ZwZWw=?= , Paul Walmsley , Jonathan Corbet , , Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation: RISC-V: patch-acceptance: mention patchwork's role Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 07:59:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20230606-rehab-monsoon-12c17bbe08e3@wendy> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=2386; i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=9aOdZLL0INgSjDe1MDQQYSUITQ9XpofYHKDcavMUzGc=; b=owGbwMvMwCFWscWwfUFT0iXG02pJDCl1N83thU0EXL6cud/843YLj0n51n8v0vfalmyqTFy3u73s dVxoRykLgxgHg6yYIkvi7b4WqfV/XHY497yFmcPKBDKEgYtTACaSqsrI8D6n5eQW1bqyVzevnT75Zs tZf3e/v8X3bnG3m8Zy1P3Yspvhnzln4loBr+pnM5qt1QOvLXux9lt35g7LC4Fh6lszzx7NZgcA X-Developer-Key: i=conor.dooley@microchip.com; a=openpgp; fpr=F9ECA03CF54F12CD01F1655722E2C55B37CF380C X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230606_000044_735353_6060F7A1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.17 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Palmer suggested at some point, not sure if it was in one of the weekly linux-riscv syncs, or a conversation at FOSDEM, that we should document the role of the automation running on our patchwork instance plays in patch acceptance. Add a short note to the patch-acceptance document to that end. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel --- I was also not sure if this was the correct doc for this, or whether a process/maintainer-riscv.rst file was better suited. There's clearly no rush on this though so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Changes in v2: - mention that riscv/master is now also a possible application target. CC: Björn Töpel CC: Palmer Dabbelt CC: Paul Walmsley CC: Jonathan Corbet CC: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst index 07d5a5623e2a..634aa222b410 100644 --- a/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst +++ b/Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst @@ -16,6 +16,24 @@ tested code over experimental code. We wish to extend these same principles to the RISC-V-related code that will be accepted for inclusion in the kernel. +Patchwork +--------- + +RISC-V has a patchwork instance, where the status of patches can be checked: + + https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ + +If your patch does not appear in the default view, the RISC-V maintainers have +likely either requested changes, or expect it to be applied to another tree. + +Automation runs against this patchwork instance, building/testing patches as +they arrive. The automation applies patches against the current HEAD of the +RISC-V `for-next` and `fixes` branches, depending on whether the patch has been +detected as a fix. Failing those, it will use the RISC-V `master` branch. +The exact commit to which a series has been applied will be noted on patchwork. +Patches for which any of the checks fail are unlikely to be applied and in most +cases will need to be resubmitted. + Submit Checklist Addendum ------------------------- We'll only accept patches for new modules or extensions if the