From patchwork Mon Jun 19 11:49:45 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Menglong Dong X-Patchwork-Id: 13284369 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A408C06 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E12BC9; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-54fac329a71so1525323a12.1; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687175421; x=1689767421; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9UQHgCYMSUpJKwkxCT8Gz4j2ViWlUBZ9rAr/225IOUc=; b=X+AH26S0pESoQoY7mV4YObJoPGMhOo8TcwKST2E0D9DFgnIavPYPHGKxCZAXlbQmXU K9boDCLJgoN4H/Uv18k3G49LAVlBNV9jEHH//Kj6Dz3bHqOhX1VUZfiW33/Ueq6MLJto 9yW/b70xsdaL4Rr+8o0Uil1vmKLab7Zi+WtIpSmIdW4aEHHckBTdbb7e1ksjwPwcXa1v DcH2onF1Z++xeEkBJ/UWAu32uGzldJ9zwkVmPAYee5K9xqF9A+dDofmwD8MF+lfEVkMx WlGjVheE3NocsSCOWxYWRkcu0DcxJF5+HNRd2UnNK+AMvQd08HQM3/onEJtZhYY9MFOc 7kKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687175421; x=1689767421; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9UQHgCYMSUpJKwkxCT8Gz4j2ViWlUBZ9rAr/225IOUc=; b=FgZgIyQyfFT7ftudhq0hrL/Z0D8lsXxBkaoUcFLjvop0b14g+R6517jfi/RzMTt6z9 8zMdtcXZLKds8ZW8QxeneawFI2wI9gJHUKE1iLx/fQATuE6ETmEKFdqujkmIh5wXPfHM szEYZNR9oU0BYRZZ5+gYPUAI/GKxS/uANhQM077XZYhBk74XvLxLMYP1V8eXSZteN2lv k6HyGsgHGUTM4DZbMpGOZHHcMFZ2PyNAHk/bTqNOkKfqpijGFRxTqnLOpDjZz+guz9ZN t+qSP3aB/zAYwkGT1Tr1yKKfGX/EbfKOpZ2YK33uiFFxiaG4y51PEut38hsw0kXz7VVS 4mKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxOlXjoZ3N/Nxsth1OxEWon1k2y/U3GWV9tRCzfJ/0QSy1GsVS9 cBaAi1CEjyvXxHhFhfYcVcI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4eZxfFOfZ5KE3j/CQj2Lr8ga8x20Xxa2lrQQ2aI4tqX47awC9xIimK7gLx0W2mv+kcSw3V8g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:da92:b0:1b4:ff2a:24e3 with SMTP id j18-20020a170902da9200b001b4ff2a24e3mr4843469plx.45.1687175421011; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.205.141.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1-20020a170902694100b001aaf370b1c7sm20287882plt.278.2023.06.19.04.50.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:20 -0700 (PDT) From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: imagedong@tencent.com To: yhs@meta.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, benbjiang@tencent.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] bpf, x86: save/restore regs with BPF_DW size Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 19:49:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20230619114947.1543848-2-imagedong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> References: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Menglong Dong As we already reserve 8 byte in the stack for each reg, it is ok to store/restore the regs in BPF_DW size. This will make the code in save_regs()/restore_regs() simpler. Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- v6: - adjust the commit log --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 35 ++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 1056bbf55b17..a407fbbffecd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1860,57 +1860,34 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs, int stack_size) { - int i, j, arg_size; - bool next_same_struct = false; + int i; /* Store function arguments to stack. * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be: * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rdi * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rsi */ - for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) { - /* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */ - arg_size = m->arg_size[j]; - if (arg_size > 8) { - arg_size = 8; - next_same_struct = !next_same_struct; - } - - emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size), - BPF_REG_FP, + for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) + emit_stx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i, -(stack_size - i * 8)); - - j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1; - } } static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs, int stack_size) { - int i, j, arg_size; - bool next_same_struct = false; + int i; /* Restore function arguments from stack. * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be: * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x7D, 0xF0); mov rdi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10] * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x75, 0xF8); mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8] */ - for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) { - /* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */ - arg_size = m->arg_size[j]; - if (arg_size > 8) { - arg_size = 8; - next_same_struct = !next_same_struct; - } - - emit_ldx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size), + for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) + emit_ldx(prog, BPF_DW, i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i, BPF_REG_FP, -(stack_size - i * 8)); - - j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1; - } } static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, From patchwork Mon Jun 19 11:49:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Menglong Dong X-Patchwork-Id: 13284370 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712368C06 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0AA102; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-25edd0df667so1076472a91.0; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687175425; x=1689767425; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SWsGbWdjSxvr78QEkMqMHRjf8P+2wCVYh2fh2kp7ME0=; b=qHDUpaT/Yw+8dhtZgrieWgVvcOo+Sob9nqqUculBfN/n6fwbz01A5ecRm29ATmscIV nP0IdG45TMO8U+5Ha8Ic8avODMIs/uKHxLBGfuP0fjENC07E1BwPMZgIgq2smvSnvFF7 xzNgyJ86t22q3ygNRuKVvVC67qvDNqVvgy77BdIQRZ1yNBdDQszENgh1mhsd6RUbS2so a6hHEKbLY3Vk4A6al4b/NvdpBoQWf6Wg+Uwr+OD2GtgvSVZwEw3hzyGYVKX1zPnQK3to W+jIGHL1Yz5iWI5e1oKuhweW5fSD1Q8eNkE6kVv7r0+z1BdpEAa8AVjGsam902Wg/lXx +7xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687175425; x=1689767425; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SWsGbWdjSxvr78QEkMqMHRjf8P+2wCVYh2fh2kp7ME0=; b=R2OauWtLyg7Oz7sUGLexGW7IFu6Seto78I+yohlfyhr/VmlshY4NUl+5yVrPLH5F9a 6BTloYKqLxcyVDjFEiB/BlrayfgG2laqQB3H9A5MTFCmF9NYnON5B3huJ9dKblOZxxXp S8CLB4AtRWzuJbCVuQSDHbSZWINmyUYWyk3fRCvGWkEe1Ai1pWgkfqnEB+85SnJ7JkQg 6BbiSdfDAgl4skprDtz93oyAhU2Sr2sAMk8l8mbfukcwfd/MDzgIAlxrrBWKBtaW7GUX WYfkTsbI2KQwHtOL56MgPimnp7QBugqJ5s7obdWSjx/RYi8oqBoz8Jm/dQw7O4FOTac/ RUNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw9/26W67/63gco41+1ow0keGHA5a1uyOaS2Ft/sxIW8f4IwB+V HR1BdhRVG2+Pn6ovFnSEVUw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4H4MVNjeqYDgtycxh375k8epxj2bYWgyBlDPxpKfkiWjqh0tRqluv8Geo8720D/4L3DQk4Jg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f30f:b0:25e:b5fa:9eea with SMTP id ca15-20020a17090af30f00b0025eb5fa9eeamr12480269pjb.17.1687175425293; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.205.141.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1-20020a170902694100b001aaf370b1c7sm20287882plt.278.2023.06.19.04.50.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:24 -0700 (PDT) From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: imagedong@tencent.com To: yhs@meta.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, benbjiang@tencent.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 19:49:46 +0800 Message-Id: <20230619114947.1543848-3-imagedong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> References: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Menglong Dong For now, the BPF program of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING can only be used on the kernel functions whose arguments count less than 6. This is not friendly at all, as too many functions have arguments count more than 6. According to the current kernel version, below is a statistics of the function arguments count: argument count | function count 7 | 704 8 | 270 9 | 84 10 | 47 11 | 47 12 | 27 13 | 22 14 | 5 15 | 0 16 | 1 Therefore, let's enhance it by increasing the function arguments count allowed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), for now, only x86_64. For the case that we don't need to call origin function, which means without BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG, we need only copy the function arguments that stored in the frame of the caller to current frame. The arguments of arg6-argN are stored in "$rbp + 0x18", we need copy them to "$rbp - regs_off + (6 * 8)". For the case with BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG, we need prepare the arguments in stack before call origin function, which means we need alloc extra "8 * (arg_count - 6)" memory in the top of the stack. Note, there should not be any data be pushed to the stack before call the origin function. Then, we have to store rbx with 'mov' instead of 'push'. According to the research of Yonghong, struct members should be all in register or all on the stack. Meanwhile, the compiler will pass the argument on regs if the remaining regs can hold the argument. Therefore, we need save the arguments in order. Otherwise, disorder of the args can happen. For example: struct foo_struct { long a; int b; }; int foo(char, char, char, char, char, struct foo_struct, char); the arg1-5,arg7 will be passed by regs, and arg6 will by stack. Therefore, we should save/restore the arguments in the same order with the declaration of foo(). And the args used as ctx in stack will be like this: reg_arg6 -- copy from regs stack_arg2 -- copy from stack stack_arg1 reg_arg5 -- copy from regs reg_arg4 reg_arg3 reg_arg2 reg_arg1 We use EMIT3_off32() or EMIT4() for "lea" and "sub". The range of the imm in "lea" and "sub" is [-128, 127] if EMIT4() is used. Therefore, we use EMIT3_off32() instead if the imm out of the range. It works well for the FENTRY/FEXIT/MODIFY_RETURN. Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- v6: - introduce get_nr_regs() to get the space that used to pass args on stack correct - rename some args and fix some spelling mistake v5: - consider the case of the struct in arguments can't be hold by regs v4: - make the stack 16-byte aligned if passing args on-stack is needed - add the function arguments statistics to the commit log v3: - use EMIT3_off32() for "lea" and "sub" only on necessary - make 12 as the maximum arguments count v2: - instead EMIT4 with EMIT3_off32 for "lea" to prevent overflow - make MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS as the maximum argument count --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 238 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 212 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index a407fbbffecd..c0637f2b5398 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1857,37 +1857,181 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) return proglen; } -static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs, - int stack_size) +static inline void clean_stack_garbage(const struct btf_func_model *m, + u8 **pprog, int nr_stack_slots, + int stack_size) { - int i; + int arg_size, off; + u8 *prog; + + /* Generally speaking, the compiler will pass the arguments + * on-stack with "push" instruction, which will take 8-byte + * on the stack. In this case, there won't be garbage values + * while we copy the arguments from origin stack frame to current + * in BPF_DW. + * + * However, sometimes the compiler will only allocate 4-byte on + * the stack for the arguments. For now, this case will only + * happen if there is only one argument on-stack and its size + * not more than 4 byte. In this case, there will be garbage + * values on the upper 4-byte where we store the argument on + * current stack frame. + * + * arguments on origin stack: + * + * stack_arg_1(4-byte) xxx(4-byte) + * + * what we copy: + * + * stack_arg_1(8-byte): stack_arg_1(origin) xxx + * + * and the xxx is the garbage values which we should clean here. + */ + if (nr_stack_slots != 1) + return; + + /* the size of the last argument */ + arg_size = m->arg_size[m->nr_args - 1]; + if (arg_size <= 4) { + off = -(stack_size - 4); + prog = *pprog; + /* mov DWORD PTR [rbp + off], 0 */ + if (!is_imm8(off)) + EMIT2_off32(0xC7, 0x85, off); + else + EMIT3(0xC7, 0x45, off); + EMIT(0, 4); + *pprog = prog; + } +} + +/* get the count of the regs that are used to pass arguments */ +static inline int get_nr_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m) +{ + int i, arg_regs, nr_regs = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < min_t(int, m->nr_args, MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS); i++) { + arg_regs = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8; + if (nr_regs + arg_regs <= 6) + nr_regs += arg_regs; + + if (nr_regs >= 6) + break; + } + + return nr_regs; +} + +static void save_args(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, + int stack_size, bool for_call_origin) +{ + int arg_regs, first_off, nr_regs = 0, nr_stack = 0; + int i, j; /* Store function arguments to stack. * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be: * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rdi * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rsi */ - for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) - emit_stx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, - i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i, - -(stack_size - i * 8)); + for (i = 0; i < min_t(int, m->nr_args, MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS); i++) { + arg_regs = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8; + + /* According to the research of Yonghong, struct members + * should be all in register or all on the stack. + * Meanwhile, the compiler will pass the argument on regs + * if the remaining regs can hold the argument. + * + * Disorder of the args can happen. For example: + * + * struct foo_struct { + * long a; + * int b; + * }; + * int foo(char, char, char, char, char, struct foo_struct, + * char); + * + * the arg1-5,arg7 will be passed by regs, and arg6 will + * by stack. + * + * Therefore, we should keep the same logic as here when + * we restore the regs in restore_regs. + */ + if (nr_regs + arg_regs > 6) { + /* copy function arguments from origin stack frame + * into current stack frame. + * + * The starting address of the arguments on-stack + * is: + * rbp + 8(push rbp) + + * 8(return addr of origin call) + + * 8(return addr of the caller) + * which means: rbp + 24 + */ + for (j = 0; j < arg_regs; j++) { + emit_ldx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, + nr_stack * 8 + 0x18); + emit_stx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, + -stack_size); + + if (!nr_stack) + first_off = stack_size; + stack_size -= 8; + nr_stack++; + } + } else { + /* Only copy the arguments on-stack to current + * 'stack_size' and ignore the regs, used to + * prepare the arguments on-stack for orign call. + */ + if (for_call_origin) { + nr_regs += arg_regs; + continue; + } + + /* copy the arguments from regs into stack */ + for (j = 0; j < arg_regs; j++) { + emit_stx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, + nr_regs == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + nr_regs, + -stack_size); + stack_size -= 8; + nr_regs++; + } + } + } + + clean_stack_garbage(m, prog, nr_stack, first_off); } -static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs, +static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int stack_size) { - int i; + int i, j, arg_regs, nr_regs = 0; /* Restore function arguments from stack. * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be: * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x7D, 0xF0); mov rdi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10] * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x75, 0xF8); mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8] + * + * The logic here is similar to what we do in save_args() */ - for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) - emit_ldx(prog, BPF_DW, - i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i, - BPF_REG_FP, - -(stack_size - i * 8)); + for (i = 0; i < min_t(int, m->nr_args, MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS); i++) { + arg_regs = (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8; + if (nr_regs + arg_regs <= 6) { + for (j = 0; j < arg_regs; j++) { + emit_ldx(prog, BPF_DW, + nr_regs == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + nr_regs, + BPF_REG_FP, + -stack_size); + stack_size -= 8; + nr_regs++; + } + } else { + stack_size -= 8 * arg_regs; + } + + if (nr_regs >= 6) + break; + } } static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, @@ -1915,7 +2059,10 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, /* arg1: mov rdi, progs[i] */ emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_1, (long) p >> 32, (u32) (long) p); /* arg2: lea rsi, [rbp - ctx_cookie_off] */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x75, -run_ctx_off); + if (!is_imm8(-run_ctx_off)) + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8D, 0xB5, -run_ctx_off); + else + EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x75, -run_ctx_off); if (emit_rsb_call(&prog, bpf_trampoline_enter(p), prog)) return -EINVAL; @@ -1931,7 +2078,10 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, emit_nops(&prog, 2); /* arg1: lea rdi, [rbp - stack_size] */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x7D, -stack_size); + if (!is_imm8(-stack_size)) + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8D, 0xBD, -stack_size); + else + EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x7D, -stack_size); /* arg2: progs[i]->insnsi for interpreter */ if (!p->jited) emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_2, @@ -1961,7 +2111,10 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, /* arg2: mov rsi, rbx <- start time in nsec */ emit_mov_reg(&prog, true, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6); /* arg3: lea rdx, [rbp - run_ctx_off] */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x55, -run_ctx_off); + if (!is_imm8(-run_ctx_off)) + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x8D, 0x95, -run_ctx_off); + else + EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x55, -run_ctx_off); if (emit_rsb_call(&prog, bpf_trampoline_exit(p), prog)) return -EINVAL; @@ -2113,7 +2266,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i void *func_addr) { int i, ret, nr_regs = m->nr_args, stack_size = 0; - int regs_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off; + int regs_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, arg_stack_off, rbx_off; struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN]; @@ -2127,8 +2280,10 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG) nr_regs += (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8 - 1; - /* x86-64 supports up to 6 arguments. 7+ can be added in the future */ - if (nr_regs > 6) + /* x86-64 supports up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS arguments. 1-6 + * are passed through regs, the remains are through stack. + */ + if (nr_regs > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS) return -ENOTSUPP; /* Generated trampoline stack layout: @@ -2147,7 +2302,14 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i * * RBP - ip_off [ traced function ] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag * + * RBP - rbx_off [ rbx value ] always + * * RBP - run_ctx_off [ bpf_tramp_run_ctx ] + * + * [ stack_argN ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG + * [ ... ] + * [ stack_arg2 ] + * RBP - arg_stack_off [ stack_arg1 ] */ /* room for return value of orig_call or fentry prog */ @@ -2167,9 +2329,26 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i ip_off = stack_size; + stack_size += 8; + rbx_off = stack_size; + stack_size += (sizeof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx) + 7) & ~0x7; run_ctx_off = stack_size; + if (nr_regs > 6 && (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG)) { + /* the space that used to pass arguments on-stack */ + stack_size += (nr_regs - get_nr_regs(m)) * 8; + /* make sure the stack pointer is 16-byte aligned if we + * need pass arguments on stack, which means + * [stack_size + 8(rbp) + 8(rip) + 8(origin rip)] + * should be 16-byte aligned. Following code depend on + * that stack_size is already 8-byte aligned. + */ + stack_size += (stack_size % 16) ? 0 : 8; + } + + arg_stack_off = stack_size; + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) { /* skip patched call instruction and point orig_call to actual * body of the kernel function. @@ -2189,8 +2368,14 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, NULL); EMIT1(0x55); /* push rbp */ EMIT3(0x48, 0x89, 0xE5); /* mov rbp, rsp */ - EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size); /* sub rsp, stack_size */ - EMIT1(0x53); /* push rbx */ + if (!is_imm8(stack_size)) + /* sub rsp, stack_size */ + EMIT3_off32(0x48, 0x81, 0xEC, stack_size); + else + /* sub rsp, stack_size */ + EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xEC, stack_size); + /* mov QWORD PTR [rbp - rbx_off], rbx */ + emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_6, -rbx_off); /* Store number of argument registers of the traced function: * mov rax, nr_regs @@ -2208,7 +2393,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -ip_off); } - save_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off); + save_args(m, &prog, regs_off, false); if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) { /* arg1: mov rdi, im */ @@ -2238,7 +2423,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i } if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) { - restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off); + restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off); + save_args(m, &prog, arg_stack_off, true); if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) { emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8); @@ -2279,7 +2465,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i } if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) - restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_regs, regs_off); + restore_regs(m, &prog, regs_off); /* This needs to be done regardless. If there were fmod_ret programs, * the return value is only updated on the stack and still needs to be @@ -2298,7 +2484,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i if (save_ret) emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, -8); - EMIT1(0x5B); /* pop rbx */ + emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_FP, -rbx_off); EMIT1(0xC9); /* leave */ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) /* skip our return address and return to parent */ From patchwork Mon Jun 19 11:49:47 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Menglong Dong X-Patchwork-Id: 13284371 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC41C8C06 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C684FE63; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b50e309602so28094035ad.0; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687175430; x=1689767430; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7yHpRcPU/Sa72lmyzQ+iBfHBoSJBYyJfz78UAY0STFc=; b=Cukfp+kfBlhnfykyvPFb9uIkjdGTJCj85SRBCBcCLh58QgXeT0oK/694n/vhEfNnlf AaxZM97k0+jgJU5EM7LIJk0ybdcpTfCUoXaABZSuUdwcGNAx4wZb4CeGIBH23ZCVYS0E v+1pKdUlrtgk9lXvq/MxZoYvPTYoJUjBIpMIMmMDMOaI3bMvuyGBPx3hBQ35udZj6kdF rUciI9q+VisJvscSm52ap0FKxDQOauujYmp6htnYvsYtDjv2NF9BxXqhu6Wu0BlRtiEe Qyz43NHB0Eal3iREJcb4NIn16vVarKbalgLzoRO67Th5fIegLpztnfp9iprl8zFvNmgz KZRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687175430; x=1689767430; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7yHpRcPU/Sa72lmyzQ+iBfHBoSJBYyJfz78UAY0STFc=; b=I0lhuW9p+Mg5AsIalKonRB8+3Cu//m2MRofTUPrpA4rxrWR5B/UTjgZG+OCzPM8sNi kYLVOahYrMCAtVhVdbThsIQMtnucprKzC+HiFpgBzxaPlEX8cDmLxn9Na20SbV1fDXAC ijy5loF70xzfDafYjoljFNegnqsnlbOJSOQnQQ2tRlyp1fsssIU4DJ03mE7ce6SA2dpM h1UbVmULip3BvF0HHSoykQDcGawt77pzGjEHJA7B1TkVfP9lCaERowWWmH0T0hal7vWh 0GbMvP08JUf7PH5V9ahEnKNMZ7qYPC7yUJC7E6a9GMC8y8KEUdmCdE2pAgW50xrW0fIA MTCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw7nQypAavmpaczfXu62SkrtWk8j7JVgoq1Q1rWcu4KX6xBghVB TdGA4/w0beoQZs7BPiLpRdY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5TBp0sFBr2ul0ou72IxAkwXDt90m4exehd0yWd8o/5jZ8PHoOgUJG8SBEvsknvoHBoDRvj/w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d38d:b0:1b1:9f7d:2aec with SMTP id e13-20020a170902d38d00b001b19f7d2aecmr8990102pld.68.1687175429594; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.205.141.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1-20020a170902694100b001aaf370b1c7sm20287882plt.278.2023.06.19.04.50.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 04:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: imagedong@tencent.com To: yhs@meta.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, benbjiang@tencent.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/3] selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 19:49:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20230619114947.1543848-4-imagedong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> References: <20230619114947.1543848-1-imagedong@tencent.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Menglong Dong Add test9/test10 in fexit_test.c and fentry_test.c to test the fentry and fexit whose target function have 7/11 arguments. Correspondingly, add bpf_testmod_fentry_test7() and bpf_testmod_fentry_test11() to bpf_testmod.c Meanwhile, add bpf_modify_return_test2() to test_run.c to test the MODIFY_RETURN with 7 arguments. Add bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7 in bpf_testmod.c to test the struct in the arguments. And the testcases passed: ./test_progs -t fexit Summary: 5/12 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED ./test_progs -t fentry Summary: 3/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED ./test_progs -t modify_return Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED ./test_progs -t tracing_struct Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- v6: - add testcases to tracing_struct.c instead of fentry_test.c and fexit_test.c v5: - add testcases for MODIFY_RETURN v4: - use different type for args in bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} - add testcase for grabage values in ctx v3: - move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile - get return value by bpf_get_func_ret() in "fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test12", as we don't change ___bpf_ctx_cast() in this version --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 23 ++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c | 4 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c | 20 ++++++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 19 +++++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 32 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c | 33 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c | 40 ++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++ 11 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 2321bd2f9964..df58e8bf5e07 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -561,6 +561,13 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test(int a, int *b) return a + *b; } +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_modify_return_test2(int a, int *b, short c, int d, + void *e, char f, int g) +{ + *b += 1; + return a + *b + c + d + (long)e + f + g; +} + int noinline bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a) { return a + 1; @@ -596,9 +603,13 @@ __diag_pop(); BTF_SET8_START(bpf_test_modify_return_ids) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_modify_return_test2) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_fentry_test1, KF_SLEEPABLE) BTF_SET8_END(bpf_test_modify_return_ids) +BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_modify_return_test_id) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_modify_return_test) + static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_test_modify_return_set = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, .set = &bpf_test_modify_return_ids, @@ -661,9 +672,15 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog, goto out; break; case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN: - ret = bpf_modify_return_test(1, &b); - if (b != 2) - side_effect = 1; + if (prog->aux->attach_btf_id == *bpf_modify_return_test_id) { + ret = bpf_modify_return_test(1, &b); + if (b != 2) + side_effect = 1; + } else { + ret = bpf_modify_return_test2(1, &b, 3, 4, (void *)5, 6, 7); + if (b != 2) + side_effect = 1; + } break; default: goto out; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index aaf6ef1201c7..a6f991b56345 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 { int b[]; }; +struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 { + u64 a; + int b; +}; + __diag_push(); __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", "Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF"); @@ -75,6 +80,24 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *a) { return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result; } +noinline int +bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, + struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 f) +{ + bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + (long)b + c + d + + (long)e + f.a + f.b; + return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result; +} + +noinline int +bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, + struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 f, int g) +{ + bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + (long)b + c + d + + (long)e + f.a + f.b + g; + return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result; +} + __bpf_kfunc void bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i) { @@ -191,6 +214,20 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c) return a + b + c; } +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, + void *e, char f, int g) +{ + return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g; +} + +noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test11(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, + void *e, char f, int g, + unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j, + unsigned long k) +{ + return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f + g + h + i + j + k; +} + int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok; noinline ssize_t @@ -206,6 +243,7 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 struct_arg1 = {10}; struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3}; struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3; + struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 struct_arg4 = {21, 22}; int i = 1; while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i)) @@ -216,6 +254,11 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3(1, 4, struct_arg2); (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct_arg1, 1, 2, 3, struct_arg2); (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(); + (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, + (void *)20, struct_arg4); + (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, + (void *)20, struct_arg4, 23); + struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) + sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -243,7 +286,11 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, if (bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(1) != 2 || bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(2, 3) != 5 || - bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15) + bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15 || + bpf_testmod_fentry_test7(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20, + 21, 22) != 133 || + bpf_testmod_fentry_test11(16, (void *)17, 18, 19, (void *)20, + 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) != 231) goto out; bpf_testmod_fentry_ok = 1; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c index 130f5b82d2e6..0078acee0ede 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c @@ -31,10 +31,12 @@ void test_fentry_fexit(void) ASSERT_OK(err, "ipv6 test_run"); ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "ipv6 test retval"); + ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read"); + fentry_res = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss; fexit_res = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss; printf("%lld\n", fentry_skel->bss->test1_result); - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < 11; i++) { ASSERT_EQ(fentry_res[i], 1, "fentry result"); ASSERT_EQ(fexit_res[i], 1, "fexit result"); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c index c0d1d61d5f66..e1c0ce40febf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ static int fentry_test(struct fentry_test_lskel *fentry_skel) ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"); ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run"); + ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read"); + result = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss; for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*fentry_skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64); i++) { if (!ASSERT_EQ(result[i], 1, "fentry_result")) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c index 101b7343036b..ea81fa913ec6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ static int fexit_test(struct fexit_test_lskel *fexit_skel) ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"); ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run"); + ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read"); + result = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss; for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*fexit_skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64); i++) { if (!ASSERT_EQ(result[i], 1, "fexit_result")) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c index 5d9955af6247..93febb6d81ef 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ #define UPPER(x) ((x) >> 16) -static void run_test(__u32 input_retval, __u16 want_side_effect, __s16 want_ret) +static void run_test(__u32 input_retval, __u16 want_side_effect, + __s16 want_ret, __s16 want_ret2) { struct modify_return *skel = NULL; int err, prog_fd; @@ -41,6 +42,19 @@ static void run_test(__u32 input_retval, __u16 want_side_effect, __s16 want_ret) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fexit_result, 1, "modify_return fexit_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fmod_ret_result, 1, "modify_return fmod_ret_result"); + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fmod_ret_test2); + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); + ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run"); + + side_effect = UPPER(topts.retval); + ret = LOWER(topts.retval); + + ASSERT_EQ(ret, want_ret2, "test_run ret2"); + ASSERT_EQ(side_effect, want_side_effect, "modify_return side_effect2"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fentry_result2, 1, "modify_return fentry_result2"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fexit_result2, 1, "modify_return fexit_result2"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fmod_ret_result2, 1, "modify_return fmod_ret_result2"); + cleanup: modify_return__destroy(skel); } @@ -50,8 +64,10 @@ void serial_test_modify_return(void) { run_test(0 /* input_retval */, 1 /* want_side_effect */, - 4 /* want_ret */); + 4 /* want_ret */, + 29 /* want_ret */); run_test(-EINVAL /* input_retval */, 0 /* want_side_effect */, + -EINVAL /* want_ret */, -EINVAL /* want_ret */); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c index 1c75a32186d6..fe0fb0c9849a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c @@ -55,6 +55,25 @@ static void test_fentry(void) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_d, 19, "t7:d"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_e, 20, "t7:e"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_f_a, 21, "t7:f.a"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_f_b, 22, "t7:f.b"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_ret, 133, "t7 ret"); + + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_a, 16, "t8:a"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_b, 17, "t8:b"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_c, 18, "t8:c"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_d, 19, "t8:d"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_e, 20, "t8:e"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_f_a, 21, "t8:f.a"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_f_b, 22, "t8:f.b"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret"); + tracing_struct__detach(skel); destroy_skel: tracing_struct__destroy(skel); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c index 52a550d281d9..18a0ea63cf67 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c @@ -77,3 +77,35 @@ int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) test8_result = 1; return 0; } + +__u64 test9_result = 0; +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7") +int BPF_PROG(test9, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g) +{ + test9_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22; + return 0; +} + +__u64 test10_result = 0; +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11") +int BPF_PROG(test10, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g, unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j, unsigned long k) +{ + test10_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 && + i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26; + return 0; +} + +__u64 test11_result = 0; +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11") +int BPF_PROG(test11, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f, + __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k) +{ + test11_result = a == 16 && b == 17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == 20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 && + i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26; + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c index 8f1ccb7302e1..b2126fb781a1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c @@ -78,3 +78,36 @@ int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) test8_result = 1; return 0; } + +__u64 test9_result = 0; +SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test7") +int BPF_PROG(test9, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g, int ret) +{ + test9_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && ret == 133; + return 0; +} + +__u64 test10_result = 0; +SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11") +int BPF_PROG(test10, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g, unsigned int h, long i, __u64 j, unsigned long k, + int ret) +{ + test10_result = a == 16 && b == (void *)17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == (void *)20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 && + i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && ret == 231; + return 0; +} + +__u64 test11_result = 0; +SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_fentry_test11") +int BPF_PROG(test11, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f, + __u64 g, __u64 h, __u64 i, __u64 j, __u64 k, __u64 ret) +{ + test11_result = a == 16 && b == 17 && c == 18 && d == 19 && + e == 20 && f == 21 && g == 22 && h == 23 && + i == 24 && j == 25 && k == 26 && ret == 231; + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c index 8b7466a15c6b..3376d4849f58 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c @@ -47,3 +47,43 @@ int BPF_PROG(fexit_test, int a, __u64 b, int ret) return 0; } + +static int sequence2; + +__u64 fentry_result2 = 0; +SEC("fentry/bpf_modify_return_test2") +int BPF_PROG(fentry_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g) +{ + sequence2++; + fentry_result2 = (sequence2 == 1); + return 0; +} + +__u64 fmod_ret_result2 = 0; +SEC("fmod_ret/bpf_modify_return_test2") +int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g, int ret) +{ + sequence2++; + /* This is the first fmod_ret program, the ret passed should be 0 */ + fmod_ret_result2 = (sequence2 == 2 && ret == 0); + return input_retval; +} + +__u64 fexit_result2 = 0; +SEC("fexit/bpf_modify_return_test2") +int BPF_PROG(fexit_test2, int a, int *b, short c, int d, void *e, char f, + int g, int ret) +{ + sequence2++; + /* If the input_reval is non-zero a successful modification should have + * occurred. + */ + if (input_retval) + fexit_result2 = (sequence2 == 3 && ret == input_retval); + else + fexit_result2 = (sequence2 == 3 && ret == 29); + + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c index c435a3a8328a..515daef3c84b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 { int b[]; }; +struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 { + u64 a; + int b; +}; + long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs; __u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3; long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret; @@ -25,6 +30,9 @@ long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret; long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret; long t5_ret; int t6; +long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret; +long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret; + SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1") int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c) @@ -130,4 +138,50 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a) return 0; } +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7") +int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_12, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, + void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f) +{ + t7_a = a; + t7_b = (long)b; + t7_c = c; + t7_d = d; + t7_e = (long)e; + t7_f_a = f.a; + t7_f_b = f.b; + return 0; +} + +SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7") +int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_13, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, + void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret) +{ + t7_ret = ret; + return 0; +} + +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8") +int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_14, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, + void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g) +{ + t8_a = a; + t8_b = (long)b; + t8_c = c; + t8_d = d; + t8_e = (long)e; + t8_f_a = f.a; + t8_f_b = f.b; + t8_g = g; + return 0; +} + +SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8") +int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_15, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d, + void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g, + int, ret) +{ + t8_ret = ret; + return 0; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";