From patchwork Tue Jun 20 09:55:07 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: stsp X-Patchwork-Id: 13285540 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55198EB64D7 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230399AbjFTKE0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:04:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36060 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231727AbjFTKEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 06:04:13 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 94 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 03:03:58 PDT Received: from forward205a.mail.yandex.net (forward205a.mail.yandex.net [178.154.239.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05D1FE6E; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 03:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from forward100a.mail.yandex.net (forward100a.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:500:1:45:d181:d100]) by forward205a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 05FC24827D; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:56:10 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-51.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-51.vla.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c1f:5e51:0:640:23ee:0]) by forward100a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3E21D46CF8; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:56:04 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-51.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Utd7jIuDca60-C477uvSM; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:56:03 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1687254963; bh=rkYmDxtuWXPP1hMHDuX5+P8sJGSUmlxPNxtIqEwkg3w=; h=Message-Id:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:References:To:From; b=D/AGAc49Aj7GVb2SA46LvULaSvzlzykalpkesue6nUPQqWCRkQN6tnUrX3lsRuDy3 9HK0v9FvtHGZgqQ6sFh8WAVDBSC+1DCD6txEzvKlunEn2TussWRBtHZyLYHoR/1+Tl ed8JMVYBBW8Q2lGCZM5oeZMtzS2ZewHNpI3jhhRY= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-51.vla.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru From: Stas Sergeev To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stas Sergeev , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , Chuck Lever , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: add OFD lock tests Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:55:07 +0500 Message-Id: <20230620095507.2677463-4-stsp2@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230620095507.2677463-1-stsp2@yandex.ru> References: <20230620095507.2677463-1-stsp2@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Test the basic locking stuff on 2 fds: multiple read locks, conflicts between read and write locks, use of len==0 for queries. Also test for pid and F_UNLCK F_OFD_GETLK extensions. Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev CC: Shuah Khan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org CC: Jeff Layton CC: Chuck Lever CC: Alexander Viro CC: Christian Brauner CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile index 6e7761ab3536..a83ced1626de 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/Makefile @@ -7,4 +7,6 @@ all: TEST_PROGS := ww_mutex.sh +TEST_GEN_PROGS := ofdlocks + include ../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1cff350e2c81 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/locking/ofdlocks.c @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "../kselftest.h" + +static int lock_set(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, fl); + if (ret) + perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +static int lock_get(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, fl); + if (ret) + perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +int main(void) +{ + int rc; + struct flock fl, fl2; + int fd = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600); + int fd2 = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDONLY); + + unlink("aa"); + assert(fd != -1); + assert(fd2 != -1); + ksft_print_msg("[INFO] opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2); + + /* Set some read lock */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 3; + rc = lock_set(fd, &fl); + if (rc == 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] set OFD read lock on first fd\n"); + } else { + ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] to set OFD read lock on first fd\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Make sure read locks do not conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + return -1; + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] read locks conflicted\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Make sure read/write locks do conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_WRLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + return -1; + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks conflicted\n"); + } else { + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks not conflicted\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Get info about the lock on first fd. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl); + if (rc != 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + return -1; + } + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + if (fl.l_pid != getpid()) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK does not return pid, %i\n", + fl.l_pid); + return -1; + } + ksft_print_msg + ("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + } else { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK did not return lock info\n"); + return -1; + } + /* Try the same but by locking everything by len==0. */ + fl2.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl2.l_start = 0; + fl2.l_len = 0; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl2); + if (rc != 0) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + return -1; + } + if (memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl))) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + return -1; + } + ksft_print_msg("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n"); + /* Get info about the lock on second fd - no locks on it. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 0; + fl.l_len = 0; + lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) { + ksft_print_msg + ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n"); + return -1; + } + return 0; +}