From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:49 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340883 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288FEC41513 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229494AbjHCWCW (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52784 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbjHCWCV (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FAD1BF9; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-68783b2e40bso1042930b3a.3; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100139; x=1691704939; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=azXqC48nCq3Nd2xmDDFqonleBrNUa9rXdZ8wwR7mDDQ=; b=eMnJ6yhGGrzbYf3p+wA2FyP7Fo8/8PQgkDAKTheJIUvbcj884zmtWlFhWJozNbYijX z/0Ko5WZ8jfXGZgc6dpmuj4cKYo/PlOK2SQHRbfFULnmwVlYFR03EWS6n9So5EnHfxWV kzmQCQY1G+pUwyDe8nShZ7qYUZ/vtXcbjGHuy0iwBTKMNk2lKrnZF+hxeIW8mtw1LqbS Ixalry7komkmtpAOwCu7iVC6RqmNByFBkyp4rbcvs6fxEnP6CseQoQvN8orAZWSkBxD0 aHJgp+/Jr1REPic/didK9a1HtaI4M4EuoJmCxI5ZWut9eRQijcaiwLi1xpDNkeebye1Q CP9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100139; x=1691704939; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=azXqC48nCq3Nd2xmDDFqonleBrNUa9rXdZ8wwR7mDDQ=; b=kme6x1NQ3EJnB1rY4/ytX8j39photxqynddE6X2C1vXnX7/us2VA9KimYYw2rWqqG2 AsuW36nylpjjMpQNS4JSjkiZsjlnT0aDuEaeaEnafyTY1qijx7tfOyjq5EF88hq36LOF TlugmRRNhbNWCg8K5UoGBYPc47xwtzQsVAoSQenu26TgiHA8ujuQ63JRVm7p/V6mdyQY ahffFpUVVdt7RY9iMKN0Egj1k/JWYky+ulaa1iS+8jZqYHrZK93uNqPHs6vNHZQcwqkb bhXaJ4Yt446fJd73ojqLBmnfrnKOSjP88JgpuRhI2gZ7mELHaMRkUoEtshg6eKPe8nxl blTg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaALlyqm+uY8rzMjaJsu07aFIy2tzWWOSN/ICiSfIZU8z58CL+C KmzDxBOM7dOra+wJDL/gx/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlF8admb3ZIRLw60gMo4w75rhfbshol+P8cKPBqXW0IbYgTXuCxUEwME63uTc8vcpDNc+C887w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6300:8086:b0:137:e595:830f with SMTP id ap6-20020a056300808600b00137e595830fmr17720162pzc.57.1691100139400; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14-20020aa78b4e000000b006732786b5f1sm292772pfd.213.2023.08.03.15.02.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Chanwoo Choi , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:DEVICE FREQUENCY (DEVFREQ)), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 1/9] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-2-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark In the process of adding lockdep annotation for GPU job_run() path to catch potential deadlocks against the shrinker/reclaim path, I turned up this lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ ring0/123 is trying to acquire lock: ffffff8087219078 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4 do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100 topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178 get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4 parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188 smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8 kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xb8/0xe0 kstrdup+0x70/0x90 kstrdup_const+0x38/0x48 kvasprintf_const+0x48/0xbc kobject_set_name_vargs+0x40/0xb0 dev_set_name+0x64/0x8c devfreq_add_device+0x31c/0x55c devm_devfreq_add_device+0x6c/0xb8 msm_devfreq_init+0xa8/0x16c msm_gpu_init+0x38c/0x570 adreno_gpu_init+0x1b4/0x2b4 a6xx_gpu_init+0x15c/0x3e4 adreno_bind+0x218/0x254 component_bind_all+0x114/0x1ec msm_drm_bind+0x2b8/0x608 try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4 __component_add+0xec/0x13c component_add+0x1c/0x28 dsi_dev_attach+0x28/0x34 dsi_host_attach+0xdc/0x124 mipi_dsi_attach+0x30/0x44 devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x2c/0x70 ti_sn_bridge_probe+0x298/0x2c4 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x7c/0x94 really_probe+0x158/0x290 __driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc bus_for_each_drv+0xa0/0xc8 __device_attach+0xd8/0x168 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 bus_probe_device+0x38/0xa0 deferred_probe_work_func+0xc8/0xe0 process_one_work+0x2d8/0x478 process_scheduled_works+0x4c/0x50 worker_thread+0x218/0x274 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0 devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8 msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8 a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234 adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44 __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174 rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c rpm_resume+0x318/0x524 __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20 msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &devfreq->lock --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(dma_fence_map); lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&devfreq->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by ring0/123: #0: ffffff8087201170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150 #1: ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 stack backtrace: CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0 devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8 msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8 a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234 adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44 __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174 rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c rpm_resume+0x318/0x524 __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20 msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 The issue is that we cannot be holding any lock while doing memory allocations that is also needed in the job_run (and in the case of devfreq, this means runpm_resume()) because lockdep sees this as a potential dependency. Fortunately there is really no reason to hold the devfreq lock when we are creating the devfreq device, as it is not yet visible to any other task. The only reason it was needed was for a lockdep assert in devfreq_get_freq_range(). Instead, split this up into an internal fxn that is used in the devfreq_add_device() (where the lock is not required). Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c index e36cbb920ec8..e5558ec68ce8 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c @@ -111,23 +111,13 @@ static unsigned long find_available_max_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq) return max_freq; } -/** - * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range - * @devfreq: the devfreq instance - * @min_freq: the min frequency - * @max_freq: the max frequency - * - * This takes into consideration all constraints. - */ -void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq, - unsigned long *min_freq, - unsigned long *max_freq) +static void __get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq, + unsigned long *min_freq, + unsigned long *max_freq) { unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->freq_table; s32 qos_min_freq, qos_max_freq; - lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock); - /* * Initialize minimum/maximum frequency from freq table. * The devfreq drivers can initialize this in either ascending or @@ -158,6 +148,23 @@ void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq, if (*min_freq > *max_freq) *min_freq = *max_freq; } + +/** + * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range + * @devfreq: the devfreq instance + * @min_freq: the min frequency + * @max_freq: the max frequency + * + * This takes into consideration all constraints. + */ +void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq, + unsigned long *min_freq, + unsigned long *max_freq) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock); + + __get_freq_range(devfreq, min_freq, max_freq); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_get_freq_range); /** @@ -810,7 +817,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, } mutex_init(&devfreq->lock); - mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock); devfreq->dev.parent = dev; devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class; devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release; @@ -823,17 +829,14 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, if (devfreq->profile->timer < 0 || devfreq->profile->timer >= DEVFREQ_TIMER_NUM) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = -EINVAL; goto err_dev; } if (!devfreq->profile->max_state || !devfreq->profile->freq_table) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = set_freq_table(devfreq); if (err < 0) goto err_dev; - mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock); } else { devfreq->freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table; devfreq->max_state = devfreq->profile->max_state; @@ -841,19 +844,17 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, devfreq->scaling_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq); if (!devfreq->scaling_min_freq) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = -EINVAL; goto err_dev; } devfreq->scaling_max_freq = find_available_max_freq(devfreq); if (!devfreq->scaling_max_freq) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = -EINVAL; goto err_dev; } - devfreq_get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq); + __get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq); devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(dev); devfreq->opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev); @@ -865,7 +866,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev)); err = device_register(&devfreq->dev); if (err) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); put_device(&devfreq->dev); goto err_out; } @@ -876,7 +876,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, devfreq->max_state), GFP_KERNEL); if (!devfreq->stats.trans_table) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = -ENOMEM; goto err_devfreq; } @@ -886,7 +885,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, sizeof(*devfreq->stats.time_in_state), GFP_KERNEL); if (!devfreq->stats.time_in_state) { - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); err = -ENOMEM; goto err_devfreq; } @@ -896,8 +894,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, srcu_init_notifier_head(&devfreq->transition_notifier_list); - mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock); - err = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, &devfreq->user_min_freq_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0); if (err < 0) From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:50 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340884 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84FEC04FDF for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229446AbjHCWCZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52812 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231803AbjHCWCX (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732D33A9C; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-52cb8e5e9f5so1030488a12.0; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100142; x=1691704942; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WHzqSThmy913fuGKpn4uXf/XGbug/XgU3SVaHteOTFw=; b=Ktbivmf1unMCf5Lfw6cU+ehdRCR9VHwUJJpt/z0XBJXfOLvfvaJbI1UkOCHdzcg/Gs 9/o1P/B3x3FCEVNmkLWkumhFqN11In5fCIvCUUkeyMwMBvDxiX5iEJMaGbSz1LLSOprD rwsYXMy5+YRP8HJdfC7UMU1MBAlhEAW1kEThrsMj3NzYBbJj/TiUe2esFfezQ06YvAyt qiawcF5mHD1SRVUtc7hc+DK0y4NZc/CzCoUxcybbmTcUbdzKIxvj0TqAj1A1zGs3cwQB uAZqlu3/rvbZj8izwT2S/qH6DolxpUS2APHPEl6GYkXh8Kaw6vXwlly6BCRj9Y/g61ZR 5ZbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100142; x=1691704942; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WHzqSThmy913fuGKpn4uXf/XGbug/XgU3SVaHteOTFw=; b=fzdgRUwn1VLfR4I+/wHcay7Pbydj7LEPkb1p2mUAYzT/vi+SlsG3OoJ4ax45lprxPX iBTTjtLlFBxRkqiOPe0tDvJfNcRPk5p+50Dxl/yUcx6lQvqvxM5fqQQNwXDyaAVU3lXj +o3JlW+v3ONNWLjn+a5yUznZR47qOZnyv4dHp4P6chOdM106wlY7OhNVJCWd6xzi2Hyp Np6XjihdHA8STHHh9ZYM1H7249hAkK19KvwJJSnYLVegGiK3w5hxEovtTCYw/Fe4QiKU HHfiVak+pmN4kfdtgHEy+apkzjJ9a3eoMQFiEqGSxBlIhts2swIDGjGfySCqAPszprM/ ECQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNQdXnPPokMIJfWHHmqsm4/UnNiB/6FTLods/7gatC8lPAx7GY HhC1wUdB6m8scGtGHpB9ZmgZ5IOeNyI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG0EMAk3QzLGHjyK1kBBG+MKsuNGPfVOyaz6A+S75XyvoJ077wEJA+SRLoCx2VFa2/q3zovCg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6f23:b0:268:f2e:b480 with SMTP id d32-20020a17090a6f2300b002680f2eb480mr27152pjk.11.1691100141639; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3-20020a17090a654300b002641a9faa01sm2946499pjs.52.2023.08.03.15.02.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Chanwoo Choi , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:DEVICE FREQUENCY (DEVFREQ)), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-3-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark This will make it easier to catch places doing allocations that can trigger reclaim under devfreq->lock. Because devfreq->lock is held over various devfreq_dev_profile callbacks, there might be some fallout if those callbacks do allocations that can trigger reclaim, but I've looked through the various callback implementations and don't see anything obvious. If it does trigger any lockdep splats, those should be fixed. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c index e5558ec68ce8..81add6064406 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c @@ -817,6 +817,12 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, } mutex_init(&devfreq->lock); + + /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_lock(&devfreq->lock); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); + devfreq->dev.parent = dev; devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class; devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release; From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:51 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340885 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE70C04A94 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231743AbjHCWC1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231947AbjHCWC0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F6B3C23; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bbf0f36ce4so10321375ad.0; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100144; x=1691704944; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DIKm3KXW0BL2JyogAnZ2vg+/kVkCrZycjm7nvt+Ji58=; b=ErSK6InaI2pfpjFZspAp/kNj9zIU5+BxZiqjMBfiIJhN75pDYYqTMlzG6LeNzoR/fo LmHAivo7tSOek8dLbFEFdzmj7gVNIZdFh5RoeHxdH11ujLS9ZctBk1hH04ZGh/NlaFy8 qz3SWdX4Q71xt13jtSLKWMEYPwPibuDFSfE8ePtQKLW7YKIa3AvmHgAitHCeqTWNuWTp qoa+q6SN5gc3gOeVK6XiUmjaVCaFXUBdT/uNzXyD9iVGCX+SEra+pPTYA83wxCmnTFOV WaRp0/ZtRkv6EoUMkCGBJNV6cd1s/Ozt/atKCrEMAiaoAnc8Q5vAmIRbOossilUSqRCC kuZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100144; x=1691704944; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DIKm3KXW0BL2JyogAnZ2vg+/kVkCrZycjm7nvt+Ji58=; b=Tja72HdRoKsBmkhD7m7QOPzyf1+fqFC9GKM2A/iSep3MCLuYl6SGQnoqrUrRhdRNhk 1jGDgloJ0huEL9khHTjK0BQlVr7Si3H9oFnqonLHjWbApnnclyU1VF7+iBbXtLzNegNY AxQFL3uwjZDCYvx/fEjmyI+FLH/tQ2ENLcN0pCclPZVbzbX6CkuUAoWJKva7FSpTNoSU Mh5gxlgx30Tmk4SEep0ttKH6Ehtvm16cjmRyJ/IH8MaG0ezrpLEpXWAQHo2N14lc/emx 4WlsmxtkFnV76eP/69ZXlcMSR7GqFjyq7J3kzqpT1v/H2/wkNJLzGdMbQFZ3Uw08Q0HK Jdew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMNSpzgvNsNYzUXmoO916V8iIc4QwlWoALApNyt7MYDv4WIXOM Dy0ZC4aVJjqqJyBsFwCLglo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGOfO4T/mMTJ+qviNyTQJesL5WbocShHrK0MjyWuhluP9cjAzdpQj0LHnj+pFHXigjXR13k0A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1205:b0:1bc:e6a:205f with SMTP id l5-20020a170903120500b001bc0e6a205fmr19215plh.20.1691100143953; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q8-20020a170902a3c800b001bba7002132sm338824plb.33.2023.08.03.15.02.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:HIBERNATION (aka Software Suspend, aka swsusp)), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-4-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark In the process of adding lockdep annotation for drm GPU scheduler's job_run() to detect potential deadlock against shrinker/reclaim, I hit this lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #558 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ ring0/125 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffd6d6ce0f28 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 but task is already holding lock: ffffff8087239208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4 do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100 topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178 get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4 parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188 smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8 kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc kmalloc_trace+0x50/0xa8 dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate+0x38/0x100 __dev_pm_qos_add_request+0xb0/0x1e8 dev_pm_qos_add_request+0x58/0x80 dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit+0x60/0x13c register_cpu+0x12c/0x130 topology_init+0xac/0xbc do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: dev_pm_qos_mtx --> dma_fence_map --> &gpu->active_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&gpu->active_lock); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&gpu->active_lock); lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by ring0/123: #0: ffffff8087251170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150 #1: ffffffd00b0e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 #2: ffffff8087251208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 stack backtrace: CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #559 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 The issue is that dev_pm_qos_mtx is held in the runpm suspend/resume (or freq change) path, but it is also held across allocations that could recurse into shrinker. Solve this by changing dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate() into a function that can be called unconditionally before the device qos object is needed and before aquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx. This way the allocations can be done without holding the mutex. In the case that we raced with another thread to allocate the qos object, detect this *after* acquiring the dev_pm_qos_mtx and simply free the redundant allocations. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/base/power/qos.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c index 8e93167f1783..f3e0c6b65635 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c @@ -185,18 +185,24 @@ static int apply_constraint(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, } /* - * dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate + * dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated * @dev: device to allocate data for * - * Called at the first call to add_request, for constraint data allocation - * Must be called with the dev_pm_qos_mtx mutex held + * Called to ensure that devices qos is allocated, before acquiring + * dev_pm_qos_mtx. */ -static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev) +static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated(struct device *dev) { struct dev_pm_qos *qos; struct pm_qos_constraints *c; struct blocking_notifier_head *n; + if (!dev) + return -ENODEV; + + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos)) + return 0; + qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos), GFP_KERNEL); if (!qos) return -ENOMEM; @@ -227,10 +233,26 @@ static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qos->flags.list); + mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); + + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos)) { + /* + * We have raced with another task to create the qos. + * No biggie, just free the resources we've allocated + * outside of dev_pm_qos_mtx and move on with life. + */ + kfree(n); + kfree(qos); + goto unlock; + } + spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock); dev->power.qos = qos; spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); + return 0; } @@ -331,17 +353,15 @@ static int __dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, { int ret = 0; - if (!dev || !req || dev_pm_qos_invalid_req_type(dev, type)) + if (!req || dev_pm_qos_invalid_req_type(dev, type)) return -EINVAL; if (WARN(dev_pm_qos_request_active(req), "%s() called for already added request\n", __func__)) return -EINVAL; - if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos)) + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos)) ret = -ENODEV; - else if (!dev->power.qos) - ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); trace_dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev_name(dev), type, value); if (ret) @@ -390,6 +410,10 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, { int ret; + ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated(dev); + if (ret) + return ret; + mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, type, value); mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); @@ -537,15 +561,11 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier, { int ret = 0; - mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); - - if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos)) - ret = -ENODEV; - else if (!dev->power.qos) - ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); - + ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated(dev); if (ret) - goto unlock; + return ret; + + mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); switch (type) { case DEV_PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY: @@ -565,7 +585,6 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier, ret = -EINVAL; } -unlock: mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); return ret; } @@ -905,10 +924,13 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val) { int ret; + ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated(dev); + if (ret) + return ret; + mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos) - || !dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) { + if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) { struct dev_pm_qos_request *req; if (val < 0) { From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:52 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340886 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485C7C04A6A for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232302AbjHCWCj (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232141AbjHCWCg (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D6E3C16; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-68783004143so1069284b3a.2; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100146; x=1691704946; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pdIQ5YsNyrlOWXwSuXx23oN8qxRbhtWI4ShbAosGVe0=; b=sY6tJHcmXKaCE9qCeuSrRxn8tuTREX4eVuSfZvU32Ry0/icJ9OtVDmxhagKAVuyBMG SUlXoizmhVMryD/E8eq5VmhsMaFhtRWTcx8Z3VDUZPEoYMQTd6SkR9z7vso9XLWHYkTS 6G9Ivds6degZQNmEcVjcTyJml6OXTI9ZiM35raRv4xX8Ealp/ILJbHMBVkGxiok4i1jv 79yixE/qNmhB6NESnN2Zw9tQ5znpOqPcsYkko7KoB2AK/a1bDGMh1E4oYnQh8/heHyfO TjaF/icZeS7mS7tCSdKfcxd9dlGz731i4zqGEICpOLuMrrnAaVLJnUCIL9OuxNCX08Xt fC9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100146; x=1691704946; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pdIQ5YsNyrlOWXwSuXx23oN8qxRbhtWI4ShbAosGVe0=; b=MqApzZOS6yhBQrX/ndS0QrZiA8QicXBbrVKjDsRdkavgLPUFXcaKkHOFtxbKow7ROj G/X2imbOXIKwI6mWp8og1IZhdvOKjIlu4JBaSfaFK2/AP9rjnuqbMJZgRqL/Gba5BtgP 5TXARwh9aZiw3FpVO7KrW+QlE1HJ8Say8VOuyUUYFiKlBj1ZsJVaCwaKh5OjE8U8MeBH Q3kTdxTHdMk5pucdURgGHIRscJspj1wsLHdvtFK1S5M1nD2P/lfzZxwsl02bDSvDA4Y5 nBDiKl5HUuiuuq+HavuQGHsAfiRjOwR3/sbwH9ZiZ3WkOyiUGJvUVQE87+7oUBU4bhBr hGJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZ/ABKMcMP9oPCTLXzISVUMAzkHdeKFsiwW4+FNWH7FQGPFyVEC wGDYouTpwrrk7qVbbo/EwEA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFOc6AAnszSskkuTa0g94925qyVeNjNM4id7xkJhDjPBOi6n4upfghDHL/yd0tHm29nnK72Rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:4984:b0:12d:3069:69e1 with SMTP id ax4-20020a056a21498400b0012d306969e1mr16263038pzc.60.1691100145981; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1-20020a62e701000000b00666b012baedsm295147pfh.158.2023.08.03.15.02.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:POWER MANAGEMENT CORE), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 4/9] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-5-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark Similar to the previous patch, move the allocation out from under dev_pm_qos_mtx, by speculatively doing the allocation and handle any race after acquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx by freeing the redundant allocation. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/base/power/qos.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c index f3e0c6b65635..4537d93ddb45 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c @@ -922,17 +922,19 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev) */ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val) { + struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = NULL; int ret; ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_ensure_allocated(dev); if (ret) return ret; + if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) + req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL); + mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) { - struct dev_pm_qos_request *req; - if (val < 0) { if (val == PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE_NO_CONSTRAINT) ret = 0; @@ -940,7 +942,6 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val) ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } - req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL); if (!req) { ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; @@ -952,6 +953,13 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val) } dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req = req; } else { + /* + * If we raced with another thread to allocate the request, + * simply free the redundant allocation and move on. + */ + if (req) + kfree(req); + if (val < 0) { __dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request(dev, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE); ret = 0; From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:53 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340887 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42865C41513 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232482AbjHCWCk (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52904 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232338AbjHCWCh (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 137EB4228; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bc3bec2c95so10713855ad.0; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100148; x=1691704948; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=4DhIg3tNHO0nntKDGAxke0FWjkdaCQbgLVhUvGrrYUs=; b=IVlws/H4rqzASnvCfzGDeM/2XoRReLJI6eIC0i9+rPNLhDlwnCMr8bdveheG+sCd5J 3gFvy0xz1vCS65CzLWl7PQwOUoMfs4iq47iApgydooKTPVi0iV95aDAnaK53qDnZylyL n+lXg0DKtjNYPkv2/2ZkW3dLUJcMk1mS0FF2f2ueQ0j4W7Gwt0VtudxJtbIdndtM2vvO wTzZfpw+fzEZEFU41QIEttkYj1djtMIGHlKN25Fg9nqVMKlaRSmFvwnxf6tjqlhPuoZg wo+N++RmXWWGxczyUFmaBmPnChRUdct7H2SLhWfHWEQtc0eosJwwiPV4MaubrdmNueGN Gucw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100148; x=1691704948; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4DhIg3tNHO0nntKDGAxke0FWjkdaCQbgLVhUvGrrYUs=; b=XYkE6de8XuqVA3l0/zizv2Fatr/cOFXVkYndoOR11BUb/kUYX/t0st2srl3/Cey7RI F+JHz7LX6O9+xfyJePi3G3CP/wlaHzJZZq/CSHZuT+PO91AFzvRFDWUddTygoDcvCH5N r3D1jdF3l7bzCkQ8KX/H0GRU6HHU825Rj7DlvmwKr0hRgAQQPzEo7EoQNdNan6IsyDnp AeCrywQF3K72yMvKs2FxRwzQdFWIH8l2TR8LQyjhbjKgrr5pcVNdkzhQcwftkCZ13XWg PHjKoVQGxHYhYEuvAD50EQdqDT+wMiI/IuyQhN1I3GBQ2S3AH/o3StdNfit5Itpr9ycY zLAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YydSMp6VqQJ6pPWMvioRPIe4IdtiEPwlGiNegW6WWKoSsaGj1ZH lCmJFk+E4matZkVC090DTdM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuhhbpypvPjmu6boQpzcgERRrZoJqVc0eDSJ/uhLny1OFK5GhIrA4vr/pGLwrUAZTitqZOeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e746:b0:1b8:af5e:853c with SMTP id p6-20020a170902e74600b001b8af5e853cmr4507plf.26.1691100148236; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p17-20020a170902ead100b001b03a1a3151sm325374pld.70.2023.08.03.15.02.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:SUSPEND TO RAM), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 5/9] PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-6-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark Annotate dev_pm_qos_mtx to teach lockdep to scream about allocations that could trigger reclaim under dev_pm_qos_mtx. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/base/power/qos.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c index 4537d93ddb45..6cb4143d1090 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c @@ -1010,3 +1010,14 @@ void dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev) pm_runtime_put(dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance); + +static int __init dev_pm_qos_init(void) +{ + /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); + + return 0; +} +early_initcall(dev_pm_qos_init); From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:54 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340888 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461BC41513 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232505AbjHCWCz (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229935AbjHCWCm (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:42 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096874686; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-790ab117bd5so50733039f.0; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100150; x=1691704950; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=u9SzfK8f8benMkFPZZn5M0dDI6Vik7V2Z9qVmakjIP4=; b=NXFC0SgMR6lPcGAuZ/t4OFEGCGcljI+NjqkglYS6burKBeyQa3c/KPDvGFw/b8XhZ5 3Bnn3wRzAdzocpWpqmG8UBKZQJ69ZDqNy3UfGr42OSlem4HHZhZozxf7zQC5RQ3C3EYP 935LW07FwynLc+PUcp2FMfYZLLY3cOZCtAmy7ns6XY7slbsobF4RRiU3Beev+RVQz1aR ycPInvnsfP8VS+2KOcfQOvgppfKGHwcvcdqDgWBckEaP4zIzdZ4UN63yf3NEYyC34WCP pMU0e4SxOVDvedCdyvh9nvrls0BQ6i/8QbtCcXyXaCEWLVrgYD+yBIklV3fTdTuZJieS jy2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100150; x=1691704950; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u9SzfK8f8benMkFPZZn5M0dDI6Vik7V2Z9qVmakjIP4=; b=hbFvQN7mLTHsa5mK9AJZixweWHSZnBb2NyE2tCsEhPAaoAuyzZTj0PKAwHObgnHmFt BgiNje4doUaH40iLc0NsrPD6IPiQQ4/7nggIrg8w/cMVFaLmIBlNnTs2tGRE9KbSvyIN AtUmnjVbxOeUdpuXjqnfj9E7tjzZkph2g3P5teQk9lIP60ZJOLvdJL8Zmm1DaSZ7n/Pp Tqyixbzt5cWdy2ALm8RTJlfwmMwTSs/B/DYhNjyPFqKjSxFMTC1Xikoq5PkSPltlFnMS AGQIaZgAB0W+/2ltIIUQI2x530FPyDvzHtyaTVZZdY+Av5BVYTYT9g3ZziIS66bf2KMV LayA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyKU2agF3Uh95k5OLuOGHg9kD1k4QCot5/D0qe7MXagXJaETv2f DfaVwhFwarjvV7MtfdbuMvc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvjEDBfu4lY4atvoirKumYSBHJnt6vhnxOGdlriuw7JUtNLetHs5BWQXz9p3e9w+IJkTSYTg== X-Received: by 2002:a92:cda9:0:b0:346:779a:ff70 with SMTP id g9-20020a92cda9000000b00346779aff70mr87434ild.28.1691100150510; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bt26-20020a63291a000000b0056438ae5e29sm294747pgb.43.2023.08.03.15.02.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , Georgi Djakov , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:INTERCONNECT API), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 6/9] interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-7-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark For cases where icc_bw_set() can be called in callbaths that could deadlock against shrinker/reclaim, such as runpm resume, we need to decouple the icc locking. Introduce a new icc_bw_lock for cases where we need to serialize bw aggregation and update to decouple that from paths that require memory allocation such as node/link creation/ destruction. Fixes this lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #554 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ ring0/132 is trying to acquire lock: ffffff80871916d0 (&gmu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234 but task is already holding lock: ffffffdb5aee57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0 dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4 do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #3 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100 topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178 get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4 parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188 smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8 kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100 kzalloc.constprop.0+0x14/0x20 icc_node_create_nolock+0x4c/0xc4 icc_node_create+0x38/0x58 qcom_icc_rpmh_probe+0x1b8/0x248 platform_probe+0x70/0xc4 really_probe+0x158/0x290 __driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __driver_attach+0xf8/0x108 bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc4 driver_attach+0x2c/0x38 bus_add_driver+0xd0/0x1d8 driver_register+0xbc/0xf8 __platform_driver_register+0x30/0x3c qnoc_driver_init+0x24/0x30 do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c kernel_init+0x30/0x134 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 (icc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 icc_set_bw+0x88/0x2b4 _set_opp_bw+0x8c/0xd8 _set_opp+0x19c/0x300 dev_pm_opp_set_opp+0x84/0x94 a6xx_gmu_resume+0x18c/0x804 a6xx_pm_resume+0xf8/0x234 adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44 __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174 rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c rpm_resume+0x318/0x524 __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc adreno_load_gpu+0xc4/0x17c msm_open+0x50/0x120 drm_file_alloc+0x17c/0x228 drm_open_helper+0x74/0x118 drm_open+0xa0/0x144 drm_stub_open+0xd4/0xe4 chrdev_open+0x1b8/0x1e4 do_dentry_open+0x2f8/0x38c vfs_open+0x34/0x40 path_openat+0x64c/0x7b4 do_filp_open+0x54/0xc4 do_sys_openat2+0x9c/0x100 do_sys_open+0x50/0x7c __arm64_sys_openat+0x28/0x34 invoke_syscall+0x8c/0x128 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xa0/0x11c do_el0_svc+0xac/0xbc el0_svc+0x48/0xa0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xac/0x13c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 -> #0 (&gmu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234 adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44 __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174 rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c rpm_resume+0x318/0x524 __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20 msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &gmu->lock --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(dma_fence_map); lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start); lock(dma_fence_map); lock(&gmu->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by ring0/132: #0: ffffff8087191170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150 #1: ffffffdb5aee57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 132 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #554 Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234 adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38 pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44 __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174 rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c rpm_resume+0x318/0x524 __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20 msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178 msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 kthread+0xf0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/interconnect/core.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c index 5fac448c28fd..e15a92a79df1 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(icc_providers); static int providers_count; static bool synced_state; static DEFINE_MUTEX(icc_lock); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(icc_bw_lock); static struct dentry *icc_debugfs_dir; static void icc_summary_show_one(struct seq_file *s, struct icc_node *n) @@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ int icc_set_bw(struct icc_path *path, u32 avg_bw, u32 peak_bw) if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(path) || !path->num_nodes)) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&icc_lock); + mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock); old_avg = path->reqs[0].avg_bw; old_peak = path->reqs[0].peak_bw; @@ -663,7 +664,7 @@ int icc_set_bw(struct icc_path *path, u32 avg_bw, u32 peak_bw) apply_constraints(path); } - mutex_unlock(&icc_lock); + mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock); trace_icc_set_bw_end(path, ret); @@ -872,6 +873,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider) return; mutex_lock(&icc_lock); + mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock); node->provider = provider; list_add_tail(&node->node_list, &provider->nodes); @@ -900,6 +902,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider) node->avg_bw = 0; node->peak_bw = 0; + mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock); mutex_unlock(&icc_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_add); @@ -1025,6 +1028,7 @@ void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev) return; mutex_lock(&icc_lock); + mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock); synced_state = true; list_for_each_entry(p, &icc_providers, provider_list) { dev_dbg(p->dev, "interconnect provider is in synced state\n"); From patchwork Thu Aug 3 22:01:55 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rob Clark X-Patchwork-Id: 13340889 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E5C001DB for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 22:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232530AbjHCWC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53316 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232537AbjHCWCn (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:02:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8612846B3; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-26824c32cfbso1004755a91.1; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1691100153; x=1691704953; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GuYmHdMlJJm2W9mV95yYZgg2mXFJPDcfJ3tRYlFlHrM=; b=K12ls+5nEVl36ytG8cbp2yL75TIL1947X1Gv+ztaa5Hs1nzv+rsT75oXjLTWThiuvm NMIvk4kaDD61ZhpuSH4+0g7aEkyWAZ/NEZTx3b93Z5VyIeAHAGSJ8qqNK0CegT54Y9Np UDlfQNqA52YALXkFjv+uRLcBVhMD+GzpiiYGUdLFL45VVymD2Aw5Q1JMBgkcfV7HYERO s/Bua6mD4cUkMEn8l8w1lpFEQczncgzXSTSGm7o+2SfFS4f7l+hEasQgu9bzjwDbRl8n jgWdy9tyjFvrcQnH6g/FvYmmDOjY/JYPESrbt2yArlBGFnSp7h1A14npTAFYtwyvKfBb t2Dw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691100153; x=1691704953; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GuYmHdMlJJm2W9mV95yYZgg2mXFJPDcfJ3tRYlFlHrM=; b=PoOhhJ3cH334R39y8wmUaQ86De0eKENqsTpr3ykapaKdBJtWf/nbTSkwbretKuuLcQ FnFO5VqqReltpt/vTpmZNXlyRNouMBdjo4sUeiEO2rrd89Y2EvbGsBzFqxu7lXcf/4Px k5nvJFbuHGvRBt4JNltWttYgtMVhNG5MhCO4nIdZLlcLVh35fKVbDgsk1dP73bvWROHP +JVvUxMEwa0mahnsRPYPJj83SKxdxkpZnBYcbC5WtQs7Ucq+CA13kOLraKCKUAcPc0oF iodza9G3ryTDfyLN/Zwt9V05dsTBxc/UviCuQ65UUvnio13stAgJ5Fqt1sjEaFNYJSga PbjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxzr0+0R4F/w2TNuTedBsSIRc6GFhMMDlvrQe4RoseGNyLF3iCX g7fl5tY/Dd6Z0f0X/u2G4Zo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG3YFvsDLwStkO1uqHxjVFxeObDGmEDiHO59o2QB19zWFMW8tsvoWzHpEa0C01KLQGzwYn+Hg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6f23:b0:268:f2e:b480 with SMTP id d32-20020a17090a6f2300b002680f2eb480mr27686pjk.11.1691100152708; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e1:abd:4a00:6c80:7c10:75a0:44f4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3-20020a17090a654300b002641a9faa01sm2946592pjs.52.2023.08.03.15.02.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Aug 2023 15:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob Clark To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark , Georgi Djakov , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:INTERCONNECT API), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Subject: [PATCH v3 7/9] interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:01:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20230803220202.78036-8-robdclark@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> References: <20230803220202.78036-1-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Clark Teach lockdep that icc_bw_lock is needed in code paths that could deadlock if they trigger reclaim. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c index e15a92a79df1..1afbc4f7c6e7 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c @@ -1041,13 +1041,21 @@ void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev) } } } + mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock); mutex_unlock(&icc_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_sync_state); static int __init icc_init(void) { - struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); + struct device_node *root; + + /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_lock(&icc_bw_lock); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); + + root = of_find_node_by_path("/"); providers_count = of_count_icc_providers(root); of_node_put(root);