From patchwork Tue Oct 10 08:21:23 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hanjun Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 13414981 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CF763D9F for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C6197 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 01:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4S4TNC0s7Rz1M92P; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:19:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.112.125) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:22:26 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Robin Murphy CC: , , Hanjun Guo , D Scott Phillips Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: bus: Move acpi_arm_init() to the place of after acpi_ghes_init() Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:21:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20231010082123.4167603-1-guohanjun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.112.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net acpi_agdi_init() in acpi_arm_init() will register a SDEI event, so it needs the SDEI subsystem to be initialized (which is done in acpi_ghes_init()) before the AGDI driver probing. In commit fcea0ccf4fd7 ("ACPI: bus: Consolidate all arm specific initialisation into acpi_arm_init()"), the acpi_agdi_init() was called before acpi_ghes_init() and it causes following failure: | [ 0.515864] sdei: Failed to create event 1073741825: -5 | [ 0.515866] agdi agdi.0: Failed to register for SDEI event 1073741825 | [ 0.515867] agdi: probe of agdi.0 failed with error -5 | ... | [ 0.516022] sdei: SDEIv1.0 (0x0) detected in firmware. Fix it by moving acpi_arm_init() to the place of after acpi_ghes_init(). Fixes: fcea0ccf4fd7 ("ACPI: bus: Consolidate all arm specific initialisation into acpi_arm_init()") Reported-by: D Scott Phillips Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla Tested-by: D Scott Phillips --- I did a test on a ARM server and I didn't see regressions, but I don't have a AGDI table firmware, so Scott please give a test to see if it fixes your issue. drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index f41dda2d3493..a4aa53b7e2bb 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -1410,10 +1410,10 @@ static int __init acpi_init(void) acpi_init_ffh(); pci_mmcfg_late_init(); - acpi_arm_init(); acpi_viot_early_init(); acpi_hest_init(); acpi_ghes_init(); + acpi_arm_init(); acpi_scan_init(); acpi_ec_init(); acpi_debugfs_init();