From patchwork Tue Jan 23 02:32:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13526781 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBB951C49; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705977094; cv=none; b=hMHhVL3dX9BhIE5vputvGVAhU4zumuvP/Zk+wMHxAfUrY+YJWEqbIc2+5HMLnKYhc9XqVX+yeet33EI41t3XMhO7SC6+oj2pH1oZXsU6Hj3EO0ZO5NGrMtzxcSlNFEX3oDVxDEZBMvsDz6ZyCdf0tqj40N5ccREB5GVA+AySKt8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705977094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qQoBK/yPG3qUttEb8gVNV9skWBiCb1iM8nAruNyeQnw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KmuywYfQ+935kLv92b3MD7Gve+nGuHUg451/K8tcuVddNVGWV789tijane2/ZWEzxYMC4dObYudCWdPx05vwuWUSyYyeTSgZ/CNqhbwvScTAK8KaMLZ4FZpIaE2UI0DPtRxb07QgNWszPwfUxfbkytdS4Me5BFFXS8uy26uB7zA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TJrgc0cznz4f3kFC; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:31:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.75]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33541A0199; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:31:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgCHqg3+JK9lkTDZBg--.54023S2; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:31:27 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Palmer Dabbelt , Luke Nelson , Pu Lehui , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf] riscv, bpf: Fix unpredictable kernel crash about RV64 struct_ops Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:32:07 +0000 Message-Id: <20240123023207.1917284-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: Syh0CgCHqg3+JK9lkTDZBg--.54023S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxuF1rWrW3Zw4kXFy5ZryUGFg_yoW5tF48pF 15Gr15CF48XrnrGF1kXF4UXr13t3yqva47GFy7Gr4F9a45Wry8Ar18tayjyry5KFn09r17 JF1qvw1ktr18A3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvF14x267AKxVW5JVWrJwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2 Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4 xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r4a6rW5 MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AK xVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj fUOmhFUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Pu Lehui We encountered a kernel crash triggered by the bpf_tcp_ca testcase as show below: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff60000088554500 Oops [#1] ... CPU: 3 PID: 458 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.8.0-rc1-kselftest_plain #1 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : 0xff60000088554500 ra : tcp_ack+0x288/0x1232 epc : ff60000088554500 ra : ffffffff80cc7166 sp : ff2000000117ba50 gp : ffffffff82587b60 tp : ff60000087be0040 t0 : ff60000088554500 t1 : ffffffff801ed24e t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff2000000117bbc0 s1 : 0000000000000500 a0 : ff20000000691000 a1 : 0000000000000018 a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : ff60000087be03a0 a4 : 0000000000000000 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000021 a7 : ffffffff8263f880 s2 : 000000004ac3c13b s3 : 000000004ac3c13a s4 : 0000000000008200 s5 : 0000000000000001 s6 : 0000000000000104 s7 : ff2000000117bb00 s8 : ff600000885544c0 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: ff60000086ff0b80 s11: 000055557983a9c0 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 000000000000ffc4 t5 : ffffffff8154f170 t6 : 0000000000000030 status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ff60000088554500 cause: 000000000000000c Code: c796 67d7 0000 0000 0052 0002 c13b 4ac3 0000 0000 (0001) 0000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The reason is that commit 2cd3e3772e41 ("x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI") changes the func_addr of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline in struct_ops from NULL to non-NULL, while we use func_addr on RV64 to differentiate between struct_ops and regular trampoline. When the struct_ops testcase is triggered, it emits wrong prologue and epilogue, and lead to unpredictable issues. After commit 2cd3e3772e41, we can use BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT to distinguish them as it always be set in struct_ops. Fixes: 2cd3e3772e41 ("x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI") Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Tested-by: Björn Töpel Acked-by: Björn Töpel --- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 58dc64dd94a8..719a97e7edb2 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -795,6 +795,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN]; + bool is_struct_ops = flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT; void *orig_call = func_addr; bool save_ret; u32 insn; @@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, stack_size = round_up(stack_size, 16); - if (func_addr) { + if (!is_struct_ops) { /* For the trampoline called from function entry, * the frame of traced function and the frame of * trampoline need to be considered. @@ -998,7 +999,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, emit_ld(RV_REG_S1, -sreg_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx); - if (func_addr) { + if (!is_struct_ops) { /* trampoline called from function entry */ emit_ld(RV_REG_T0, stack_size - 8, RV_REG_SP, ctx); emit_ld(RV_REG_FP, stack_size - 16, RV_REG_SP, ctx);