From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:50 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598726 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8E2C54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAo-00076Q-Tt; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAm-00074Y-7d; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:32 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAj-0002o6-RR; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:31 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.105]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2L1KyWztQWl; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46B7140158; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:23 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.187; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org FEAT_NMI defines another three new bits in HCRX_EL2: TALLINT, HCRX_VINMI and HCRX_VFNMI. When the feature is enabled, allow these bits to be written in HCRX_EL2. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Declare cpu variable to reuse latter. v4: - Update the comment for FEAT_NMI in hcrx_write(). - Update the commit message, s/thress/three/g. v3: - Add Reviewed-by. - Add HCRX_VINMI and HCRX_VFNMI support in HCRX_EL2. - Upate the commit messsage. --- target/arm/cpu-features.h | 5 +++++ target/arm/helper.c | 9 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-features.h b/target/arm/cpu-features.h index e5758d9fbc..b300d0446d 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu-features.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu-features.h @@ -681,6 +681,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sme(const ARMISARegisters *id) return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, SME) != 0; } +static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_nmi(const ARMISARegisters *id) +{ + return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, NMI) != 0; +} + static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_tgran4_lpa2(const ARMISARegisters *id) { return FIELD_SEX64(id->id_aa64mmfr0, ID_AA64MMFR0, TGRAN4) >= 1; diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 3f3a5b55d4..7d6c6e9878 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -6183,13 +6183,20 @@ bool el_is_in_host(CPUARMState *env, int el) static void hcrx_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value) { + ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env); + uint64_t valid_mask = 0; /* FEAT_MOPS adds MSCEn and MCE2 */ - if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mops, env_archcpu(env))) { + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mops, cpu)) { valid_mask |= HCRX_MSCEN | HCRX_MCE2; } + /* FEAT_NMI adds TALLINT, VINMI and VFNMI */ + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) { + valid_mask |= HCRX_TALLINT | HCRX_VINMI | HCRX_VFNMI; + } + /* Clear RES0 bits. */ env->cp15.hcrx_el2 = value & valid_mask; } From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:51 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598733 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D528C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAo-00075s-5U; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAl-00074Q-UJ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:31 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAj-0002oC-JJ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:31 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m46130rz1vxBd; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:08:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E6C180060; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:24 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 02/23] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.32; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga06-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org When PSTATE.ALLINT is set, an IRQ or FIQ interrupt that is targeted to ELx, with or without superpriority is masked. As Richard suggested, place ALLINT bit in PSTATE in env->pstate. With the change to pstate_read/write, exception entry and return are automatically handled. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v5: - Remove the ALLINT comment, as it is covered by "all other bits". - Add Reviewed-by. v4: - Keep PSTATE.ALLINT in env->pstate but not env->allint. - Update the commit message. v3: - Remove ALLINT dump in aarch64_cpu_dump_state(). - Update the commit message. --- target/arm/cpu.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index bc0c84873f..de740d223f 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -1430,6 +1430,7 @@ void pmu_init(ARMCPU *cpu); #define PSTATE_D (1U << 9) #define PSTATE_BTYPE (3U << 10) #define PSTATE_SSBS (1U << 12) +#define PSTATE_ALLINT (1U << 13) #define PSTATE_IL (1U << 20) #define PSTATE_SS (1U << 21) #define PSTATE_PAN (1U << 22) From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:52 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598739 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3FBC54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAr-00078c-Fi; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-00076o-2U; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAm-0002oR-7G; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:34 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2q5hCdz1xrhT; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2BBA1A016C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:25 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 03/23] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add support for FEAT_NMI. NMI (FEAT_NMI) is an mandatory feature in ARMv8.8-A and ARM v9.3-A. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v3: - Add Reviewed-by. - Adjust to before the MSR patches. --- target/arm/internals.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h index dd3da211a3..516e0584bf 100644 --- a/target/arm/internals.h +++ b/target/arm/internals.h @@ -1229,6 +1229,9 @@ static inline uint32_t aarch64_pstate_valid_mask(const ARMISARegisters *id) if (isar_feature_aa64_mte(id)) { valid |= PSTATE_TCO; } + if (isar_feature_aa64_nmi(id)) { + valid |= PSTATE_ALLINT; + } return valid; } From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:53 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598737 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12424C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAs-00078s-4v; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-00076p-69; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAl-0002oV-SD; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:34 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m244f3wz1h3MH; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:06:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCFC81A0188; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:26 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 04/23] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add ALLINT MSR (immediate) to decodetree, in which the CRm is 0b000x. The EL0 check is necessary to ALLINT, and the EL1 check is necessary when imm == 1. So implement it inline for EL2/3, or EL1 with imm==0. Avoid the unconditional write to pc and use raise_exception_ra to unwind. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v7: - Add Reviewed-by. v6: - Fix DISAS_TOO_MANY to DISAS_UPDATE_EXIT and add the comment. v5: - Drop the & 1 in trans_MSR_i_ALLINT(). - Simplify and merge msr_i_allint() and allint_check(). - Rename msr_i_allint() to msr_set_allint_el1(). v4: - Fix the ALLINT MSR (immediate) decodetree implementation. - Remove arm_is_el2_enabled() check in allint_check(). - Update env->allint to env->pstate. - Only call allint_check() when imm == 1. - Simplify the allint_check() to not pass "op" and extract. - Implement it inline for EL2/3, or EL1 with imm==0. - Pass (a->imm & 1) * PSTATE_ALLINT (i64) to simplfy the ALLINT set/clear. v3: - Remove EL0 check in allint_check(). - Add TALLINT check for EL1 in allint_check(). - Remove unnecessarily arm_rebuild_hflags() in msr_i_allint helper. --- target/arm/tcg/a64.decode | 1 + target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c | 12 ++++++++++++ target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h | 1 + target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode index 8a20dce3c8..0e7656fd15 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode +++ b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ MSR_i_DIT 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 010 11111 @msr_i MSR_i_TCO 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 100 11111 @msr_i MSR_i_DAIFSET 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 110 11111 @msr_i MSR_i_DAIFCLEAR 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 111 11111 @msr_i +MSR_i_ALLINT 1101 0101 0000 0 001 0100 000 imm:1 000 11111 MSR_i_SVCR 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 0 mask:2 imm:1 011 11111 # MRS, MSR (register), SYS, SYSL. These are all essentially the diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c index ebaa7f00df..7818537890 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c @@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ void HELPER(msr_i_spsel)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t imm) update_spsel(env, imm); } +void HELPER(msr_set_allint_el1)(CPUARMState *env) +{ + /* ALLINT update to PSTATE. */ + if (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_TALLINT) { + raise_exception_ra(env, EXCP_UDEF, + syn_aa64_sysregtrap(0, 1, 0, 4, 1, 0x1f, 0), + exception_target_el(env), GETPC()); + } + + env->pstate |= PSTATE_ALLINT; +} + static void daif_check(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t op, uint32_t imm, uintptr_t ra) { diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h index 575a5dab7d..0518165399 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h +++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(rbit64, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG_SE, i64, i64) DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_spsel, void, env, i32) DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_daifset, void, env, i32) DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_daifclear, void, env, i32) +DEF_HELPER_1(msr_set_allint_el1, void, env) DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmph_a64, i64, f16, f16, ptr) DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmpeh_a64, i64, f16, f16, ptr) DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmps_a64, i64, f32, f32, ptr) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c index 340265beb0..21758b290d 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c @@ -2036,6 +2036,25 @@ static bool trans_MSR_i_DAIFCLEAR(DisasContext *s, arg_i *a) return true; } +static bool trans_MSR_i_ALLINT(DisasContext *s, arg_i *a) +{ + if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, s) || s->current_el == 0) { + return false; + } + + if (a->imm == 0) { + clear_pstate_bits(PSTATE_ALLINT); + } else if (s->current_el > 1) { + set_pstate_bits(PSTATE_ALLINT); + } else { + gen_helper_msr_set_allint_el1(tcg_env); + } + + /* Exit the cpu loop to re-evaluate pending IRQs. */ + s->base.is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE_EXIT; + return true; +} + static bool trans_MSR_i_SVCR(DisasContext *s, arg_MSR_i_SVCR *a) { if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme, s) || a->mask == 0) { From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:54 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598729 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4827AC54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAq-00078G-UQ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAo-00075r-2d; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:34 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAl-0002oh-Ku; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:33 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m250Ggvz1R7Wj; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:06:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87731A0172; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:27 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.35; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga07-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Support ALLINT msr access as follow: mrs , ALLINT // read allint msr ALLINT, // write allint with imm Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Move nmi_reginfo and related functions inside an existing ifdef TARGET_AARCH64 to solve the --target-list=aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu compilation problem. - Check 'isread' when writing to ALLINT. v5: - Add Reviewed-by. v4: - Remove arm_is_el2_enabled() check in allint_check(). - Change to env->pstate instead of env->allint. v3: - Remove EL0 check in aa64_allint_access() which alreay checks in .access PL1_RW. - Use arm_hcrx_el2_eff() in aa64_allint_access() instead of env->cp15.hcrx_el2. - Make ALLINT msr access function controlled by aa64_nmi. --- target/arm/helper.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 7d6c6e9878..a65729af66 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -7497,6 +7497,37 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo rme_mte_reginfo[] = { .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 7, .crm = 14, .opc2 = 5, .access = PL3_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP }, }; + +static void aa64_allint_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, + uint64_t value) +{ + env->pstate = (env->pstate & ~PSTATE_ALLINT) | (value & PSTATE_ALLINT); +} + +static uint64_t aa64_allint_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) +{ + return env->pstate & PSTATE_ALLINT; +} + +static CPAccessResult aa64_allint_access(CPUARMState *env, + const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, bool isread) +{ + if (!isread && arm_current_el(env) == 1 && + (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_TALLINT)) { + return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2; + } + return CP_ACCESS_OK; +} + +static const ARMCPRegInfo nmi_reginfo[] = { + { .name = "ALLINT", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64, + .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0, .crn = 4, .crm = 3, + .type = ARM_CP_NO_RAW, + .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = aa64_allint_access, + .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, pstate), + .writefn = aa64_allint_write, .readfn = aa64_allint_read, + .resetfn = arm_cp_reset_ignore }, +}; #endif /* TARGET_AARCH64 */ static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu) @@ -9891,6 +9922,10 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu) if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nv2, cpu)) { define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nv2_reginfo); } + + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) { + define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nmi_reginfo); + } #endif if (cpu_isar_feature(any_predinv, cpu)) { From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:55 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598741 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A7FC54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAr-00078m-Tg; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAq-00077b-1S; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAm-0002oj-2T; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m263Y8lz1h3MD; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:06:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B66180060; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:28 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 06/23] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-7-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org This only implements the external delivery method via the GICv3. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Update the GPIOs passed in the arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, and update the comment. - Definitely not merge VINMI and VFNMI into EXCP_VNMI. - Update VINMI and VFNMI when writing HCR_EL2 or HCRX_EL2. v8: - Fix the rcu stall after sending a VNMI in qemu VM. v7: - Add Reviewed-by. v6: - env->cp15.hcr_el2 -> arm_hcr_el2_eff(). - env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff(). - Not include VF && VFNMI in CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI. v4: - Accept NMI unconditionally for arm_cpu_has_work() but add comment. - Change from & to && for EXCP_IRQ or EXCP_FIQ. - Refator nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked(). - Also handle VNMI in arm_cpu_exec_interrupt() and arm_cpu_set_irq(). - Rename virtual to Virtual. v3: - Not include CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI when FEAT_NMI not enabled - Add ARM_CPU_VNMI. - Refator nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked(). - Test SCTLR_ELx.NMI for ALLINT mask for NMI. --- target/arm/cpu-qom.h | 5 +- target/arm/cpu.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- target/arm/cpu.h | 6 ++ target/arm/helper.c | 33 +++++++++-- target/arm/internals.h | 18 ++++++ 5 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-qom.h b/target/arm/cpu-qom.h index 8e032691db..b497667d61 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu-qom.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu-qom.h @@ -36,11 +36,14 @@ DECLARE_CLASS_CHECKERS(AArch64CPUClass, AARCH64_CPU, #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX "-" TYPE_ARM_CPU #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME(name) (name ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX) -/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's four inbound GPIO lines */ +/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's seven inbound GPIO lines */ #define ARM_CPU_IRQ 0 #define ARM_CPU_FIQ 1 #define ARM_CPU_VIRQ 2 #define ARM_CPU_VFIQ 3 +#define ARM_CPU_NMI 4 +#define ARM_CPU_VINMI 5 +#define ARM_CPU_VFNMI 6 /* For M profile, some registers are banked secure vs non-secure; * these are represented as a 2-element array where the first element diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c index ab8d007a86..f1e7ae0975 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.c +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c @@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ void arm_restore_state_to_opc(CPUState *cs, } #endif /* CONFIG_TCG */ +/* + * With SCTLR_ELx.NMI == 0, IRQ with Superpriority is masked identically with + * IRQ without Superpriority. Moreover, if the GIC is configured so that + * FEAT_GICv3_NMI is only set if FEAT_NMI is set, then we won't ever see + * CPU_INTERRUPT_*NMI anyway. So we might as well accept NMI here + * unconditionally. + */ static bool arm_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs) { ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs); @@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ static bool arm_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs) return (cpu->power_state != PSCI_OFF) && cs->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD + | CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR | CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB); } @@ -668,6 +676,7 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx, CPUARMState *env = cpu_env(cs); bool pstate_unmasked; bool unmasked = false; + bool allIntMask = false; /* * Don't take exceptions if they target a lower EL. @@ -678,13 +687,36 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx, return false; } + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, env_archcpu(env)) && + env->cp15.sctlr_el[target_el] & SCTLR_NMI && cur_el == target_el) { + allIntMask = env->pstate & PSTATE_ALLINT || + ((env->cp15.sctlr_el[target_el] & SCTLR_SPINTMASK) && + (env->pstate & PSTATE_SP)); + } + switch (excp_idx) { + case EXCP_NMI: + pstate_unmasked = !allIntMask; + break; + + case EXCP_VINMI: + if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) { + /* VINMIs are only taken when hypervized. */ + return false; + } + return !allIntMask; + case EXCP_VFNMI: + if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) { + /* VFNMIs are only taken when hypervized. */ + return false; + } + return !allIntMask; case EXCP_FIQ: - pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_F); + pstate_unmasked = (!(env->daif & PSTATE_F)) && (!allIntMask); break; case EXCP_IRQ: - pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_I); + pstate_unmasked = (!(env->daif & PSTATE_I)) && (!allIntMask); break; case EXCP_VFIQ: @@ -692,13 +724,13 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx, /* VFIQs are only taken when hypervized. */ return false; } - return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F); + return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F) && (!allIntMask); case EXCP_VIRQ: if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) { /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized. */ return false; } - return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I); + return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I) && (!allIntMask); case EXCP_VSERR: if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_AMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) { /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized. */ @@ -804,6 +836,32 @@ static bool arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request) /* The prioritization of interrupts is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. */ + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, env_archcpu(env))) { + if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) { + excp_idx = EXCP_NMI; + target_el = arm_phys_excp_target_el(cs, excp_idx, cur_el, secure); + if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el, + cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) { + goto found; + } + } + if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) { + excp_idx = EXCP_VINMI; + target_el = 1; + if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el, + cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) { + goto found; + } + } + if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) { + excp_idx = EXCP_VFNMI; + target_el = 1; + if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el, + cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) { + goto found; + } + } + } if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ) { excp_idx = EXCP_FIQ; target_el = arm_phys_excp_target_el(cs, excp_idx, cur_el, secure); @@ -900,6 +958,48 @@ void arm_cpu_update_vfiq(ARMCPU *cpu) } } +void arm_cpu_update_vinmi(ARMCPU *cpu) +{ + /* + * Update the interrupt level for VINMI, which is the logical OR of + * the HCRX_EL2.VINMI bit and the input line level from the GIC. + */ + CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env; + CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); + + bool new_state = ((arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VI) && + (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VINMI)) || + (env->irq_line_state & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI); + + if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) != 0)) { + if (new_state) { + cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI); + } else { + cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI); + } + } +} + +void arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(ARMCPU *cpu) +{ + /* + * Update the interrupt level for VFNMI, which is the HCRX_EL2.VFNMI bit. + */ + CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env; + CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); + + bool new_state = (arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VF) && + (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VFNMI); + + if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) != 0)) { + if (new_state) { + cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI); + } else { + cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI); + } + } +} + void arm_cpu_update_vserr(ARMCPU *cpu) { /* @@ -929,7 +1029,9 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level) [ARM_CPU_IRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD, [ARM_CPU_FIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ, [ARM_CPU_VIRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ, - [ARM_CPU_VFIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ + [ARM_CPU_VFIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ, + [ARM_CPU_NMI] = CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI, + [ARM_CPU_VINMI] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI, }; if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2) && @@ -955,8 +1057,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level) case ARM_CPU_VFIQ: arm_cpu_update_vfiq(cpu); break; + case ARM_CPU_VINMI: + arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu); + break; case ARM_CPU_IRQ: case ARM_CPU_FIQ: + case ARM_CPU_NMI: if (level) { cpu_interrupt(cs, mask[irq]); } else { @@ -1350,12 +1456,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj) #else /* Our inbound IRQ and FIQ lines */ if (kvm_enabled()) { - /* VIRQ and VFIQ are unused with KVM but we add them to maintain - * the same interface as non-KVM CPUs. + /* VIRQ, VFIQ, NMI, VINMI are unused with KVM but we add + * them to maintain the same interface as non-KVM CPUs. */ - qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 4); + qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 6); } else { - qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 4); + qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 6); } qdev_init_gpio_out(DEVICE(cpu), cpu->gt_timer_outputs, diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index de740d223f..08a6bc50de 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ #define EXCP_DIVBYZERO 23 /* v7M DIVBYZERO UsageFault */ #define EXCP_VSERR 24 #define EXCP_GPC 25 /* v9 Granule Protection Check Fault */ +#define EXCP_NMI 26 +#define EXCP_VINMI 27 +#define EXCP_VFNMI 28 /* NB: add new EXCP_ defines to the array in arm_log_exception() too */ #define ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET 1 @@ -80,6 +83,9 @@ #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_2 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_3 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_0 +#define CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_4 +#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_0 +#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_1 /* The usual mapping for an AArch64 system register to its AArch32 * counterpart is for the 32 bit world to have access to the lower diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index a65729af66..1868235499 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -6042,15 +6042,19 @@ static void do_hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t value, uint64_t valid_mask) * and the state of the input lines from the GIC. (This requires * that we have the BQL, which is done by marking the * reginfo structs as ARM_CP_IO.) - * Note that if a write to HCR pends a VIRQ or VFIQ it is never - * possible for it to be taken immediately, because VIRQ and - * VFIQ are masked unless running at EL0 or EL1, and HCR - * can only be written at EL2. + * Note that if a write to HCR pends a VIRQ or VFIQ or VINMI or + * VFNMI, it is never possible for it to be taken immediately + * because VIRQ, VFIQ, VINMI and VFNMI are masked unless running + * at EL0 or EL1, and HCR can only be written at EL2. */ g_assert(bql_locked()); arm_cpu_update_virq(cpu); arm_cpu_update_vfiq(cpu); arm_cpu_update_vserr(cpu); + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) { + arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu); + arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(cpu); + } } static void hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value) @@ -6199,6 +6203,23 @@ static void hcrx_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, /* Clear RES0 bits. */ env->cp15.hcrx_el2 = value & valid_mask; + + /* + * Updates to VINMI and VFNMI require us to update the status of + * virtual NMI, which are the logical OR of these bits + * and the state of the input lines from the GIC. (This requires + * that we have the BQL, which is done by marking the + * reginfo structs as ARM_CP_IO.) + * Note that if a write to HCRX pends a VINMI or VFNMI it is never + * possible for it to be taken immediately, because VINMI and + * VFNMI are masked unless running at EL0 or EL1, and HCRX + * can only be written at EL2. + */ + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) { + g_assert(bql_locked()); + arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu); + arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(cpu); + } } static CPAccessResult access_hxen(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, @@ -6214,6 +6235,7 @@ static CPAccessResult access_hxen(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, static const ARMCPRegInfo hcrx_el2_reginfo = { .name = "HCRX_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64, + .type = ARM_CP_IO, .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 2, .access = PL2_RW, .writefn = hcrx_write, .accessfn = access_hxen, .nv2_redirect_offset = 0xa0, @@ -10796,6 +10818,9 @@ void arm_log_exception(CPUState *cs) [EXCP_DIVBYZERO] = "v7M DIVBYZERO UsageFault", [EXCP_VSERR] = "Virtual SERR", [EXCP_GPC] = "Granule Protection Check", + [EXCP_NMI] = "NMI", + [EXCP_VINMI] = "Virtual IRQ NMI", + [EXCP_VFNMI] = "Virtual FIQ NMI", }; if (idx >= 0 && idx < ARRAY_SIZE(excnames)) { diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h index 516e0584bf..b53f5e8ff2 100644 --- a/target/arm/internals.h +++ b/target/arm/internals.h @@ -1109,6 +1109,24 @@ void arm_cpu_update_virq(ARMCPU *cpu); */ void arm_cpu_update_vfiq(ARMCPU *cpu); +/** + * arm_cpu_update_vinmi: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI bit in cs->interrupt_request + * + * Update the CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI bit in cs->interrupt_request, following + * a change to either the input VNMI line from the GIC or the HCRX_EL2.VINMI. + * Must be called with the BQL held. + */ +void arm_cpu_update_vinmi(ARMCPU *cpu); + +/** + * arm_cpu_update_vfnmi: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI bit in cs->interrupt_request + * + * Update the CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI bit in cs->interrupt_request, following + * a change to the HCRX_EL2.VFNMI. + * Must be called with the BQL held. + */ +void arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(ARMCPU *cpu); + /** * arm_cpu_update_vserr: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR bit * From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598738 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE0BC54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAs-00079e-Pz; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-00076w-A6; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAn-0002ox-6u; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.112]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2v3YZqz1xsGt; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8600A140153; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:28 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-8-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Remove nmi_is_irq flag in CPUARMState. - Handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el(). --- target/arm/helper.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 1868235499..077c9a6923 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -10760,6 +10760,7 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint32_t excp_idx, hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env); switch (excp_idx) { case EXCP_IRQ: + case EXCP_NMI: scr = ((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_IRQ) == SCR_IRQ); hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO; break; From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:57 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598722 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D55B6C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAt-0007AW-DI; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-000776-Dx; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAn-0002qV-GU; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:35 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4f0Fcdz1GCbw; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B151402CC; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:29 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 08/23] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add IS and FS bit in ISR_EL1 and handle the read. With CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI or CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI, both CPSR_I and ISR_IS must be set. With CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI, both CPSR_F and ISR_FS must be set. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI -> CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI. - Handle CPSR_F and ISR_FS according to CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI instead of CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ and HCRX_EL2.VFNMI. - Update the commit message. v7: - env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff(). - Add Reviewed-by. v6: - Verify that HCR_EL2.VF is set before checking VFNMI. v4； - Also handle VNMI. v3: - CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI do not set FIQ, so remove it. - With CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI, both CPSR_I and ISR_IS must be set. --- target/arm/cpu.h | 2 ++ target/arm/helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index 08a6bc50de..97997dbd08 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.h +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h @@ -1398,6 +1398,8 @@ void pmu_init(ARMCPU *cpu); #define CPSR_N (1U << 31) #define CPSR_NZCV (CPSR_N | CPSR_Z | CPSR_C | CPSR_V) #define CPSR_AIF (CPSR_A | CPSR_I | CPSR_F) +#define ISR_FS (1U << 9) +#define ISR_IS (1U << 10) #define CPSR_IT (CPSR_IT_0_1 | CPSR_IT_2_7) #define CACHED_CPSR_BITS (CPSR_T | CPSR_AIF | CPSR_GE | CPSR_IT | CPSR_Q \ diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 077c9a6923..b57114d35d 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -2021,16 +2021,29 @@ static uint64_t isr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ) { ret |= CPSR_I; } + if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) { + ret |= ISR_IS; + ret |= CPSR_I; + } } else { if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) { ret |= CPSR_I; } + + if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) { + ret |= ISR_IS; + ret |= CPSR_I; + } } if (hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) { if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ) { ret |= CPSR_F; } + if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) { + ret |= ISR_FS; + ret |= CPSR_F; + } } else { if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ) { ret |= CPSR_F; From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:58 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598720 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58087C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAw-0007Dx-UX; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAr-00078O-7Z; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:37 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-0002qt-An; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m291RXVz1h3MJ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:06:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB8A1A0172; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:30 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 09/23] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Set or clear PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception to ELx according to the SCTLR_ELx.SPINTMASK bit. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Not check SCTLR_NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(). v3: - Add Reviewed-by. --- target/arm/helper.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index b57114d35d..967e833ee8 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -11730,6 +11730,14 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs) } } + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) { + if (!(env->cp15.sctlr_el[new_el] & SCTLR_SPINTMASK)) { + new_mode |= PSTATE_ALLINT; + } else { + new_mode &= ~PSTATE_ALLINT; + } + } + pstate_write(env, PSTATE_DAIF | new_mode); env->aarch64 = true; aarch64_restore_sp(env, new_el); From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:07:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598719 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44854C54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAw-0007Ci-4c; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAq-00078H-Un; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAp-0002rC-5L; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:36 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4g5Zxwz1GCc0; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD0A14011B; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:32 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:31 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 10/23] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:07:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-11-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Wire the new NMI and VINMI interrupt line from the GIC to each CPU. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Rename ARM_CPU_VNMI to ARM_CPU_VINMI. - Update the commit message. v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Also add VNMI wire. --- hw/arm/virt.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index a9a913aead..ef2e6c2c4d 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -821,7 +821,8 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem) /* Wire the outputs from each CPU's generic timer and the GICv3 * maintenance interrupt signal to the appropriate GIC PPI inputs, - * and the GIC's IRQ/FIQ/VIRQ/VFIQ interrupt outputs to the CPU's inputs. + * and the GIC's IRQ/FIQ/VIRQ/VFIQ/NMI/VINMI interrupt outputs to the + * CPU's inputs. */ for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) { DeviceState *cpudev = DEVICE(qemu_get_cpu(i)); @@ -865,6 +866,10 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem) qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VIRQ)); sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 3 * smp_cpus, qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VFIQ)); + sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 4 * smp_cpus, + qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_NMI)); + sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 5 * smp_cpus, + qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VINMI)); } fdt_add_gic_node(vms); From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598725 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A19CCD11BF for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAu-0007Bq-KT; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAs-00078p-10; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:38 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAq-0002rc-5x; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:37 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4h5VHpz1GCc1; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB981A016F; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:32 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-12-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Augment the GICv3's QOM device interface by adding one new set of sysbus IRQ line, to signal NMI to each CPU. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Add support for VNMI. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c | 6 ++++++ include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h | 2 ++ include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c index cb55c72681..c52f060026 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c @@ -299,6 +299,12 @@ void gicv3_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICv3State *s, qemu_irq_handler handler, for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) { sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_vfiq); } + for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) { + sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_nmi); + } + for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) { + sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_vnmi); + } memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem_dist, OBJECT(s), ops, s, "gicv3_dist", 0x10000); diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h index 7080375008..97fea4102d 100644 --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ struct GICState { qemu_irq parent_fiq[GIC_NCPU]; qemu_irq parent_virq[GIC_NCPU]; qemu_irq parent_vfiq[GIC_NCPU]; + qemu_irq parent_nmi[GIC_NCPU]; + qemu_irq parent_vnmi[GIC_NCPU]; qemu_irq maintenance_irq[GIC_NCPU]; /* GICD_CTLR; for a GIC with the security extensions the NS banked version diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h index 4e2fb518e7..7324c7d983 100644 --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ struct GICv3CPUState { qemu_irq parent_fiq; qemu_irq parent_virq; qemu_irq parent_vfiq; + qemu_irq parent_nmi; + qemu_irq parent_vnmi; /* Redistributor */ uint32_t level; /* Current IRQ level */ From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598736 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580A8C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAx-0007En-Ki; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAt-0007Ax-O5; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:39 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAr-0002rz-TA; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:39 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4H33sWz1vx4X; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:08:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B67B180060; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:33 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 12/23] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-13-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.32; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga06-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so the NMI exception trap entry behave like IRQ. And VINMI(vIRQ with Superpriority) can be raised from the GIC or come from the hcrx_el2.HCRX_VINMI bit, VFNMI(vFIQ with Superpriority) come from the hcrx_el2.HCRX_VFNMI bit. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Update the commit message. - Handle VINMI and VFNMI. v7: - Add Reviewed-by. v6: - Not combine VFNMI with CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI. v4: - Also handle VNMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(). v3: - Remove the FIQ NMI handle. --- target/arm/helper.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 967e833ee8..eef37b801d 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -11650,10 +11650,13 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs) break; case EXCP_IRQ: case EXCP_VIRQ: + case EXCP_NMI: + case EXCP_VINMI: addr += 0x80; break; case EXCP_FIQ: case EXCP_VFIQ: + case EXCP_VFNMI: addr += 0x100; break; case EXCP_VSERR: From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:02 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598740 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9CFC54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAx-0007Es-MY; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAv-0007Cc-W1; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:42 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAt-0002sb-Qt; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:41 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.174]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4F6WstzbdH0; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:08:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AEFB140FEF; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:34 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 13/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq superpriority information Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-14-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.188; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org A SPI, PPI or SGI interrupt can have a superpriority property. So maintain superpriority information in PendingIrq and GICR/GICD. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Acked-by: Richard Henderson --- v3: - Place this ahead of implement GICR_INMIR. - Add Acked-by. --- include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h index 7324c7d983..df4380141d 100644 --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct { int irq; uint8_t prio; int grp; + bool superprio; } PendingIrq; struct GICv3CPUState { @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ struct GICv3CPUState { uint32_t gicr_ienabler0; uint32_t gicr_ipendr0; uint32_t gicr_iactiver0; + uint32_t gicr_isuperprio; uint32_t edge_trigger; /* ICFGR0 and ICFGR1 even bits */ uint32_t gicr_igrpmodr0; uint32_t gicr_nsacr; @@ -274,6 +276,7 @@ struct GICv3State { GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(active); /* GICD_ISACTIVER */ GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(level); /* Current level */ GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(edge_trigger); /* GICD_ICFGR even bits */ + GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(superprio); /* GICD_INMIR */ uint8_t gicd_ipriority[GICV3_MAXIRQ]; uint64_t gicd_irouter[GICV3_MAXIRQ]; /* Cached information: pointer to the cpu i/f for the CPUs specified @@ -313,6 +316,7 @@ GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(pending) GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(active) GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(level) GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(edge_trigger) +GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(superprio) #define TYPE_ARM_GICV3_COMMON "arm-gicv3-common" typedef struct ARMGICv3CommonClass ARMGICv3CommonClass; From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598721 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1020C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAz-0007GX-9C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAx-0007Eh-D5; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAv-0002ss-KV; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4K28BPz1vx6g; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:08:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECB01A016F; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:35 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-15-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.32; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga06-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add GICR_INMIR0 register and support access GICR_INMIR0. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v6: - Add Reviewed-by. v4: - Make the GICR_INMIR0 implementation more clearer. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c index 8153525849..7a16a058b1 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c @@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ static int gicr_ns_access(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq) return extract32(cs->gicr_nsacr, irq * 2, 2); } +static void gicr_write_bitmap_reg(GICv3CPUState *cs, MemTxAttrs attrs, + uint32_t *reg, uint32_t val) +{ + /* Helper routine to implement writing to a "set" register */ + val &= mask_group(cs, attrs); + *reg = val; + gicv3_redist_update(cs); +} + static void gicr_write_set_bitmap_reg(GICv3CPUState *cs, MemTxAttrs attrs, uint32_t *reg, uint32_t val) { @@ -406,6 +415,10 @@ static MemTxResult gicr_readl(GICv3CPUState *cs, hwaddr offset, *data = value; return MEMTX_OK; } + case GICR_INMIR0: + *data = cs->gic->nmi_support ? + gicr_read_bitmap_reg(cs, attrs, cs->gicr_isuperprio) : 0; + return MEMTX_OK; case GICR_ICFGR0: case GICR_ICFGR1: { @@ -555,6 +568,12 @@ static MemTxResult gicr_writel(GICv3CPUState *cs, hwaddr offset, gicv3_redist_update(cs); return MEMTX_OK; } + case GICR_INMIR0: + if (cs->gic->nmi_support) { + gicr_write_bitmap_reg(cs, attrs, &cs->gicr_isuperprio, value); + } + return MEMTX_OK; + case GICR_ICFGR0: /* Register is all RAZ/WI or RAO/WI bits */ return MEMTX_OK; diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h index 29d5cdc1b6..f35b7d2f03 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ #define GICR_ICFGR1 (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0C04) #define GICR_IGRPMODR0 (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0D00) #define GICR_NSACR (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0E00) +#define GICR_INMIR0 (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0F80) /* VLPI redistributor registers, offsets from VLPI_base */ #define GICR_VPROPBASER (GICR_VLPI_OFFSET + 0x70) From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:04 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598735 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E61C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAy-0007G0-Lv; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAw-0007Cs-9A; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:42 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAt-0002tJ-SW; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:42 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2G5p7Zz1h3L6; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CC01402CC; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:36 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-16-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add GICD_INMIR, GICD_INMIRnE register and support access GICD_INMIR0. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Make the GICD_INMIR implementation more clearer. - Udpate the commit message. v3: - Add Reviewed-by. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c index 35e850685c..9739404e35 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c @@ -89,6 +89,29 @@ static int gicd_ns_access(GICv3State *s, int irq) return extract32(s->gicd_nsacr[irq / 16], (irq % 16) * 2, 2); } +static void gicd_write_bitmap_reg(GICv3State *s, MemTxAttrs attrs, + uint32_t *bmp, maskfn *maskfn, + int offset, uint32_t val) +{ + /* + * Helper routine to implement writing to a "set" register + * (GICD_INMIR, etc). + * Semantics implemented here: + * RAZ/WI for SGIs, PPIs, unimplemented IRQs + * Bits corresponding to Group 0 or Secure Group 1 interrupts RAZ/WI. + * offset should be the offset in bytes of the register from the start + * of its group. + */ + int irq = offset * 8; + + if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL || irq >= s->num_irq) { + return; + } + val &= mask_group_and_nsacr(s, attrs, maskfn, irq); + *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq) = val; + gicv3_update(s, irq, 32); +} + static void gicd_write_set_bitmap_reg(GICv3State *s, MemTxAttrs attrs, uint32_t *bmp, maskfn *maskfn, @@ -543,6 +566,11 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset, /* RAZ/WI since affinity routing is always enabled */ *data = 0; return true; + case GICD_INMIR ... GICD_INMIR + 0x7f: + *data = (!s->nmi_support) ? 0 : + gicd_read_bitmap_reg(s, attrs, s->superprio, NULL, + offset - GICD_INMIR); + return true; case GICD_IROUTER ... GICD_IROUTER + 0x1fdf: { uint64_t r; @@ -752,6 +780,12 @@ static bool gicd_writel(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset, case GICD_SPENDSGIR ... GICD_SPENDSGIR + 0xf: /* RAZ/WI since affinity routing is always enabled */ return true; + case GICD_INMIR ... GICD_INMIR + 0x7f: + if (s->nmi_support) { + gicd_write_bitmap_reg(s, attrs, s->superprio, NULL, + offset - GICD_INMIR, value); + } + return true; case GICD_IROUTER ... GICD_IROUTER + 0x1fdf: { uint64_t r; diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h index f35b7d2f03..a1fc34597e 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ #define GICD_SGIR 0x0F00 #define GICD_CPENDSGIR 0x0F10 #define GICD_SPENDSGIR 0x0F20 +#define GICD_INMIR 0x0F80 +#define GICD_INMIRnE 0x3B00 #define GICD_IROUTER 0x6000 #define GICD_IDREGS 0xFFD0 From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598716 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66E5CD11BF for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAz-0007Gt-J3; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAx-0007F4-RH; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAv-0002tg-NZ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:43 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2H41nwz2Bgj1; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94361A0172; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:37 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 16/23] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:05 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-17-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Added properties to enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature, setup distributor and redistributor registers to indicate NMI support. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c | 1 + hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c | 2 ++ hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h | 1 + include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c index c52f060026..2d2cea6858 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c @@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ static Property arm_gicv3_common_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICv3State, num_irq, 32), DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("revision", GICv3State, revision, 3), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-lpi", GICv3State, lpi_enable, 0), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-nmi", GICv3State, nmi_support, 0), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-security-extensions", GICv3State, security_extn, 0), /* * Compatibility property: force 8 bits of physical priority, even diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c index 9739404e35..c4e28d209a 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset, * by GICD_TYPER.IDbits) * MBIS == 0 (message-based SPIs not supported) * SecurityExtn == 1 if security extns supported + * NMI = 1 if Non-maskable interrupt property is supported * CPUNumber == 0 since for us ARE is always 1 * ITLinesNumber == (((max SPI IntID + 1) / 32) - 1) */ @@ -425,6 +426,7 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset, bool dvis = s->revision >= 4; *data = (1 << 25) | (1 << 24) | (dvis << 18) | (sec_extn << 10) | + (s->nmi_support << GICD_TYPER_NMI_SHIFT) | (s->lpi_enable << GICD_TYPER_LPIS_SHIFT) | (0xf << 19) | itlinesnumber; return true; diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h index a1fc34597e..8d793243f4 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ #define GICD_CTLR_E1NWF (1U << 7) #define GICD_CTLR_RWP (1U << 31) +#define GICD_TYPER_NMI_SHIFT 9 #define GICD_TYPER_LPIS_SHIFT 17 /* 16 bits EventId */ diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h index df4380141d..16c5fa7256 100644 --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ struct GICv3State { uint32_t num_irq; uint32_t revision; bool lpi_enable; + bool nmi_support; bool security_extn; bool force_8bit_prio; bool irq_reset_nonsecure; From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598724 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9851CD11DC for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB6-0007Lz-P8; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB4-0007KF-Lc; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:50 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB2-0002v4-7w; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2P4fR3z2Bgj1; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A04180060; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:38 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-18-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Add the NMIAR CPU interface registers which deal with acknowledging NMI. When introduce NMI interrupt, there are some updates to the semantics for the register ICC_IAR1_EL1 and ICC_HPPIR1_EL1. For ICC_IAR1_EL1 register, it should return 1022 if the intid has super priority. And for ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 register, it should return 1023 if the intid do not have super priority. Howerever, these are not necessary for ICC_HPPIR1_EL1 register. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v7: - Add Reviewed-by. v4: - Define ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 only if FEAT_GICv3_NMI is implemented. - Check sctrl_elx.SCTLR_NMI to return 1022 for icc_iar1_read(). - Add gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read() trace event. - Do not check icc_hppi_can_preempt() for icc_nmiar1_read(). - Add icv_nmiar1_read() and call it when EL2Enabled() and HCR_EL2.IMO == '1' --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h | 1 + hw/intc/trace-events | 1 + 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index e1a60d8c15..df82a413c6 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -795,6 +795,13 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) return intid; } +static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) +{ + /* todo */ + uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS; + return intid; +} + static uint32_t icc_fullprio_mask(GICv3CPUState *cs) { /* @@ -1097,7 +1104,8 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir0_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env) return cs->hppi.irq; } -static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env) +static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env, + bool is_nmi, bool is_hppi) { /* Return the highest priority pending interrupt register value * for group 1. @@ -1108,6 +1116,19 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env) return INTID_SPURIOUS; } + if (!is_hppi) { + int el = arm_current_el(env); + + if (is_nmi && (!cs->hppi.superprio)) { + return INTID_SPURIOUS; + } + + if ((!is_nmi) && cs->hppi.superprio + && env->cp15.sctlr_el[el] & SCTLR_NMI) { + return INTID_NMI; + } + } + /* Check whether we can return the interrupt or if we should return * a special identifier, as per the CheckGroup1ForSpecialIdentifiers * pseudocode. (We can simplify a little because for us ICC_SRE_EL1.RM @@ -1168,7 +1189,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) if (!icc_hppi_can_preempt(cs)) { intid = INTID_SPURIOUS; } else { - intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env); + intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, false); } if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) { @@ -1179,6 +1200,25 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) return intid; } +static uint64_t icc_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) +{ + GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env); + uint64_t intid; + + if (icv_access(env, HCR_IMO)) { + return icv_nmiar1_read(env, ri); + } + + intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, true, false); + + if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) { + icc_activate_irq(cs, intid); + } + + trace_gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid); + return intid; +} + static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp) { /* Drop the priority of the currently active interrupt in @@ -1555,7 +1595,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) return icv_hppir_read(env, ri); } - value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env); + value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, true); trace_gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value); return value; } @@ -2482,6 +2522,15 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_icc_apxr23_reginfo[] = { }, }; +static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo[] = { + { .name = "ICC_NMIAR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH, + .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 12, .crm = 9, .opc2 = 5, + .type = ARM_CP_IO | ARM_CP_NO_RAW, + .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = gicv3_irq_access, + .readfn = icc_nmiar1_read, + }, +}; + static uint64_t ich_ap_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) { GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env); @@ -2838,6 +2887,10 @@ void gicv3_init_cpuif(GICv3State *s) */ define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_reginfo); + if (s->nmi_support) { + define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo); + } + /* * The CPU implementation specifies the number of supported * bits of physical priority. For backwards compatibility diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h index 8d793243f4..93e56b3726 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h @@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ FIELD(VTE, RDBASE, 42, RDBASE_PROCNUM_LENGTH) /* Special interrupt IDs */ #define INTID_SECURE 1020 #define INTID_NONSECURE 1021 +#define INTID_NMI 1022 #define INTID_SPURIOUS 1023 /* Functions internal to the emulated GICv3 */ diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events index 1ef29d0256..94030550d5 100644 --- a/hw/intc/trace-events +++ b/hw/intc/trace-events @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ gicv3_cpuif_set_irqs(uint32_t cpuid, int fiqlevel, int irqlevel) "GICv3 CPU i/f gicv3_icc_generate_sgi(uint32_t cpuid, int irq, int irm, uint32_t aff, uint32_t targetlist) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x generating SGI %d IRM %d target affinity 0x%xxx targetlist 0x%x" gicv3_icc_iar0_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_IAR0 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icc_iar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_IAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 +gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_NMIAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icc_eoir_write(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_EOIR%d write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icc_hppir0_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_HPPIR0 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_HPPIR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598717 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BB9C54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB5-0007Kh-41; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB2-0007Iw-Sr; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:48 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB0-0002us-Cj; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:48 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2N6SGmz2BgZ7; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AD71402C6; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:39 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read() Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-19-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Implement icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read(), so add definition for ICH_LR_EL2.NMI and ICH_AP1R_EL2.NMI bit. If FEAT_GICv3_NMI is supported, ich_ap_write() should consider ICH_AP1R_EL2.NMI bit. In icv_activate_irq() and icv_eoir_write(), the ICH_AP1R_EL2.NMI bit should be set or clear according to the Superpriority info. By the way, add gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read trace event. If the hpp irq is a NMI, the icv iar read should return 1022 and trap for NMI again Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Correct the INTID_NMI logic. v8: - Fix an unexpected interrupt bug when sending VNMI by running qemu VM. v7: - Add Reviewed-by. v6: - Implement icv_nmiar1_read(). --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h | 3 +++ hw/intc/trace-events | 1 + 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index df82a413c6..65e84bc013 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static uint64_t icv_hppir_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) return value; } -static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp) +static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp, bool nmi) { /* Activate the interrupt in the specified list register * by moving it from Pending to Active state, and update the @@ -742,7 +742,12 @@ static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp) cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT; cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] |= ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_ACTIVE_BIT; - cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit); + + if (cs->gic->nmi_support) { + cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit) | (nmi ? ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI : 0); + } else { + cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit); + } } static void icv_activate_vlpi(GICv3CPUState *cs) @@ -776,7 +781,11 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) if (thisgrp == grp && icv_hppi_can_preempt(cs, lr)) { intid = ich_lr_vintid(lr); if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) { - icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, grp); + if (!(lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) { + icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, grp, false); + } else { + intid = INTID_NMI; + } } else { /* Interrupt goes from Pending to Invalid */ cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT; @@ -797,8 +806,32 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) { - /* todo */ + GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env); + int idx = hppvi_index(cs); uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS; + + if (idx >= 0 && idx != HPPVI_INDEX_VLPI) { + uint64_t lr = cs->ich_lr_el2[idx]; + int thisgrp = (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP) ? GICV3_G1NS : GICV3_G0; + + if ((thisgrp == GICV3_G1NS) && (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) { + intid = ich_lr_vintid(lr); + if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) { + icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, GICV3_G1NS, true); + } else { + /* Interrupt goes from Pending to Invalid */ + cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT; + /* We will now return the (bogus) ID from the list register, + * as per the pseudocode. + */ + } + } + } + + trace_gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid); + + gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(cs); + return intid; } @@ -1403,6 +1436,11 @@ static int icv_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs) return (apr0count + i * 32) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1); } else { *papr1 &= *papr1 - 1; + + if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (*papr1 & ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI)) { + *papr1 &= ~ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI; + } + return (apr1count + i * 32) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1); } } @@ -2552,7 +2590,11 @@ static void ich_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, trace_gicv3_ich_ap_write(ri->crm & 1, regno, gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value); - cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU; + if (cs->gic->nmi_support) { + cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI); + } else { + cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU; + } gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(cs); } diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h index 93e56b3726..5e2b32861d 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ FIELD(GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID, 63, 1) #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_SHIFT 48 #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_LENGTH 8 #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_MASK (0xffULL << ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_SHIFT) +#define ICH_LR_EL2_NMI (1ULL << 59) #define ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP (1ULL << 60) #define ICH_LR_EL2_HW (1ULL << 61) #define ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_SHIFT 62 @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ FIELD(GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID, 63, 1) #define ICH_VTR_EL2_PREBITS_SHIFT 26 #define ICH_VTR_EL2_PRIBITS_SHIFT 29 +#define ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI (1ULL << 63) + /* ITS Registers */ FIELD(GITS_BASER, SIZE, 0, 8) diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events index 94030550d5..47340b5bc1 100644 --- a/hw/intc/trace-events +++ b/hw/intc/trace-events @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ gicv3_icv_rpr_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_RPR read cpu 0x%x valu gicv3_icv_hppir_read(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_HPPIR%d read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icv_dir_write(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_DIR write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icv_iar_read(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_IAR%d read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 +gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_NMIAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_icv_eoir_write(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_EOIR%d write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64 gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(uint32_t cpuid, int idx, int hppvlpi, int grp, int prio) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x virt HPPI update LR index %d HPPVLPI %d grp %d prio %d" gicv3_cpuif_virt_set_irqs(uint32_t cpuid, int fiqlevel, int irqlevel) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x virt HPPI update: setting FIQ %d IRQ %d" From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598732 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3300C54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB3-0007JS-EM; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB1-0007IT-Io; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:47 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIAy-0002uG-3O; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:46 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m3710sDz1xsBm; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3298D1A016F; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:40 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 19/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-20-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org If GICD_CTLR_DS bit is zero and the NMI is non-secure, the NMI prioirty is higher than 0x80, otherwise it is higher than 0x0. And save NMI super prioirty information in hppi.superprio to deliver NMI exception. Since both GICR and GICD can deliver NMI, it is both necessary to check whether the pending irq is NMI in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset and gicv3_update_noirqset. And In irqbetter(), only a non-NMI with the same priority and a smaller interrupt number can be preempted but not NMI. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v8: - Add Reviewed-by. v7: - Reorder the irqbetter() code for clarity. - Eliminate the has_superprio local variable for gicv3_get_priority(). - false -> cs->hpplpi.superprio in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(). - 0x0 -> false in arm_gicv3_common_reset_hold(). - Clear superprio in several places for hppi, hpplpi and hppvlpi. v6: - Put the "extract superprio info" logic into gicv3_get_priority(). - Update the comment in irqbetter(). - Reset the cs->hppi.superprio to 0x0. - Set hppi.superprio to false for LPI. v4: - Replace is_nmi with has_superprio to not a mix NMI and superpriority. - Update the comment in irqbetter(). - Extract gicv3_get_priority() to avoid code repeat. --- v3: - Add missing brace --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c | 3 ++ hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c index 0b8f79a122..9496a28005 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ #include "hw/intc/arm_gicv3.h" #include "gicv3_internal.h" -static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio) +static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio, + bool has_superprio) { /* Return true if this IRQ at this priority should take * precedence over the current recorded highest priority @@ -30,14 +31,23 @@ static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio) * is the same as this one (a property which the calling code * relies on). */ - if (prio < cs->hppi.prio) { - return true; + if (prio != cs->hppi.prio) { + return prio < cs->hppi.prio; + } + + /* + * The same priority IRQ with superpriority should signal to the CPU + * as it have the priority higher than the labelled 0x80 or 0x00. + */ + if (has_superprio != cs->hppi.superprio) { + return has_superprio; } + /* If multiple pending interrupts have the same priority then it is an * IMPDEF choice which of them to signal to the CPU. We choose to * signal the one with the lowest interrupt number. */ - if (prio == cs->hppi.prio && irq <= cs->hppi.irq) { + if (irq <= cs->hppi.irq) { return true; } return false; @@ -129,6 +139,40 @@ static uint32_t gicr_int_pending(GICv3CPUState *cs) return pend; } +static bool gicv3_get_priority(GICv3CPUState *cs, bool is_redist, + uint8_t *prio, int irq) +{ + uint32_t superprio = 0x0; + + if (is_redist) { + superprio = extract32(cs->gicr_isuperprio, irq, 1); + } else { + superprio = *gic_bmp_ptr32(cs->gic->superprio, irq); + superprio = superprio & (1 << (irq & 0x1f)); + } + + if (superprio) { + /* DS = 0 & Non-secure NMI */ + if (!(cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) && + ((is_redist && extract32(cs->gicr_igroupr0, irq, 1)) || + (!is_redist && gicv3_gicd_group_test(cs->gic, irq)))) { + *prio = 0x80; + } else { + *prio = 0x0; + } + + return true; + } + + if (is_redist) { + *prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[irq]; + } else { + *prio = cs->gic->gicd_ipriority[irq]; + } + + return false; +} + /* Update the interrupt status after state in a redistributor * or CPU interface has changed, but don't tell the CPU i/f. */ @@ -141,6 +185,7 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs) uint8_t prio; int i; uint32_t pend; + bool has_superprio = false; /* Find out which redistributor interrupts are eligible to be * signaled to the CPU interface. @@ -152,10 +197,11 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs) if (!(pend & (1 << i))) { continue; } - prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[i]; - if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) { + has_superprio = gicv3_get_priority(cs, true, &prio, i); + if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, has_superprio)) { cs->hppi.irq = i; cs->hppi.prio = prio; + cs->hppi.superprio = has_superprio; seenbetter = true; } } @@ -168,9 +214,11 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs) if ((cs->gicr_ctlr & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS) && cs->gic->lpi_enable && (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_EN_GRP1NS) && (cs->hpplpi.prio != 0xff)) { - if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio)) { + if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio, + cs->hpplpi.superprio)) { cs->hppi.irq = cs->hpplpi.irq; cs->hppi.prio = cs->hpplpi.prio; + cs->hppi.superprio = cs->hpplpi.superprio; cs->hppi.grp = cs->hpplpi.grp; seenbetter = true; } @@ -213,6 +261,7 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int start, int len) int i; uint8_t prio; uint32_t pend = 0; + bool has_superprio = false; assert(start >= GIC_INTERNAL); assert(len > 0); @@ -240,10 +289,11 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int start, int len) */ continue; } - prio = s->gicd_ipriority[i]; - if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) { + has_superprio = gicv3_get_priority(cs, false, &prio, i); + if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, has_superprio)) { cs->hppi.irq = i; cs->hppi.prio = prio; + cs->hppi.superprio = has_superprio; cs->seenbetter = true; } } @@ -293,6 +343,7 @@ void gicv3_full_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s) for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) { s->cpu[i].hppi.prio = 0xff; + s->cpu[i].hppi.superprio = false; } /* Note that we can guarantee that these functions will not diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c index 2d2cea6858..822d99d8b4 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c @@ -498,8 +498,11 @@ static void arm_gicv3_common_reset_hold(Object *obj) memset(cs->gicr_ipriorityr, 0, sizeof(cs->gicr_ipriorityr)); cs->hppi.prio = 0xff; + cs->hppi.superprio = false; cs->hpplpi.prio = 0xff; + cs->hpplpi.superprio = false; cs->hppvlpi.prio = 0xff; + cs->hppvlpi.superprio = false; /* State in the CPU interface must *not* be reset here, because it * is part of the CPU's reset domain, not the GIC device's. diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c index 7a16a058b1..4118c2f297 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static void update_for_one_lpi(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, ((prio == hpp->prio) && (irq <= hpp->irq))) { hpp->irq = irq; hpp->prio = prio; + hpp->superprio = false; /* LPIs and vLPIs are always non-secure Grp1 interrupts */ hpp->grp = GICV3_G1NS; } @@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ static void update_for_all_lpis(GICv3CPUState *cs, uint64_t ptbase, int i, bit; hpp->prio = 0xff; + hpp->superprio = false; for (i = GICV3_LPI_INTID_START / 8; i < pendt_size / 8; i++) { address_space_read(as, ptbase + i, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &pend, 1); @@ -241,6 +243,7 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_vlpi_only(GICv3CPUState *cs) if (!FIELD_EX64(cs->gicr_vpendbaser, GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID)) { cs->hppvlpi.prio = 0xff; + cs->hppvlpi.superprio = false; return; } From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:09 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598718 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F70CD11DC for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB4-0007KD-Bb; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB2-0007Ig-DF; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:48 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB0-0002uW-9z; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:48 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.174]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m3752VDzNmBN; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33107140FEA; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:41 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 20/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-21-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.189; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga03-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org In CPU Interface, if the IRQ has the superpriority property, report NMI to the corresponding PE. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v6: - Add Reviewed-by. v4: - Swap the ordering of the IFs. v3: - Remove handling nmi_is_irq flag. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index 65e84bc013..f8bc74323f 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -971,6 +971,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) /* Tell the CPU about its highest priority pending interrupt */ int irqlevel = 0; int fiqlevel = 0; + int nmilevel = 0; ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu); CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env; @@ -1009,6 +1010,8 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) if (isfiq) { fiqlevel = 1; + } else if (cs->hppi.superprio) { + nmilevel = 1; } else { irqlevel = 1; } @@ -1018,6 +1021,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_fiq, fiqlevel); qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_irq, irqlevel); + qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_nmi, nmilevel); } static uint64_t icc_pmr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598731 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35A5CD11BF for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIBD-0007Nj-Oa; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB9-0007Mn-NR; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:55 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB0-0002uq-P5; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:54 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.234]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m4S3KCSz1vxBN; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:08:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353CC14011B; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:42 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 21/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-22-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.32; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga06-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org In vCPU Interface, if the vIRQ has the superpriority property, report vINMI to the corresponding vPE. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v9: - Update the commit subject and message, vNMI -> vINMI. v6: - Add Reviewed-by. --- hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c index f8bc74323f..faafd17703 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c @@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) int idx; int irqlevel = 0; int fiqlevel = 0; + int nmilevel = 0; idx = hppvi_index(cs); trace_gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), idx, @@ -482,9 +483,17 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) uint64_t lr = cs->ich_lr_el2[idx]; if (icv_hppi_can_preempt(cs, lr)) { - /* Virtual interrupts are simple: G0 are always FIQ, and G1 IRQ */ + /* + * Virtual interrupts are simple: G0 are always FIQ, and G1 are + * IRQ or NMI which depends on the ICH_LR_EL2.NMI to have + * non-maskable property. + */ if (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP) { - irqlevel = 1; + if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) { + nmilevel = 1; + } else { + irqlevel = 1; + } } else { fiqlevel = 1; } @@ -494,6 +503,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) trace_gicv3_cpuif_virt_set_irqs(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), fiqlevel, irqlevel); qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_vfiq, fiqlevel); qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_virq, irqlevel); + qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_vnmi, nmilevel); } static void gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(GICv3CPUState *cs) From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598734 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D58C54E68 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIBE-0007OC-Bu; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:10:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIBB-0007N2-0v; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:57 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB1-0002v2-0s; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:56 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.163]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m3B0Fy5z1xsCd; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17910180063; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:43 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 22/23] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-23-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Enable FEAT_NMI on the 'max' CPU. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v3: - Add Reviewed-by. - Sorted to last. --- docs/system/arm/emulation.rst | 1 + target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst b/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst index 2a7bbb82dc..a9ae7ede9f 100644 --- a/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst +++ b/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ the following architecture extensions: - FEAT_MTE (Memory Tagging Extension) - FEAT_MTE2 (Memory Tagging Extension) - FEAT_MTE3 (MTE Asymmetric Fault Handling) +- FEAT_NMI (Non-maskable Interrupt) - FEAT_NV (Nested Virtualization) - FEAT_NV2 (Enhanced nested virtualization support) - FEAT_PACIMP (Pointer authentication - IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED algorithm) diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c index 9f7a9f3d2c..62c4663512 100644 --- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c +++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj) t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, RAS_FRAC, 0); /* FEAT_RASv1p1 + FEAT_DoubleFault */ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, SME, 1); /* FEAT_SME */ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, CSV2_FRAC, 0); /* FEAT_CSV2_2 */ + t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, NMI, 1); /* FEAT_NMI */ cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 = t; t = cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0; From patchwork Thu Mar 21 13:08:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13598730 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB56C54E58 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB8-0007MW-P5; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB4-0007KT-VV; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:50 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rnIB3-0002vM-6C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:09:50 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0m2R00Bwz1h3MS; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30CC31A016C; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:09:44 +0800 To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v9 23/23] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 13:08:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20240321130812.2983113-24-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240321130812.2983113-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org A PE that implements FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 also implements FEAT_GICv3_NMI. A PE that does not implement FEAT_NMI, does not implement FEAT_GICv3_NMI So included support FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature as part of virt platform GIC initialization if FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 supported. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- v4: - Add Reviewed-by. v3: - Adjust to be the last after add FEAT_NMI to max. - Check whether support FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 for FEAT_GICv3_NMI. --- hw/arm/virt.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index ef2e6c2c4d..63d9f5b553 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -729,6 +729,19 @@ static void create_v2m(VirtMachineState *vms) vms->msi_controller = VIRT_MSI_CTRL_GICV2M; } +/* + * A PE that implements FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 also implements + * FEAT_GICv3_NMI. A PE that does not implement FEAT_NMI, does not implement + * FEAT_GICv3_NMI. + */ +static bool gicv3_nmi_present(VirtMachineState *vms) +{ + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(qemu_get_cpu(0)); + + return cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu) && + (vms->gic_version != VIRT_GIC_VERSION_2); +} + static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem) { MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms); @@ -802,6 +815,11 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem) vms->virt); } } + + if (gicv3_nmi_present(vms)) { + qdev_prop_set_bit(vms->gic, "has-nmi", true); + } + gicbusdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(vms->gic); sysbus_realize_and_unref(gicbusdev, &error_fatal); sysbus_mmio_map(gicbusdev, 0, vms->memmap[VIRT_GIC_DIST].base);