From patchwork Mon Jul 22 03:56:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13738231 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2263BC3DA5D for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:53:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=50SeSjne/pj4Tr8U6ds3kz1+O2Vy6Rz22ZpKvxWHe8s=; b=gae86+b9JzbvQ+uxdwxllfJQfN cEhlxMg04+LMLVQKI+R6N1teDxzlXUGH6kr4V6WI2o/qzpj5q8lbAWHDl9N419qf6s6Tlp5ppuS+L Ry98URpyJtSgsAIuvCSbfjQNdx/sWa2nbRXq/w+aYNFyS2VaE5imQCQi8ffQlP/b2XWKIB+IkOqQw LvR1Hua7j1jK/yWuYCtL9iLWkaHtj8kj6qj5v8UIH7Uo3i1JzO7eWhNX8Ls9No5YZUJd6CgZDCcqT 33RmN9rq9tAAUlYHCrQXJU2eo1tMXXEBdtG9hzBUHMFHx2ml8tt4tYwC4F/DPrPUo9q1MPjDngron 0oN0F0yg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk7H-00000008FMO-3Ss0; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:53:39 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk5u-00000008EnT-0eMA; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:52:16 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.252]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WS5nT6nVKzxSQm; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:47:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.57]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0721800A1; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:07 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] x86/kexec: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:56:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20240722035701.696874-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240721_205214_377305_88F0F336 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On x86_32 Qemu machine with 1GB memory, the cmdline "crashkernel=4G" is ok as below: crashkernel reserved: 0x0000000020000000 - 0x0000000120000000 (4096 MB) The cause is that the crash_size is parsed and printed with "unsigned long long" data type which is 8 bytes but allocated used with "phys_addr_t" which is 4 bytes in memblock_phys_alloc_range(). Fix it by checking if the crash_size is greater than system RAM size and warn out as parse_crashkernel_mem() do it if so as Baoquan suggested. After this patch, it fails and there is no above confusing reserve success info. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Suggested-by: Baoquan He --- v4: - Update the warn info to align with parse_crashkernel_mem(). - Update the commit message. v3: - Handle the check in arch_reserve_crashkernel() Baoquan suggested. - Split x86_32 and arm32. - Add Suggested-by. - Drop the wrong fix tag. v2: - Also fix for x86_32. - Update the fix method. - Peel off the other two patches. - Update the commit message. --- arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index 5d34cad9b7b1..77b937dbd98c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -482,6 +482,11 @@ static void __init arch_reserve_crashkernel(void) if (ret) return; + if (crash_size >= memblock_phys_mem_size()) { + pr_warn("Crashkernel: invalid size."); + return; + } + if (xen_pv_domain()) { pr_info("Ignoring crashkernel for a Xen PV domain\n"); return; From patchwork Mon Jul 22 03:57:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13738230 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E506C3DA59 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:53:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6bVBP7VJDDa5D2jcfs8dwYqVFRqv117spZayv7HBHmQ=; b=DwPSKiclfIIuzMQJLa3CScHNJR +CWOZgktIwFs1M3dVyx9qW18dcRvvHZYmKahtb1pDIW+iwS5OHxuUiii0k9c4p+8sgY/HmL8TZ+QY zbD0eP2QXgfwVbGAWc9hf2/JPHJ7e4+NLyH8/eXQAsLNnxIefRDVhRUtOLtnnHXKsMFMF2TCTHA4u utBoyqCnPOHz8TeFAeHTAYyRRTJgIbUEK0sD/zPoPJ4QgGrARt9tiavcrNaBfZ8CfhtI+envxVPzJ PEMuj4zyYlrrQW+D2AIp26dIixQT55ZbF4vGs92WYmb5/tclaYINxiT2WwHzbSxYxZFtH4M9BC5xX 1k2x55fQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk6v-00000008FDV-2l5v; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:53:17 +0000 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk5u-00000008EnU-0dyV; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:52:16 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WS5pS4cxPz20krZ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:48:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.57]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5BE1A016C; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:07 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:57:00 +0800 Message-ID: <20240722035701.696874-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240721_205214_375363_2E27E897 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Similar with x86_32, on Qemu vexpress-a9 with 1GB memory, the crash kernel "crashkernel=4G" is ok as below: Reserving 4096MB of memory at 2432MB for crashkernel (System RAM: 1024MB) The cause is that the crash_size is parsed and printed with "unsigned long long" data type which is 8 bytes but allocated used with "phys_addr_t" which is 4 bytes in memblock_phys_alloc_range(). Fix it by checking if the crash_size is greater than system RAM size and warn out as parse_crashkernel_mem() do it if so as Baoquan suggested. After this patch, it fails and there is no above confusing reserve success info. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Suggested-by: Baoquan He Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) --- v4: - Update the warn info to align with parse_crashkernel_mem(). - Rebased on the "ARM: Use generic interface to simplify crashkernel reservation" patch. - Update the commit message. v3: - Handle the check in reserve_crashkernel() Baoquan suggested. - Split x86_32 and arm32. - Add Suggested-by. - Drop the wrong fix tag. v2: - Also fix for x86_32. - Update the fix method. - Peel off the other two patches. - Update the commit message. --- arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index fc0ada003f6d..aea320dcac41 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c @@ -1005,6 +1005,11 @@ static void __init arch_reserve_crashkernel(void) if (ret || !crash_size) return; + if (crash_size >= total_mem) { + pr_warn("Crashkernel: invalid size."); + return; + } + reserve_crashkernel_generic(boot_command_line, crash_size, crash_base, low_size, high); if (arm_has_idmap_alias()) { From patchwork Mon Jul 22 03:57:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13738229 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8992C3DA5D for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:53:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=d8IM41/IePDrmjlwjR+KDcXRMipYSax/3Dfo52NbYaI=; b=x32MiWmDYqO34F+WoeTOp7LN2d wj8l27nKnza7wihguMvWz6Tp6TQ141UqKxrhANKgCcfEZcH6w6hBcM/faQx6g3+cdgTlYeRZTd619 hOU5drLikwSoiDk7467gKl418vw/RwW/t/MvddTGq4i5kI+JtZlTpsW609PhVeMWS2/3Y5MQ0Sw/A 3089LkpBjjJcKKfQ0AeihOBixC9BC52+gL1QPJSwxxlZUP//Fy0ohoW1nWpHrzB8paLODoysQ++iu W4EoUOqMU/BWWN/19jN/B1GrmgWytzch0A9KrCKixAviqGNw7z0F0NdDB0ljkMd/E4y+zs7TmojB7 JVbr7Osw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk6a-00000008F2D-1DgQ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:52:56 +0000 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVk5u-00000008EnS-0dls; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 03:52:15 +0000 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WS5pB6SQcz2ClNw; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:47:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.57]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63621A0188; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:52:08 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] riscv: kdump: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:57:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20240722035701.696874-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240722035701.696874-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemi100008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.57) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240721_205214_372361_5F90D6DC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.07 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Similar with x86_32, on Riscv32 Qemu "virt" machine with 1GB memory, the crash kernel "crashkernel=4G" is ok as below: crashkernel reserved: 0x00000000bf400000 - 0x00000001bf400000 (4096 MB) The cause is that the crash_size is parsed and printed with "unsigned long long" data type which is 8 bytes but allocated used with "phys_addr_t" which is 4 bytes in memblock_phys_alloc_range(). Fix it by checking if the crash_size is greater than system RAM size and warn out as parse_crashkernel_mem() do it if so. After this patch, it fails and there is no above confusing reserve success info. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c index bfa2dea95354..5d66a4937fcd 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c @@ -1381,6 +1381,11 @@ static void __init arch_reserve_crashkernel(void) if (ret) return; + if (crash_size >= memblock_phys_mem_size()) { + pr_warn("Crashkernel: invalid size."); + return; + } + reserve_crashkernel_generic(cmdline, crash_size, crash_base, low_size, high); }