From patchwork Fri Sep 6 09:56:39 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Xing X-Patchwork-Id: 13793848 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com (mail-pl1-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654423B1A2; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725616615; cv=none; b=cg5PEKnOY9DSMJ94/wXh+qG4UXvem1E+YQwecvbTBV+Vu0FQpas9YynukXRCnUTGc353E6J2ihSICI2vpPqs+RuQXP35bbp7PqT6e1fJdk+MEeDQ9tkTfzMTPwd2i78MpJnp7NNu9XTP9+2kVF73ankDLGpoHByYEQ4KebNFdQA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725616615; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Gg/cFI4uLlqsVbnZaoEm8EdIUALzwgRPjjBkwowQQYw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=enXfWMYIQ/czdH8cy2y0YF596sgzgJgLsMbyGqCK6u2dasJv/aXZWGz1vI9X7kOBFRuaeOycQvqYwbP0fzePAdYdykL6kXqUds6XNVtNE1kLPnxZcSkqnvcnaySHV9Jm4Ks5PNyG8rRoz6RNBJTlxVlGWqzD5fWevsEPKvBP+hA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=OqgIk0sn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OqgIk0sn" Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-206f9b872b2so2271895ad.3; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725616613; x=1726221413; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0BxxaI5LPZkABtslo3wKELpnxyTLvGZ8594bDUzf9kY=; b=OqgIk0snrOLTMxOvVSJwhfrEQCS9/ZQI8xTA5XuDA2eZpy83FSV2BQCJFIDYe7ltmd 726aA+zVVqeHUK3yKC8DIJvwvlQpXMGt50jmmb+w1TpBJ6NDJ4QCPzf32H/SZpj/0RaJ fMZd0fEvbIs/Z8RTYegoaR8Ay12aaBsWenNMtQEQLhu1vytmaSkmQWqm8oqrvh7iksWE TsjrrsHtmck0WtAQLNvKQ7K3X5F3ycHMyQVJ7nzBuRT3jRuWn7MM21W2cPqGHNHAQFn4 9TI4mIq4ruzaWNXtflflKAFt+xozWQX1prMf/UN5ZA0Cck2Li+vmXttMcbas1UqT57E8 NXiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725616613; x=1726221413; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0BxxaI5LPZkABtslo3wKELpnxyTLvGZ8594bDUzf9kY=; b=D4qx/V1/S2fSILeNiond3nar0UdbNt7UUNHuQTbaJRyL6N4iM18O33OVBiqehj0BK6 cwakZVDx8Vmnt0ueLxucoN7UEHM7rgJbjXWtw7T9+hbwcyeYVDOiwmHibEhpIZN/yTFr rAp5T4tFZTJE7sovj7FVNlu5stvqWBmAPOzE0ytzZGJ52eRoop9zpQX7Vbrx3QT4y/+5 OscVBg80QQerpHAiSE/LTVfz9F69F97/TR7AAWjC/K++Pxvv1ITRbs3PWjl2V/j0hviJ 075KvNBCD49ULBgi9aSElHfegk98FcEth1olj00ZxPvCQhqRp56Ray+V7SQgnpH/V7vz 5aZA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXR8Vijy/Y2hLcoPrP4IsmOEceHp4lhdTMKCXLGFedqxevccxjb9Bl31cbVJZ4K2orQTJdJEAU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSvJ5LjInMCErxycjRVZCxKePbQr97MYJvHL1vYdpMqSdgDd3b Ppg+RKGRAeiSgLYRcqQSyUKOMZok/SwhaxeqmZUQXDSsW2lYoGI3WPMLmyjkqh4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGz4kWsb/kpQ1FmXy6H6E3rDazo3LGK+vvo3d4cxRzz7d0SDPuRCJngWXpTPDt3PvstwLzo5w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1c5:b0:206:fd9b:f4f1 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-206fd9bf52dmr3689035ad.56.1725616612490; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from KERNELXING-MB0.tencent.com ([43.132.141.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-206aea5582csm39982595ad.221.2024.09.06.02.56.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Xing To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, willemb@google.com Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net-timestamp: introduce SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER flag Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 17:56:39 +0800 Message-Id: <20240906095640.77533-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> References: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Jason Xing introduce a new flag SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER in the receive path. User can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE to filter out rx software timestamp report, especially after a process turns on netstamp_needed_key which can time stamp every incoming skb. Previously, we found out if an application starts first which turns on netstamp_needed_key, then another one only passing SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE could also get rx timestamp. Now we handle this case by introducing this new flag without breaking users. Quoting Willem to explain why we need the flag: "why a process would want to request software timestamp reporting, but not receive software timestamp generation. The only use I see is when the application does request SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE." Similarly, this new flag could also be used for hardware case where we can set it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE, then we won't receive hardware receive timestamp. Another thing about errqueue in this patch I have a few words to say: In this case, we need to handle the egress path carefully, or else reporting the tx timestamp will fail. Egress path and ingress path will finally call sock_recv_timestamp(). We have to distinguish them. Errqueue is a good indicator to reflect the flow direction. Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn Signed-off-by: Jason Xing --- v5 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240905071738.3725-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/ 1. squash the hardware case patch into this one (Willem) 2. update corresponding commit message and doc (Willem) 3. remove the limitation in sock_set_timestamping() and restore the simplification branches. (Willem) v4 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240830153751.86895-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/ 1. revise the commit message and doc (Willem) 2. simplify the test statement (Jakub) 3. add Willem's reviewed-by tag (Willem) v3 1. Willem suggested this alternative way to solve the issue, so I added his Suggested-by tag here. Thanks! --- Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h | 3 ++- net/ethtool/common.c | 1 + net/ipv4/tcp.c | 9 ++++++-- net/socket.c | 10 +++++++-- 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst index 9c7773271393..ae122ae3df72 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst @@ -267,6 +267,33 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW: two separate messages will be looped to the socket's error queue, each containing just one timestamp. +SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER: + Used to filter out software/hardware receive timestamps. Existing + applications can 1) set SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE only, or 2) set + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE only because they implicitly came to + depend on another (usually daemon) process to enable receive + timestamps systemwide. Enabling the flag along with + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE or SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE will not + report the software or hardware receive timestamp to the userspace + so that it can filter out the cases where 1) one process starts + first which turns on netstamp_needed_key through setting generation + flags like SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or 2) similarly one process + enables generating the hardware timestamp first like setting + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, then another one only passing report + flag could also get the receive timestamp. + + If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE, or + 2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE, they will only receive software or + hardware transmit timestamp respectively. + + If the new applications 1) enable the flag along with + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, or + 2) enable it with SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE and + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE, they will still receive software or + hardware receive timestamp respectively. + New applications are encouraged to pass SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID to disambiguate timestamps and SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TSONLY to operate regardless of the setting of sysctl net.core.tstamp_allow_data. diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h index a2c66b3d7f0f..858339d1c1c4 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/net_tstamp.h @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ enum { SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW = (1<<14), SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC = (1 << 15), SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP = (1 << 16), + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER = (1 << 17), - SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP, + SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER, SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK = (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST - 1) | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_LAST }; diff --git a/net/ethtool/common.c b/net/ethtool/common.c index 781834ef57c3..6c245e59bbc1 100644 --- a/net/ethtool/common.c +++ b/net/ethtool/common.c @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ const char sof_timestamping_names[][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = { [const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW)] = "option-tx-swhw", [const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_BIND_PHC)] = "bind-phc", [const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID_TCP)] = "option-id-tcp", + [const_ilog2(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER)] = "option-rx-filter", }; static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(sof_timestamping_names) == __SOF_TIMESTAMPING_CNT); diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c index 8a5680b4e786..e359a9161445 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c @@ -2235,6 +2235,7 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk, struct scm_timestamping_internal *tss) { int new_tstamp = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TSTAMP_NEW); + u32 tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags); bool has_timestamping = false; if (tss->ts[0].tv_sec || tss->ts[0].tv_nsec) { @@ -2274,14 +2275,18 @@ void tcp_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, const struct sock *sk, } } - if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) + if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE && + (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE || + !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) has_timestamping = true; else tss->ts[0] = (struct timespec64) {0}; } if (tss->ts[2].tv_sec || tss->ts[2].tv_nsec) { - if (READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags) & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) + if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE && + (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE || + !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) has_timestamping = true; else tss->ts[2] = (struct timespec64) {0}; diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index fcbdd5bc47ac..1c2fd1a317af 100644 --- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c @@ -946,11 +946,17 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk, memset(&tss, 0, sizeof(tss)); tsflags = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_tsflags); - if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE) && + if ((tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE && + (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE || + skb_is_err_queue(skb) || + !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) && ktime_to_timespec64_cond(skb->tstamp, tss.ts + 0)) empty = 0; if (shhwtstamps && - (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE) && + (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE && + (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE || + skb_is_err_queue(skb) || + !(tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER))) && !skb_is_swtx_tstamp(skb, false_tstamp)) { if_index = 0; if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV) From patchwork Fri Sep 6 09:56:40 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Xing X-Patchwork-Id: 13793849 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7D01CB158; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725616617; cv=none; b=t0ljkU0hxL33LZOaRLLSzmTfggz5F5CnjvzhiI9DlvoxISWTJW/rodSaj4mjC8h1dkCf/G37SlTCubz7k+G7lQZKbQc/RKXKGaubkz92ACOdAcn8/frnFCsuvLxVhhe5MTOC8q1Hl/KE70OhSqpKVvVdwMOAJIgbChpQpPyYhiY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725616617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uxJr8HI575cU2I9eRQ0A18f0JZR5HN+ogm4wbuf+hzo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Ess12MS0n98wOB7/H4AvP3eC0Wq/gx620BvZ/QWXxe6ZeXQKglPCNSfX9L8NWn7A3MU1SF8qwC0Sx2OFYg2kn7Jy4yXNI2ytAYASL3tJ7ucWV5u9w71ESWFp8DIhiOl7N61RxU+joo7yyjLnngNZ5p4nsbnGWi0XsYrsrHzyYJQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=hYZeCQWX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hYZeCQWX" Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20696938f86so17329045ad.3; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725616615; x=1726221415; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kyyARlWipjDoS0SXZOFTgBRApilxAcItlWIAe+irTHY=; b=hYZeCQWXJoulKBc11qBGDAYSS3wmaKtxUIrVB7r1AZuZ3wLUnSAEzLzDMG7BQtkZU7 ++6nNl/f+ZmbaUpoWhoXfFxB9Z9X6lmJjRM1zO2fa+34rXd7e6CLWgmkJ3NYpcRsYspY 5mrxy0+vAyF66BobO5yNnEwX8DvMdfKuUBSCXVn645O11AODw7ijYzu2NHYGDGdOP2WT t5bOvrzbLXo0LpKRe+RmqZDqhDE8GU73I25ZWgntYsWEOzVqW4yJ9u9LG6qKZper0i6h amL2rjTrHiBdGeM4tgTl/V2ekydgx+aTQFtYPIBIh/P0dhUSRbr6HyVfdUKe2u4ff5qz ld1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725616615; x=1726221415; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kyyARlWipjDoS0SXZOFTgBRApilxAcItlWIAe+irTHY=; b=Hi64OP4xHolB8zorJ/XLRDcUQQlzQE9cELkhm4Gt9HDhOF2SauoIl5+bPUaaCvBMYP TuAlakV1D38c1yu9BzXxQ2ZQ+PfWrxftD2sdXKnLMSpaQvuFT0miiH03QIhs1f+UhSuG 4DEYthx8MaSrtSPzDY4NtxddIxXtrxzwn9yn9/AUugYwuLmp4sa2sx4TKZi+FA/MniOJ nT8msw/vV+PHix9CdFCRCE4+CQgDenzPWc5/1AfhtVR+gEPgkUQZOMf/L0LeAMvHWPQt L+62jbrzz0rQxfnMN4oBBI/KEkc9Yk+Dk+4VOAMyNFkH6BQsA8+TvcL8SLvfeMseBSpm P6lQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVd9NtyqNXm407oXWhw1k3B8TtVE4AMBby+hsjtH8tFqmtelXXrZYKywJCAFIw586wdivrEB/U=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yze+/F6M52SDlrIj1NMH/0ZfkQ/17VkjOB5Fd0FHHSXD8tHgKX1 qQmPP7i153gVzK783dJJT9xiquYaQOaD93ziS0xpMAC2vomRnJEA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6499Xn15y+nKGzL55z8eQyKoBweqyDbyzdVQdEE+ZcudWGXCuPiZF3CHDfP3HKZZ3WFEHlA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2b07:b0:1fd:9d0c:998c with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-206f065bb48mr18915845ad.56.1725616615473; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from KERNELXING-MB0.tencent.com ([43.132.141.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-206aea5582csm39982595ad.221.2024.09.06.02.56.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Sep 2024 02:56:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Xing To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, willemb@google.com Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net-timestamp: add selftests for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 17:56:40 +0800 Message-Id: <20240906095640.77533-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> References: <20240906095640.77533-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Jason Xing Test a few possible cases where we use SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER with software or hardware report/generation flag. Signed-off-by: Jason Xing --- 1. add a new combination test when both flags are set at once --- tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c index 9eb42570294d..16ac4df55fdb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static struct sof_flag sof_flags[] = { SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE), SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE), SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE), + SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER), + SOF_FLAG(SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE), }; static struct socket_type socket_types[] = { @@ -97,6 +99,22 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = { | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE }, {} }, + { + { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE + | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER }, + {} + }, + { + { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE + | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER }, + {} + }, + { + { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE + | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE + | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_FILTER }, + { .swtstamp = true } + }, { { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },