From patchwork Mon Sep 16 03:45:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13804991 Received: from fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C99831CA85; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726458338; cv=none; b=JiXugWwLiXcw7eJWj83P5+otbNyWgBiMiLuL28gcujY8LuZ8zNp0F+74QPqnoAmdwiaG1VbU0IX2IxqYcw6tRKnF80dNRDykI8OzYzPosAkSA8zPUM7GMZXVAKIQR3E5UfmP1nZMss2ILc1lUftMNhzMPlWefB2MyM/L1WWa2p0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726458338; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sz1qCSdDv5YlmO/PXn+JqvkLz1UwT+ctLwLAUoLb9Ms=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=QOFCaCN5KaE7qyckWsXqaA79Mwqetle5PgYqc9mF5Af1Jba6O+3CSAf1oE/8xT/bgWnWhzzQE2V3TjEk24cw/ZUucQwJSITpCMjalgvWeZDPLMjvz2MdRllPPI5GPR5we59qT1bU+uaJwUzy81Arh689eq7p0mdqLrUrzeupBv4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dxuuu.xyz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dxuuu.xyz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dxuuu.xyz header.i=@dxuuu.xyz header.b=lZeUk8a4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=mpeiYKsC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dxuuu.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dxuuu.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dxuuu.xyz header.i=@dxuuu.xyz header.b="lZeUk8a4"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="mpeiYKsC" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B1E11401F0; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dxuuu.xyz; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1726458335; x= 1726544735; bh=yU8nhOJGYzc0DOMMI0G8l5B/bSrnAhtVorqxp2H7Y/4=; b=l ZeUk8a41P0/IKeHBIK0c9oyik0OARATWUK5+cUz9x0e7SDMmFUoJJKXl3XiwtLb7 ePyX2ehKLqi+KJVCPLSP1tFLuYCLSfmYctnbEQw0cPykoLIuaFCsM+Bq/L/6uAiq vDM3YgufZCcxZkutWojJgSsGjIIbri37B4CTs+bzlHj0v12o67SahFrLeUF3fK8W uRbb8CgzWy1OBI83JDZcilY1BPZq8BSN56bJYL+BlE/Up6vulzQdmaqLhHzary1W xZg/IIqFo5OD3B3pznM9lCbbo0At/DUuMKPTtP0bszelPMYZlzBKf6OSxm44/S+p RHX9vz5ix/TjiHkWaPp9g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1726458335; x= 1726544735; bh=yU8nhOJGYzc0DOMMI0G8l5B/bSrnAhtVorqxp2H7Y/4=; b=m peiYKsCbY+LkHAeZ0PScLX9oawnWpDpMwD8hZG4D9jKyzFk2JhZq6/S2eLT+DZa/ 6mJKxHwq/LFPbf2RwfT/8DsTiGvF9mY1erGg6jGVmis+SctPH1muVVfh7cLeGdiw JO+yyrYMpT+LcvoAP6um3X2yrefydHYHVk5CNUhlG1mAAoAOC1DSmAoAbdP4WMci N+wlAQ1s3p+Cbn8PaoxrxMPnnQtj/+496gWqBj3Ibyib3gYto11Ri6ZNBYIvXw/b 1JIn5wbiDbNH+uDiDM7CTaqK/RcMigkd+eZgUBvQDznXLE7yEaWtWiV1M8YwmUxF smPcTj/dPGHQrxuPJuxlA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudekgedgjeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdlje dtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkffojghfggfgsedtkeertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpeff rghnihgvlhcuighuuceougiguhesugiguhhuuhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epgfefgfegjefhudeikedvueetffelieefuedvhfehjeeljeejkefgffeghfdttdetnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugiguhesug iguhhuuhdrgiihiidpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudekpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdp rhgtphhtthhopegurghnihgvlhesihhoghgvrghrsghogidrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhope gvugguhiiikeejsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshhhuhgrhheskhgvrhhn vghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprghnughrihhisehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtph htthhopegrshhtsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhnhdrfhgrshht rggsvghnugesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghrthhinhdrlhgruheslh hinhhugidruggvvhdprhgtphhtthhopehsohhngheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghp thhtohephihonhhghhhonhhgrdhsohhngheslhhinhhugidruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i6a694271:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Xu To: daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: verifier: Support eliding map lookup nullness Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:45:19 -0600 Message-ID: <3b54139f8d4877e0487daebdd799c3878ee27ed0.1726458273.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 This commit allows progs to elide a null check on statically known map lookup keys. In other words, if the verifier can statically prove that the lookup will be in-bounds, allow the prog to drop the null check. This is useful for two reasons: 1. Large numbers of nullness checks (especially when they cannot fail) unnecessarily pushes prog towards BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_JMP_SEQ. 2. It forms a tighter contract between programmer and verifier. For (1), bpftrace is starting to make heavier use of percpu scratch maps. As a result, for user scripts with large number of unrolled loops, we are starting to hit jump complexity verification errors. These percpu lookups cannot fail anyways, as we only use static key values. Eliding nullness probably results in less work for verifier as well. For (2), percpu scratch maps are often used as a larger stack, as the currrent stack is limited to 512 bytes. In these situations, it is desirable for the programmer to express: "this lookup should never fail, and if it does, it means I messed up the code". By omitting the null check, the programmer can "ask" the verifier to double check the logic. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c | 14 ++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c | 2 +- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_in_map.c | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 7df5c29293a4..e0c9c53ce9c0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct bpf_call_arg_meta { u32 ret_btf_id; u32 subprogno; struct btf_field *kptr_field; + long const_map_key; }; struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta { @@ -10414,6 +10415,51 @@ static void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno state->callback_subprogno == subprogno); } +/* Returns whether or not the given map type can potentially elide + * lookup return value nullness check. This is possible if the key + * is statically known. + */ +static bool can_elide_value_nullness(enum bpf_map_type type) +{ + switch (type) { + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY: + case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} + +/* Returns constant key value if possible, else -1 */ +static long get_constant_map_key(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *key) +{ + struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, key); + struct bpf_reg_state *reg; + int stack_off; + int slot; + int spi; + + if (key->type != PTR_TO_STACK) + return -1; + if (!tnum_is_const(key->var_off)) + return -1; + + stack_off = key->off + key->var_off.value; + slot = -stack_off - 1; + if (slot >= state->allocated_stack) + /* Stack uninitialized */ + return -1; + + spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + reg = &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) + /* Stack value not statically known */ + return -1; + + return reg->var_off.value; +} + static int get_helper_proto(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, const struct bpf_func_proto **ptr) { @@ -10511,6 +10557,15 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].storage_get_func_atomic = true; } + /* Logically we are trying to check on key register state before + * the helper is called, so process here. Otherwise argument processing + * may clobber the spilled key values. + */ + regs = cur_regs(env); + if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem) + meta.const_map_key = get_constant_map_key(env, ®s[BPF_REG_2]); + + meta.func_id = func_id; /* check args */ for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) { @@ -10771,10 +10826,17 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn "kernel subsystem misconfigured verifier\n"); return -EINVAL; } + + if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem && + can_elide_value_nullness(meta.map_ptr->map_type) && + meta.const_map_key >= 0 && + meta.const_map_key < meta.map_ptr->max_entries) + ret_flag &= ~PTR_MAYBE_NULL; + regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr; regs[BPF_REG_0].map_uid = meta.map_uid; regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE | ret_flag; - if (!type_may_be_null(ret_type) && + if (!type_may_be_null(regs[BPF_REG_0].type) && btf_record_has_field(meta.map_ptr->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) { regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c index ef70b88bccb2..24e6cd946396 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c @@ -524,11 +524,11 @@ int iter_subprog_iters(const void *ctx) } struct { - __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH); __type(key, int); __type(value, int); __uint(max_entries, 1000); -} arr_map SEC(".maps"); +} hash_map SEC(".maps"); SEC("?raw_tp") __failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'") @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ int iter_err_too_permissive1(const void *ctx) MY_PID_GUARD(); - map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr_map, &key); + map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); if (!map_val) return 0; @@ -561,12 +561,12 @@ int iter_err_too_permissive2(const void *ctx) MY_PID_GUARD(); - map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr_map, &key); + map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); if (!map_val) return 0; bpf_repeat(1000000) { - map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr_map, &key); + map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); } *map_val = 123; @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ int iter_err_too_permissive3(const void *ctx) MY_PID_GUARD(); bpf_repeat(1000000) { - map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr_map, &key); + map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); found = true; } @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ int iter_tricky_but_fine(const void *ctx) MY_PID_GUARD(); bpf_repeat(1000000) { - map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr_map, &key); + map_val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_map, &key); if (map_val) { found = true; break; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c index 450bb373b179..c4a81d1c1354 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ int reject_indirect_global_func_access(struct __sk_buff *ctx) } SEC("?tc") -__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id=5 alloc_insn=") +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=") int kptr_xchg_ref_state(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_in_map.c index 4eaab1468eb7..7d088ba99ea5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_in_map.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_in_map.c @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ SEC("xdp") __description("map in map state pruning") -__success __msg("processed 26 insns") +__success __msg("processed 15 insns") __log_level(2) __retval(0) __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) __naked void map_in_map_state_pruning(void) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c index f420c0312aa0..4b39f8472f9b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .fixup_map_kptr = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "Unreleased reference id=5 alloc_insn=20", + .errstr = "Unreleased reference id=4 alloc_insn=20", .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = { { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 15 }, } From patchwork Mon Sep 16 03:45:20 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13804992 Received: from fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFFA1210E9; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726458341; cv=none; b=Pmgv4VtRHl2+5ZywugKmeW+YM/XtF9mkYS+/smHkCAihKva1feKiLJT1vrpPbAQF37wsX/0JCIAMMCNexHmVTpr8pFOZXnl7xYu1Yv/i8qk801YIT1Ljk4Y0nmhQlqLERQwzvSTEkk1dC2pd4d7KQsE3/AOoRzxh/jR0urZ/iuA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726458341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vXDJQCJessgWs7j3OPnNSJrwOAmsKCw/ugcv6ZQnd0o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=mwJFH2Wrc09p33P5GZYEzXtB1j3bMrcM+82YDPS/BeYeqACuL18gmHs4+D6zctdPFPZ3Ny5c7Aw1azctxjJiYvfK0Up/67bZwP64cSRqBOg/KRoLZcak4/gTMoWtpRiv9cC/zNOCK8TyAeKLZFCuE2WCjdukchGnTdz/mZJcoGY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dxuuu.xyz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dxuuu.xyz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dxuuu.xyz header.i=@dxuuu.xyz header.b=AoQqC1oq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=qNx8ORoS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dxuuu.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dxuuu.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dxuuu.xyz header.i=@dxuuu.xyz header.b="AoQqC1oq"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="qNx8ORoS" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE671380278; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dxuuu.xyz; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1726458338; x= 1726544738; bh=/yzZ56O5FRFhQ5SJTT8R9rL6t8SgRbGwbbj/xdpptdo=; b=A oQqC1oqIVcFAJoho5kwzwRPkiOuDMo5ZMPLxPIK80ndstLb1Llz6OjR5Svn26FdK lNymAkRlAx3dl2UnLDUyrmjHdwDC4Mc3Xb2thxc5SFMBua6qJg2sVBfX5ZYxOXco 48cTlZ54uhI+vv7+5fq5d4qcD2W22wGJ5AyqcFQcY0jggZGZdAfiOc3pfeEOZYOl ij36MvLB1NJh983WxykFhG46YNmp3Rl21MeuU6shFNCMOV5UHQbh3R7mnufIOPpF ywI7WnUlKJgGSCsCOXahRe2233ljsp5bCzTeItI9QMZ+n1IIMpP4eyeOJMXNA/CZ lgce0OjoJhE4X6BannGfw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1726458338; x= 1726544738; bh=/yzZ56O5FRFhQ5SJTT8R9rL6t8SgRbGwbbj/xdpptdo=; b=q Nx8ORoSH+u4JNcYmK2gNqhxfM+apqKSwdWPk+q2uc8P5wJtojx8MHQiiXX+igXT5 D3UiaUT4BXoyE94tS/tbxDwIMwmzdWt0JYHqi1Ogc1oz6VRMQQtFnfjs2atNFAzo HRtA4utufQNtBYubZwdUFziannL24N5pDFssWzLSIw+XQGNzWoCn9/NgtsWplI8b mlJRP8CczJTqMjITkUSvfoBozFAaCZ/nw/nE8rquC8jc7MLK3/1Tbbp7DunWEOmX InuwJUeFQzEg6gh3/adqWLCvHGcpKVILaBaVIZbZ3Esi2dSszJphyLXqMq46kRkE KD0IBsRgMB25EcyckVzDQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudekgedgjeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgfrhhlucfvnfffucdlje dtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkffojghfggfgsedtkeertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpeff rghnihgvlhcuighuuceougiguhesugiguhhuuhdrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epgfefgfegjefhudeikedvueetffelieefuedvhfehjeeljeejkefgffeghfdttdetnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugiguhesug iguhhuuhdrgiihiidpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudekpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdp rhgtphhtthhopegurghnihgvlhesihhoghgvrghrsghogidrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhope gvugguhiiikeejsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshhhuhgrhheskhgvrhhn vghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprghnughrihhisehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtph htthhopegrshhtsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghrthhinhdrlhgr uheslhhinhhugidruggvvhdprhgtphhtthhopehsohhngheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpd hrtghpthhtohephihonhhghhhonhhgrdhsohhngheslhhinhhugidruggvvhdprhgtphht thhopehjohhhnhdrfhgrshhtrggsvghnugesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i6a694271:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:45:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Xu To: daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org Cc: martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: selftests: verifier: Add nullness elision tests Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:45:20 -0600 Message-ID: <1d8e11853a04ad6a6fdb2ba726090666d5bc6473.1726458273.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Test that nullness elision works for common use cases. For example, we want to check that both full and subreg stack slots are recognized. As well as when there's both const and non-const values of R2 leading up to a lookup. And obviously some bound checks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman --- .../bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c index 95d7ecc12963..2e74504ddbb5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_array_access.c @@ -28,6 +28,20 @@ struct { __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_WRONLY_PROG); } map_array_wo SEC(".maps"); +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 2); + __type(key, int); + __type(value, struct test_val); +} map_array_pcpu SEC(".maps"); + +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 2); + __type(key, int); + __type(value, struct test_val); +} map_array SEC(".maps"); + struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH); __uint(max_entries, 1); @@ -526,4 +540,156 @@ l0_%=: exit; \ : __clobber_all); } +SEC("socket") +__description("valid map access into an array using constant without nullness") +__success __retval(4) +__naked void an_array_with_a_constant_no_nullness(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r1 = 1; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ + r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r1 = %[test_val_foo]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array), + __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("valid multiple map access into an array using constant without nullness") +__success __retval(8) +__naked void multiple_array_with_a_constant_no_nullness(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r1 = 1; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ + r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r6 = %[test_val_foo]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r6; \ + r7 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + r1 = 0; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 16) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -16; \ + r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r6; \ + r1 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + r7 += r1; \ + r0 = r7; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array), + __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("valid map access into an array using 32-bit constant without nullness") +__success __retval(4) +__naked void an_array_with_a_32bit_constant_no_nullness(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r1 = 1; \ + *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -4; \ + r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r1 = %[test_val_foo]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array), + __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("valid map access into a pcpu array using constant without nullness") +__success __retval(4) +__naked void a_pcpu_array_with_a_constant_no_nullness(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r1 = 1; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ + r1 = %[map_array_pcpu] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r1 = %[test_val_foo]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array_pcpu), + __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("invalid map access into an array using constant without nullness") +__failure __msg("R0 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'") +__naked void an_array_with_a_constant_no_nullness_out_of_bounds(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r1 = 3; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ + r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r1 = %[test_val_foo]; \ + *(u64*)(r0 + 0) = r1; \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array), + __imm_const(test_val_foo, offsetof(struct test_val, foo)) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("invalid elided lookup using const and non-const key") +__failure __msg("R0 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'") +__naked void mixed_const_and_non_const_key_lookup(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + if r0 > 42 goto l1_%=; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ + goto l0_%=; \ +l1_%=: r1 = 1; \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + r2 = r10; \ + r2 += -8; \ +l0_%=: r1 = %[map_array] ll; \ + call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r0 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32), + __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem), + __imm_addr(map_array) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";