From patchwork Mon Nov 4 08:39:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: yangerkun X-Patchwork-Id: 13861033 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8AA518B488 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730709763; cv=none; b=Qb+hB2Pjq+ykDojaUFGU1YEdyqU2lhuyoQ54ZklEpAH7flZoElrL0ztL+s1LsTNvHVNrIHmNdzYF4dwvD58jhyaHBuXaun1LHYPZYANZXR507EbdnObkSRcHu20/wYYGpdI1owZ3ACVAKxkNEWYPKNVO0pwu1GUYky7aPJU5+2I= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730709763; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e/uJDKSmV+nPWhZYFdVyBtk41tFN+DwYBSQ46pDJXhA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=QU0XFGD7GhecoKTASWz/4cWK+QWj1JGXaAsJ56EpoegvvJROGGrDW0P7wKmLEN6qk7I2R+1bL1BSx/MP0kOf1DvjzVGmAFtrU3ppn9Q1SzB+Yhzc43eu0zv0Z0UKgU3TqPApFF1oMMuz1Zi6LIhdQBDXyH2rxURRhaf+kFQNJAU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XhlMY1qPZz4f3lg9 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:42:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072BE1A06D7 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:42:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgCXcYX3iChnp2xCAw--.18677S4; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:42:35 +0800 (CST) From: Yang Erkun To: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, okorniev@redhat.com, Dai.Ngo@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com, trondmy@kernel.org Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com, yangerkun@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: fix nfs4_openowner leak when concurrent nfsd4_open occur Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:39:12 +0800 Message-Id: <20241104083912.669132-1-yangerkun@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgCXcYX3iChnp2xCAw--.18677S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxtr1DWF1kGw1rKr45Ww18AFb_yoW7CF15pF Z3tFyfGr1rXasrtrW3Ca10k3WUGwsYvry7Wr93KrWSvr4jvrn5XF1jg34SvrWUG395Z3y7 XF1DtF4UXws5AFUanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Y14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2 Y2ka0xkIwI1lc7CjxVAaw2AFwI0_Jw0_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x 0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2 zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF 4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWU CwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCT nIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUonmRUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51dqwvhunx0q5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ From: Yang Erkun The action force umount(umount -f) will attempt to kill all rpc_task even umount operation may ultimately fail if some files remain open. Consequently, if an action attempts to open a file, it can potentially send two rpc_task to nfs server. NFS CLIENT thread1 thread2 open("file") ... nfs4_do_open _nfs4_do_open _nfs4_open_and_get_state _nfs4_proc_open nfs4_run_open_task /* rpc_task1 */ rpc_run_task rpc_wait_for_completion_task umount -f nfs_umount_begin rpc_killall_tasks rpc_signal_task rpc_task1 been wakeup and return -512 _nfs4_do_open // while loop ... nfs4_run_open_task /* rpc_task2 */ rpc_run_task rpc_wait_for_completion_task While processing an open request, nfsd will first attempt to find or allocate an nfs4_openowner. If it finds an nfs4_openowner that is not marked as NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED, this nfs4_openowner will released. Since two rpc_task can attempt to open the same file simultaneously from the client to server, and because two instances of nfsd can run concurrently, this situation can lead to lots of memory leak. Additionally, when we echo 0 to /proc/fs/nfsd/threads, warning will be triggered. NFS SERVER nfsd1 nfsd2 echo 0 > /proc/fs/nfsd/threads nfsd4_open nfsd4_process_open1 find_or_alloc_open_stateowner // alloc oo1, stateid1 nfsd4_open nfsd4_process_open1 find_or_alloc_open_stateowner // find oo1, without NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED release_openowner unhash_openowner_locked list_del_init(&oo->oo_perclient) // cannot find this oo // from client, LEAK!!! alloc_stateowner // alloc oo2 nfsd4_process_open2 init_open_stateid // associate oo1 // with stateid1, stateid1 LEAK!!! nfs4_get_vfs_file // alloc nfsd_file1 and nfsd_file_mark1 // all LEAK!!! nfsd4_process_open2 ... write_threads ... nfsd_destroy_serv nfsd_shutdown_net nfs4_state_shutdown_net nfs4_state_destroy_net destroy_client __destroy_client // won't find oo1!!! nfsd_shutdown_generic nfsd_file_cache_shutdown kmem_cache_destroy for nfsd_file_slab and nfsd_file_mark_slab // bark since nfsd_file1 // and nfsd_file_mark1 // still alive ======================================================================= BUG nfsd_file (Not tainted): Objects remaining in nfsd_file on __kmem_cache_shutdown() ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Slab 0xffd4000004438a80 objects=34 used=1 fp=0xff11000110e2ad28 flags=0x17ffffc0000240(workingset|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 757 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6+ #19 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 slab_err+0xb0/0xf0 __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x15c/0x310 kmem_cache_destroy+0x66/0x160 nfsd_file_cache_shutdown+0xac/0x210 [nfsd] nfsd_destroy_serv+0x251/0x2a0 [nfsd] nfsd_svc+0x125/0x1e0 [nfsd] write_threads+0x16a/0x2a0 [nfsd] nfsctl_transaction_write+0x74/0xa0 [nfsd] vfs_write+0x1ae/0x6d0 ksys_write+0xc1/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint Object 0xff11000110e2ac38 @offset=3128 Allocated in nfsd_file_do_acquire+0x20f/0xa30 [nfsd] age=1635 cpu=3 pid=800 nfsd_file_do_acquire+0x20f/0xa30 [nfsd] nfsd_file_acquire_opened+0x5f/0x90 [nfsd] nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x4c9/0x570 [nfsd] nfsd4_process_open2+0x713/0x1070 [nfsd] nfsd4_open+0x74b/0x8b0 [nfsd] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x70b/0xc20 [nfsd] nfsd_dispatch+0x1b4/0x3a0 [nfsd] svc_process_common+0x5b8/0xc50 [sunrpc] svc_process+0x2ab/0x3b0 [sunrpc] svc_handle_xprt+0x681/0xa20 [sunrpc] nfsd+0x183/0x220 [nfsd] kthread+0x199/0x1e0 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Add nfs4_openowner_unhashed to help found unhashed nfs4_openowner, and break nfsd4_open process to fix this problem. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6 Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 551d2958ec29..d3b5321d02a5 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -1660,6 +1660,12 @@ static void release_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp) free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist); } +static bool nfs4_openowner_unhashed(struct nfs4_openowner *oo) +{ + return list_empty(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash) && + list_empty(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash); +} + static void unhash_openowner_locked(struct nfs4_openowner *oo) { struct nfs4_client *clp = oo->oo_owner.so_client; @@ -4975,6 +4981,12 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfsd4_open *open) spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock); spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); + if (nfs4_openowner_unhashed(oo)) { + mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex); + stp = NULL; + goto out_unlock; + } + retstp = nfsd4_find_existing_open(fp, open); if (retstp) goto out_unlock; @@ -6127,6 +6139,11 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf if (!stp) { stp = init_open_stateid(fp, open); + if (!stp) { + status = nfserr_jukebox; + goto out; + } + if (!open->op_stp) new_stp = true; }