From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:16 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865950 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED9B018E756; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; cv=none; b=QLVmgDW4kIOt93U1/nEO/sRPTMVUmGJloihpPRPYQL28J+1ayZknKg/XqQh/ao1MwTN5bp+5R/sNlyvMTh7UxTvzLUu2TJ/ub+gaANpxVr7SOMaPENQqsGSmWmnfe7yIfxlItbhyMp+qP866ejImQ5OnTkxIGmB74c7Slijv/P8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SEq7DKLBNmA29ldzeeouDHYzH9koQTD4ZArvWUUL63Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=kDieMnSr33Gdq3oQRFwvvJiQDUnZwrdOdqqrfqmRaX1YulhyvHdNFFj28i/s0b1UyF0F/CwlpE9bdaN88GM40IWCBtmtdJhne8oYHT0WqC9zdW84ECs8lteJ3+5NnYeVz4Ts0ogrxceaEoStqzgQfMGfTU6YI4/wIkwdKReHlkQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYcd02qVz4f3jXw; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070451A0568; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S3; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:10 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] Xarray: Do not return sibling entries from xas_find_marked() Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:16 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7AFyrArW8Xr4rWF17uw1xKrg_yoW8KF15pF W8Ga40gF4xtr4jyry0yayUXayF9wn8XFWFyay8Gr1SyFnxJ3W0yr4jkryDtF9rZrW5Zw43 C3WFq345Za1DJw7anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBjb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGwA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Jrv_JF4l8cAvFVAK 0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4 x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l 84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I 8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AK xVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07js2-5UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ Similar to issue fixed in commit cbc02854331ed ("XArray: Do not return sibling entries from xa_load()"), we may return sibling entries from xas_find_marked as following: Thread A: Thread B: xa_store_range(xa, entry, 6, 7, gfp); xa_set_mark(xa, 6, mark) XA_STATE(xas, xa, 6); xas_find_marked(&xas, 7, mark); offset = xas_find_chunk(xas, advance, mark); [offset is 6 which points to a valid entry] xa_store_range(xa, entry, 4, 7, gfp); entry = xa_entry(xa, node, 6); [entry is a sibling of 4] if (!xa_is_node(entry)) return entry; Skip sibling entry like xas_find() does to protect caller from seeing sibling entry from xas_find_marked(). Besides, load_race() test is modified to catch mentioned issue and modified load_race() only passes after this fix is merged. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/xarray.c | 2 ++ tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index 32d4bac8c94c..fa87949719a0 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -1382,6 +1382,8 @@ void *xas_find_marked(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned long max, xa_mark_t mark) entry = xa_entry(xas->xa, xas->xa_node, xas->xa_offset); if (!entry && !(xa_track_free(xas->xa) && mark == XA_FREE_MARK)) continue; + if (xa_is_sibling(entry)) + continue; if (!xa_is_node(entry)) return entry; xas->xa_node = xa_to_node(entry); diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c index cffaf2245d4f..eaff1b036989 100644 --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/multiorder.c @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static void *load_creator(void *ptr) unsigned long index = (3 << RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT) - (1 << order); item_insert_order(tree, index, order); + xa_set_mark(tree, index, XA_MARK_1); item_delete_rcu(tree, index); } } @@ -242,8 +243,11 @@ static void *load_worker(void *ptr) rcu_register_thread(); while (!stop_iteration) { + unsigned long find_index = (2 << RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT) + 1; struct item *item = xa_load(ptr, index); assert(!xa_is_internal(item)); + item = xa_find(ptr, &find_index, index, XA_MARK_1); + assert(!xa_is_internal(item)); } rcu_unregister_thread(); From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:17 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865948 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED96314293; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964622; cv=none; b=DQq+EceTFW76rFYSLSRij1q/gMc7kNDJq61vkPL7CNf2DpSRx2AWo2oHOiDPlCzCLd8v2TlFhU6hRDGabUYo6tVGoWfxnyhB6dfqEjJepW1LU3ELYfDvQjqtg2sbAj++3fZU56NqTqI4p0X7Dlv665lq4R5V5SIjXgHlz15vjQc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964622; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Un+aOYer2H0EjCL7FIwb3OBpemTJ7mwcK/NY6x1Qrwc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=okRuEJmPNUNn9OX+MovZcXD/Tw/BUNgtIFreLBJ45Sts0ESK29y7Ijp9fZKGFaxpuROjOtTFHUTgQWyxWkZIPYHfAHLGqkY+2JNsZ7u7bbZlFkw99hYD8CpyPLxcwTfGzvXbnJAqqfTnId9CaMxbkfJf7MDXy/30uJAeP8yLwo4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYcd2B9rz4f3jsK; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0761A0568; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S4; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] Xarray: distinguish large entries correctly in xas_split_alloc() Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:17 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7GF1rGr4kJF1DCr4DJw1fZwb_yoWfZFc_ur 1FqF4kZrW5CFs7WwnxCFsYy34FkFs0kF9ruFW8JF9xW34UJwsrZw1kWrZrWa4rAFyqyFy7 CFs5Jry093yjyjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbfxYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l87I20VAvwVAaII0Ic2I_JFv_Gryl82 xGYIkIc2x26280x7IE14v26r15M28IrcIa0xkI8VCY1x0267AKxVWUCVW8JwA2ocxC64kI II0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UM28EF7 xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2 z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4 xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvY0x0EwI xGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480 Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07j-BMNUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ We don't support large entries which expand two more level xa_node in split. For case "xas->xa_shift + 2 * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT == order", we also need two level of xa_node to expand. Distinguish entry as large entry in case "xas->xa_shift + 2 * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT == order". Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/xarray.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index fa87949719a0..b9fd321a02ad 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ void xas_split_alloc(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, unsigned int order, unsigned int mask = xas->xa_sibs; /* XXX: no support for splitting really large entries yet */ - if (WARN_ON(xas->xa_shift + 2 * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT < order)) + if (WARN_ON(xas->xa_shift + 2 * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT <= order)) goto nomem; if (xas->xa_shift + XA_CHUNK_SHIFT > order) return; From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:18 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865953 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32467194AD1; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964624; cv=none; b=MXe1fps84EMA+Grfj1aTJZzbN6HgNGg8G1/981xnvnAG9ALsJCbcPkltWKAZmJrQLsHUce6DgPp75n4vx3iI5ezhGcr/+G2BmgqZrSVnJVtJIt4Ba4ozMIRIx9Ty3PktfSDK3lnLKZgpMRlBVbbqBpGj6pK1XrD1OfKXmD0nlTc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WL+VTvKdCZu8KF3VGHdzLA4DPkzH0GCIHPSj7kp9giA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=B51XXyJOXocTH9PxzovXFDwmp3V4Odc5Gt6bnxGHC3bVag9A+wNPoQdkuH8yd4cG6tD6e4VBWSN+Rp25P7XNxmenlNwSLQEq63j5gsRBAGOfdmHq/OuR6qfUQKeeQeiQXqnHG79OhTDfFHRHk7tgCm6yddS6PuYt5o2VFH85VK4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYcd3g3qz4f3jsM; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845851A058E; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S5; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] Xarray: move forward index correctly in xas_pause() Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:18 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxuFyUWFWxCF4fJFyrAFy5Arb_yoW5Gr1UpF WDGryFyw18Jr1I9rnIqa18uw1Fg3WrKa13trWfGr1ftrZxGr9Fy3Wjkr98XF9xWa18Aa47 CF4rWrn8Ga1DJ3DanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUWwA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK 0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4 x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l 84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I 8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AK xVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU3G-eDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ After xas_load(), xas->index could point to mid of found multi-index entry and xas->index's bits under node->shift maybe non-zero. The afterward xas_pause() will move forward xas->index with xa->node->shift with bits under node->shift un-masked and thus skip some index unexpectedly. Consider following case: Assume XA_CHUNK_SHIFT is 4. xa_store_range(xa, 16, 31, ...) xa_store(xa, 32, ...) XA_STATE(xas, xa, 17); xas_for_each(&xas,...) xas_load(&xas) /* xas->index = 17, xas->xa_offset = 1, xas->xa_node->xa_shift = 4 */ xas_pause() /* xas->index = 33, xas->xa_offset = 2, xas->xa_node->xa_shift = 4 */ As we can see, index of 32 is skipped unexpectedly. Fix this by mask bit under node->xa_shift when move forward index in xas_pause(). Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/test_xarray.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/xarray.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/test_xarray.c b/lib/test_xarray.c index d5c5cbba33ed..6932a26f4927 100644 --- a/lib/test_xarray.c +++ b/lib/test_xarray.c @@ -1448,6 +1448,41 @@ static noinline void check_pause(struct xarray *xa) XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit); xa_destroy(xa); + + index = 0; + for (order = XA_CHUNK_SHIFT; order > 0; order--) { + XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, index, order, + xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL)); + index += 1UL << order; + } + + index = 0; + count = 0; + xas_set(&xas, 0); + rcu_read_lock(); + xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) { + XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index)); + index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count); + count++; + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT); + + index = 0; + count = 0; + xas_set(&xas, XA_CHUNK_SIZE / 2 + 1); + rcu_read_lock(); + xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) { + XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index)); + index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count); + count++; + xas_pause(&xas); + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT); + + xa_destroy(xa); + } static noinline void check_move_tiny(struct xarray *xa) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index b9fd321a02ad..3fac3f2cea9d 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -1147,6 +1147,7 @@ void xas_pause(struct xa_state *xas) if (!xa_is_sibling(xa_entry(xas->xa, node, offset))) break; } + xas->xa_index &= ~0UL << node->shift; xas->xa_index += (offset - xas->xa_offset) << node->shift; if (xas->xa_index == 0) xas->xa_node = XAS_BOUNDS; From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865949 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C575191F9C; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; cv=none; b=YwHSEynOR1TCaW8R/bscDTP/xTSr6FNz2CVTFc8LkZhLX5gt0zKDhZ6+ZN4f17u2fBwc26n4t11m6in6L+1r6lLhFN4M4Tb9WB63FummRZxhmOJnoHXy1+zCijcSlqUb3BYtVkTkuN3rzxfXQCexZ0plaBusewvzvEq+2CnEL1w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964623; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XtlA+Aq0rbUEYLB0kd7+wNs8u/7jCZVEWBvDzDhooDM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ElhB6+mmvuLZxBJlwGZvQItAoWl7KOOrQJttpN9GfIvJv7zWbsHAz4bXXf0lpJuH3X0+Lpi3W5qWRg03WAoylj8+m4jOBHTarzodkhWk0sgaLSXc4O9VV5TXuk7MAffOy9MiigOgbSsboUPfiTJCu0zclqWpPIsAtnNB/cCzKoE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYck6kh1z4f3kkm; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EF81A018C; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S6; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] Xarray: remove repeat check in xas_squash_marks() Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtFWxKF1Dtr4kXFy7Xw4kCrg_yoWxtwb_Za 10yr1vyr1UCrn7XwsIkFs8tryjkryvqF9rKFW8Ja43ur10qry5WF4vqr15Aa4kZw4ayFy7 JF45Zr1Y9r15GjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbS8YFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Wr0E3s1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l87I20VAvwVAaII0Ic2I_JFv_Gryl82 xGYIkIc2x26280x7IE14v26r126s0DM28IrcIa0xkI8VCY1x0267AKxVW8JVW5JwA2ocxC 64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j6w1UM2 8EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq 3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8w Aqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE 14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvY0x 0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E 7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcV C0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF 04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jyYLPUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ Caller of xas_squash_marks() has ensured xas->xa_sibs is non-zero. Just remove repeat check of xas->xa_sibs in xas_squash_marks(). Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/xarray.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index 3fac3f2cea9d..4231af284bd8 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -128,9 +128,6 @@ static void xas_squash_marks(const struct xa_state *xas) unsigned int mark = 0; unsigned int limit = xas->xa_offset + xas->xa_sibs + 1; - if (!xas->xa_sibs) - return; - do { unsigned long *marks = xas->xa_node->marks[mark]; if (find_next_bit(marks, limit, xas->xa_offset + 1) == limit) From patchwork Thu Nov 7 16:29:20 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 13865951 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C62C193074; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964624; cv=none; b=O7rC192rB/ZTuWfWAmmi7n5twfLqLkJoewyQUn+D0r4WugjIuxxYpnpVcznyVVRJDKMvyLMjII6igIw2fPVj5WqW2PAtPq59fK9fmSVa8ST3nKS0HPBeypeC8pFSkZSXIYU30xISjO1aaeyCK8AsWhB9e1wO99gTsB4umQ1mk/s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730964624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tyU/E7IdI0PoI6xnGSKBcD21KiHHsKL6ZTo0hZJt4KA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qsblzGc7DHepxz2fV5NH4CjIcLD+pTXS6ghBYZWzu+s95waOV1wjejTrEQ+/c7vzdyMsJEoyD1TdxgFxFVCIr7/VJl8wqt3CqLahrkCQ7XyaU1tBG2BWrCtqYDuH0gLQrLqMnFpzuYwromyl/QpfhbajwlQI4T4V5ObDO5DHojw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.93.142]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XkYcd1cx7z4f3mJ4; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:29:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEC61A018D; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:30:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.101.6]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S7; Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:30:11 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] Xarray: use xa_mark_t in xas_squash_marks() to keep code consistent Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 00:29:20 +0800 Message-Id: <20241107162920.208796-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20241107162920.208796-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgB3Ha+BbCxnnlhABA--.55387S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Cw1UuF13JryrGFWxCFyfWFg_yoW8GrWkpF 97C3s8Ka1xA3WUKrnFvan7t345Ja1kK3yjyr4xGwnayFZ8Gr1Yqay7tryjqFnxGFy8ZFy3 Cr1Fg3y5Wa1UZw7anT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB2b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAv FVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE 3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr2 1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv 67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2 Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s02 6x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0x vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE 42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6x kF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU3XTQUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ Besides xas_squash_marks(), all functions use xa_mark_t type to iterate all possible marks. Use xa_mark_t in xas_squash_marks() to keep code consistent. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi --- lib/xarray.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index 4231af284bd8..a74795911f1c 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -125,16 +125,20 @@ static inline void node_mark_all(struct xa_node *node, xa_mark_t mark) */ static void xas_squash_marks(const struct xa_state *xas) { - unsigned int mark = 0; + xa_mark_t mark = 0; unsigned int limit = xas->xa_offset + xas->xa_sibs + 1; - do { - unsigned long *marks = xas->xa_node->marks[mark]; - if (find_next_bit(marks, limit, xas->xa_offset + 1) == limit) - continue; - __set_bit(xas->xa_offset, marks); - bitmap_clear(marks, xas->xa_offset + 1, xas->xa_sibs); - } while (mark++ != (__force unsigned)XA_MARK_MAX); + for (;;) { + unsigned long *marks = node_marks(xas->xa_node, mark); + + if (find_next_bit(marks, limit, xas->xa_offset + 1) != limit) { + __set_bit(xas->xa_offset, marks); + bitmap_clear(marks, xas->xa_offset + 1, xas->xa_sibs); + } + if (mark == XA_MARK_MAX) + break; + mark_inc(mark); + } } /* extracts the offset within this node from the index */