From patchwork Thu Nov 14 10:46:53 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 13874933 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DCA4D65C6F for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBXNR-0006yi-Qt; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:47:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBXNQ-0006wk-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:47:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tBXNP-00039H-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:47:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731581221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QRyjjvGWmTxYlaLZ0/OczvAJKqqWf3ryi3aOg9DaiFM=; b=dgtTOK4TsB7qt5/B+xuXcx7Yen4HLzq+jjpo3+2GtF/b7nl4w2ZoFScrDjAD2TMYt4ktuN hlRwY+8Wlir5l+lfps7b9o9dCPpfigY7E7thgvyYzeX3j4UAgybBp+klwPxXO+uttlod6L EXKeKEfe1NGe92rpeXqPO6oQ0zaOei0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-471-X8dSH3s1NU2NoawMvKxbqw-1; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:46:59 -0500 X-MC-Unique: X8dSH3s1NU2NoawMvKxbqw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: X8dSH3s1NU2NoawMvKxbqw Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1DA719560B5; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.59]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CEC1956054; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:46:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH] hw/misc/mos6522: Fix bad class definition of the MOS6522 device Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:46:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20241114104653.963812-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.119, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.738, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org When compiling QEMU with --enable-cfi, the "q800" m68k machine currently crashes very early, when the q800_machine_init() function tries to wire the interrupts of the "via1" device. This happens because TYPE_MOS6522_Q800_VIA1 is supposed to be a proper SysBus device, but its parent (TYPE_MOS6522) has a mistake in its class definition where it is only derived from DeviceClass, and not from SysBusDeviceClass, so we end up in funny memory access issues here. Using the right class hierarchy for the MOS6522 device fixes the problem. Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2675 Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- include/hw/misc/mos6522.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/hw/misc/mos6522.h b/include/hw/misc/mos6522.h index fba45668ab..920871a598 100644 --- a/include/hw/misc/mos6522.h +++ b/include/hw/misc/mos6522.h @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ struct MOS6522State { OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(MOS6522State, MOS6522DeviceClass, MOS6522) struct MOS6522DeviceClass { - DeviceClass parent_class; + SysBusDeviceClass parent_class; ResettablePhases parent_phases; void (*portB_write)(MOS6522State *dev);