diff mbox

mac80211-hwsim: add frequency attribute to netlink pkts

Message ID 1414447486-10385-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Ben Greear Oct. 27, 2014, 10:04 p.m. UTC
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>

Add frequency attribute when sending to user-space over
netlink socket.  The frequency is currently ignored when
receiving from user-space.

Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c | 7 +++++++
 drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Johannes Berg Oct. 29, 2014, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 15:04 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> 
> Add frequency attribute when sending to user-space over
> netlink socket.  The frequency is currently ignored when
> receiving from user-space.

Applied.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ben Greear Oct. 29, 2014, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/29/2014 08:55 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 15:04 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
>> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
>>
>> Add frequency attribute when sending to user-space over
>> netlink socket.  The frequency is currently ignored when
>> receiving from user-space.
> 
> Applied.

Do you have any suggestions for how to deal with pkts
received (from user-space netlink) on a frequency that does
not match the current hwsim radio's center frequency?

Thanks,
Ben
Johannes Berg Oct. 29, 2014, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 09:02 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 08:55 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 15:04 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> >> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> >>
> >> Add frequency attribute when sending to user-space over
> >> netlink socket.  The frequency is currently ignored when
> >> receiving from user-space.
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions for how to deal with pkts
> received (from user-space netlink) on a frequency that does
> not match the current hwsim radio's center frequency?

No, sorry. I don't even know if you can find out the current frequency?
If you have multi-channel you don't even have a single frequency :)

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jukka Rissanen Oct. 31, 2014, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Ben & Johannes,

while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that
the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The
same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should
they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes?


On ma, 2014-10-27 at 15:04 -0700, greearb@candelatech.com wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> 
> Add frequency attribute when sending to user-space over
> netlink socket.  The frequency is currently ignored when
> receiving from user-space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c | 7 +++++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> index 270f8cd..b40435c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> @@ -906,6 +906,9 @@ static void mac80211_hwsim_tx_frame_nl(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>  	if (nla_put_u32(skb, HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS, hwsim_flags))
>  		goto nla_put_failure;
>  
> +	if (nla_put_u32(skb, HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ, data->channel->center_freq))
> +		goto nla_put_failure;
> +
>  	/* We get the tx control (rate and retries) info*/
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES; i++) {
> @@ -2421,6 +2424,7 @@ static int hwsim_cloned_frame_received_nl(struct sk_buff *skb_2,
>  	int frame_data_len;
>  	void *frame_data;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> +	u32 freq;
>  
>  	if (info->snd_portid != wmediumd_portid) {
>  		printk(KERN_DEBUG "mac80211-hwsim: port-id mismatch: %d %d\n",
> @@ -2468,6 +2472,9 @@ static int hwsim_cloned_frame_received_nl(struct sk_buff *skb_2,
>  
>  	/* A frame is received from user space */
>  	memset(&rx_status, 0, sizeof(rx_status));
> +	/* TODO: Check ATTR_FREQ if it exists, and maybe throw away off-channel
> +	 * packets?
> +	 */
>  	rx_status.freq = data2->channel->center_freq;
>  	rx_status.band = data2->channel->band;
>  	rx_status.rate_idx = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[HWSIM_ATTR_RX_RATE]);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
> index e614a20..85da35a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ enum hwsim_tx_control_flags {
>   * space, uses:
>   *	%HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_TRANSMITTER, %HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_RECEIVER,
>   *	%HWSIM_ATTR_FRAME, %HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS, %HWSIM_ATTR_RX_RATE,
> - *	%HWSIM_ATTR_SIGNAL, %HWSIM_ATTR_COOKIE
> + *	%HWSIM_ATTR_SIGNAL, %HWSIM_ATTR_COOKIE, %HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ (optional)
>   * @HWSIM_CMD_TX_INFO_FRAME: Transmission info report from user space to
>   * kernel, uses:
>   *	%HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_TRANSMITTER, %HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS,
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ enum {
>   *	single channel is supported
>   * @HWSIM_ATTR_RADIO_NAME: Name of radio, e.g. phy666
>   * @HWSIM_ATTR_NO_VIF:  Do not create vif (wlanX) when creating radio.
> + * @HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ: Frequency at which packet is transmitted or received.
>   * @__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX: enum limit
>   */
>  
> @@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ enum {
>  	HWSIM_ATTR_DESTROY_RADIO_ON_CLOSE,
>  	HWSIM_ATTR_RADIO_NAME,
>  	HWSIM_ATTR_NO_VIF,
> +	HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ,
>  	__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX,
>  };
>  #define HWSIM_ATTR_MAX (__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX - 1)


Cheers,
Jukka



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Johannes Berg Oct. 31, 2014, 8:04 a.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:02 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote:

> while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that
> the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The
> same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should
> they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes?

Hmm, yes, they should be there. It's only important for the name, I
guess, but better have them all. I can fix it or would you like to send
a patch?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jukka Rissanen Oct. 31, 2014, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi Johannes,

On pe, 2014-10-31 at 09:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:02 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
> 
> > while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that
> > the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The
> > same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should
> > they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes?
> 
> Hmm, yes, they should be there. It's only important for the name, I
> guess, but better have them all. I can fix it or would you like to send
> a patch?

Please fix it so it gets applied faster :)


Cheers,
Jukka


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Johannes Berg Oct. 31, 2014, 8:26 a.m. UTC | #7
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:16 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
> 
> On pe, 2014-10-31 at 09:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 10:02 +0200, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
> > 
> > > while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that
> > > the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The
> > > same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should
> > > they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes?
> > 
> > Hmm, yes, they should be there. It's only important for the name, I
> > guess, but better have them all. I can fix it or would you like to send
> > a patch?
> 
> Please fix it so it gets applied faster :)

Done.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ben Greear Oct. 31, 2014, 3:50 p.m. UTC | #8
On 10/31/2014 01:02 AM, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
> Hi Ben & Johannes,
> 
> while rebasing my hwsim patches on top of Ben's patches, I noticed that
> the freq attribute is not mentioned in hwsim_genl_policy struct. The
> same applies also to radio name and vif attributes. Just wondered should
> they be mentioned in the policy struct like the other attributes?

Thanks for fixing that!

Ben
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
index 270f8cd..b40435c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
@@ -906,6 +906,9 @@  static void mac80211_hwsim_tx_frame_nl(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	if (nla_put_u32(skb, HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS, hwsim_flags))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
+	if (nla_put_u32(skb, HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ, data->channel->center_freq))
+		goto nla_put_failure;
+
 	/* We get the tx control (rate and retries) info*/
 
 	for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES; i++) {
@@ -2421,6 +2424,7 @@  static int hwsim_cloned_frame_received_nl(struct sk_buff *skb_2,
 	int frame_data_len;
 	void *frame_data;
 	struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+	u32 freq;
 
 	if (info->snd_portid != wmediumd_portid) {
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "mac80211-hwsim: port-id mismatch: %d %d\n",
@@ -2468,6 +2472,9 @@  static int hwsim_cloned_frame_received_nl(struct sk_buff *skb_2,
 
 	/* A frame is received from user space */
 	memset(&rx_status, 0, sizeof(rx_status));
+	/* TODO: Check ATTR_FREQ if it exists, and maybe throw away off-channel
+	 * packets?
+	 */
 	rx_status.freq = data2->channel->center_freq;
 	rx_status.band = data2->channel->band;
 	rx_status.rate_idx = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[HWSIM_ATTR_RX_RATE]);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
index e614a20..85da35a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@  enum hwsim_tx_control_flags {
  * space, uses:
  *	%HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_TRANSMITTER, %HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_RECEIVER,
  *	%HWSIM_ATTR_FRAME, %HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS, %HWSIM_ATTR_RX_RATE,
- *	%HWSIM_ATTR_SIGNAL, %HWSIM_ATTR_COOKIE
+ *	%HWSIM_ATTR_SIGNAL, %HWSIM_ATTR_COOKIE, %HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ (optional)
  * @HWSIM_CMD_TX_INFO_FRAME: Transmission info report from user space to
  * kernel, uses:
  *	%HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_TRANSMITTER, %HWSIM_ATTR_FLAGS,
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@  enum {
  *	single channel is supported
  * @HWSIM_ATTR_RADIO_NAME: Name of radio, e.g. phy666
  * @HWSIM_ATTR_NO_VIF:  Do not create vif (wlanX) when creating radio.
+ * @HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ: Frequency at which packet is transmitted or received.
  * @__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX: enum limit
  */
 
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@  enum {
 	HWSIM_ATTR_DESTROY_RADIO_ON_CLOSE,
 	HWSIM_ATTR_RADIO_NAME,
 	HWSIM_ATTR_NO_VIF,
+	HWSIM_ATTR_FREQ,
 	__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX,
 };
 #define HWSIM_ATTR_MAX (__HWSIM_ATTR_MAX - 1)