Message ID | 1425356741-26789-3-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors, > so relax the checks to avoid regressions. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> It'd be nice to have a DSDT archived and referenced in this changelog for future reference. This sounds similar to previous issues: 3162b6f0c5e1 ("PNPACPI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") d558b483d5a7 ("x86/PCI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") f238b414a74a ("PNPACPI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") 48728e077480 ("x86/PCI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") I assume your work fixes both these paths and avoids the issues we fixed above. > --- > drivers/acpi/resource.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > index c723668e3e27..5589a6e2a023 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > @@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io) > * CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum > * length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does > * not make any sense at all. > + * Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space > + * descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression. > */ > - if (len && reslen && reslen == len && start <= end) > + if (len && reslen && start <= end) > return true; > > pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] length [%016llx]\n", > -- > 1.7.10.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2015/3/3 23:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors, >> so relax the checks to avoid regressions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > > It'd be nice to have a DSDT archived and referenced in this changelog > for future reference. This sounds similar to previous issues: Hi all, Could anybody help to dump an ACPI table from those failure systems so we could archive it? Thanks! Gerry > > 3162b6f0c5e1 ("PNPACPI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") > d558b483d5a7 ("x86/PCI: truncate _CRS windows with _LEN > _MAX - _MIN + 1") > f238b414a74a ("PNPACPI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") > 48728e077480 ("x86/PCI: compute Address Space length rather than using _LEN") > > I assume your work fixes both these paths and avoids the issues we fixed above. > >> --- >> drivers/acpi/resource.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> index c723668e3e27..5589a6e2a023 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> @@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io) >> * CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum >> * length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does >> * not make any sense at all. >> + * Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space >> + * descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression. >> */ >> - if (len && reslen && reslen == len && start <= end) >> + if (len && reslen && start <= end) >> return true; >> >> pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] length [%016llx]\n", >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
reference. This sounds similar to previous issues: > Hi all, > Could anybody help to dump an ACPI table from those failure > systems so we could archive it? Here is the DSDT from my amd rs780 box. Dave.
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Jiang Liu wrote: > Hi all, > Could anybody help to dump an ACPI table from those failure > systems so we could archive it? and here is the DSDT from a Asrock-Q1900B-ITX mainboard. Thanks again, Thomas
On 04.03.2015 03:29, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2015/3/3 23:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors, >>> so relax the checks to avoid regressions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> >> >> It'd be nice to have a DSDT archived and referenced in this changelog >> for future reference. This sounds similar to previous issues: > Hi all, > Could anybody help to dump an ACPI table from those failure > systems so we could archive it? Attached: DSDT from my Abit A-S78H. Regards, Prakash
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 10:29 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > Hi all, > Could anybody help to dump an ACPI table from those failure > systems so we could archive it? > Thanks! > Gerry Here is DSDT from Gigabyte GA-MA785G-UD3H.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c index c723668e3e27..5589a6e2a023 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c @@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io) * CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum * length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does * not make any sense at all. + * Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space + * descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression. */ - if (len && reslen && reslen == len && start <= end) + if (len && reslen && start <= end) return true; pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] length [%016llx]\n",
Some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space descriptors, so relax the checks to avoid regressions. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/acpi/resource.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)