| Message ID | 1428911141-6534-2-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: > Don't disable PS while we are not connected. > In other case we will get higher power consumption. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) > enable_ps = false; > } > > - if (enable_ps) { > + if (!arvif->is_started) { > + /* enable power save mode while not connected, > + * in other case after iface up we will get > + * higher power consumption - firmware design > + */ > + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; > + } else if (enable_ps) { > psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; > param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME; > > -- What the expectation behavior after we enable the WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status? Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it? BR /Yanbo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 15 April 2015 at 00:45, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic > <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >> Don't disable PS while we are not connected. >> In other case we will get higher power consumption. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) >> enable_ps = false; >> } >> >> - if (enable_ps) { >> + if (!arvif->is_started) { >> + /* enable power save mode while not connected, >> + * in other case after iface up we will get >> + * higher power consumption - firmware design >> + */ >> + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >> + } else if (enable_ps) { >> psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >> param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME; >> >> -- > > What the expectation behavior after we enable the > WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status? > Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it? > First I think that WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED is important only when we are connected. But, I see current consumption drop in my test environtment from 88mA to 33mA when: 1) load driver, iface up 2) disconnect network, iface down, iface up So, seems WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED do something more in FW (not only standard PS enable/disable when connected to AP). Probably someone from FW team should answer that, if that is a feature or a bug. BTW. Patch don't change behavior we had before, when we are connected. We can enable/disable PS using iw. BR Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: > On 15 April 2015 at 00:45, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic >> <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >>> Don't disable PS while we are not connected. >>> In other case we will get higher power consumption. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) >>> enable_ps = false; >>> } >>> >>> - if (enable_ps) { >>> + if (!arvif->is_started) { >>> + /* enable power save mode while not connected, >>> + * in other case after iface up we will get >>> + * higher power consumption - firmware design >>> + */ >>> + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>> + } else if (enable_ps) { >>> psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>> param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME; >>> >>> -- >> >> What the expectation behavior after we enable the >> WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status? >> Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it? >> > > First I think that WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED is important only when we > are connected. > But, I see current consumption drop in my test environtment from 88mA > to 33mA when: > 1) load driver, iface up > 2) disconnect network, iface down, iface up > So, seems WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED do something more in FW (not only > standard PS enable/disable when > connected to AP). Probably someone from FW team should answer that, if > that is a feature or a bug. > I guess the chip enter Idle mode power save after set this, did you run the the test on QCA61XX or QCA 98XX? Can it still auto scan to get all the APs around it, cause for IMPS mode it will only looks in its existing profile list and sends a probe request, with SSID specified in profile for what I know BR /Yanbo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 15 April 2015 at 19:10, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Janusz Dziedzic > <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >> On 15 April 2015 at 00:45, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic >>> <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >>>> Don't disable PS while we are not connected. >>>> In other case we will get higher power consumption. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) >>>> enable_ps = false; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - if (enable_ps) { >>>> + if (!arvif->is_started) { >>>> + /* enable power save mode while not connected, >>>> + * in other case after iface up we will get >>>> + * higher power consumption - firmware design >>>> + */ >>>> + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>>> + } else if (enable_ps) { >>>> psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>>> param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME; >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> What the expectation behavior after we enable the >>> WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status? >>> Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it? >>> >> >> First I think that WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED is important only when we >> are connected. >> But, I see current consumption drop in my test environtment from 88mA >> to 33mA when: >> 1) load driver, iface up >> 2) disconnect network, iface down, iface up >> So, seems WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED do something more in FW (not only >> standard PS enable/disable when >> connected to AP). Probably someone from FW team should answer that, if >> that is a feature or a bug. >> > I guess the chip enter Idle mode power save after set this, did you > run the the > test on QCA61XX or QCA 98XX? Can it still auto scan to get all the APs around > it, cause for IMPS mode it will only looks in its existing profile > list and sends a probe request, > with SSID specified in profile for what I know > I see iw scan works correctly after iface up (same scan results like ath9k): In my laptop I have 3 cards wlan0 - ath9k wlan1 - QCA9888 wlan4 - QCA6174 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan dump|grep SSID |wc -l 0 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan |grep SSID| wc -l 21 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan0 down janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l 0 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan |grep SSID|wc -l 21 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan1 down janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l 0 janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan |grep SSID|wc -l 22 Should I run any other scan tests? BR Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: > On 15 April 2015 at 19:10, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Janusz Dziedzic >> <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >>> On 15 April 2015 at 00:45, YanBo <dreamfly281@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic >>>> <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> wrote: >>>>> Don't disable PS while we are not connected. >>>>> In other case we will get higher power consumption. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) >>>>> enable_ps = false; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> - if (enable_ps) { >>>>> + if (!arvif->is_started) { >>>>> + /* enable power save mode while not connected, >>>>> + * in other case after iface up we will get >>>>> + * higher power consumption - firmware design >>>>> + */ >>>>> + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>>>> + } else if (enable_ps) { >>>>> psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; >>>>> param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME; >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>>> What the expectation behavior after we enable the >>>> WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status? >>>> Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it? >>>> >>> >>> First I think that WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED is important only when we >>> are connected. >>> But, I see current consumption drop in my test environtment from 88mA >>> to 33mA when: >>> 1) load driver, iface up >>> 2) disconnect network, iface down, iface up >>> So, seems WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED do something more in FW (not only >>> standard PS enable/disable when >>> connected to AP). Probably someone from FW team should answer that, if >>> that is a feature or a bug. >>> >> I guess the chip enter Idle mode power save after set this, did you >> run the the >> test on QCA61XX or QCA 98XX? Can it still auto scan to get all the APs around >> it, cause for IMPS mode it will only looks in its existing profile >> list and sends a probe request, >> with SSID specified in profile for what I know >> > I see iw scan works correctly after iface up (same scan results like ath9k): > > In my laptop I have 3 cards > wlan0 - ath9k > wlan1 - QCA9888 > wlan4 - QCA6174 > > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan dump|grep SSID |wc -l > 0 > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan |grep SSID| wc -l > 21 > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan0 down > > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l > 0 > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan |grep SSID|wc -l > 21 > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan1 down > > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l > 0 > janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan |grep SSID|wc -l > 22 > > Should I run any other scan tests? > Thanks for the verification, I also get the confirmation that the card will leave IMPS mode when scanning, so it works as expected. BR /Yanbo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif) enable_ps = false; } - if (enable_ps) { + if (!arvif->is_started) { + /* enable power save mode while not connected, + * in other case after iface up we will get + * higher power consumption - firmware design + */ + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; + } else if (enable_ps) { psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED; param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME;
Don't disable PS while we are not connected. In other case we will get higher power consumption. Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)