diff mbox

[V2,1/3] staging: wilc1000: coreconfigurator.c: remove WILC_MALLOC

Message ID 1437695755-9731-1-git-send-email-chaehyun.lim@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show

Commit Message

Chaehyun Lim July 23, 2015, 11:55 p.m. UTC 
Use kmalloc and kmalloc_array instead of WILC_MALLOC.

Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
---
V2: Use GFP_KERNEL flag instead of GFP_ATOMIC

 drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Dan Carpenter July 24, 2015, 12:44 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:55:53AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> Use kmalloc and kmalloc_array instead of WILC_MALLOC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: Use GFP_KERNEL flag instead of GFP_ATOMIC

This is probably the correct thing but how did you check that we aren't
holding a spin_lock or in IRQ context?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Dan Carpenter July 27, 2015, 7:52 a.m. UTC | #2 
> On 2015? 07? 24? 09:44, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:55:53AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> >>Use kmalloc and kmalloc_array instead of WILC_MALLOC.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
> >>---
> >>V2: Use GFP_KERNEL flag instead of GFP_ATOMIC
> >This is probably the correct thing but how did you check that we aren't
> >holding a spin_lock or in IRQ context?

Thanks for the reply Tony, but I was really just trying to see how
Chaehyun checks his patches or if they are automatically generated.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Greg Kroah-Hartman July 29, 2015, 8:45 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:55:53AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> Use kmalloc and kmalloc_array instead of WILC_MALLOC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: Use GFP_KERNEL flag instead of GFP_ATOMIC

Please answer Dan's question for the next time you resend this series, I
can't take these as-is so am dropping them from my queue.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c
index b069614..fb37367 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.c
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@  s32 CoreConfiguratorInit(void)
 	sema_init(&SemHandleSendPkt, 1);
 	sema_init(&SemHandlePktResp, 0);
 
-	gps8ConfigPacket = (s8 *)WILC_MALLOC(MAX_PACKET_BUFF_SIZE);
+	gps8ConfigPacket = kmalloc(MAX_PACKET_BUFF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (gps8ConfigPacket == NULL) {
 		PRINT_ER("failed in gps8ConfigPacket allocation\n");
 		s32Error = WILC_NO_MEM;
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@  s32 ParseNetworkInfo(u8 *pu8MsgBuffer, tstrNetworkInfo **ppstrNetworkInfo)
 		u32 u32Tsf_Lo;
 		u32 u32Tsf_Hi;
 
-		pstrNetworkInfo = (tstrNetworkInfo *)WILC_MALLOC(sizeof(tstrNetworkInfo));
+		pstrNetworkInfo = kmalloc(sizeof(tstrNetworkInfo), GFP_KERNEL);
 		WILC_memset((void *)(pstrNetworkInfo), 0, sizeof(tstrNetworkInfo));
 
 		pstrNetworkInfo->s8rssi = pu8WidVal[0];
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@  s32 ParseNetworkInfo(u8 *pu8MsgBuffer, tstrNetworkInfo **ppstrNetworkInfo)
 		u16IEsLen = u16RxLen - (MAC_HDR_LEN + TIME_STAMP_LEN + BEACON_INTERVAL_LEN + CAP_INFO_LEN);
 
 		if (u16IEsLen > 0) {
-			pstrNetworkInfo->pu8IEs = (u8 *)WILC_MALLOC(u16IEsLen);
+			pstrNetworkInfo->pu8IEs = kmalloc(u16IEsLen, GFP_KERNEL);
 			WILC_memset((void *)(pstrNetworkInfo->pu8IEs), 0, u16IEsLen);
 
 			WILC_memcpy(pstrNetworkInfo->pu8IEs, pu8IEs, u16IEsLen);
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@  s32 ParseAssocRespInfo(u8 *pu8Buffer, u32 u32BufferLen,
 	u8 *pu8IEs = 0;
 	u16 u16IEsLen = 0;
 
-	pstrConnectRespInfo = (tstrConnectRespInfo *)WILC_MALLOC(sizeof(tstrConnectRespInfo));
+	pstrConnectRespInfo = kmalloc(sizeof(tstrConnectRespInfo), GFP_KERNEL);
 	WILC_memset((void *)(pstrConnectRespInfo), 0, sizeof(tstrConnectRespInfo));
 
 	/* u16AssocRespLen = pu8Buffer[0]; */
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@  s32 ParseAssocRespInfo(u8 *pu8Buffer, u32 u32BufferLen,
 		pu8IEs = &pu8Buffer[CAP_INFO_LEN + STATUS_CODE_LEN + AID_LEN];
 		u16IEsLen = u16AssocRespLen - (CAP_INFO_LEN + STATUS_CODE_LEN + AID_LEN);
 
-		pstrConnectRespInfo->pu8RespIEs = (u8 *)WILC_MALLOC(u16IEsLen);
+		pstrConnectRespInfo->pu8RespIEs = kmalloc(u16IEsLen, GFP_KERNEL);
 		WILC_memset((void *)(pstrConnectRespInfo->pu8RespIEs), 0, u16IEsLen);
 
 		WILC_memcpy(pstrConnectRespInfo->pu8RespIEs, pu8IEs, u16IEsLen);
@@ -1018,7 +1018,8 @@  s32 ParseSurveyResults(u8 ppu8RcvdSiteSurveyResults[][MAX_SURVEY_RESULT_FRAG_SIZ
 		}
 	}
 
-	pstrSurveyResults = (wid_site_survey_reslts_s *)WILC_MALLOC(u32SurveyResultsCount * sizeof(wid_site_survey_reslts_s));
+	pstrSurveyResults = kmalloc_array(u32SurveyResultsCount,
+				sizeof(wid_site_survey_reslts_s), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (pstrSurveyResults == NULL) {
 		u32SurveyResultsCount = 0;
 		WILC_ERRORREPORT(s32Error, WILC_NO_MEM);