@@ -5786,7 +5786,9 @@ static void brcmf_wiphy_wowl_params(struct wiphy *wiphy)
static int brcmf_setup_wiphy(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
{
struct brcmf_pub *drvr = ifp->drvr;
+ const struct ieee80211_iface_combination *combo;
struct ieee80211_supported_band *band;
+ u16 max_interfaces = 0;
__le32 bandlist[3];
u32 n_bands;
int err, i;
@@ -5799,8 +5801,13 @@ static int brcmf_setup_wiphy(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
if (err)
return err;
- for (i = 0; i < wiphy->iface_combinations->max_interfaces &&
- i < ARRAY_SIZE(drvr->addresses); i++) {
+ for (i = 0, combo = wiphy->iface_combinations;
+ i < wiphy->n_iface_combinations; i++, combo++) {
+ max_interfaces = max(max_interfaces, combo->max_interfaces);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < max_interfaces && i < ARRAY_SIZE(drvr->addresses);
+ i++) {
u8 *addr = drvr->addresses[i].addr;
memcpy(addr, drvr->mac, ETH_ALEN);
Broadcom is working on better reflection of interface combinations. With upcoming patches we may have 1st combination supporting less interfaces than others. To don't run out of addresses check all combinations to find the one with the greatest max_interfaces value. Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> --- I believe this patch should be applied before: brcmfmac: correct interface combination info --- drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)