diff mbox

[1/4] PCI: refactor io size calculation code

Message ID BANLkTikqB2tr-jNTaqVtTpBkH5O1iYQS-Q@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Linus Torvalds April 11, 2011, 2:42 p.m. UTC
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com> wrote:
>In commit 13583b16592a ("PCI: refactor io size calculation code"):
>>
>> refactor  code  that  calculates  the  io  size in pbus_size_io()
>> and pbus_mem_io() into separate functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |   66
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> index 66cb8f4..2121215 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> @@ -404,6 +404,43 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_resource(struct
>> pci_bus *bus, unsigned lon
>>        return NULL;
>> }
>>
> ...
>
>> +
>> +static resource_size_t calculate_memsize(resource_size_t size,
>> +               resource_size_t min_size,
>> +               resource_size_t size1,
>> +               resource_size_t old_size,
>> +               resource_size_t align)
>> +{
>> +       if (size < min_size)
>> +               size = min_size;
>> +       if (old_size == 1 )
>> +               old_size = 0;
>> +       if (size < old_size)
>> +               size = old_size;
>> +       size = ALIGN(size + size1, align);
>> +       return size;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Sizing the IO windows of the PCI-PCI bridge is trivial,
>>   since these windows have 4K granularity and the IO ranges
>>   of non-bridge PCI devices are limited to 256 bytes.
>>
>>
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -516,14 +542,6 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> unsigned long mask,
>>                        mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>>                }
>>        }
>> -       if (size < min_size)
>> -               size = min_size;
>> -       old_size = resource_size(b_res);
>> -       if (old_size == 1)
>> -               old_size = 0;
>> -       if (size < old_size)
>> -               size = old_size;
>> -
>>        align = 0;
>>        min_align = 0;
>>        for (order = 0; order <= max_order; order++) {
>> @@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned
>> long mask,
>>                        min_align = align1 >> 1;
>>                align += aligns[order];
>>        }
>> -       size = ALIGN(size, min_align);
>> +       size = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res),
>> align);
>>
>
> On my SPARC32/LEON4 PCI system I get overlapped areas, double mapped
> resources. Some BARs on PCIBUS0 are in the same non-prefetchable memory
> range as the secondary bus PCIBUS1. Changing align to min_align in the above
> call to calculate_memsize() fixes the problem, and the memory allocation is
> the same as with 2.6.36.4 kernel.
>
> I belive this is just a typo.

It does seem that way. The original code used 'min_align' and 'align'
itself is meaningless in that place.

Can you confirm that the patch you talk about as fixing things is the attached?

                  Linus

Comments

Daniel Hellstrom April 11, 2011, 2:53 p.m. UTC | #1
Linus Torvalds wrote:

>On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>In commit 13583b16592a ("PCI: refactor io size calculation code"):
>>    
>>
>>>refactor  code  that  calculates  the  io  size in pbus_size_io()
>>>and pbus_mem_io() into separate functions.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>---
>>>drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |   66
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>index 66cb8f4..2121215 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>@@ -404,6 +404,43 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_resource(struct
>>>pci_bus *bus, unsigned lon
>>>       return NULL;
>>>}
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>...
>>
>>    
>>
>>>+
>>>+static resource_size_t calculate_memsize(resource_size_t size,
>>>+               resource_size_t min_size,
>>>+               resource_size_t size1,
>>>+               resource_size_t old_size,
>>>+               resource_size_t align)
>>>+{
>>>+       if (size < min_size)
>>>+               size = min_size;
>>>+       if (old_size == 1 )
>>>+               old_size = 0;
>>>+       if (size < old_size)
>>>+               size = old_size;
>>>+       size = ALIGN(size + size1, align);
>>>+       return size;
>>>+}
>>>+
>>>/* Sizing the IO windows of the PCI-PCI bridge is trivial,
>>>  since these windows have 4K granularity and the IO ranges
>>>  of non-bridge PCI devices are limited to 256 bytes.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>...
>>
>>    
>>
>>>@@ -516,14 +542,6 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>unsigned long mask,
>>>                       mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
>>>               }
>>>       }
>>>-       if (size < min_size)
>>>-               size = min_size;
>>>-       old_size = resource_size(b_res);
>>>-       if (old_size == 1)
>>>-               old_size = 0;
>>>-       if (size < old_size)
>>>-               size = old_size;
>>>-
>>>       align = 0;
>>>       min_align = 0;
>>>       for (order = 0; order <= max_order; order++) {
>>>@@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned
>>>long mask,
>>>                       min_align = align1 >> 1;
>>>               align += aligns[order];
>>>       }
>>>-       size = ALIGN(size, min_align);
>>>+       size = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res),
>>>align);
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>On my SPARC32/LEON4 PCI system I get overlapped areas, double mapped
>>resources. Some BARs on PCIBUS0 are in the same non-prefetchable memory
>>range as the secondary bus PCIBUS1. Changing align to min_align in the above
>>call to calculate_memsize() fixes the problem, and the memory allocation is
>>the same as with 2.6.36.4 kernel.
>>
>>I belive this is just a typo.
>>    
>>
>
>It does seem that way. The original code used 'min_align' and 'align'
>itself is meaningless in that place.
>  
>
Agree.

>Can you confirm that the patch you talk about as fixing things is the attached?
>
>                  Linus
>  
>
Yes, the below patch works on the system that triggered the problem 
before. The last min_align was added in a later patch, I missed it 
initially.

Thanks,
Daniel

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>index 89d0a6a88df7..ebf51ad1b714 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>@@ -676,10 +676,10 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
> 			min_align = align1 >> 1;
> 		align += aligns[order];
> 	}
>-	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), align);
>+	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), min_align);
> 	size1 = !add_size ? size :
> 		calculate_memsize(size, min_size+add_size, 0,
>-				resource_size(b_res), align);
>+				resource_size(b_res), min_align);
> 	if (!size0 && !size1) {
> 		if (b_res->start || b_res->end)
> 			dev_info(&bus->self->dev, "disabling bridge window "
>  
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ram Pai April 11, 2011, 3:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:42:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@gaisler.com> wrote:
> >In commit 13583b16592a ("PCI: refactor io size calculation code"):
> >>
> >> refactor  code  that  calculates  the  io  size in pbus_size_io()
> >> and pbus_mem_io() into separate functions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |   66
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> >> index 66cb8f4..2121215 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> >> @@ -404,6 +404,43 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_resource(struct
> >> pci_bus *bus, unsigned lon
> >>        return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> > ...
> >
> >> +
> >> +static resource_size_t calculate_memsize(resource_size_t size,
> >> +               resource_size_t min_size,
> >> +               resource_size_t size1,
> >> +               resource_size_t old_size,
> >> +               resource_size_t align)
> >> +{
> >> +       if (size < min_size)
> >> +               size = min_size;
> >> +       if (old_size == 1 )
> >> +               old_size = 0;
> >> +       if (size < old_size)
> >> +               size = old_size;
> >> +       size = ALIGN(size + size1, align);
> >> +       return size;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /* Sizing the IO windows of the PCI-PCI bridge is trivial,
> >>   since these windows have 4K granularity and the IO ranges
> >>   of non-bridge PCI devices are limited to 256 bytes.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> @@ -516,14 +542,6 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus,
> >> unsigned long mask,
> >>                        mem64_mask &= r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64;
> >>                }
> >>        }
> >> -       if (size < min_size)
> >> -               size = min_size;
> >> -       old_size = resource_size(b_res);
> >> -       if (old_size == 1)
> >> -               old_size = 0;
> >> -       if (size < old_size)
> >> -               size = old_size;
> >> -
> >>        align = 0;
> >>        min_align = 0;
> >>        for (order = 0; order <= max_order; order++) {
> >> @@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned
> >> long mask,
> >>                        min_align = align1 >> 1;
> >>                align += aligns[order];
> >>        }
> >> -       size = ALIGN(size, min_align);
> >> +       size = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res),
> >> align);
> >>
> >
> > On my SPARC32/LEON4 PCI system I get overlapped areas, double mapped
> > resources. Some BARs on PCIBUS0 are in the same non-prefetchable memory
> > range as the secondary bus PCIBUS1. Changing align to min_align in the above
> > call to calculate_memsize() fixes the problem, and the memory allocation is
> > the same as with 2.6.36.4 kernel.
> >
> > I belive this is just a typo.


Yes it is my mistake. I got the parameter wrong. Your fix should correct the problem.

RP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index 89d0a6a88df7..ebf51ad1b714 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -676,10 +676,10 @@  static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
 			min_align = align1 >> 1;
 		align += aligns[order];
 	}
-	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), align);
+	size0 = calculate_memsize(size, min_size, 0, resource_size(b_res), min_align);
 	size1 = !add_size ? size :
 		calculate_memsize(size, min_size+add_size, 0,
-				resource_size(b_res), align);
+				resource_size(b_res), min_align);
 	if (!size0 && !size1) {
 		if (b_res->start || b_res->end)
 			dev_info(&bus->self->dev, "disabling bridge window "