| Message ID | 1769930.Ws5UzSBdLV@vostro.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
Hi Rafael,
[auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: i386-randconfig-i1-201540 (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: In function 'i8042_pm_suspend':
>> drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:1174:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_suspend_via_firmware' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (pm_suspend_via_firmware())
^
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: In function 'i8042_pm_resume_noirq':
>> drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:1190:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_resume_via_firmware' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!pm_resume_via_firmware())
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/pm_suspend_via_firmware +1174 drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
1168 */
1169
1170 static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
1171 {
1172 int i;
1173
> 1174 if (pm_suspend_via_firmware())
1175 i8042_controller_reset(true);
1176
1177 /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */
1178 for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
1179 struct serio *serio = i8042_ports[i].serio;
1180
1181 if (serio && device_may_wakeup(&serio->dev))
1182 enable_irq_wake(i8042_ports[i].irq);
1183 }
1184
1185 return 0;
1186 }
1187
1188 static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
1189 {
> 1190 if (!pm_resume_via_firmware())
1191 i8042_interrupt(0, NULL);
1192
1193 return 0;
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:31:44AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 03:43:08 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:08:30AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 03:34:42 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 12:53:49AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > > > > > > > If the upcoming system suspend is not going to be handled by the > > > > > platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, it is not > > > > > necessary to reset the controller in i8042_pm_suspend(), so avoid > > > > > doing that. > > > > > > > > > > Moreover, if the system resume currently in progress has not been > > > > > started by the platform firmware, like in the suspend-to-idle case, > > > > > i8042_controller_resume() need not be called by i8042_pm_resume(), > > > > > so avoid doing that too in that case. > > > > > > > > > > Additionally, try to catch the event that woke up the system by > > > > > calling the interrupt handler early during system resume if it has > > > > > not been started by the platform firmware. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > > > > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > > > > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > > > > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > > > > #include <linux/i8042.h> > > > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > > +#include <linux/suspend.h> > > > > > > > > > > #include <asm/io.h> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > > > > > { > > > > > int i; > > > > > > > > > > - i8042_controller_reset(true); > > > > > + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) > > > > > + i8042_controller_reset(true); > > > > > > > > > > /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ > > > > > for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > > > > > @@ -1183,6 +1185,14 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > > > > > return 0; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) > > > > > + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); > > > > > + > > > > > + return 0; > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > > > > > { > > > > > int i; > > > > > @@ -1199,7 +1209,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device > > > > > * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect > > > > > * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) > > > > > */ > > > > > - return i8042_controller_resume(true); > > > > > + return pm_resume_via_firmware() ? i8042_controller_resume(true) : 0; > > > > > > > > What happens if we were going to suspend via firmware so we reset the > > > > controller but then we got wakeup condition and we actually did not > > > > suspend. What pm_resume_via_firmware() will return in this case? > > > > > > It will return 'false'. Do we need to resume the controller then? > > > > Yes. > > > > > But I guess > > > 'false' should be passed to i8042_controller_resume() in that case? > > > > Yes, we do not need to reset the controller in this case, just > > reactivate multiplexing mode, etc. > > So something like this I suppose: > > --- > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/i8042.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/suspend.h> > > #include <asm/io.h> > > @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > { > int i; > > - i8042_controller_reset(true); > + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) > + i8042_controller_reset(true); > > /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ > for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { > @@ -1183,6 +1185,14 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic > return 0; > } > > +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) > +{ > + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) > + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) > { > int i; > @@ -1199,7 +1209,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device > * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect > * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) > */ > - return i8042_controller_resume(true); > + return pm_suspend_via_firmware() ? > + i8042_controller_resume(pm_resume_via_firmware()) : 0; Hmm, looks right, maybe just be more verbose... /* * If firmware was not going to be involved in suspend we did * not restore controller state to whatever it was when we were * booting, so we do not need to do anything. */ if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) return 0; /* * We only need to reset controller if we are resuming after * handing off control to the firmware, otherwise we can * simply restore the mode. */ do_reset = pm_resume_via_firmware(); return i8042_controller_resume(do_reset); > } > > static int i8042_pm_thaw(struct device *dev) > @@ -1223,6 +1234,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_restore(struct devic > > static const struct dev_pm_ops i8042_pm_ops = { > .suspend = i8042_pm_suspend, > + .resume_noirq = i8042_pm_resume_noirq, > .resume = i8042_pm_resume, > .thaw = i8042_pm_thaw, > .poweroff = i8042_pm_reset, >
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:31:44AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 03:43:08 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:08:30AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > > On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 03:34:42 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote: [cut] >> So something like this I suppose: >> >> --- >> drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c >> +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> #include <linux/i8042.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> +#include <linux/suspend.h> >> >> #include <asm/io.h> >> >> @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic >> { >> int i; >> >> - i8042_controller_reset(true); >> + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) >> + i8042_controller_reset(true); >> >> /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ >> for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { >> @@ -1183,6 +1185,14 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) >> + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) >> { >> int i; >> @@ -1199,7 +1209,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device >> * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect >> * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) >> */ >> - return i8042_controller_resume(true); >> + return pm_suspend_via_firmware() ? >> + i8042_controller_resume(pm_resume_via_firmware()) : 0; > > Hmm, looks right, maybe just be more verbose... > > /* > * If firmware was not going to be involved in suspend we did > * not restore controller state to whatever it was when we were > * booting, so we do not need to do anything. > */ > if (!pm_suspend_via_firmware()) > return 0; > > /* > * We only need to reset controller if we are resuming after > * handing off control to the firmware, otherwise we can > * simply restore the mode. > */ > do_reset = pm_resume_via_firmware(); > > return i8042_controller_resume(do_reset); > >> } >> >> static int i8042_pm_thaw(struct device *dev) >> @@ -1223,6 +1234,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_restore(struct devic >> >> static const struct dev_pm_ops i8042_pm_ops = { >> .suspend = i8042_pm_suspend, >> + .resume_noirq = i8042_pm_resume_noirq, >> .resume = i8042_pm_resume, >> .thaw = i8042_pm_thaw, >> .poweroff = i8042_pm_reset, OK I'll send a new version shortly. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/i8042.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/suspend.h> #include <asm/io.h> @@ -1170,7 +1171,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic { int i; - i8042_controller_reset(true); + if (pm_suspend_via_firmware()) + i8042_controller_reset(true); /* Set up serio interrupts for system wakeup. */ for (i = 0; i < I8042_NUM_PORTS; i++) { @@ -1183,6 +1185,14 @@ static int i8042_pm_suspend(struct devic return 0; } +static int i8042_pm_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) +{ + if (!pm_resume_via_firmware()) + i8042_interrupt(0, NULL); + + return 0; +} + static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device *dev) { int i; @@ -1199,7 +1209,8 @@ static int i8042_pm_resume(struct device * to bring it in a sane state. (In case of S2D we expect * BIOS to reset the controller for us.) */ - return i8042_controller_resume(true); + return pm_suspend_via_firmware() ? + i8042_controller_resume(pm_resume_via_firmware()) : 0; } static int i8042_pm_thaw(struct device *dev) @@ -1223,6 +1234,7 @@ static int i8042_pm_restore(struct devic static const struct dev_pm_ops i8042_pm_ops = { .suspend = i8042_pm_suspend, + .resume_noirq = i8042_pm_resume_noirq, .resume = i8042_pm_resume, .thaw = i8042_pm_thaw, .poweroff = i8042_pm_reset,