| Message ID | 9810c6bf-9fd7-bf41-13ab-a96bec861457@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:32:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_error_get_cfg() is called with bp->b_error as an arg, > which is negative, so the switch statement won't ever find > any matches. > > This results in only the default error handler having > any effect, as EIO/ENOSPC/ENODEV get ignored due to the > wrong sign. > > It seems simplest to always flip the error sign to positive, > so that we can handle either negative errors in bp->b_error, > or possibly a positive errno via something like > xfs_error_get_cfg(EIO) - this future-proofs the function. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> This looks the right thing to do for me too. Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > --- > > I'm still chasing down some odd behaviors in the error handling > patches but this seems worth sending now :) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > index 4c2c550..79cfd3f 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > @@ -634,6 +634,9 @@ xfs_error_get_cfg( > { > struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg; > > + if (error < 0) > + error = -error; > + > switch (error) { > case EIO: > cfg = &mp->m_error_cfg[error_class][XFS_ERR_EIO]; > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c index 4c2c550..79cfd3f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c @@ -634,6 +634,9 @@ xfs_error_get_cfg( { struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg; + if (error < 0) + error = -error; + switch (error) { case EIO: cfg = &mp->m_error_cfg[error_class][XFS_ERR_EIO];
xfs_error_get_cfg() is called with bp->b_error as an arg, which is negative, so the switch statement won't ever find any matches. This results in only the default error handler having any effect, as EIO/ENOSPC/ENODEV get ignored due to the wrong sign. It seems simplest to always flip the error sign to positive, so that we can handle either negative errors in bp->b_error, or possibly a positive errno via something like xfs_error_get_cfg(EIO) - this future-proofs the function. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> --- I'm still chasing down some odd behaviors in the error handling patches but this seems worth sending now :)