Message ID | 1483707918-31480-7-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
On 2017-01-06 14:05, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> I think falling back from the lowest dual-stream to the highest single-stream rate is a really bad idea. Instead you should get rid of the assumption that fallback rates are ordered by their MCS index. - Felix
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:10:48PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2017-01-06 14:05, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> > I think falling back from the lowest dual-stream to the highest > single-stream rate is a really bad idea. Ok, Kalle please drop this patch. > Instead you should get rid of the assumption that fallback rates are > ordered by their MCS index. I think I will stay with the current code. With decreased retry limit setting in other patch, problem is mitigated. For newer chips there is retry count TX_STA_FIFO_EXT register, so I'll look into that. Thanks Stanislaw
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote: > If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate > correctly number of retries in TX status code. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Dropping per Stanislaw's request Patch set to Changes Requested.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c index 1f4a120..6cac311 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c @@ -4968,7 +4968,7 @@ static int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, HT_FBK_CFG0, reg); rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, HT_FBK_CFG1, ®); - rt2x00_set_field32(®, HT_FBK_CFG1_HTMCS8FBK, 8); + rt2x00_set_field32(®, HT_FBK_CFG1_HTMCS8FBK, 7); rt2x00_set_field32(®, HT_FBK_CFG1_HTMCS9FBK, 8); rt2x00_set_field32(®, HT_FBK_CFG1_HTMCS10FBK, 9); rt2x00_set_field32(®, HT_FBK_CFG1_HTMCS11FBK, 10);
If we do not fallback to lower rate, we are unable to calculate correctly number of retries in TX status code. Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)