Message ID | 1491392180-11078-1-git-send-email-gbhat@marvell.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 1aed89640a899cd695bbfc976a4356affa474646 |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com> wrote: > From: Karthik Ananthapadmanabha <karthida@marvell.com> > > When IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR is set by cfg80211, passive scan must be > performed. In mwifiex,active scan is performed even though flag is > set from cfg80211. mwifiex_reg_apply_radar_flags() function added > in this patch correctly uses radar flag. > > Signed-off-by: Karthik Ananthapadmanabha <karthida@marvell.com> > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com> > Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com> Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. 1aed89640a89 mwifiex: apply radar flag
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c index 1e3bd43..44d0617 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c @@ -594,6 +594,24 @@ int mwifiex_send_domain_info_cmd_fw(struct wiphy *wiphy) return 0; } +static void mwifiex_reg_apply_radar_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy) +{ + struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband; + struct ieee80211_channel *chan; + unsigned int i; + + if (!wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ]) + return; + sband = wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ]; + + for (i = 0; i < sband->n_channels; i++) { + chan = &sband->channels[i]; + if ((!(chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED)) && + (chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR)) + chan->flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR; + } +} + /* * CFG802.11 regulatory domain callback function. * @@ -613,6 +631,7 @@ static void mwifiex_reg_notifier(struct wiphy *wiphy, mwifiex_dbg(adapter, INFO, "info: cfg80211 regulatory domain callback for %c%c\n", request->alpha2[0], request->alpha2[1]); + mwifiex_reg_apply_radar_flags(wiphy); switch (request->initiator) { case NL80211_REGDOM_SET_BY_DRIVER: