Message ID | 20170818225638.31563-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Friday, August 18, 2017 6:57 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Some implementations of the Synopsys Designware PCIe controller implement > a so-called ECAM shift mode, which allows a static memory window to be > configured that covers the configuration space of the entire bus range. > > If the firmware performs all the low level configuration that is required > to expose this controller in a fully ECAM compatible manner, we can > simply describe it as "pci-host-ecam-generic" and be done with it. > However, it appears that in some cases (one of which is the Armada 80x0), > the IP is synthesized with an ATU window size that does not allow the > first bus to be mapped in a way that prevents the device on the > downstream port from appearing more than once. > > So implement a driver that relies on the firmware to perform all low > level initialization, and drives the controller in ECAM mode, but > overrides the config space accessors to take the above quirk into > account. > > Note that, unlike most drivers for this IP, this driver does not expose > a fake bridge device at B/D/F 00:00.0. There is no point in doing so, > given that this is not a true bridge, and does not require any windows > to be configured in order for the downstream device to operate correctly. > Omitting it also prevents the PCI resource allocation routines from > handing out BAR space to it unnecessarily. > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> > Cc: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > > Posted as RFC for discussion. We have systems booting with UEFI firmware (CC'ed Arnd Bergmann) Thank you for sharing this patch. I have no objection about this patch. I think that this driver is required for ARM-based server system. But, as you wrote above, UEFI should support low-level code for this DesignWare Controller if we want to use this DWC-ECAM driver. So, can we get the UEFI code for this controller? If not, can you share your plan about that? Best regards, Jingoo Han > that don't require yet another variation of the driver with all its > low-level initialization code, given that the firmware takes care of that > already for its own needs. However, it seems we cannot drive these > controllers in a fully ECAM compliant mode either, and so all we need > is ECAM with a quirk for the config space accessors. > > Kernel log capture after the patch, of a SoC with two of these puppies, > one with a Realtek 8169 and one with a Renesas uPD720200. > > If having a patch such as this one is considered acceptable, I will > create a DT binding to go with it as well. > > drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig | 11 +++ > drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig > index d275aadc47ee..f2afa2c519c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig > @@ -169,4 +169,15 @@ config PCIE_KIRIN > Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support > on HiSilicon Kirin series SoCs. > > +config PCIE_DW_HOST_ECAM > + bool "Synopsys DesignWare PCIe controller in ECAM mode" > + depends on OF > + select PCI_HOST_COMMON > + select IRQ_DOMAIN > + help > + Add support for Synopsys DesignWare PCIe controllers configured > + by the firmware into ECAM shift mode. In some cases, these are > + fully ECAM compliant, in which case the pci-host-generic driver > + may be used instead. > + > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile > index c61be9738cce..7d5a23e5b767 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST) += pcie-designware-host.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST_ECAM) += pcie-designware-ecam.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP) += pcie-designware-ep.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT) += pcie-designware-plat.o > ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX_HOST) $(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX_EP)),) > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3ab3f88b2592 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c > @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ > +/* > + * Driver for mostly ECAM compatible Synopsys dw PCIe controllers > + * configured by the firmware into RC mode > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Limited > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Linaro Limited > + * > + * Authors: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> > + * Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_pci.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > + > +static int pci_dw_ecam_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int > where, > + int size, u32 *val) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + > + /* > + * The Synopsys dw PCIe controller in RC mode will not filter type > 0 > + * config TLPs sent to devices 1 and up on its downstream port, > + * resulting in devices appearing multiple times on bus 0 unless we > + * filter them here. > + */ > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start && PCI_SLOT(devfn) > 0) { > + *val = 0xffffffff; > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + } > + > + return pci_generic_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, val); > +} > + > +static int pci_dw_ecam_config_write(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int > where, > + int size, u32 val) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start && PCI_SLOT(devfn) > 0) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + > + return pci_generic_config_write(bus, devfn, where, size, val); > +} > + > +static struct pci_ecam_ops pci_dw_ecam_bus_ops = { > + .bus_shift = 20, > + .pci_ops = { > + .map_bus = pci_ecam_map_bus, > + .read = pci_dw_ecam_config_read, > + .write = pci_dw_ecam_config_write, > + } > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id pci_dw_ecam_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "snps,dw-pcie-ecam", > + .data = &pci_dw_ecam_bus_ops }, > + > + { }, > +}; > + > +static int pci_dw_ecam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + const struct of_device_id *of_id; > + struct pci_ecam_ops *ops; > + > + of_id = of_match_node(pci_dw_ecam_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node); > + ops = (struct pci_ecam_ops *)of_id->data; > + > + return pci_host_common_probe(pdev, ops); > +} > + > +static struct platform_driver pci_dw_ecam_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "pci-synopsys-dw-ecam", > + .of_match_table = pci_dw_ecam_of_match, > + .suppress_bind_attrs = true, > + }, > + .probe = pci_dw_ecam_probe, > +}; > +builtin_platform_driver(pci_dw_ecam_driver); > -- > 2.11.0 > > Note that this is not the final configuration. Most notably, there is no > 32-bit addressable MMIO space yet. > > OF: PCI: host bridge /pcie@3f00000000 ranges: > OF: PCI: IO 0x3f01000000..0x3f0100ffff -> 0x00000000 > OF: PCI: MEM 0x3f40000000..0x3f7fffffff -> 0x3f40000000 > pci-synopsys-dw-ecam 3f00000000.pcie: ECAM at [mem 0x3f00000000- > 0x3f03ffffff] for [bus 00-3f] > pci-synopsys-dw-ecam 3f00000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 > pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-3f] > pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff] > pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x3f40000000-0x3f7fffffff] > pci 0000:00:00.0: [10ec:8168] type 00 class 0x020000 > pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [io 0x0000-0x00ff] > pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x3f40004000-0x3f40004fff 64bit] > pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x20: [mem 0x3f40000000-0x3f40003fff 64bit pref] > pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1 D2 > pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold > pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0x3f40000000-0x3f40003fff 64bit > pref] > pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0x3f40004000-0x3f40004fff 64bit] > pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [io 0x1000-0x10ff] > OF: PCI: host bridge /pcie@3f80000000 ranges: > OF: PCI: IO 0x3f81000000..0x3f8100ffff -> 0x00010000 > OF: PCI: MEM 0x3fc0000000..0x3fffffffff -> 0x3fc0000000 > pci-synopsys-dw-ecam 3f80000000.pcie: ECAM at [mem 0x3f80000000- > 0x3f83ffffff] for [bus 00-3f] > pci-synopsys-dw-ecam 3f80000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0001:00 > pci_bus 0001:00: root bus resource [bus 00-3f] > pci_bus 0001:00: root bus resource [io 0x10000-0x1ffff] > pci_bus 0001:00: root bus resource [mem 0x3fc0000000-0x3fffffffff] > pci 0001:00:00.0: [1033:0194] type 00 class 0x0c0330 > pci 0001:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x3fc0000000-0x3fc0001fff 64bit] > pci 0001:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot > pci 0001:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x3fc0000000-0x3fc0001fff 64bit] > pci 0001:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
On 21 August 2017 at 16:19, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2017 6:57 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Some implementations of the Synopsys Designware PCIe controller implement >> a so-called ECAM shift mode, which allows a static memory window to be >> configured that covers the configuration space of the entire bus range. >> >> If the firmware performs all the low level configuration that is required >> to expose this controller in a fully ECAM compatible manner, we can >> simply describe it as "pci-host-ecam-generic" and be done with it. >> However, it appears that in some cases (one of which is the Armada 80x0), >> the IP is synthesized with an ATU window size that does not allow the >> first bus to be mapped in a way that prevents the device on the >> downstream port from appearing more than once. >> >> So implement a driver that relies on the firmware to perform all low >> level initialization, and drives the controller in ECAM mode, but >> overrides the config space accessors to take the above quirk into >> account. >> >> Note that, unlike most drivers for this IP, this driver does not expose >> a fake bridge device at B/D/F 00:00.0. There is no point in doing so, >> given that this is not a true bridge, and does not require any windows >> to be configured in order for the downstream device to operate correctly. >> Omitting it also prevents the PCI resource allocation routines from >> handing out BAR space to it unnecessarily. >> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> >> Cc: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> >> --- >> >> Posted as RFC for discussion. We have systems booting with UEFI firmware > > (CC'ed Arnd Bergmann) > > Thank you for sharing this patch. > I have no objection about this patch. > Thanks. > I think that this driver is required for ARM-based server system. > But, as you wrote above, UEFI should support low-level code for this > DesignWare > Controller if we want to use this DWC-ECAM driver. So, can we get the UEFI > code > for this controller? > > If not, can you share your plan about that? > Yes, I will share the code via the edk2-platforms tree as soon as we are ready to publish support for this particular platform.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig index d275aadc47ee..f2afa2c519c1 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig @@ -169,4 +169,15 @@ config PCIE_KIRIN Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on HiSilicon Kirin series SoCs. +config PCIE_DW_HOST_ECAM + bool "Synopsys DesignWare PCIe controller in ECAM mode" + depends on OF + select PCI_HOST_COMMON + select IRQ_DOMAIN + help + Add support for Synopsys DesignWare PCIe controllers configured + by the firmware into ECAM shift mode. In some cases, these are + fully ECAM compliant, in which case the pci-host-generic driver + may be used instead. + endmenu diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile index c61be9738cce..7d5a23e5b767 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW) += pcie-designware.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST) += pcie-designware-host.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_HOST_ECAM) += pcie-designware-ecam.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_EP) += pcie-designware-ep.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT) += pcie-designware-plat.o ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX_HOST) $(CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX_EP)),) diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3ab3f88b2592 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +/* + * Driver for mostly ECAM compatible Synopsys dw PCIe controllers + * configured by the firmware into RC mode + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Limited + * Copyright (C) 2017 Linaro Limited + * + * Authors: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + * Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +static int pci_dw_ecam_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where, + int size, u32 *val) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; + + /* + * The Synopsys dw PCIe controller in RC mode will not filter type 0 + * config TLPs sent to devices 1 and up on its downstream port, + * resulting in devices appearing multiple times on bus 0 unless we + * filter them here. + */ + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start && PCI_SLOT(devfn) > 0) { + *val = 0xffffffff; + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + } + + return pci_generic_config_read(bus, devfn, where, size, val); +} + +static int pci_dw_ecam_config_write(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where, + int size, u32 val) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; + + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start && PCI_SLOT(devfn) > 0) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + + return pci_generic_config_write(bus, devfn, where, size, val); +} + +static struct pci_ecam_ops pci_dw_ecam_bus_ops = { + .bus_shift = 20, + .pci_ops = { + .map_bus = pci_ecam_map_bus, + .read = pci_dw_ecam_config_read, + .write = pci_dw_ecam_config_write, + } +}; + +static const struct of_device_id pci_dw_ecam_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "snps,dw-pcie-ecam", + .data = &pci_dw_ecam_bus_ops }, + + { }, +}; + +static int pci_dw_ecam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + const struct of_device_id *of_id; + struct pci_ecam_ops *ops; + + of_id = of_match_node(pci_dw_ecam_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node); + ops = (struct pci_ecam_ops *)of_id->data; + + return pci_host_common_probe(pdev, ops); +} + +static struct platform_driver pci_dw_ecam_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "pci-synopsys-dw-ecam", + .of_match_table = pci_dw_ecam_of_match, + .suppress_bind_attrs = true, + }, + .probe = pci_dw_ecam_probe, +}; +builtin_platform_driver(pci_dw_ecam_driver);
Some implementations of the Synopsys Designware PCIe controller implement a so-called ECAM shift mode, which allows a static memory window to be configured that covers the configuration space of the entire bus range. If the firmware performs all the low level configuration that is required to expose this controller in a fully ECAM compatible manner, we can simply describe it as "pci-host-ecam-generic" and be done with it. However, it appears that in some cases (one of which is the Armada 80x0), the IP is synthesized with an ATU window size that does not allow the first bus to be mapped in a way that prevents the device on the downstream port from appearing more than once. So implement a driver that relies on the firmware to perform all low level initialization, and drives the controller in ECAM mode, but overrides the config space accessors to take the above quirk into account. Note that, unlike most drivers for this IP, this driver does not expose a fake bridge device at B/D/F 00:00.0. There is no point in doing so, given that this is not a true bridge, and does not require any windows to be configured in order for the downstream device to operate correctly. Omitting it also prevents the PCI resource allocation routines from handing out BAR space to it unnecessarily. Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> Cc: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> --- Posted as RFC for discussion. We have systems booting with UEFI firmware that don't require yet another variation of the driver with all its low-level initialization code, given that the firmware takes care of that already for its own needs. However, it seems we cannot drive these controllers in a fully ECAM compliant mode either, and so all we need is ECAM with a quirk for the config space accessors. Kernel log capture after the patch, of a SoC with two of these puppies, one with a Realtek 8169 and one with a Renesas uPD720200. If having a patch such as this one is considered acceptable, I will create a DT binding to go with it as well. drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig | 11 +++ drivers/pci/dwc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ecam.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+)