diff mbox

[RFC] Add support for BTRFS raid5/6 to GRUB

Message ID 2708f56e-1dac-481e-af8a-d81066df8b42@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Goffredo Baroncelli April 17, 2018, 7:57 p.m. UTC
Hi All,

Below you can find a patch to add support for accessing files from grub in a RAID5/6 btrfs filesystem. This is a RFC because it is missing the support for recovery (i.e. if some devices are missed). In the next days (weeks ?) I will extend this patch to support also this case.

Comments are welcome.

BR
G.Baroncelli


---

commit 8c80a1b7c913faf50f95c5c76b4666ed17685666
Author: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
Date:   Tue Apr 17 21:40:31 2018 +0200

    Add initial support for btrfs raid5/6 chunk

Comments

Daniel Kiper April 23, 2018, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Below you can find a patch to add support for accessing files from
> grub in a RAID5/6 btrfs filesystem. This is a RFC because it is
> missing the support for recovery (i.e. if some devices are missed). In
> the next days (weeks ?) I will extend this patch to support also this
> case.
>
> Comments are welcome.

More or less LGTM. Just a nitpick below... I am happy to take full blown
patch into GRUB if it is ready.

> BR
> G.Baroncelli
>
>
> ---
>
> commit 8c80a1b7c913faf50f95c5c76b4666ed17685666
> Author: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
> Date:   Tue Apr 17 21:40:31 2018 +0200
>
>     Add initial support for btrfs raid5/6 chunk
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> index be195448d..4c5632acb 100644
> --- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> +++ b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct grub_btrfs_chunk_item
>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID1         0x10
>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_DUPLICATED    0x20
>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID10        0x40
> +#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5         0x80
> +#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6        0x100
>    grub_uint8_t dummy2[0xc];
>    grub_uint16_t nstripes;
>    grub_uint16_t nsubstripes;
> @@ -764,6 +766,39 @@ grub_btrfs_read_logical (struct grub_btrfs_data *data, grub_disk_addr_t addr,
>  	      stripe_offset = low + chunk_stripe_length
>  		* high;
>  	      csize = chunk_stripe_length - low;
> +	      break;
> +	    }
> +	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5:
> +	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6:
> +	    {
> +	      grub_uint64_t nparities;
> +	      grub_uint64_t parity_pos;
> +	      grub_uint64_t stripe_nr, high;
> +	      grub_uint64_t low;
> +
> +	      redundancy = 1;	/* no redundancy for now */
> +
> +	      if (grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->type) & GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5)
> +		{
> +		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID5\n");
> +		  nparities = 1;
> +		}
> +	      else
> +		{
> +		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID6\n");
> +		  nparities = 2;
> +		}
> +
> +	      stripe_nr = grub_divmod64 (off, chunk_stripe_length, &low);
> +
> +	      high = grub_divmod64 (stripe_nr, nstripes - nparities, &stripen);
> +	      grub_divmod64 (high+nstripes-nparities, nstripes, &parity_pos);
> +	      grub_divmod64 (parity_pos+nparities+stripen, nstripes, &stripen);

Missing spaces around "+" and "-".

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Goffredo Baroncelli April 23, 2018, 7:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On 04/23/2018 01:50 PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Below you can find a patch to add support for accessing files from
>> grub in a RAID5/6 btrfs filesystem. This is a RFC because it is
>> missing the support for recovery (i.e. if some devices are missed). In
>> the next days (weeks ?) I will extend this patch to support also this
>> case.
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
> 
> More or less LGTM. Just a nitpick below... I am happy to take full blown
> patch into GRUB if it is ready.

Thanks for the comments; however now I implemented also the recovery. It is under testing. Let me few days and I will resubmit the patches.

> 
>> BR
>> G.Baroncelli
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> commit 8c80a1b7c913faf50f95c5c76b4666ed17685666
>> Author: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
>> Date:   Tue Apr 17 21:40:31 2018 +0200
>>
>>     Add initial support for btrfs raid5/6 chunk
>>
>> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
>> index be195448d..4c5632acb 100644
>> --- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
>> +++ b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
>> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct grub_btrfs_chunk_item
>>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID1         0x10
>>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_DUPLICATED    0x20
>>  #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID10        0x40
>> +#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5         0x80
>> +#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6        0x100
>>    grub_uint8_t dummy2[0xc];
>>    grub_uint16_t nstripes;
>>    grub_uint16_t nsubstripes;
>> @@ -764,6 +766,39 @@ grub_btrfs_read_logical (struct grub_btrfs_data *data, grub_disk_addr_t addr,
>>  	      stripe_offset = low + chunk_stripe_length
>>  		* high;
>>  	      csize = chunk_stripe_length - low;
>> +	      break;
>> +	    }
>> +	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5:
>> +	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6:
>> +	    {
>> +	      grub_uint64_t nparities;
>> +	      grub_uint64_t parity_pos;
>> +	      grub_uint64_t stripe_nr, high;
>> +	      grub_uint64_t low;
>> +
>> +	      redundancy = 1;	/* no redundancy for now */
>> +
>> +	      if (grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->type) & GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5)
>> +		{
>> +		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID5\n");
>> +		  nparities = 1;
>> +		}
>> +	      else
>> +		{
>> +		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID6\n");
>> +		  nparities = 2;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +	      stripe_nr = grub_divmod64 (off, chunk_stripe_length, &low);
>> +
>> +	      high = grub_divmod64 (stripe_nr, nstripes - nparities, &stripen);
>> +	      grub_divmod64 (high+nstripes-nparities, nstripes, &parity_pos);
>> +	      grub_divmod64 (parity_pos+nparities+stripen, nstripes, &stripen);
> 
> Missing spaces around "+" and "-".
> 
> Daniel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
index be195448d..4c5632acb 100644
--- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
+++ b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@  struct grub_btrfs_chunk_item
 #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID1         0x10
 #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_DUPLICATED    0x20
 #define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID10        0x40
+#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5         0x80
+#define GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6        0x100
   grub_uint8_t dummy2[0xc];
   grub_uint16_t nstripes;
   grub_uint16_t nsubstripes;
@@ -764,6 +766,39 @@  grub_btrfs_read_logical (struct grub_btrfs_data *data, grub_disk_addr_t addr,
 	      stripe_offset = low + chunk_stripe_length
 		* high;
 	      csize = chunk_stripe_length - low;
+	      break;
+	    }
+	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5:
+	  case GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6:
+	    {
+	      grub_uint64_t nparities;
+	      grub_uint64_t parity_pos;
+	      grub_uint64_t stripe_nr, high;
+	      grub_uint64_t low;
+
+	      redundancy = 1;	/* no redundancy for now */
+
+	      if (grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->type) & GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5)
+		{
+		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID5\n");
+		  nparities = 1;
+		}
+	      else
+		{
+		  grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "RAID6\n");
+		  nparities = 2;
+		}
+
+	      stripe_nr = grub_divmod64 (off, chunk_stripe_length, &low);
+
+	      high = grub_divmod64 (stripe_nr, nstripes - nparities, &stripen);
+	      grub_divmod64 (high+nstripes-nparities, nstripes, &parity_pos);
+	      grub_divmod64 (parity_pos+nparities+stripen, nstripes, &stripen);
+
+	      stripe_offset = low + chunk_stripe_length * high;
+	      csize = chunk_stripe_length - low;
+
 	      break;
 	    }
 	  default: