Message ID | 20180912031709.14112-1-jasowang@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | vhost_net TX batching | expand |
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800 > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: ... Series applied, thanks Jason.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:28:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800 > > > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket > > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: > ... > > Series applied, thanks Jason. Going over it now I don't see a lot to complain about, but I'd appreciate a bit more time for review in the future. 3 days ok?
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:02:13 -0400 > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:28:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> >> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800 >> >> > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket >> > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: >> ... >> >> Series applied, thanks Jason. > > Going over it now I don't see a lot to complain about, but I'd > appreciate a bit more time for review in the future. 3 days ok? I try to handle every patchwork entry within 48 hours, more specifically 2 business days. Given the rate at which patches flow through networking, I think this is both reasonable and necessary. One always have the option to send a quick reply to the list saying "Please wait for my review, I'll get to it in the next day or two." which I will certainly honor. Thank you.