Message ID | 1552470749-3625-1-git-send-email-p.figiel@camlintechnologies.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | a9fd0953fa4a62887306be28641b4b0809f3b2fd |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | brcmfmac: convert dev_init_lock mutex to completion | expand |
Piotr Figiel <p.figiel@camlintechnologies.com> wrote: > Leaving dev_init_lock mutex locked in probe causes BUG and a WARNING when > kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Convert mutex to completion > which silences those warnings and improves code readability. > > Fix below errors when connecting the USB WiFi dongle: > > brcmfmac: brcmf_fw_alloc_request: using brcm/brcmfmac43143 for chip BCM43143/2 > BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: kworker/0:2/0x00000000/434 > last function: hub_event > 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: > #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] > CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 > Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) > Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event > [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) > [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<8014195c>] (process_one_work+0x710/0x808) > [<8014195c>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) > [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) > [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) > Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) > 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------ > kworker/0:2/434 is trying to acquire lock: > e29cf799 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x174/0x808 > > but task is already holding lock: > 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #2 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}: > mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 > brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] > usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0x1bc > really_probe+0x228/0x2c0 > __driver_attach+0xe4/0xe8 > bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4 > bus_add_driver+0x19c/0x214 > driver_register+0x78/0x110 > usb_register_driver+0x84/0x148 > process_one_work+0x228/0x808 > worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 > kthread+0x13c/0x16c > ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 > (null) > > -> #1 (brcmf_driver_work){+.+.}: > worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 > kthread+0x13c/0x16c > ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 > (null) > > -> #0 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}: > process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808 > worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 > kthread+0x13c/0x16c > ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 > (null) > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > (wq_completion)"events" --> brcmf_driver_work --> &devinfo->dev_init_lock > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); > lock(brcmf_driver_work); > lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); > lock((wq_completion)"events"); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: > #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 > Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) > Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func > [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) > [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug+0x210/0x330) > [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug) from [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire+0x160c/0x1a30) > [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268) > [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire) from [<80141404>] (process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808) > [<80141404>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) > [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) > [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) > Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) > 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Figiel <p.figiel@camlintechnologies.com> Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. a9fd0953fa4a brcmfmac: convert dev_init_lock mutex to completion
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:2/434 is trying to acquire lock: e29cf799 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x174/0x808 but task is already holding lock: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}: mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24 brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] usb_probe_interface+0xc0/0x1bc really_probe+0x228/0x2c0 __driver_attach+0xe4/0xe8 bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0xb4 bus_add_driver+0x19c/0x214 driver_register+0x78/0x110 usb_register_driver+0x84/0x148 process_one_work+0x228/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #1 (brcmf_driver_work){+.+.}: worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) -> #0 ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808 worker_thread+0x2c/0x564 kthread+0x13c/0x16c ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20 (null) other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)"events" --> brcmf_driver_work --> &devinfo->dev_init_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock(brcmf_driver_work); lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); lock((wq_completion)"events"); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kworker/0:2/434: #0: 18d5dcdf (&devinfo->dev_init_lock){+.+.}, at: brcmf_usb_probe+0x78/0x550 [brcmfmac] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 434 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.19.23-00084-g454a789-dirty #123 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func [<8011237c>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010d74c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<8010d74c>] (show_stack) from [<809c4324>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4) [<809c4324>] (dump_stack) from [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug+0x210/0x330) [<80172838>] (print_circular_bug) from [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire+0x160c/0x1a30) [<80175940>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x268) [<8017671c>] (lock_acquire) from [<80141404>] (process_one_work+0x1b8/0x808) [<80141404>] (process_one_work) from [<80141a80>] (worker_thread+0x2c/0x564) [<80141a80>] (worker_thread) from [<80147bcc>] (kthread+0x13c/0x16c) [<80147bcc>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xed1d9fb0 to 0xed1d9ff8) 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Signed-off-by: Piotr Figiel <p.figiel@camlintechnologies.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c index e9cbfd0..a513990 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ struct brcmf_usbdev_info { struct usb_device *usbdev; struct device *dev; - struct mutex dev_init_lock; + struct completion dev_init_done; int ctl_in_pipe, ctl_out_pipe; struct urb *ctl_urb; /* URB for control endpoint */ @@ -1193,11 +1193,11 @@ static void brcmf_usb_probe_phase2(struct device *dev, int ret, if (ret) goto error; - mutex_unlock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + complete(&devinfo->dev_init_done); return; error: brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "failed: dev=%s, err=%d\n", dev_name(dev), ret); - mutex_unlock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + complete(&devinfo->dev_init_done); device_release_driver(dev); } @@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_probe_cb(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo) if (ret) goto fail; /* we are done */ - mutex_unlock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + complete(&devinfo->dev_init_done); return 0; } bus->chip = bus_pub->devid; @@ -1325,11 +1325,10 @@ brcmf_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) devinfo->usbdev = usb; devinfo->dev = &usb->dev; - /* Take an init lock, to protect for disconnect while still loading. + /* Init completion, to protect for disconnect while still loading. * Necessary because of the asynchronous firmware load construction */ - mutex_init(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); - mutex_lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + init_completion(&devinfo->dev_init_done); usb_set_intfdata(intf, devinfo); @@ -1407,7 +1406,7 @@ brcmf_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) return 0; fail: - mutex_unlock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + complete(&devinfo->dev_init_done); kfree(devinfo); usb_set_intfdata(intf, NULL); return ret; @@ -1422,7 +1421,7 @@ brcmf_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf) devinfo = (struct brcmf_usbdev_info *)usb_get_intfdata(intf); if (devinfo) { - mutex_lock(&devinfo->dev_init_lock); + wait_for_completion(&devinfo->dev_init_done); /* Make sure that devinfo still exists. Firmware probe routines * may have released the device and cleared the intfdata. */