Message ID | cover.1560361364.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Convert files to ReST - part 1 | expand |
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:36 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> wrote: > This is mostly a rebase of the /33 series v3 I sent, on the top of the latest > linux-next (next-20190612). > > Changes from v3: > > - dropped cpufreq conversion - documents are too outdated; > - infiniband patch is not here anymore - as it should be merged via RDMA; > - s390 patches were already merged; > - Dropped Geert as Maintainer from fb/framebuffer.rst, as per his request; > - Did a minor editorial change at popwerpc/cxl.rst per Andrew Donellan > request; > - Added acks/reviews; > - trivial rebase fixups. So I had to pull docs-next forward to -rc4, but then I was able to apply this set except for parts 5, 6, 14, 18, and 19. Some progress made, but this is somewhat painful work... jon
Em Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:36:40 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:36 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> wrote: > > > This is mostly a rebase of the /33 series v3 I sent, on the top of the latest > > linux-next (next-20190612). > > > > Changes from v3: > > > > - dropped cpufreq conversion - documents are too outdated; > > - infiniband patch is not here anymore - as it should be merged via RDMA; > > - s390 patches were already merged; > > - Dropped Geert as Maintainer from fb/framebuffer.rst, as per his request; > > - Did a minor editorial change at popwerpc/cxl.rst per Andrew Donellan > > request; > > - Added acks/reviews; > > - trivial rebase fixups. > > So I had to pull docs-next forward to -rc4, but then I was able to apply > this set except for parts 5, 6, 14, 18, and 19. Patch 5 went via Cgroups tree; Patch 18 went via power tree; Patch 6 is obsolete, as the cgroups-v1 CBQ chapter was removed; So, what's left from this series are patches 14 and 19. I have a rebased version of them on the top of linux-next on my working tree. Perhaps we should try to push those two late during the merge window. > Some progress made, but > this is somewhat painful work... Yeah, a change like that is not easy. Thanks, Mauro