Message ID | 1562346622-1003-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup | expand |
Hi Paolo, Would you help to review this patch, plz? Many thanks. --- Best wishes Yi Wang > 在 2019年7月6日,01:10,Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> 写道: > > There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have > been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested. > > Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 -------- > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index fafd81d..86f9861 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz, > > *pshift = shift; > *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32); > - > - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n", > - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) > vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) { > if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) { > offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset; > - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data); > } else { > u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed); > data += delta; > offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data); > - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta); > } > matched = true; > already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation); > @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) > kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data; > kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset; > matched = false; > - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n", > - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data); > } > > /* > @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void) > cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block, > CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); > } > - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz); > > cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online", > kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep); > -- > 1.8.3.1 >
On 15/07/19 06:50, Yi Wang wrote: > Hi Paolo, > Would you help to review this patch, plz? > Many thanks. I have queued it now. Paolo > --- > Best wishes > Yi Wang > >> 在 2019年7月6日,01:10,Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> 写道: >> >> There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have >> been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 -------- >> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> index fafd81d..86f9861 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz, >> >> *pshift = shift; >> *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32); >> - >> - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n", >> - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier); >> } >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 >> @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) >> vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) { >> if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) { >> offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset; >> - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data); >> } else { >> u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed); >> data += delta; >> offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data); >> - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta); >> } >> matched = true; >> already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation); >> @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) >> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data; >> kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset; >> matched = false; >> - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n", >> - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data); >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void) >> cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block, >> CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); >> } >> - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz); >> >> cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online", >> kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep); >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index fafd81d..86f9861 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz, *pshift = shift; *pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32); - - pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n", - __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier); } #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 @@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) { if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) { offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset; - pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data); } else { u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed); data += delta; offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data); - pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta); } matched = true; already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation); @@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data; kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset; matched = false; - pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n", - kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data); } /* @@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void) cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); } - pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz); cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online", kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested. Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)