| Message ID | 20190902031716.43195-12-xiaowei.bao@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
| Series | *** SUBJECT HERE *** | expand |
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used > for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > --- > v2: > - No change. > v3: > - No change. > > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > index 6e208a0..d531951 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = { > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) }, > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) }, > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) }, > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) }, The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that don't have a define for their device ID. I think a define should be created for both of the device IDs above. Thanks, Andrew Murray > { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) }, > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654), > .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data > -- > 2.9.5 >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:55 > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo > Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h. > Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy > Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou > <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in > pci_device_id table > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used > > for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > > --- > > v2: > > - No change. > > v3: > > - No change. > > > > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > index 6e208a0..d531951 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = { > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) }, > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) }, > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) }, > > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) }, > > The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that don't have a > define for their device ID. I think a define should be created for both of the > device IDs above. OK, but I only define in this file, I am not sure this can define in include/linux/pci_ids.h file Thanks Xiaowei > > Thanks, > > Andrew Murray > > > { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) }, > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654), > > .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data > > -- > > 2.9.5 > >
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:52:30AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> > > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:55 > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo > > Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h. > > Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy > > Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; > > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou > > <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in > > pci_device_id table > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used > > > for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - No change. > > > v3: > > > - No change. > > > > > > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > index 6e208a0..d531951 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > > pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = { > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) }, > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) }, > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) }, > > > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) }, > > > > The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that don't have a > > define for their device ID. I think a define should be created for both of the > > device IDs above. > > OK, but I only define in this file, I am not sure this can define in include/linux/pci_ids.h > file This file seems a little inconsistent... - Two of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_ids.h and only used in pci_endpoint_test.c - One of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_endpoint_test.c and only used there - The Freescale device ID is hardcoded and only used in pci_endpoint_test.c The header in pci_ids.h has a comment suggestion definitions are only added where used in multiple files - yet I don't think this holds true. Bjorn - do you have a suggestion? Thanks, Andrew Murray > > Thanks > Xiaowei > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew Murray > > > > > { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) }, > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654), > > > .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data > > > -- > > > 2.9.5 > > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> > Sent: 2019年9月12日 21:00 > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>; helgaas@kernel.org > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo > Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; M.h. > Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy > Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou > <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in > pci_device_id table > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:52:30AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> > > > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:55 > > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > > > Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; > > > Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; kishon@ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; > M.h. > > > Lian <minghuan.lian@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; Roy > > > Zang <roy.zang@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; > > > gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; > > > arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; Z.q. Hou > > > <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a > > > in pci_device_id table > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > > > Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be > > > > used for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> > > > > --- > > > > v2: > > > > - No change. > > > > v3: > > > > - No change. > > > > > > > > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > > b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > > index 6e208a0..d531951 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c > > > > @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id > > > pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = { > > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) }, > > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) }, > > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) }, > > > > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) }, > > > > > > The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that > > > don't have a define for their device ID. I think a define should be > > > created for both of the device IDs above. > > > > OK, but I only define in this file, I am not sure this can define in > > include/linux/pci_ids.h file > > This file seems a little inconsistent... > > - Two of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_ids.h and only used in > pci_endpoint_test.c > - One of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_endpoint_test.c and only used > there > - The Freescale device ID is hardcoded and only used in pci_endpoint_test.c > > The header in pci_ids.h has a comment suggestion definitions are only added > where used in multiple files - yet I don't think this holds true. Thanks Andrew. > > Bjorn - do you have a suggestion? > > Thanks, > > Andrew Murray > > > > > Thanks > > Xiaowei > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Andrew Murray > > > > > > > { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) }, > > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654), > > > > .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data > > > > -- > > > > 2.9.5 > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c index 6e208a0..d531951 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = { { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) }, { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) }, { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) }, + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) }, { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) }, { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654), .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data
Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be used for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a. Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com> --- v2: - No change. v3: - No change. drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)