| Message ID | 20190918094114.15867-1-gregory.clement@bootlin.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ASoC: atmel_ssc_dai: Remove wrong spinlock usage | expand |
On 18/09/2019 11:41:14+0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a > possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1] > > Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a > critical section protected by spinlock. > > However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and > atmel_ssc_startup() functions. After further analysis, it occurred that > the call to these function are already protected by mutex used on the > calling functions. > > Then we can remove the spinlock which will fix this bug as a side > effect. Thanks to this patch the following message disappears: > > "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > kernel/locking/mutex.c:909" > > [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71286.html > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> > --- > sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c > index 6f89483ac88c..365957e86419 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c > +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c > @@ -116,19 +116,16 @@ static struct atmel_pcm_dma_params ssc_dma_params[NUM_SSC_DEVICES][2] = { > static struct atmel_ssc_info ssc_info[NUM_SSC_DEVICES] = { > { > .name = "ssc0", > - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[0].lock), This member is now unused and can be removed from the struct. Once fixed, Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, > .initialized = 0, > }, > { > .name = "ssc1", > - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[1].lock), > .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, > .initialized = 0, > }, > { > .name = "ssc2", > - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[2].lock), > .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, > .initialized = 0, > }, > @@ -317,13 +314,11 @@ static int atmel_ssc_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > > snd_soc_dai_set_dma_data(dai, substream, dma_params); > > - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); > if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask) { > spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); > return -EBUSY; > } > ssc_p->dir_mask |= dir_mask; > - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); > > return 0; > } > @@ -355,7 +350,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > > dir_mask = 1 << dir; > > - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); > ssc_p->dir_mask &= ~dir_mask; > if (!ssc_p->dir_mask) { > if (ssc_p->initialized) { > @@ -369,7 +363,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, > ssc_p->cmr_div = ssc_p->tcmr_period = ssc_p->rcmr_period = 0; > ssc_p->forced_divider = 0; > } > - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); > > /* Shutdown the SSC clock. */ > pr_debug("atmel_ssc_dai: Stopping clock\n"); > -- > 2.23.0 >
Hi Alex, > On 18/09/2019 11:41:14+0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a >> possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1] >> >> Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a >> critical section protected by spinlock. >> >> However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and >> atmel_ssc_startup() functions. After further analysis, it occurred that >> the call to these function are already protected by mutex used on the >> calling functions. >> >> Then we can remove the spinlock which will fix this bug as a side >> effect. Thanks to this patch the following message disappears: >> >> "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at >> kernel/locking/mutex.c:909" >> >> [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71286.html >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> >> --- >> sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 7 ------- >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c >> index 6f89483ac88c..365957e86419 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c >> @@ -116,19 +116,16 @@ static struct atmel_pcm_dma_params ssc_dma_params[NUM_SSC_DEVICES][2] = { >> static struct atmel_ssc_info ssc_info[NUM_SSC_DEVICES] = { >> { >> .name = "ssc0", >> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[0].lock), > > This member is now unused and can be removed from the struct. > > Once fixed, Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Indeed I wanted to do this but finally forgot. I am sending a v2. Thanks, Gregory > >> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, >> .initialized = 0, >> }, >> { >> .name = "ssc1", >> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[1].lock), >> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, >> .initialized = 0, >> }, >> { >> .name = "ssc2", >> - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[2].lock), >> .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, >> .initialized = 0, >> }, >> @@ -317,13 +314,11 @@ static int atmel_ssc_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, >> >> snd_soc_dai_set_dma_data(dai, substream, dma_params); >> >> - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); >> if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask) { >> spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); >> return -EBUSY; >> } >> ssc_p->dir_mask |= dir_mask; >> - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -355,7 +350,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, >> >> dir_mask = 1 << dir; >> >> - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); >> ssc_p->dir_mask &= ~dir_mask; >> if (!ssc_p->dir_mask) { >> if (ssc_p->initialized) { >> @@ -369,7 +363,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, >> ssc_p->cmr_div = ssc_p->tcmr_period = ssc_p->rcmr_period = 0; >> ssc_p->forced_divider = 0; >> } >> - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); >> >> /* Shutdown the SSC clock. */ >> pr_debug("atmel_ssc_dai: Stopping clock\n"); >> -- >> 2.23.0 >> > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com
diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c index 6f89483ac88c..365957e86419 100644 --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c @@ -116,19 +116,16 @@ static struct atmel_pcm_dma_params ssc_dma_params[NUM_SSC_DEVICES][2] = { static struct atmel_ssc_info ssc_info[NUM_SSC_DEVICES] = { { .name = "ssc0", - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[0].lock), .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, .initialized = 0, }, { .name = "ssc1", - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[1].lock), .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, .initialized = 0, }, { .name = "ssc2", - .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ssc_info[2].lock), .dir_mask = SSC_DIR_MASK_UNUSED, .initialized = 0, }, @@ -317,13 +314,11 @@ static int atmel_ssc_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, snd_soc_dai_set_dma_data(dai, substream, dma_params); - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); if (ssc_p->dir_mask & dir_mask) { spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); return -EBUSY; } ssc_p->dir_mask |= dir_mask; - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); return 0; } @@ -355,7 +350,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, dir_mask = 1 << dir; - spin_lock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); ssc_p->dir_mask &= ~dir_mask; if (!ssc_p->dir_mask) { if (ssc_p->initialized) { @@ -369,7 +363,6 @@ static void atmel_ssc_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, ssc_p->cmr_div = ssc_p->tcmr_period = ssc_p->rcmr_period = 0; ssc_p->forced_divider = 0; } - spin_unlock_irq(&ssc_p->lock); /* Shutdown the SSC clock. */ pr_debug("atmel_ssc_dai: Stopping clock\n");
A potential bug was reported in the email "[BUG] atmel_ssc_dai: a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in atmel_ssc_shutdown"[1] Indeed in the function atmel_ssc_shutdown() free_irq() was called in a critical section protected by spinlock. However this spinlock is only used in atmel_ssc_shutdown() and atmel_ssc_startup() functions. After further analysis, it occurred that the call to these function are already protected by mutex used on the calling functions. Then we can remove the spinlock which will fix this bug as a side effect. Thanks to this patch the following message disappears: "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:909" [1]: https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71286.html Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> --- sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)