Message ID | 20191002171811.23993-1-efremov@linux.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | f170d44bc4ec2feae5f6206980e7ae7fbf0432a0 |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | rsi: fix potential null dereference in rsi_probe() | expand |
Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> wrote: > The id pointer can be NULL in rsi_probe(). It is checked everywhere except > for the else branch in the idProduct condition. The patch adds NULL check > before the id dereference in the rsi_dbg() call. > > Fixes: 54fdb318c111 ("rsi: add new device model for 9116") > Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> > Cc: Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@gmail.com> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. f170d44bc4ec rsi: fix potential null dereference in rsi_probe()
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:47:36PM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote: > Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> wrote: > > > The id pointer can be NULL in rsi_probe(). While the existing code in rsi_probe() may lead you to believe that, this statement is false. > > It is checked everywhere except > > for the else branch in the idProduct condition. The patch adds NULL check > > before the id dereference in the rsi_dbg() call. > > > > Fixes: 54fdb318c111 ("rsi: add new device model for 9116") > > Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> > > Cc: Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@gmail.com> > > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> > > Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. > > f170d44bc4ec rsi: fix potential null dereference in rsi_probe() I just sent a revert to prevent the confusion from spreading (e.g. to stable autosel and contributers looking for things to work on). Hope you don't mind, Kalle. Johan
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:47:36PM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> wrote: >> >> > The id pointer can be NULL in rsi_probe(). > > While the existing code in rsi_probe() may lead you to believe that, > this statement is false. > >> > It is checked everywhere except >> > for the else branch in the idProduct condition. The patch adds NULL check >> > before the id dereference in the rsi_dbg() call. >> > >> > Fixes: 54fdb318c111 ("rsi: add new device model for 9116") >> > Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> >> > Cc: Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@gmail.com> >> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> >> >> Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. >> >> f170d44bc4ec rsi: fix potential null dereference in rsi_probe() > > I just sent a revert to prevent the confusion from spreading (e.g. to > stable autosel and contributers looking for things to work on). Hope you > don't mind, Kalle. That's great, thanks Johan.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c index 760eaffeebd6..23a1d00b5f38 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c @@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static int rsi_probe(struct usb_interface *pfunction, adapter->device_model = RSI_DEV_9116; } else { rsi_dbg(ERR_ZONE, "%s: Unsupported RSI device id 0x%x\n", - __func__, id->idProduct); + __func__, id ? id->idProduct : 0x0); goto err1; }
The id pointer can be NULL in rsi_probe(). It is checked everywhere except for the else branch in the idProduct condition. The patch adds NULL check before the id dereference in the rsi_dbg() call. Fixes: 54fdb318c111 ("rsi: add new device model for 9116") Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com> Cc: Siva Rebbagondla <siva8118@gmail.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_usb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)