Message ID | cb77c8d5-e894-4e9d-bf6f-fc1be14c5423@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | avoid softlockups in various s_inodes iterators | expand |
On 11/7/19 1:42 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > 2 patches to make sure we either schedule in an s_inodes walking > loop, or do our best to limit the size of the walk, to avoid soft > lockups. > > -Eric > Something mangled that sorry, let me resend it sanely... -Eric