Message ID | 20191202230155.99071-1-ebiggers@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | xfstests: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies | expand |
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:01:50PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > Hello, > > This series adds an xfstest which tests that the encryption for > IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies is being done correctly. > > IV_INO_LBLK_64 is a new fscrypt policy flag which modifies the > encryption to be optimized for inline encryption hardware compliant with > the UFS v2.1 standard or the upcoming version of the eMMC standard. For > more information, see the kernel patchset: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20191024215438.138489-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u > > The kernel patches have been merged into mainline and will be in v5.5. > > In addition to the latest kernel, to run on ext4 this test also needs a > version of e2fsprogs built from the master branch, in order to get > support for formatting the filesystem with '-O stable_inodes'. > > As usual, the test will skip itself if the prerequisites aren't met. > > No real changes since v1; just rebased onto the latest xfstests master > branch and updated the cover letter. > > Eric Biggers (5): > fscrypt-crypt-util: create key_and_iv_params structure > fscrypt-crypt-util: add HKDF context constants > common/encrypt: create named variables for UAPI constants > common/encrypt: support verifying ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 > policies > generic: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies > > common/encrypt | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > tests/generic/805 | 43 +++++++++++ > tests/generic/805.out | 6 ++ > tests/generic/group | 1 + > 5 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805 > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805.out > Ping. Does anyone want to take a look at this? Satya? - Eric
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:01:50PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This series adds an xfstest which tests that the encryption for > > IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies is being done correctly. > > > > IV_INO_LBLK_64 is a new fscrypt policy flag which modifies the > > encryption to be optimized for inline encryption hardware compliant with > > the UFS v2.1 standard or the upcoming version of the eMMC standard. For > > more information, see the kernel patchset: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20191024215438.138489-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u > > > > The kernel patches have been merged into mainline and will be in v5.5. > > > > In addition to the latest kernel, to run on ext4 this test also needs a > > version of e2fsprogs built from the master branch, in order to get > > support for formatting the filesystem with '-O stable_inodes'. > > > > As usual, the test will skip itself if the prerequisites aren't met. > > > > No real changes since v1; just rebased onto the latest xfstests master > > branch and updated the cover letter. > > > > Eric Biggers (5): > > fscrypt-crypt-util: create key_and_iv_params structure > > fscrypt-crypt-util: add HKDF context constants > > common/encrypt: create named variables for UAPI constants > > common/encrypt: support verifying ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 > > policies > > generic: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies > > > > common/encrypt | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > tests/generic/805 | 43 +++++++++++ > > tests/generic/805.out | 6 ++ > > tests/generic/group | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805 > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805.out > > > > Ping. Does anyone want to take a look at this? Satya? > Eryu, can you review and consider applying this series? It doesn't look like anyone else is going to formally review it. Thanks, - Eric
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 08:46:26AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:18:27AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:01:50PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This series adds an xfstest which tests that the encryption for > > > IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies is being done correctly. > > > > > > IV_INO_LBLK_64 is a new fscrypt policy flag which modifies the > > > encryption to be optimized for inline encryption hardware compliant with > > > the UFS v2.1 standard or the upcoming version of the eMMC standard. For > > > more information, see the kernel patchset: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20191024215438.138489-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u > > > > > > The kernel patches have been merged into mainline and will be in v5.5. > > > > > > In addition to the latest kernel, to run on ext4 this test also needs a > > > version of e2fsprogs built from the master branch, in order to get > > > support for formatting the filesystem with '-O stable_inodes'. > > > > > > As usual, the test will skip itself if the prerequisites aren't met. > > > > > > No real changes since v1; just rebased onto the latest xfstests master > > > branch and updated the cover letter. > > > > > > Eric Biggers (5): > > > fscrypt-crypt-util: create key_and_iv_params structure > > > fscrypt-crypt-util: add HKDF context constants > > > common/encrypt: create named variables for UAPI constants > > > common/encrypt: support verifying ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 > > > policies > > > generic: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies > > > > > > common/encrypt | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > tests/generic/805 | 43 +++++++++++ > > > tests/generic/805.out | 6 ++ > > > tests/generic/group | 1 + > > > 5 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805 > > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/805.out > > > > > > > Ping. Does anyone want to take a look at this? Satya? > > > > Eryu, can you review and consider applying this series? It doesn't look like > anyone else is going to formally review it. I've reviewed & applied this patchset in my local tree, will push them out soon. So sorry for the delay! Thanks, Eryu