mbox series

[net-next,v2,0/3] ethtool: allow nesting of begin() and complete() callbacks

Message ID cover.1578292157.git.mkubecek@suse.cz (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series ethtool: allow nesting of begin() and complete() callbacks | expand

Message

Michal Kubecek Jan. 6, 2020, 6:39 a.m. UTC
The ethtool ioctl interface used to guarantee that ethtool_ops callbacks
were always called in a block between calls to ->begin() and ->complete()
(if these are defined) and that this whole block was executed with RTNL
lock held:

	rtnl_lock();
	ops->begin();
	/* other ethtool_ops calls */
	ops->complete();
	rtnl_unlock();

This prevented any nesting or crossing of the begin-complete blocks.
However, this is no longer guaranteed even for ioctl interface as at least
ethtool_phys_id() releases RTNL lock while waiting for a timer. With the
introduction of netlink ethtool interface, the begin-complete pairs are
naturally nested e.g. when a request triggers a netlink notification.

Fortunately, only minority of networking drivers implements begin() and
complete() callbacks and most of those that do, fall into three groups:

  - wrappers for pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put()
  - wrappers for clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()
  - begin() checks netif_running() (fails if false), no complete()

First two have their own refcounting, third is safe w.r.t. nesting of the
blocks.

Only three in-tree networking drivers need an update to deal with nesting
of begin() and complete() calls: via-velocity and epic100 perform resume
and suspend on their own and wil6210 completely serializes the calls using
its own mutex (which would lead to a deadlock if a request request
triggered a netlink notification). The series addresses these problems.

changes between v1 and v2:
  - fix inverted condition in epic100 ethtool_begin() (thanks to Andrew
    Lunn)


Michal Kubecek (3):
  wil6210: get rid of begin() and complete() ethtool_ops
  via-velocity: allow nesting of ethtool_ops begin() and complete()
  epic100: allow nesting of ethtool_ops begin() and complete()

 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/epic100.c        |  7 +++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c    | 14 +++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.h    |  1 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/ethtool.c | 43 ++++++++--------------
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Comments

Simon Horman Jan. 6, 2020, 8:41 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> The ethtool ioctl interface used to guarantee that ethtool_ops callbacks
> were always called in a block between calls to ->begin() and ->complete()
> (if these are defined) and that this whole block was executed with RTNL
> lock held:
> 
> 	rtnl_lock();
> 	ops->begin();
> 	/* other ethtool_ops calls */
> 	ops->complete();
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 
> This prevented any nesting or crossing of the begin-complete blocks.
> However, this is no longer guaranteed even for ioctl interface as at least
> ethtool_phys_id() releases RTNL lock while waiting for a timer. With the
> introduction of netlink ethtool interface, the begin-complete pairs are
> naturally nested e.g. when a request triggers a netlink notification.
> 
> Fortunately, only minority of networking drivers implements begin() and
> complete() callbacks and most of those that do, fall into three groups:
> 
>   - wrappers for pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put()
>   - wrappers for clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()
>   - begin() checks netif_running() (fails if false), no complete()
> 
> First two have their own refcounting, third is safe w.r.t. nesting of the
> blocks.
> 
> Only three in-tree networking drivers need an update to deal with nesting
> of begin() and complete() calls: via-velocity and epic100 perform resume
> and suspend on their own and wil6210 completely serializes the calls using
> its own mutex (which would lead to a deadlock if a request request
> triggered a netlink notification). The series addresses these problems.
> 
> changes between v1 and v2:
>   - fix inverted condition in epic100 ethtool_begin() (thanks to Andrew
>     Lunn)

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
David Miller Jan. 6, 2020, 9:55 p.m. UTC | #2
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Date: Mon,  6 Jan 2020 07:39:26 +0100 (CET)

> The ethtool ioctl interface used to guarantee that ethtool_ops callbacks
> were always called in a block between calls to ->begin() and ->complete()
> (if these are defined) and that this whole block was executed with RTNL
> lock held:
> 
> 	rtnl_lock();
> 	ops->begin();
> 	/* other ethtool_ops calls */
> 	ops->complete();
> 	rtnl_unlock();
> 
> This prevented any nesting or crossing of the begin-complete blocks.
> However, this is no longer guaranteed even for ioctl interface as at least
> ethtool_phys_id() releases RTNL lock while waiting for a timer. With the
> introduction of netlink ethtool interface, the begin-complete pairs are
> naturally nested e.g. when a request triggers a netlink notification.
> 
> Fortunately, only minority of networking drivers implements begin() and
> complete() callbacks and most of those that do, fall into three groups:
> 
>   - wrappers for pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put()
>   - wrappers for clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()
>   - begin() checks netif_running() (fails if false), no complete()
> 
> First two have their own refcounting, third is safe w.r.t. nesting of the
> blocks.
> 
> Only three in-tree networking drivers need an update to deal with nesting
> of begin() and complete() calls: via-velocity and epic100 perform resume
> and suspend on their own and wil6210 completely serializes the calls using
> its own mutex (which would lead to a deadlock if a request request
> triggered a netlink notification). The series addresses these problems.
> 
> changes between v1 and v2:
>   - fix inverted condition in epic100 ethtool_begin() (thanks to Andrew
>     Lunn)

Series applied, thanks.